The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Causal Models: How People Think about the World and Its Alternatives
Abstract
Human beings are active agents who can think. To understand how thought serves action requires understanding how people conceive of the relation between cause and effect, between action and outcome. This book presents the question, in cognitive terms: how do people construct and reason with the causal models we use to represent our world? A revolution is occurring in how statisticians, philosophers, and computer scientists answer this question. Those fields have ushered in new insights about causal models by thinking about how to represent causal structure mathematically, in a framework that uses graphs and probability theory to develop what are called causal Bayesian networks. The framework starts with the idea that the purpose of causal structure is to understand and predict the effects of intervention. How does intervening on one thing affect other things? This is not a question merely about probability (or logic), but about action. The framework offers a new understanding of mind: thought is about the effects of intervention and cognition is thus intimately tied to actions that take place either in the actual physical world or in imagination, in counterfactual worlds. This book offers a conceptual introduction to the key mathematical ideas, presenting them in a non-technical way, focusing on the intuitions rather than the theorems. It tries to show why the ideas are important to understanding how people explain things and why thinking not only about the world as it is but the world as it could be is so central to human action. The book reviews the role of causality, causal models, and intervention in the basic human cognitive functions: decision making, reasoning, judgment, categorization, inductive inference, language, and learning. In short, the book offers a discussion about how people think, talk, learn, and explain things in causal terms, in terms of action and manipulation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Another way that causal junctures drive meaning making is by indicating which information is relevant (Sloman, 2005).”
From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Sloman, 2005
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
I.—COMPUTING MACHINERY AND INTELLIGENCE
TURING, A. M. (1950) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/lix.236.433 · Cited by 10,290
Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
(1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511809477 · Cited by 8,240
Fodor, J. A. (1983) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001 · Cited by 7,734
REMEMBERING: A STUDY IN EXPERIMENTAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
Bartlett, F. C., & Burt, C. (1933) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1933.tb02913.x · Cited by 7,475
An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior
Heider, F., & Simmel, M. (1944) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1416950 · Cited by 3,340
Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing
Klayman, J., & Ha, Y.-W. (1987) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.94.2.211 · Cited by 2,094
Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development
Keil, F. C. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/2065.001.0001 · Cited by 1,886
Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0 · Cited by 1,783
Cheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90014-3 · Cited by 1,463
Research works printed but not linked: 142
- Abelson,, 1966, Cognitive consistency: Motivational antecedents and behavioral consequents
- Ajzen,, 1977, Intuitive theories of events and the effects of base‐rate information on prediction., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.35.5.303 · DOI · Paper page
- Allan,, 1980, A note on measurements of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks., Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society,, 10.3758/BF03334492 · DOI
- Anderson,, 1980, The perseverance of social theories: The role of explanation in the persistence of discredited information., Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,, 10.1037/h0077720 · DOI
- Andersson,, 1986, The experiential gestalt of causation: A common core to pupil's preconceptions in science., European Journal of Scientific Education,, 10.1080/0140528860080205 · DOI
- Arnheim,, 1969, Visual thinking.
- Bacon,, 1620, The works
- Biederman,, 1987, Sexing day‐old chicks., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,, 10.1037/0278-7393.13.4.640 · DOI
- Brown,, 1958, How shall a thing be called?, Psychological Review,, 10.1037/h0041727 · DOI
- Brown,, 1983, The psychological causality implicit in language., Cognition,, 10.1016/0010-0277(83)90006-9 · DOI
- Bruner,, 1973, Beyond the information given: Studies in the psychology of knowing.
- Buehner,, 1997, Proceedings of the nineteenth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society
- Camerer,, 1995, Handbook of experimental economics.
- Carey,, 1985, Conceptual change in childhood.
- Chaigneau,, Theoria et Historia Scientiarum.
- Chaigneau,, 2004, Assessing affordance and intention in the HIPE theory of function., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,, 10.1037/0096-3445.133.4.601 · DOI
- Chapman,, 1969, Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs., Journal of Abnormal Psychology,, 10.1037/h0027592 · DOI
- Cheng,, 1997, From covariation to causation: A causal power theory., Psychological Review,, 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.367 · DOI
- Cheng,, 2005, Cambridge handbook of thinking & reasoning
- Cohen,, 1998, Perceptual development: Visual, auditory and speech perception in infancy
- Danks,, 2003, Equilibria of the Rescorla‐Wagner model., Journal of Mathematical Psychology,, 10.1016/S0022-2496(02)00016-0 · DOI
- diSessa,, 1993, Towards an epistemology of physics., Cognition and Instruction,, 10.1207/s1532690xci1002&3_2 · DOI
- Dougherty,, 1997, The role of mental simulation in judgments of likelihood., Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,, 10.1006/obhd.1997.2700 · DOI
- Driver,, 1993, Children's ideas in science
- Edgington,, 1995, On conditionals., Mind,, 10.1093/mind/104.414.235 · DOI
- Forbus,, 1984, Qualitative process theory., Artificial Intelligence,, 10.1016/0004-3702(84)90038-9 · DOI
- Forbus,, 1996, The computer science and engineering handbook
- Garnham,, 1996, The locus of implicit causality effects in comprehension., Journal of Memory and Language,, 10.1006/jmla.1996.0028 · DOI
- Gentner,, 1983, Mental models.
