Cited by 7,111Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksBiomedical Text Mining and OntologiesGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0

Open access

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Well-annotated gene sets representing the universe of the biological processes are critical for meaningful and insightful interpretation of large-scale genomic data. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) is one of the most widely used repositories of such sets. RESULTS: We report the availability of a new version of the database, MSigDB 3.0, with over 6700 gene sets, a complete revision of the collection of canonical pathways and experimental signatures from publications, enhanced annotations and upgrades to the web site. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: MSigDB is freely available for non-commercial use at http://www.broadinstitute.org/msigdb.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr260

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 14 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,039 of 1,039

Metadata

Authors
Liberzon, A., Subramanian, A., Pinchback, R., Thorvaldsdóttir, H., Tamayo, P., & Mesirov, J. P.
Affiliations
Broad Institute (US)
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2011-05-05
Volume
27
Issue
12
Pages
1739-1740
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2010457001
Cited by
7,111
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 675 · 2025: 1003 · 2024: 1086 · 2023: 942 · 2022: 825 · 2021: 774 · 2020: 602 · 2019: 374 · 2018: 203 · 2017: 151 · 2016: 141 · 2015: 117 · 2014: 102 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 38
FWCI
27.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01CA121941)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
MSigDB, gene sets, canonical pathways, experimental signatures, gene set annotation, biological process annotation, genomic data interpretation, molecular signatures
MeSH terms
Internet, Genomics, Databases, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Annotation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review