Cited by 129Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Assessment of low-to-moderate intensity physical activity thermogenesis in young adults using synchronized heart rate and accelerometry with branched-equation modeling

Open access
Thompson, Dylan, Batterham, Alan M, Bock, Susan, Robson, Claire, Stokes, Keith·2006·The Journal of Nutrition

Abstract

Low-to-moderate intensity physical activity thermogenesis is a highly variable and quantitatively important component of total energy expenditure that is difficult to assess outside the laboratory. Greater precision and accuracy in the measurement of this key contributor to energy balance is a research priority. We developed a laboratory-based protocol that simulated a range of low-to-moderate intensity physical activities. We characterized the bias and random (individual) error in estimating energy expenditure using combined accelerometry and heart rate (AHR) with branched-equation modeling and a simple motion sensor (pedometer) against an indirect calorimetry criterion. Twenty young adult subjects performed a 2-h laboratory-based protocol, simulating 6 low-to-moderate intensity physical activities interspersed with periods of rest. The physical activity level during the laboratory-based protocol reflected an energy expenditure toward the lower end of the active category. We found that AHR-derived energy expenditure showed no evidence of substantial fixed or proportional bias (mean bias 6%), whereas pedometer-derived energy expenditure showed both fixed and proportional bias (bias at minimum, mean, and maximum energy expenditure +11, -20, and -36%, respectively). It appears that AHR provides an accurate estimate of criterion energy expenditure whereas a simple motion sensor (pedometer) does not. It is noteworthy that AHR provides quantitative information about the nature and patterns of physical activity, such as the amount of time and/or energy spent engaged in physical activity above critical health-related thresholds.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jn/136.4.1037

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The physical activity measurement method was validated against gold-standard measures of energy expenditure in laboratory and free-living conditions.

    “This method has been validated against gold-standard measures of energy expenditure in laboratory and free-living conditions [22–24].”

    From Resting heart rate is a population-level biomarker of cardiorespiratory fitness: The Fenland Study (2023) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Method comparisons section validates the heart-rate and accelerometry method against indirect calorimetry in a laboratory protocol. The Discussion describes the 24-hour, away-from-laboratory comparison as preliminary and compares its estimates with the Compendium of Physical Activities, not a gold-standard measure of energy expenditure. The cited paper therefore does not establish the claimed free-living validation against a gold standard. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The COSMED K4b2 portable metabolic system has been shown to be reliable and valid for measuring energy expenditure.

    “This device has been shown to be both reliable and valid [30,31], and has also been used previously to determine criterion energy expenditure [28,32–34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thompson, D., Batterham, A. M., Bock, S., Robson, C., & Stokes, K.
Affiliations
University of Bath (GB)
Corresponding author
Thompson, Dylan
Venue
The Journal of Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-04
Volume
136
Issue
4
Pages
1037-1042
ISSN
0022-3166 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101195842
Cited by
129
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TeesRep (Teesside University) (publishedVersion)
  • Teesside University Research Portal (Teesside University) (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (VS04BTHAA17OAAMFH)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
energy expenditure estimation, heart rate, accelerometry, pedometers, measurement bias, measurement error, indirect calorimetry, young adults, energy balance
MeSH terms
Adult, Energy Metabolism, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Mathematics, Models, Biological, Exercise, Bias, Thermogenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review