- Gilovich,, 1985, The hot hand in basketball: On the misperception of random sequences., Cognitive Psychology,, 10.1016/0010-0285(85)90010-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Gillies,, 2001, Philosophical theories of probability.
- Glymour,, 2001, The mind's arrows, 10.7551/mitpress/4638.001.0001 · DOI
- Goldvarg,, 2001, Naïve causality: A mental model theory of causal meaning and reasoning., Cognitive Science,, 10.1016/S0364-0213(01)00046-5 · DOI
- Gopnik,, 2004, A theory of causal learning in children: Causal maps and Bayes nets., Psychological Review,, 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.3 · DOI
- Griffiths,, 2004, Using physical theories to infer hidden causal structure., Proceedings of the Twenty‐Sixth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
- Hacking,, 2001, An introduction to probability and logic., 10.1017/CBO9780511801297 · DOI
- Hadjichristidis,, 2004, Feature centrality and property induction., Cognitive Science,, 10.1016/j.cogsci.2003.09.001 · DOI
- Hagmayer,, 2002, How temporal assumptions influence causal judgments., Memory & Cognition,, 10.3758/BF03194330 · DOI
- Halpern,, 2003, Reasoning about uncertainty.
- Hampton,, 1982, A demonstration of intransitivity in natural categories., Cognition,, 10.1016/0010-0277(82)90010-5 · DOI
- Hampton,, 1998, Similarity and symbols in human thinking
- Hampton,, 2000, Concepts and prototypes., Mind and Language,, 10.1111/1468-0017.00134 · DOI
- Harman,, 1995, Thinking (An invitation to cognitive science, Vol. 3)
- Hart,, 1985, Causation in the law, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198254744.001.0001 · DOI
- Heckerman,, 1999, Computation, causation, discovery
- Heit,, 1994, Similarity and property effects in inductive reasoning., 10.1037/0278-7393.20.2.411 · DOI
- Hitchcock,, 2001, The intransitivity of causation revealed in equations and graphs., Journal of Philosophy,, 10.2307/2678432 · DOI
- Hoffman,, 1990, Interpersonal verbs and dispositional adjectives: The psychology of causality embodied in language., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.765 · DOI
- Howard,, 1981, Readings on the principles and applications of decision analysis,
- Hoyle,, 1957, The black cloud.
- Hume,, 1748, An enquiry concerning human understanding.
- Hunt,, 1994, Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice
- Johnson‐Laird,, 1991, Deduction
- Johnson‐Laird,, 2002, Conditionals: A theory of meaning, pragmatics, and inference., Psychological Review,, 10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.646 · DOI
- Kahneman,, 2002, Heuristics & biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment, 10.1017/CBO9780511808098.004 · DOI · Paper page
- Kaufmann,, 2004, Conditioning against the grain: Abduction and indicative conditionals., Journal of Philosophical Logic,, 10.1023/B:LOGI.0000046142.51136.bf · DOI
- Kaufmann,, Conditional predictions: A probabilistic account., Linguistics and Philosophy.
- Keil,, 1995, Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary approach
- Keil,, 2003, Folkscience: Coarse interpretations of a complex reality., Trends in Cognitive Science,, 10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00158-X · DOI
- Kelley,, 1967, Nebraska symposium on motivation,
- Kemler, 2004, When children ask, “what is it?” what do they want to know about artifacts?, Psychological Science,, 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00689.x · DOI
- Kemler, 2000, Young children's use of functional information to categorize artifacts: Three factors that matter., Cognition,, 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00097-4 · DOI
- Kemp,, 2003, Theory‐based induction., Proceedings of the Twenty‐Fifth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society,
- Keren,, 1985, On the psychology of playing Blackjack. Normative and descriptive considerations with implications for decision theory., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,, 10.1037/0096-3445.114.2.133 · DOI
- Kuhn,, 2002, Handbook of childhood cognitive development.
- Lagnado,, 2004, The advantage of timely intervention., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,, 10.1037/0278-7393.30.4.856 · DOI
- Larkin,, 1983, Mental models.
- Lewis,, 1929, Mind and the world order: An outline of a theory of knowledge.
- Lewis,, 1973, Counterfactuals.
