Cited by 130Regulation of Appetite and ObesityObesity, Physical Activity, DietNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Body composition and energy intake: do overweight women overeat and underreport?

Lissner, L, Habicht, J P, Strupp, B J, Levitsky, D A, Haas, J D, Roe, D A·1989·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

The relationship between energy consumption and body composition was evaluated in 63 women by use of energy-intake values that were precisely measured in a metabolic unit and corrected for deviations from energy balance. Energy requirement for the maintenance of body weight was not significantly correlated with adiposity expressed as percent body fat. However, energy requirement was positively associated with lean mass (p less than 0.0001) whereas fat mass added no predictive value to the same multivariate regression equation. Self-reported energy intake (before the experiments) was not correlated with lean mass and was underestimated by lean subjects at least as much as by obese subjects. Discrepant findings in the literature concerning relationships between obesity and energy intake may be explained by reporting error and by the relative lean mass of obese vs nonobese women but not by systematic underreporting unique to obese subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/49.2.320

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a comprehensive analysis by Lissner et al., there are clear positive associations of FFM and EI, and negative associations of FM and EI.

    “In addition, clear positive associations of FFM and EI, and negative associations of FM and EI, have been demonstrated - but overlooked - in a comprehensive analysis carried out by Lissner et al. [48] more than 25 years ago.”

    From Appetite control and energy balance: Impact of exercise (2015) · cites this paper as [48]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lissner, L., Habicht, J. P., Strupp, B. J., Levitsky, D. A., Haas, J. D., & Roe, D. A.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-02
Volume
49
Issue
2
Pages
320-325
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2115444570
Cited by
130
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
body composition, energy intake, overweight women, obesity, energy requirements, lean body mass, fat mass, underreporting, energy balance
MeSH terms
Adult, Body Composition, Energy Intake, Diet, Energy Metabolism, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Obesity, Self-Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review