The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational and Social Research
Abstract
The relationship between theory and practice, research and action, is fundamental to all fields of applied social science. Should research findings and knowledge be useful for science, practice, and policy? If so, how should such research be designed, carried out and disseminated to achieve the twin goals of rigor and relevance? These challenges are particularly relevant in the applied areas of management and organization studies where there is a distinct responsibility for researchers to engage with the ‘real world’. In this carefully crafted and thoughtful book, leading management researcher Andrew Van de Ven both presents the broad intellectual challenge of ‘engaged scholarship’, and also sets out a clear framework and guidelines for carrying out soundly based and useful research for advancing both science and practice. At a time when some may question the value and status of academic knowledge; and others, contrastingly, urge a closer relationship between researchers and research users – be they businesses, governments or other institutions – the challenge of engaged scholarship is as relevant as ever, and there is a real need for the thoughtful and considered approach offered by Van de Ven. The book both provides a manifesto for engaged scholarship in the social sciences, and clear framework for research design and methodology. It will be an invaluable reference point and guide for academics, researchers and graduate students across the social sciences concerned with rigorous and relevant research in the contemporary world.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Harvey, G., & Kitson, A. (2015) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-016-0398-2 · Cited by 1,271
Adams, R. J., Smart, P., & Huff, A. S. (2017) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/ijmr.12102 · Cited by 995
Toward an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research Program
Wurth, B., Stam, E., & Spigel, B. (2022) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/1042258721998948 · Cited by 789
Maneuvering in Poor Visibility: How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game when Uncertainty is High
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0869 · Cited by 567
A Temporal Perspective on Organizational Identity
Schultz, M., & Hernes, T. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1110.0731 · Cited by 556
GREENHALGH, T., POTTS, H. W. W., WONG, G., BARK, P., & SWINGLEHURST, D. (2009) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00578.x · Cited by 541
Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research
Goldkuhl, G. (2012) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2011.54 · Cited by 541
Baird, A., & Maruping, L. M. (2021) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2021/15882 · Cited by 512
Nobre, G. C., & Tavares, E. (2017) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-017-2281-6 · Cited by 375
Sustaining organizational culture change in health systems
Willis, C. D., Saul, J., Bevan, H., Scheirer, M. A., Best, A., Greenhalgh, T., Mannion, R., Cornelissen, E., Howland, D., Jenkins, E., et al. (2016) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-07-2014-0117 · Cited by 178
Burton-Jones, A., McLean, E. R., & Monod, E. (2015) · European Journal of Information Systems · doi:10.1057/ejis.2014.31 · Cited by 167
Toward a theory of evidence based decision making
Baba, V. V., & HakemZadeh, F. (2012) · Management Decision · doi:10.1108/00251741211227546 · Cited by 167
Configuring New Business Models for Circular Economy through Product–Service Systems
P. P. Pieroni, M., C. McAloone, T., & C. A. Pigosso, D. (2019) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su11133727 · Cited by 150
Data governance as a collective action problem
Benfeldt, O., Persson, J. S., & Madsen, S. (2020) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-019-09923-z · Cited by 137
Fashion Waves in Information Systems Research and Practice1
Baskerville, R. L., & Myers, M. D. (2009) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/20650319 · Cited by 137
How Can It Be Made Right Again? A Review of Trust Repair Research
Sharma, K., Schoorman, F. D., & Ballinger, G. A. (2023) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063221089897 · Cited by 117
Rütten, A., Frahsa, A., Abel, T., Bergmann, M., de Leeuw, E., Hunter, D., Jansen, M., King, A., & Potvin, L. (2019) · Health Promotion International · doi:10.1093/heapro/dax053 · Cited by 109
Rycroft-Malone, J., Wilkinson, J., Burton, C. R., Harvey, G., McCormack, B., Graham, I., & Staniszewska, S. (2013) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1177/1355819613498859 · Cited by 98
Wells, P. (2016) · Organization & Environment · doi:10.1177/1086026615590882 · Cited by 93
The Sustainability of Polycentric Information Commons1
Mindel, V., Mathiassen, L., & Rai, A. (2018) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2018/14015 · Cited by 90
Hilbolling, S., Berends, H., Deken, F., & Tuertscher, P. (2021) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12555 · Cited by 71
The sensemaking-coevolution-implementation theory of software design
Ralph, P. (2015) · Science of Computer Programming · doi:10.1016/j.scico.2014.11.007 · Cited by 60
Do entrepreneurial ecosystems foster sustainable development?
Audretsch, D. B., Rocha, H., Aggarwal, S., & Bramanti, A. (2024) · International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal · doi:10.1007/s11365-023-00916-8 · Cited by 48
Chandrasekaran, A., Linderman, K., & Sting, F. J. (2018) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1016/j.jom.2018.11.003 · Cited by 37
Complexities of managing a mobile phone ban in the digitalized schools’ classroom.
Grigic Magnusson, A., Ott, T., Hård af Segerstad, Y., & Sofkova Hashemi, S. (2023) · Computers in the Schools · doi:10.1080/07380569.2023.2211062 · Cited by 18
Organizational Closure Competencies and Scaling: A Realist Approach to Theorizing Social Enterprise
Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2014) · Social Entrepreneurship and Research Methods · doi:10.1108/s1479-838720140000009014 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Van de Ven, A. H.
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-05-24
- OpenAlex
- W4388152402
- Cited by
- 1,851
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.16
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.