The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Get Real! Individuals Prefer More Sustainable Investments
Open accessAbstract
The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have created societal and political pressure for pension funds to address sustainable investing. We run two field surveys (n = 1,669, n = 3,186) with a pension fund that grants its members a real vote on its sustainable-investment policy. Two-thirds of participants are willing to expand the fund’s engagement with companies based on selected SDGs, even when they expect engagement to hurt financial performance. Support remains strong after the fund implements the choice. A key reason is participants’ strong social preferences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We find broad consensus in the literature on the sustainability preferences of investors (Bauer et al., 2021;Ceccarelli et al., 2023;Heeb et al., 2023, among others).”
From A review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions (2024) · cites this paper as Bauer et al., 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“We find strong empirical evidence in the literature that investors have a preference for ESG”
From A review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions (2024) · cites this paper as Bauer et al., 2021
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Bauer et al. (2021) provide evidence that the support for sustainable investments is driven by strong social preferences of investors rather than beliefs for better financial outcomes from investments in green assets.”
From A review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions (2024) · cites this paper as Bauer et al. (2021)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“They also show that individual investor's social preferences matter in delegated portfolio decisions.”
From A review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions (2024) · cites this paper as Bauer et al. (2021)
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The field surveys explored in Bauer et al. (2021) shed light on the willingness of pension fund investors to support engagement in sustainable actions in portfolio companies.”
From A review on ESG investing: Investors' expectations, beliefs and perceptions (2024) · cites this paper as Bauer et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Theory of Fairness, Competition, and Cooperation
Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399556151 · Cited by 11,264
Social Choice and Individual Values
Schnepp, G. J., & Arrow, K. (1951) · Economica · doi:10.2307/2549613 · Cited by 10,000
“Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms.”
Ellsberg, D. (1961) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1884324 · Cited by 7,891
Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference-dependent model.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/2937956 · Cited by 6,432
Status quo bias in decision making
Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988) · Journal of Risk and Uncertainty · doi:10.1007/bf00055564 · Cited by 5,897
Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods: A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving
Andreoni, J. (1990) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.2307/2234133 · Cited by 5,825
Gender Differences in Preferences
Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.47.2.448 · Cited by 5,694
ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
Bolton, G. E., & Ockenfels, A. (2000) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.90.1.166 · Cited by 5,399
Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. H. (1991) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193 · Cited by 5,019
Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests
Charness, G., & Rabin, M. (2002) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355302760193904 · Cited by 3,970
Does Culture Affect Economic Outcomes?
Guiso, L., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2006) · The Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.20.2.23 · Cited by 3,561
Incentives and Prosocial Behavior
Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2006) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.96.5.1652 · Cited by 3,357
An economic theory of political action in a democracy
Downs, A. (1957) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/257897 · Cited by 3,300
Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity
Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.14.3.159 · Cited by 3,239
The Importance of Climate Risks for Institutional Investors
Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2020) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhz137 · Cited by 3,034
The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets
Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001 · Cited by 2,601
Do institutional investors drive corporate social responsibility? International evidence
Dyck, A., Lins, K. V., Roth, L., & Wagner, H. F. (2019) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013 · Cited by 2,547
Sustainable food consumption: Exploring the consumer “attitude–behavioral intention” gap
Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2006) · Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10806-005-5485-3 · Cited by 2,524
Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices
Edmans, A. (2011) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.021 · Cited by 2,511
Sustainable investing in equilibrium
Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2021) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011 · Cited by 2,226
Socially responsible investments: Institutional aspects, performance, and investor behavior
Renneboog, L. D. R., ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2007.12.039 · Cited by 1,907
Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth
Krüger, P. (2015) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008 · Cited by 1,901
Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving Prosocially
Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2009) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.99.1.544 · Cited by 1,753
Global Evidence on Economic Preferences*
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Enke, B., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2018) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjy013 · Cited by 1,724
Do Investors Value Sustainability? A Natural Experiment Examining Ranking and Fund Flows
HARTZMARK, S. M., & SUSSMAN, A. B. (2019) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12841 · Cited by 1,711
Social Choice and Individual Values.
Goodman, L. A., & Arrow, K. J. (1953) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2087870 · Cited by 1,540
Incentive and informational properties of preference questions
Carson, R. T., & Groves, T. (2007) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-007-9124-5 · Cited by 1,409
Why Do Investors Hold Socially Responsible Mutual Funds?
