Cited by 292Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersSchizophrenia research and treatment

Anatomical Abnormalities in Autism?

Open access
Haar, Shlomi, Berman, Sigal, Behrmann, Marlene, Dinstein, Ilan·2016·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

Substantial controversy exists regarding the presence and significance of anatomical abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders (ASD). The release of the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (∼1000 participants, age 6–65 years) offers an unprecedented opportunity to conduct large-scale comparisons of anatomical MRI scans across groups and to resolve many of the outstanding questions. Comprehensive univariate analyses using volumetric, thickness, and surface area measures of over 180 anatomically defined brain areas, revealed significantly larger ventricular volumes, smaller corpus callosum volume (central segment only), and several cortical areas with increased thickness in the ASD group. Previously reported anatomical abnormalities in ASD including larger intracranial volumes, smaller cerebellar volumes, and larger amygdala volumes were not substantiated by the current study. In addition, multivariate classification analyses yielded modest decoding accuracies of individuals' group identity (<60%), suggesting that the examined anatomical measures are of limited diagnostic utility for ASD. While anatomical abnormalities may be present in distinct subgroups of ASD individuals, the current findings show that many previously reported anatomical measures are likely to be of low clinical and scientific significance for understanding ASD neuropathology as a whole in individuals 6–35 years old.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhu242

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent study utilizing 590 6-35-year-old participants from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE) achieved only 56 and 60% accuracy based on subcortical volumes and cortical thickness measures, respectively.

    “A recent study utilizing 590 6–35-year-old participants from the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange (ABIDE38) data set, however, was more pessimistic. Using linear and non-linear discriminant analysis to perform multivariate classification based on anatomical measures (gray matter volume, cortical thickness and cortical surface area) the authors achieved only 56 and 60% accuracy based on subcorti”
  • The authors of that study take these poor decoding accuracies to indicate that anatomical differences offer very limited diagnostic value in ASD.

    “The authors take these poor decoding accuracies to indicate that anatomical differences offer very limited diagnostic value in ASD.34”
  • Volume-based neuroimaging analyses may lack sufficient resolution to detect subtle morphological changes.

    “Volume-based analyses undertaken using neuroimaging techniques may lack sufficient resolution to detect subtle morphological changes (see recent aggregated study in [136]).”

    From Autism spectrum disorder: neuropathology and animal models (2017) · cites this paper as [136]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haar, S., Berman, S., Behrmann, M., & Dinstein, I.
Affiliations
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
  • Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Corresponding author
Haar, Shlomi
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2014-10-14
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
1440-1452
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2108623767
Cited by
292
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 29
FWCI
15.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation (177638)
  • NIH
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, anatomical anomalies, brain structure, ventricular volume, corpus callosum, cortical thickness, brain surface area, intracranial volume, cerebellar volume, amygdala volume, brain volumetry, diagnostic classification
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Autistic Disorder, Brain, Child, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review