Cited by 191Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEpistemology, Ethics, and MetaphysicsPhilosophy and History of Science

Ignorance and Imagination: The Epistemic Origin of the Problem of Consciousness

Stoljar, Daniel·2006

Abstract

This book advances a novel way to resolve the central philosophical problem about the mind: how it is that consciousness or experience fits into a larger naturalistic picture of the world. The correct response to the problem, it is argued, is not to posit a realm of experience distinct from the physical, nor to deny the reality of phenomenal experience, nor even to rethink our understanding of consciousness and the language we use to talk about it. Instead, we should view the problem itself as having its origin in our ignorance of the relevant physical facts. This change of orientation is shown to be well motivated historically, empirically, and philosophically, and to have none of the side effects it is sometimes thought to have. The result is a philosophical perspective on the mind that has a number of far-reaching consequences: for consciousness studies, for our place in nature, and for the way we think about the relationship between philosophy and science.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/0195306589.001.0001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stoljar, D.
Affiliations
Australian National University (AU)
Corresponding author
Stoljar, Daniel
Published
2006-07-01
OpenAlex
W2497314384
Cited by
191
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
5.03
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
problem of consciousness, phenomenal experience, naturalism, mind-body problem, ignorance, imagination, philosophy of mind, consciousness studies, philosophy and science, human place in nature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review