RIEDL, A., & SMEETS, P. (2017) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12547 · Cited by 1,378
Self-citationCummings, R. G., & Taylor, L. O. (1999) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.89.3.649 · Cited by 1,300
Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2015) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhv044 · Cited by 1,242
Social Comparisons and Pro-social Behavior: Testing “Conditional Cooperation” in a Field Experiment
Frey, B. S., & Meier, S. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828043052187 · Cited by 1,184
A Meta-analysis of Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Valuation
Murphy, J. J., Allen, P. G., Stevens, T. H., & Weatherhead, D. A. (2005) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-004-3332-z · Cited by 1,153
Testing for Altruism and Social Pressure in Charitable Giving
DellaVigna, S., List, J. A., & Malmendier, U. (2012) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qjr050 · Cited by 1,080
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2002) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00027 · Cited by 1,061
Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments.
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1998) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00311 · Cited by 1,000
What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values?
List, J. A., & Gallet, C. A. (2001) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1023/a:1012791822804 · Cited by 991
The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle
Derwall, J., Guenster, N., Bauer, R., & Koedijk, K. (2005) · Financial Analysts Journal · doi:10.2469/faj.v61.n2.2716 · Cited by 965
Self-citationUsing Experimental Economics to Measure Social Capital and Predict Financial Decisions
Karlan, D. (2005) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282805775014407 · Cited by 850
Mutual Fund Attributes and Investor Behavior
Bollen, N. P. B. (2007) · Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis · doi:10.1017/s0022109000004142 · Cited by 785
Red and blue investing: Values and finance
Hong, H., & Kostovetsky, L. (2012) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.01.006 · Cited by 749
Barber, B. M., Morse, A., & Yasuda, A. (2021) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.008 · Cited by 728
Social Preferences and the Response to Incentives: Evidence from Personnel Data
Bandiera, O., Barankay, I., & Imran Rasul, A. (2005) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/120.3.917 · Cited by 717
A Signaling Explanation for Charity
Glazer, A., & Konrad, K. A. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-79247-5_43 · Cited by 703
Uri Gneezy, B., & List, J. A. (2006) · Econometrica · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0262.2006.00707.x · Cited by 689
Optimal Defaults and Active Decisions*
Carroll, G. D., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Metrick, A. (2009) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.4.1639 · Cited by 679
Ajzen, I., Brown, T. C., & Carvajal, F. (2004) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167204264079 · Cited by 605
Assessing the Costs and Benefits of Brokers in the Mutual Fund Industry
Bergstresser, D., Chalmers, J. M. R., & Tufano, P. (2009) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhp022 · Cited by 604
Pride and Prejudice: The Human Side of Incentive Theory
Ellingsen, T., & Johannesson, M. (2008) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.98.3.990 · Cited by 598
Handbook of Experimental Economics Results
Plott, C. R., & Smith, V. L. (2008) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 573
Homegrown Values and Hypothetical Surveys: Is the Dichotomous Choice Approach Incentive-Compatible?
Cummings, R. G., & Harrison, G. W. (1995) · American Economic Review · Cited by 538
Avoiding the Ask: A Field Experiment on Altruism, Empathy, and Charitable Giving
James Andreoni, A., Rao, J. M., & Trachtman, H. (2017) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/691703 · Cited by 495
Falk, A., & Szech, N. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231566 · Cited by 468
List, J. A. (2001) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1498 · Cited by 451
Financial advisors: A case of babysitters?
Hackethal, A., Haliassos, M., & Jappelli, T. (2012) · Journal of Banking & Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.08.008 · Cited by 422
Truth in Consequentiality: Theory and Field Evidence on Discrete Choice Experiments
Vossler, C. A., Doyon, M., Rondeau, D., & Roy-Vigneault, F. (2012) · American Economic Journal Microeconomics · doi:10.1257/mic.4.4.145 · Cited by 390
List, J. A. (2006) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/498587 · Cited by 386
Almås, I., Cappelen, A. W., & Tungodden, B. (2019) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/705551 · Cited by 377
Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2008) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.04.010 · Cited by 362
Doing Good or Doing Well? Image Motivation and Monetary Incentives in Behaving ProsociallyPreprint
Ariely, D., Bracha, A., & Meier, S. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1010620 · Cited by 345
What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices
FeldmanHall, O., Mobbs, D., Evans, D., Hiscox, L. V., Navrady, L. B., & Dalgleish, T. (2012) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2012.02.001 · Cited by 337
Grimm, P. E. (2010) · Wiley International Encyclopedia of Marketing · doi:10.1002/9781444316568.wiem02057 · Cited by 324
PORTFOLIO CHOICE AND RISK ATTITUDES: AN EXPERIMENT
Charness, G., & Uri Gneezy, B. (2010) · Economic Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2009.00219.x · Cited by 310
Shared Social Responsibility: A Field Experiment in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing and Charitable Giving
Gneezy, A., Uri Gneezy, B., Nelson, L. D., & Brown, A. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1186744 · Cited by 309
Do Markets Erode Social Responsibility? *
Bartling, B., Weber, R. A., & Yao, L. (2014) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/qje/qju031 · Cited by 305
Falk, A., Becker, A., Dohmen, T., Huffman, D., & Sunde, U. (2016) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2725874 · Cited by 296
An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior
Bolton, G. E., & Katok, E. (1995) · Economics Letters · doi:10.1016/0165-1765(94)00621-8 · Cited by 285
Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2002) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.299142 · Cited by 273
Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible?
