Cited by 141Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Feasibility of Long-Term Closed-Loop Control: A Multicenter 6-Month Trial of 24/7 Automated Insulin Delivery

Kovatchev, Boris, Cheng, Peiyao, Anderson, Stacey M., Pinsker, Jordan E., Boscari, Federico, Buckingham, Bruce A., Doyle, Francis J., Hood, Korey K. +17 more·2017·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background: In the past few years, the artificial pancreas—the commonly accepted term for closed-loop control (CLC) of blood glucose in diabetes—has become a hot topic in research and technology development. In the summer of 2014, we initiated a 6-month trial evaluating the safety of 24/7 CLC during free-living conditions. Research Design and Methods: Following an initial 1-month Phase 1, 14 individuals (10 males/4 females) with type 1 diabetes at three clinical centers in the United States and one in Italy continued with a 5-month Phase 2, which included 24/7 CLC using the wireless portable Diabetes Assistant (DiAs) developed at the University of Virginia Center for Diabetes Technology. Median subject characteristics were age 45 years, duration of diabetes 27 years, total daily insulin 0.53 U/kg/day, and baseline HbA1c 7.2% (55 mmol/mol). Results: Compared with the baseline observation period, the frequency of hypoglycemia below 3.9 mmol/L during the last 3 months of CLC was lower: 4.1% versus 1.3%, P < 0.001. This was accompanied by a downward trend in HbA1c from 7.2% (55 mmol/mol) to 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at 6 months. HbA1c improvement was correlated with system use (Spearman r = 0.55). The user experience was favorable with identified benefit particularly at night and overall trust in the system. There were no serious adverse events, severe hypoglycemia, or diabetic ketoacidosis. Conclusion: We conclude that CLC technology has matured and is safe for prolonged use in patients' natural environment. Based on these promising results, a large randomized trial is warranted to assess long-term CLC efficacy and safety.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2016.0333

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kovatchev, B., Cheng, P., Anderson, S. M., Pinsker, J. E., Boscari, F., Buckingham, B. A., Doyle, F. J., Hood, K. K., Brown, S. A., Breton, M. D., Chernavvsky, D., Bevier, W. C., Bradley, P. K., Bruttomesso, D., Del Favero, S., Calore, R., Cobelli, C., Avogaro, A., Ly, T. T., Shanmugham, S., Dassau, E., Kollman, C., Lum, J. W., Beck, R. W., & for the Control to Range Study Group
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Jaeb Center for Health Research (US)
  • Sansum Diabetes Research Institute (US)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Virginia
  • University of Padova
Corresponding author
Kovatchev, Boris
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2017-01
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
18-24
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W2564509157
Cited by
141
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 23
FWCI
24.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Dexcom
  • Roche Diabetes Care
  • Abbott Diabetes Care
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
feedback control, artificial pancreas, type 1 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring, hypoglycemia, HbA1c, user experience, free-living conditions
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Pancreas, Artificial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review