Cited by 4Psychometric Methodologies and TestingMedical Education and AdmissionsNames, Identity, and Discrimination Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictive Bias in Work and Educational Settings

Kuncel, Nathan R., Klieger, David M.·2012·The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection

Abstract

In this chapter we review the research and concept of predictive bias, present a new theory of when and how predictive bias will occur, and create a list of methodological and substantive confounds that complicate research on predictive bias. We note that educational and organizational researchers have often used different methods to operationalize the same concept in academic and work settings, respectively. We review these approaches and recommend a modified method based on the examination of regression plots and residuals. A new theory is presented that addresses how and when predictive bias would occur using the existing definition (i.e., the Cleary Model). Theoretically, we suggest that a performance determinants framework provides a good foundation for understanding how and when predictive bias can occur. We illustrate key concepts in our theory using existing research. We suggest that the nature of predictive bias is dependent on the reason a predictor is correlated with subsequent performance. We then use this theory to guide a review of previous research testing for the presence of predictive bias across a range of personnel selection and academic admissions tools. Although much of the literature indicates that professional selection tools are unbiased for native speakers of English in the U.S., the most troubling finding is the scarcity of information for many of the most popular selection and admissions tools.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199732579.013.0020

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 89

  1. Aguinis,, 2010, Revival of test bias research in preemployment testing., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/a0018714 · DOI
  2. American, 1999, Standards for educational and psychological testing
  3. Arvey,, 1990, Motivational components of test taking., Personnel Psychology,, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb00679.x · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bandura,, 1977, Social learning theory
  5. Barrick,, 1993, Conscientiousness and performance of sales representatives: Test of the mediating effects of goal setting., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.715 · DOI
  6. Bartlett,, 1978, Testing for fairness with a moderated multiple regression strategy: An alternative to differential analysis., Personnel Psychology,, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1978.tb00442.x · DOI
  7. Becton,, 2009, Using biodata to predict turnover, organizational commitment, and job performance in healthcare., International Journal of Selection and Assessment,
  8. Bobko,, 1999, Derivation and implications of a meta-analytic matrix incorporating cognitive ability, alternative predictors, and job performance., Personnel Psychology,, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00172.x · DOI
  9. Borman,, 1995, Effects of ratee task performance and interpersonal factors on supervisor and peer ratings., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.80.1.168 · DOI
  10. Borman,, 1991, Models of supervisory job performance ratings., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.76.6.863 · DOI
  11. Braun,, 1985, Use of empirical Bayes method in the study of the validity of academic predictors of graduate school performance. GRE Board Professional Report
  12. Bridgeman,, 1996, Gender differences in college mathematics grades and SAT-M scores: A reanalysis of Wainer and Steinberg., Journal of Educational Measurement,, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1996.tb00492.x · DOI
  13. Bridgeman,, 2000, Predictions of freshman grade-point average from the revised and recentered SAT I: Reasoning test
  14. Bridgeman,, 2008, Predicting grades in different types of college courses, 10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02092.x · DOI
  15. Broach,, 1999, Differential prediction of FAA academy performance on the basis of race and written air traffic control specialist aptitude test scores
  16. Campbell, J. P. (1990). Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol 1, pp. 687–732). Palo Alto, CA: CPP Books.
  17. Campbell,, 1996, Group differences and personnel decisions: Validity, fairness, and affirmative action., Journal of Vocational Behavior,, 10.1006/jvbe.1996.0038 · DOI
  18. Campbell, J. P., Gasser, M. B., & Oswald, F. L. (1996). The substantive nature of job performance variability. In K. R. Murphy (Ed.), Individual differences and behavior in organizations (pp. 258–299). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
  19. Campbell, J. P., & Kuncel, N. R. (2001). Individual and team training. In N. Anderson, D. S. Ones, H. Sinangil, & C. Viswesvaran (Eds.), Handbook of industrial, work, and organizational psychology (pp. 233–277). London, UK: Sage Publications.
  20. Campion,, 1988, Structured interviews: Raising the psychometric properties of the employment interview., Personnel Psychology,, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00630.x · DOI
  21. Carretta,, 1990, Gender differences in USAF pilot training performance
  22. Carretta,, 1997, Group differences on US Air Force pilot selection tests., International Journal of Selection and Assessment,, 10.1111/1468-2389.00051 · DOI
  23. Chan,, 1997, Video-based versus paper-and-pencil method of assessment in situational judgment tests: Subgroup differences in test performance and face validity perceptions., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.82.1.143 · DOI