Cummings, R. G., Elliott, S., Harrison, G. W., & Murphy, J. (1997) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/262084 · Cited by 264
Red and Blue Investing: Values and FinancePreprint
Hong, H. G., & Kostovetsky, L. (2008) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1214382 · Cited by 253
Chapter 81 Experimental Evidence on the Existence of Hypothetical Bias in Value Elicitation Methods
Harrison, G. W., & Rutström, E. E. (2008) · Handbook of experimental economics results · doi:10.1016/s1574-0722(07)00081-9 · Cited by 238
Bargaining Outside the Lab – A Newspaper Experiment of a Three‐Person Ultimatum Game
Güth, W., Schmidt, C., & Sutter, M. (2007) · The Economic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02025.x · Cited by 233
Calibration of the difference between actual and hypothetical valuations in a field experiment
List, J. A., & Shogren, J. F. (1998) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(98)00084-5 · Cited by 231
Social identification and investment decisions
Bauer, R. M. M. J., & Smeets, P. (2015) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2015.06.006 · Cited by 219
Self-citationExperimental Evidence on Alternative Environmental Valuation Methods
Harrison, G. W. (2006) · Environmental and Resource Economics · doi:10.1007/s10640-005-3792-9 · Cited by 217
Ambiguity Aversion and Incompleteness of Financial Markets
Mukerji, S., & Tallon, J. (2001) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/1467-937x.00194 · Cited by 203
Terlau, W., & Hirsch, D. (2015) · International journal on food system dynamics · doi:10.18461/ijfsd.v6i3.634 · Cited by 195
Experimental Methods and Elicitation of Values
Harrison, G. W., Harstad, R. M., & Rutström, E. E. (2004) · Experimental Economics · doi:10.1023/b:exec.0000026975.48587.f0 · Cited by 185
Are hypothetical referenda incentive compatible?
Burton, A. C., Carson, K. S., Chilton, S., & Hutchinson, G. (2001) · Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) · Cited by 185
Bolton, P., Li, T., Ravina, E., & Rosenthal, H. (2020) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.03.004 · Cited by 183
Other-Regarding Preferences in General Equilibrium
Dufwenberg, M. A., Heidhues, P., Kirchsteiger, G., Riedel, F., & Sobel, J. (2011) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1093/restud/rdq026 · Cited by 171
Using Experimental Economics to Measure Social Capital and Predict Financial Decisions
Karlan, D. (2014) · Harvard Dataverse · doi:10.7910/dvn/27849 · Cited by 162
2013WAEA Keynote Address: Strategies for Overcoming Hypothetical Bias in Stated Preference Surveys
Loomis, J. B., & Loomis, J. B. (2014) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.22004/ag.econ.168258 · Cited by 160
Social Desirability Bias in Real, Hypothetical, and Inferred Valuation Experiments
Norwood, F. B., & Lusk, J. L. (2011) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aaq142 · Cited by 160
Statistical Analysis of Endorsement Experiments: Measuring Support for Militant Groups in Pakistan
Bullock, W., Imai, K., & Shapiro, J. N. (2011) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpr031 · Cited by 157
Shareholder engagement on environmental, social, and governance performance
Barko, T., Cremers, M., & Renneboog, L. (2022) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04850-z · Cited by 143
Procrastination in Preparing for Retirement
Aaron, H. (2010) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5771/9780815705536-125 · Cited by 142
On the Use of Honesty Priming Tasks to Mitigate Hypothetical Bias in Choice Experiments
de‐Magistris, T., Gracía, A., & Nayga, R. M. (2013) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aat052 · Cited by 141
Kanninen, B. J. (2010) · The Economics of non-market goods and resources · doi:10.1007/1-4020-5313-4 · Cited by 136
Distributional preferences and political behavior
Fisman, R. J., Jakiela, P., & Kariv, S. (2017) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2017.08.010 · Cited by 121
Lusk, J. L., & Norwood, F. B. (2009) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2008.12.003 · Cited by 113
Face-Saving or Fair-Minded: What Motivates Moral Behavior?
