Cited by 191Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionMultisensory perception and integration

Direct Temporal-Occipital Feedback Connections to Striate Cortex (V1) in the Macaque Monkey

Rockland, K. S., Van Hoesen, G. W.·1994·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Although there have been reports of sparse projections from temporal areas TE, TF, and even TH to area V1, it is generally believed that cortical afferents to V1 originate exclusively from prestriate areas. Injections of anterograde tracers in anterior occipital and temporal areas, however, consistently produce labeled terminals in area V1. In order to confirm these results and display the full range of foci projecting to V1, we injected V1 in two monkeys with the retrograde tracer fast blue. Feedback connections were found, as expected, from several prestriate areas (V2, V3, V4, and MT). These originate from neurons in layers 3A and 6. Connections were also found from several more distal regions, namely, areas TEO, TE, TF, TH, and from cortex in the occipitotemporal and superior temporal (STS) sulci. Filled neurons occurred in two small foci in the caudal intraparietal sulcus. These more distal feedback connections tend to originate only from layer 6. An additional injection of the retrograde tracer diamidino yellow in area V2 of one animal revealed a similarly widespread network of feedback connections. In some areas (in the STS and in TEO), 10-15% of fluorescent neurons were double-labeled. These results indicate that feedback connections to early visual cortex derive from a widespread network of areas, including limbic-associated cortices. These connectional patterns testify to the massive recursiveness of anatomical pathways. As there are no reports of projections from V1 to anterior temporal cortices, our results also indicate that some cortical feedback connections may not be strictly reciprocal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/4.3.300

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of reported connections of areas V1 and V2 expanded from a half-dozen to 20 inputs to V1 and 16 to V2.

    “For example, the number of reported connections of areas V1 and V2 expanded from a half-dozen (Felleman and Van Essen 1991) to 20 inputs to V1 and 16 to V2 (Boussaoud et al. 1990, 1991; Felleman and Van Essen 1991; Rockland and Van Hoesen 1994; Rockland et al. 1994; Stepniewska and Kaas 1996; Felleman et al. 1997; Barone et al. 2000; Falchier et al. 2002; Clavagnier et al. 2004; Gattass et al. 200”

    From A Weighted and Directed Interareal Connectivity Matrix for Macaque Cerebral Cortex (2014) · cites this paper as Rockland and Van Hoesen 1994

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rockland, K. S., & Van Hoesen, G. W.
Affiliations
University of Iowa (US)
Corresponding author
Rockland, K. S.
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
1994-05-01
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
300-313
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W1984571973
Cited by
191
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (EY 07058)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS014944, NS-14944, NS-19632)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
feedback connections, primary visual cortex, temporal cortex, occipitotemporal cortex, superior temporal sulcus, intraparietal sulcus, prestriate cortex, layer 6, corticocortical connections, anterograde and retrograde tracing, macaque, reciprocal connections, limbic cortex
MeSH terms
Amidines, Animals, Feedback, Female, Fluorescent Dyes, Macaca, Macaca fascicularis, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Occipital Lobe, Temporal Lobe, Visual Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review