Cited by 139Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Validation of photoplethysmography as a method to detect heart rate during rest and exercise

Spierer, David K., Rosen, Zohn, Litman, Leib L., Fujii, Kenji·2015·Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology

Abstract

Despite their enhanced marketplace visibility, validity of wearable photoplethysmographic heart rate monitoring is scarce. Forty-seven healthy participants performed seven, 6-min exercise bouts and completed a valid skin type scale. Participants wore an Omron HR500U (OHR) and a Mio Alpha (MA), two commercial wearable photoplethysmographic heart rate monitors. Data were compared to a Polar RS800CX (PRS). Means and error were calculated between devices using minutes 2-5. Compared to PRS, MA data was significantly different in walking, biking (2.41 ± 3.99 bpm and 3.26 ± 11.38 bpm, p < 0.05) and weight lifting (23.30 ± 31.94 bpm, p < 0.01). OHR differed from PRS in walking (4.95 ± 7.53 bpm, p < 0.05) and weight lifting (4.67 ± 8.95 bpm, p < 0.05). MA during elliptical, stair climbing and biking conditions demonstrated a strong correlation between jogging speed and error (r = 0.55, p < 0.0001), and showed differences in participants with less photosensitive skin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/03091902.2015.1047536

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Spierer, D. K., Rosen, Z., Litman, L. L., & Fujii, K.
Affiliations
  • Long Island University (US)
  • New York Medical College (US)
  • Lander University (US)
  • Omron (Japan) (JP)
Corresponding author
Spierer, David K.
Venue
Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology
Published
2015-06-26
Volume
39
Issue
5
Pages
264-271
ISSN
  • 0309-1902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-522X
OpenAlex
W2119121237
Cited by
139
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Touro Scholar (Touro College) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Omron Healthcare
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
photoplethysmography, wearable heart rate monitor, heart rate response to exercise, device comparison, walking, cycling, weightlifting
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Equipment Design, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Motor Activity, Rest, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Exercise, Photoplethysmography, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis, Actigraphy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review