  24. Chan,, 1997, Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test-taking motivation., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.300 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Cleary,, 1968, Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and white students in integrated colleges., Journal of Educational Measurement,, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1968.tb00613.x · DOI · Paper page
  26. Collins,, 1998, Race, job applicants, and the five-factor model of personality: Implications for black psychology, industrial/organizational psychology, and the five-factor theory., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.83.4.531 · DOI
  27. Colquitt,, 2000, Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.85.5.678 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Credé,, 2008, Study habits, skills, and attitudes: The third pillar supporting collegiate academic performance., Perspectives on Psychological Science,, 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00089.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. Cullen,, 2004, Using SAT-grade and ability-job performance relationships to test predictions derived from stereotype threat theory., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.220 · DOI
  30. Elliott,, 1990, Problem-solving appraisal, self-reported study habits, and performance of academically at-risk college students., Journal of Counseling Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-0167.37.2.203 · DOI
  31. Enright,, 1989, Toward a description of successful graduate students, 10.1002/j.2330-8516.1989.tb00335.x · DOI
  32. Gough,, 1960, Theory and measurement of socialization., Journal of Consulting Psychology,, 10.1037/h0044749 · DOI
  33. Gough,, 1994, Theory, development, and interpretation of the CPI socialization scale., Psychological Reports,, 10.2466/pr0.1994.75.1.651 · DOI
  34. Grigorenko,, 2004, Academic and practical intelligence., Learning and Individual Differences,, 10.1016/j.lindif.2004.02.002 · DOI
  35. Hartigan,, 1989, Fairness in employee testing: Validity generalization, minority issues, and the General Aptitude Test Battery
  36. Hogan, J. B. (1994). Empirical keying of background data measures. In G. S. Stokes, M. D. Mumford, & W. A. Owens (Eds.), Biodata handbook: Theory, research, and use of biographical information in selection and performance prediction (Chap. 4, pp. 69–107). Palo Alto, CA: CPP Books.
  37. Hough,, 2001, Determinants, detection and amelioration of adverse impact in personnel selection procedures: Issues, evidence and lessons learned., International Journal of Selection and Assessment,, 10.1111/1468-2389.00171 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Huffcut,, 1998, Racial group differences in employment interview evaluations., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.179 · DOI
  39. Hunter, J. E. (1983). A causal analysis of cognitive ability, job knowledge, job performance, and supervisor ratings. In F. Landy, S. Zedeck, & J. Cleveland (Eds.), Performance measurement and theory (pp. 257–266). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  40. Johnston,, 1984, Prior knowledge and reading comprehension test bias., Reading Research Quarterly,, 10.2307/747364 · DOI
  41. Judge,, 2001, The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review., Psychological Bulletin,, 10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Kane,, 2010, Modeling group differences in OLS and orthogonal regression: Implications for differential validity studies., Applied Measurement in Education,, 10.1080/08957347.2010.485990 · DOI
  43. Kanfer,, 1991, It's a goal, goal, goal setting world. Review of a theory of goal setting and task performance., Contemporary Psychology,, 10.1037/030241 · DOI
  44. Klieger,, 2010, The validity of judgment: Can the assessor learn to outperform the equation?
  45. Koenig,, 1998, Evaluating the predictive validity of MCAT scores across diverse applicant groups., Academic Medicine,, 10.1097/00001888-199810000-00021 · DOI
  46. Kraiger,, 1985, A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.70.1.56 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kuncel,, 2003, The prediction and structure of graduate student performance.
  48. Kuncel,, 2007, Standardized tests predict graduate students’ success., Science,, 10.1126/science.1136618 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Lievens,, 2002, Situational judgment tests in student selection: An examination of predictive validity, adverse impact, and construct validity., International Journal of Selection and Assessment,, 10.1111/1468-2389.00215 · DOI
  50. Linn,, 1973, Fair test use in selection., Review of Educational Research,, 10.3102/00346543043002139 · DOI
  51. Linn,, 1975, Test bias and the prediction of grades in law school., Journal of Legal Education
  52. Lubinski, D., & Davis, R. V. (1992). Aptitudes, skills, and proficiencies. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), The handbook of industrial/organizational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 1–59). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
  53. Mathews,, 1977, Racial equity in selection in Air Force Officer Training School and undergraduate flying training (AFHRL-TR-77–22)
  54. Mattern,, 2008, Differential validity and prediction of the SAT (College Board Research Report No. 2008–4)
  55. McCloy,, 1994, A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.493 · DOI
  56. Mumford,, 1987, Methodology review: Principles, procedures, and findings in the application of background data measures., Applied Psychological Measurement,, 10.1177/014662168701100101 · DOI
  57. Murphy,, 2009, The predictive power of personal statements in admissions: A meta-analysis and cautionary tale., College and University,
  58. Ones,, 1993, Comprehensive meta-analysis of integrity test validities: Findings and implications for personnel selection and theories of job performance., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.679 · DOI
  59. Oswald,, 2004, Developing a biodata measure and situational judgment inventory as predictors of college student performance., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.187 · DOI
