Cited by 198Gut microbiota and healthGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesGastrointestinal motility and disorders

Gut dysbiosis in Huntington’s disease: associations among gut microbiota, cognitive performance and clinical outcomes

Open access
Wasser, Cory I, Mercieca, Emily-Clare, Kong, Geraldine, Hannan, Anthony J, McKeown, Sonja J, Glikmann-Johnston, Yifat, Stout, Julie C·2020·Brain Communications

Abstract

Huntington’s disease is characterized by a triad of motor, cognitive and psychiatric impairments, as well as unintended weight loss. Although much of the research has focused on cognitive, motor and psychiatric symptoms, the extent of peripheral pathology and the relationship between these factors, and the core symptoms of Huntington’s disease, are relatively unknown. Gut microbiota are key modulators of communication between the brain and gut, and alterations in microbiota composition (dysbiosis) can negatively affect cognition, behaviour and affective function, and may be implicated in disease progression. Furthermore, gut dysbiosis was recently reported in Huntington’s disease transgenic mice. Our main objective was to characterize the gut microbiome in people with Huntington’s disease and determine whether the composition of gut microbiota are significantly related to clinical indicators of disease progression. We compared 42 Huntington’s disease gene expansion carriers, including 19 people who were diagnosed with Huntington’s disease (Total Functional Capacity > 6) and 23 in the premanifest stage, with 36 age- and gender-matched healthy controls. Participants were characterized clinically using a battery of cognitive tests and using results from 16S V3 to V4 rRNA sequencing of faecal samples to characterize the gut microbiome. For gut microbiome measures, we found significant differences in the microbial communities (beta diversity) based on unweighted UniFrac distance (P = 0.001), as well as significantly lower alpha diversity (species richness and evenness) between our combined Huntington’s disease gene expansion carrier group and healthy controls (P = 0.001). We also found major shifts in the microbial community structure at Phylum and Family levels, and identified functional pathways and enzymes affected in our Huntington’s disease gene expansion carrier group. Within the Huntington’s disease gene expansion carrier group, we also discovered associations among gut bacteria, cognitive performance and clinical outcomes. Overall, our findings suggest an altered gut microbiome in Huntington’s disease gene expansion carriers. These results highlight the importance of gut biomarkers and raise interesting questions regarding the role of the gut in Huntington’s disease, and whether it may be a potential target for future therapeutic intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa110

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld J, Yurgel S, Brown JR, Taylor CM, et al PICRUSt2: an improved and extensible approach for metagenome inference. BioRxiv 2020; 672295.
  2. Eaton WW, Muntaner C, Tien A, Ybarra M Center for epidemiologic studies depression scale: Review and revision (CESD and CESD-R). In: Maruish ME, editor. The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment. 3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2004. p. 363–377.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wasser, C. I., Mercieca, E.-C., Kong, G., Hannan, A. J., McKeown, S. J., Glikmann-Johnston, Y., & Stout, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Ageing and Neurodegeneration Program, School of Psychological Sciences, Turner Institute for Brain and Mental Health, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia
Corresponding author
Stout, Julie C
Venue
Brain Communications
Published
2020
Volume
2
Issue
2
Pages
fcaa110-fcaa110
ISSN
2632-1297 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3045452138
Cited by
198
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3
FWCI
7.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • Australian Government National Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • The Fox Family Foundation
  • Torquay Coasters Cycling Group
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Keywords
Huntington's disease, gut dysbiosis, gut microbiota, cognitive performance, disease progression, gene expansion carriers, premanifest Huntington's disease, alpha diversity, beta diversity, gut-brain axis, fecal microbiota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review