- Lewis,, 1976, Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities., Philosophical Review,
- Lewis,, 1986, Philosophical papers.
- Lien,, 2000, Distinguishing genuine from spurious causes: A coherence hypothesis., Cognitive Psychology,, 10.1006/cogp.1999.0724 · DOI
- Lipton,, 1992, Jurisprudence: Cambridge essays.
- Lober,, 2000, Is causal induction based on causal power? Critique of Cheng (1997)., Psychological Review,, 10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.195 · DOI
- Luria,, 1968, The mind of a mnemonist: A little book about a vast memory.
- Mackie,, 1980, The cement of the universe: A study of causation., 10.1093/0198246420.001.0001 · DOI
- Malt,, 1994, Cognitive Psychology,, 10.1006/cogp.1994.1011 · DOI
- Malt,, 1992, Do artifact concepts have cores, Journal of Memory and Language,, 10.1016/0749-596X(92)90011-L · DOI
- Mandel,, 2003, Judgment dissociation theory: An analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual, and covariational reasoning., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,, 10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.419 · DOI
- Medin,, 2003, A relevance theory of induction., Psychonomic Bulletin and Review,, 10.3758/BF03196515 · DOI
- Meek,, 1994, Conditioning and intervening., British Journal for the Philosophy of Science,, 10.1093/bjps/45.4.1001 · DOI · Paper page
- Michotte,, 1946, La perception de la causalité.
- Mochon,, 2004, Causal models frame interpretation of mathematical equations., Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,, 10.3758/BF03196743 · DOI
- Morris,, 1995, When one cause casts doubt on another: A normative analysis of discounting in causal attribution., Psychological Review,, 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.331 · DOI
- Murphy,, 1985, The role of theories in conceptual coherence., Psychological Review,, 10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.289 · DOI
- Nisbett,, 1983, The use of statistical heuristics in everyday inductive reasoning., Psychological Review,, 10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.339 · DOI
- Novick,, 2004, Assessing interactive causal influence., Psychological Review,, 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.455 · DOI
- Nosofsky,, 1992, Multidimensional models of perception and cognition
- Nozick,, 1969, Essays in honor of Carl G. Hempel
- Nozick,, 1995, The nature of rationality
- Pearl,, 1988, Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems.
- Pearl,, 2000, Causality: Models, reasoning and inference.
- Pennington,, 1993, Reasoning in explanation‐based decision making., Cognition,, 10.1016/0010-0277(93)90038-W · DOI
- Perales,, 2003, Normative and descriptive accounts of the influence of power and contingency on causal judgment., Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,, 10.1080/02724980244000738 · DOI
- Plumley,, 1975, Ancient cosmologies
- Quattrone,, 1984, Causal versus diagnostic contingencies: On self‐deception and on the voter's illusion., Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.46.2.237 · DOI
- Quattrone,, 1988, Contrasting rational and psychological analyses of political choice., American Political Science Review,, 10.2307/1962487 · DOI
- Ramsey,, 1931, The foundations of mathematics and other logical essays.
- Rehder,, 2003, A causal‐model theory of conceptual representation and categorization., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition ,, 10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1141 · DOI
- Rehder,, 2001, Causal knowledge and categories: The effects of causal beliefs on categorization, induction, and similarity., Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,, 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.323 · DOI
- Rehder,, 2004, Category coherence and category‐based property induction., Cognition,, 10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00167-7 · DOI
- Reif,, 1992, Cognition for interpreting scientific concepts: A study of acceleration., Cognition and Instruction,, 10.1207/s1532690xci0901_1 · DOI
- Reiner,, 2000, Naïve physics reasoning: A commitment to substance‐based conceptions., Cognition and Instruction,, 10.1207/S1532690XCI1801_01 · DOI
- Rescorla,, 1972, Classical conditioning II: Current theory and research
- Rips,, 2001, Necessity and natural categories., Psychological Bulletin,, 10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.827 · DOI
- Rosch,, 1973, Cognitive development and the acquisition of language
- Rosch,, 1975, Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories., Cognitive Psychology,, 10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Ross,, 1999, Food for thought: Cross‐classification and category organization in a complex real‐world domain., Cognitive Psychology,, 10.1006/cogp.1998.0712 · DOI
- Ross,, 1982, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.
- Rudolph,, 1997, The psychological causality implicit in verbs: A review., Psychological Bulletin,, 10.1037/0033-2909.121.2.192 · DOI
- Russell,, 1913, On the notion of cause., Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,, 10.1093/aristotelian/13.1.1 · DOI
- Russell,, 1948, Human knowledge: Its scope and limits.