  60. Pearsons,, 1993, Predictive validity of the scholastic aptitude test (SAT) for Hispanic bilingual students., Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences,, 10.1177/07399863930153004 · DOI
  61. Pulakos,, 1995, Experience based and situational interview questions: Studies of validity., Personnel Psychology,, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01758.x · DOI
  62. Pulakos,, 1996, An evaluation of two strategies for reducing adverse impact and their effects on criterion-related validity., Human Performance,, 10.1207/s15327043hup0903_4 · DOI
  63. Pulakos,, 1989, Examination of sex and race effects on performance ratings., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.74.5.770 · DOI
  64. Ramist,, 1984, Student group differences in predicting college grades: Sex, language, and ethnic groups
  65. Ryan,, 1998, Using personality testing to reduce adverse impact: A cautionary note., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.298 · DOI
  66. Saad,, 2002, Investigating differential prediction by gender in employment-oriented personality measures., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.667 · DOI
  67. Sacco,, 2000, Understanding race differences on situational judgment tests using readability statistics
  68. Sacco,, 2000, Using readability statistics and reading comprehension scores to predict situational judgment test performance, black-white differences, and validity
  69. Sackett,, 1989, Integrity testing for personnel selection: An update., Personnel Psychology,, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1989.tb00666.x · DOI
  70. Sackett,, 1996, New developments in the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness, dependability, trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection., Personnel Psychology,, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1996.tb02450.x · DOI
  71. Sackett,, 1994, Within-group norming and other forms of score adjustment in preemployment testing., American Psychologist,, 10.1037/0003-066X.49.11.929 · DOI
  72. Salam,, 1990, Unification of fundamental forces: The first 1988 Dirac Memorial Lecture, 10.1017/CBO9780511622854 · DOI
  73. Schmidt,, 1986, Impact of job experience and ability on job knowledge, work sample performance, and supervisory ratings of job performance., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.71.3.432 · DOI
  74. Schmidt,, 1980, The validity and fairness of employment and educational tests for Hispanic Americans: A review and analysis., Personnel Psychology,, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1980.tb02364.x · DOI
  75. Schmitt,, 1996, Subgroup differences associated with different measures of some common job relevant constructs., International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology,
  76. Schmitt,, 2002, The effects of required elaboration of answers to biodata questions., Personnel Psychology,, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2002.tb00121.x · DOI
  77. Schmitt,, 1997, Adverse impact and predictive efficiency of various predictor combinations., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/0021-9010.82.5.719 · DOI
  78. Sharon,, 1972, English proficiency, verbal aptitude, and foreign student success in American graduate schools., Education and Psychological Measurement,, 10.1177/001316447203200219 · DOI
  79. Siem,, 1990, Comparison of male and female USAF pilot candidates
  80. Sireci,, 2006, Evaluating the predictive validity of Graduate Management Admissions Test Scores., Educational and Psychological Measurement,, 10.1177/0013164405282455 · DOI
  81. Society, 2003, Principles for the validation and use of personnel selection procedures
  82. Stricker,, 2004, The performance of native speakers of English and ESL speakers on the computer based TOEFL and GRE General Test., Language Testing,, 10.1191/0265532204lt279oa · DOI
  83. Stricker,, 1993, Sex differences in predictions of college grades from scholastic aptitude test scores., Journal of Educational Psychology,, 10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.710 · DOI
  84. Terris,, 1997, The traditional regression model for measuring test bias is incorrect and biased against minorities., Journal of Business & Psychology,, 10.1023/A:1025006015357 · DOI
  85. Vancouver,, 1990, Determination of validity and bias in the use of GPA and MCAT in the selection of medical school students., Academic Medicine,
  86. Wernimont,, 1968, Signs, samples, and criteria., Journal of Applied Psychology,, 10.1037/h0026244 · DOI
  87. Wrightman,, 2000, An analysis of differential validity and differential prediction for black, Mexican American, Hispanic, and white law school students
  88. Young,, 1991, Gender bias in predicting college academic performance: A new approach using item response theory., Journal of Educational Measurement,, 10.1111/j.1745-3984.1991.tb00342.x · DOI
  89. Young,, 2001, Differential validity, differential prediction, and college admission testing: A comprehensive review and analysis

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 4

Metadata

Authors
Kuncel, N. R., & Klieger, D. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • Educational Testing Service (US)
Venue
The Oxford Handbook of Personnel Assessment and Selection
Published
2012-11-21
Pages
462-484
OpenAlex
W1657112078
Cited by
4
References
6
Citations by year
2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.87
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Oxford University Press eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Education › Medical Education and Admissions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Keywords
predictive bias, personnel selection, university admission, performance factors, selection tools, native English speakers, information scarcity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review