Cited by 257Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingNutrition and Health Studies

Body composition in elderly people: effect of criterion estimates on predictive equations

Baumgartner, RN, Heymsfield, SB, Lichtman, S, Wang, J, Pierson, RN·1991·The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to determine whether there are significant differences between two- and four-compartment model estimates of body composition, whether these differences are associated with aqueous and mineral fractions of the fat-free mass (FFM); and whether the differences are retained in equations for predicting body composition from anthropometry and bioelectric resistance. Body composition was estimated in 98 men and women aged 65-94 y by using a four-compartment model based on hydrodensitometry, 3H2O dilution, and dual-photon absorptiometry. These estimates were significantly different from those obtained by using Siri's two-compartment model. The differences were associated significantly (P less than 0.0001) with variation in the aqueous fraction of FFM. Equations for predicting body composition from anthropometry and resistance, when calibrated against two-compartment model estimates, retained these systematic errors. Equations predicting body composition in elderly people should be calibrated against estimates from multicompartment models that consider variability in FFM composition.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/ajcn/53.6.1345

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baumgartner, R., Heymsfield, S., Lichtman, S., Wang, J., & Pierson, R.
Affiliations
  • Wright State University (US)
  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
Corresponding author
Baumgartner, RN
ORCID
Wang, J
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-06
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
1345-1353
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2108892662
Cited by
257
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ag008510-04)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-08510)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-37352, R01DK037352)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD12252, R01HD012252)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
Keywords
body composition, older adults, four-compartment model, two-compartment model, fat-free mass, aqueous fraction, hydrodensitometry, dual photon absorptiometry, bioimpedance, anthropometry, prediction equations, calibration
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anthropometry, Body Composition, Densitometry, Electric Conductivity, Female, Humans, Male, Radioisotope Dilution Technique, Regression Analysis, Tritium, Absorptiometry, Photon

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review