- Schulz,, 2004, Causal learning across domains., Developmental Psychology,, 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.162 · DOI
- Shafer,, 1996, The art of causal conjecture., 10.7551/mitpress/1403.001.0001 · DOI
- Shanks,, 1987, The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory,
- Sherin,, 2001, How students understand physics equations., Cognition and Instruction,, 10.1207/S1532690XCI1904_3 · DOI
- Sloman,, 1994, When explanations compete: The role of explanatory coherence on judgments of likelihood., Cognition,, 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90002-7 · DOI
- Sloman,, 1997, Explanatory coherence and the induction of properties., Thinking and Reasoning,, 10.1080/135467897394374 · DOI
- Sloman,, 1998, Categorical inference is not a tree: The myth of inheritance hierarchies., Cognitive Psychology,, 10.1006/cogp.1997.0672 · DOI
- Sloman,, 2005, Do we “do”?, Cognitive Science,, 10.1207/s15516709cog2901_2 · DOI
- Sloman,, 2005, Cambridge handbook of thinking & reasoning
- Sloman,, 1998, Feature centrality and conceptual coherence., Cognitive Science,, 10.1016/S0364-0213(99)80039-1 · DOI
- Sloman,, 2003, Artifacts are not ascribed essences, nor are they treated as belonging to kinds., Language and Cognitive Processes,, 10.1080/01690960344000035 · DOI
- Sloman,, 2001, Similarity and categorization, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198506287.003.0005 · DOI
- Smith,, 1981, Categories and concepts., 10.4159/harvard.9780674866270 · DOI
- Smith,, 2002, Distinguishing prototype‐based and exemplar‐based processes in category learning., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition,, 10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.800 · DOI
- Sobel,, 2003, Watch it, do it, or watch it done.
- Spellman,, 2001, The relation between counterfactual (“but for”) and causal reasoning: Experimental findings and implications for jurors’ decisions., Law and Contemporary Problems: Causation in Law and Science,, 10.2307/1192297 · DOI
- Spirtes,, 1993, Causation, prediction, and search., 10.1007/978-1-4612-2748-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Stalnaker,, 1968, Studies in Logical Theory, American Philosophical Quarterly
- Stewart,, 2000, The time course of the influence of implicit causality information: Focusing versus integration accounts., Journal of Memory and Language,, 10.1006/jmla.1999.2691 · DOI
- Steyvers,, 2003, Inferring causal networks from observations and interventions., Cognitive Science,, 10.1016/S0364-0213(03)00010-7 · DOI
- Stich,, 1990, The fragmentation of reason.
- Strevens,, 2001, The essentialist aspect of naive theories., Cognition,, 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00071-2 · DOI
- Tenenbaum,, 2001, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems,
- Tversky,, 1982, Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases,
- Tversky,, 1983, Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgement., Psychological Review,, 10.1037/0033-295X.90.4.293 · DOI · Paper page
- Vallée‐Tourangeau,, 1998, Judging the importance of constant and variable candidate causes: A test of the Power PC theory., Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,, 10.1080/713755745 · DOI
- Waldmann,, 1996, The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 34: Causal learning, 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60558-7 · DOI
- Wells,, 1992, Naked statistical evidence of liability: Is subjective probability enough?, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.739 · DOI
- Wittgenstein,, 1953, Philosophical investigations.
- Woodward,, 2003, Making things happen: A theory of causal explanation.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research
Fiss, P. C. (2011) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2011.60263120 · Cited by 5,930
The probability of causal conditionals
Over, D. E., Hadjichristidis, C., Evans, J. S. B. T., Handley, S. J., & Sloman, S. A. (2007) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.05.002 · Cited by 229
Self-citationThe power of possibility: causal learning, counterfactual reasoning, and pretend play
Buchsbaum, D., Bridgers, S., Skolnick Weisberg, D., & Gopnik, A. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2012.0122 · Cited by 200
Common Sense and Sociological Explanations
Watts, D. J. (2014) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/678271 · Cited by 176
Formalizing Neurath’s ship: approximate algorithms for online causal learning.
Bramley, N. R., Dayan, P., Griffiths, T. L., & Lagnado, D. A. (2017) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000061 · Cited by 136
Metadata
- Authors
- Sloman, S.
- Affiliations
- Brown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sloman, Steven
- ORCID
- Sloman, Steven
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressNew York
- Published
- 2005-08-18
- OpenAlex
- W4211210448
- Cited by
- 677
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 35
- FWCI
- 6.47
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B)) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy of Biology and Scientific Explanation
- Keywords
- causal models, causal Bayesian networks, causal reasoning, counterfactual reasoning, intervention, causal structure, causal explanation, decision-making, judgment, categorization, inductive reasoning, language, learning, cognition and action
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Causal Models: How People Think about the World and Its Alternatives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195183115.001.0001
- The paper
- Sloman, S. (2005). Causal Models: How People Think about the World and Its Alternatives. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof%3Aoso/9780195183115.001.0001