Cappelen, A. W., Halvorsen, T., Sørensen, E. Ø., & Tungodden, B. (2013) · Journal of the European Economic Association · doi:10.1093/jeea/jvw014 · Cited by 112
From the Lab to the Field: Cooperation among Fishermen
Stoop, J., NOUSSAIR, C. N., & Soest, D. P. V. (2012) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/669253 · Cited by 104
Social preferences and political attitudes: An online experiment on a large heterogeneous sample
Kerschbamer, R., & Müller, D. (2020) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104076 · Cited by 103
Gingerich, D. (2010) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1093/pan/mpq010 · Cited by 97
A Regret-Induced Status Quo Bias
Nicolle, A., Fleming, S. M., Bach, D. R., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5615-10.2011 · Cited by 92
What is the Impact of Financial Advisors on Retirement Portfolio Choices and OutcomesPreprint
Chalmers, J., & Reuter, J. (2012) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2078536 · Cited by 91
Does Realism Matter in Contingent Valuation Surveys?
Cummings, R. G., & Taylor, L. O. (1998) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3147051 · Cited by 91
The Deadweight Loss from Christmas: CommentPreprint
List, J. A., & Shogren, J. F. (1998) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 88
Calibration of Willingness-to-Accept
List, J. A., & Shogren, J. F. (2002) · Journal of Environmental Economics and Management · doi:10.1006/jeem.2000.1182 · Cited by 86
Portfolio Choice and Risk Attitudes: An ExperimentPreprint
Charness, G. B., & Uri Gneezy, B. (2003) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.397300 · Cited by 82
Experimental Evidence of Self-Image Concerns as Motivation for Giving
Tonin, M., & Vlassopoulos, M. (2012) · Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization · doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.011 · Cited by 73
Getting the Rich and Powerful to Give
Kessler, J. B., Milkman, K. L., & Zhang, C. Y. (2019) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.2018.3142 · Cited by 72
Gracía, A., Loureiro, M. L., & Nayga, R. M. (2011) · American Journal of Agricultural Economics · doi:10.1093/ajae/aar054 · Cited by 72
The Empirical Frequency of a Pivotal Vote
Mulligan, C. B., & Hunter, C. G. (2003) · Public Choice · doi:10.1023/a:1024244329828 · Cited by 72
Dimson, E., Karakaş, O., & Li, X. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3209072 · Cited by 70
Making Choice Studies Incentive Compatible
Harrison, G. W. (2006) · The Economics of non-market goods and resources · doi:10.1007/1-4020-5313-4_4 · Cited by 60
Are Actions Regretted More Than Inactions?
Feldman, J. J., Miyamoto, J. M., & Loftus, E. F. (1999) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1999.2833 · Cited by 52
The Role of Time Preferences and Exponential-Growth Bias in Retirement Savings
Goda, G. S., Levy, M., Manchester, C. F., Sojourner, A., & Tasoff, J. (2015) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w21482 · Cited by 51
The Valuation of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Willingness to Pay ExperimentPreprint
Guenster, N. K., Brodback, D., Pouget, S., & Wang, R. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4260824 · Cited by 39
When Investors Call for Climate Responsibility, How Do Mutual Funds Respond?Preprint
Ceccarelli, M., Ramelli, S., & Wagner, A. F. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3353239 · Cited by 31
Shareholder Engagement on Environmental, Social, and Governance PerformancePreprint
Barkó, T., Cremers, M., & Renneboog, L. D. R. (2017) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2977219 · Cited by 22
Why Do the Rich Oppose Redistribution? An Experiment with America’s Top 5%Preprint
Cohn, A., Jessen, L. J., Klašnja, M., & Smeets, P. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3395213 · Cited by 22
Self-citationPension Communication in the Netherlands and Other CountriesPreprint
Debets, S., Prast, H. M., Rossi, M., & van Soest, A. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3284409 · Cited by 16
Talking About the Weather: Availabilty, Affect and the Demand for Green InvestmentsPreprint
Anderson, A., & Robinson, D. T. (2019) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3490730 · Cited by 5
Are animal welfare aspects of relevance in consumers’ purchase decisionPreprint
Klink-Lehmann, J., & Langen, N. (2015) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.18461/pfsd.2015.1528 · Cited by 3
Pension risk preferences: a personalized elicitation method and its impact on asset allocation
van der Lecq, F., Dellaert, B. G. C., Swinkels, L. A. P., & Alserda, G. (2016) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 14
- Anderson,, 2020, Climate fears and the demand for green investment
- Beshears,, 2014, Optimal illiquidity
- Carson,, 2006, Probabilistic influence and supplemental benefits: A field test of the two key assumptions behind using stated preferences
- Donkers,, 2012, Measuring and debiasing consumer pension risk attitudes
- 2016, European SRI Study 2016
- 2018, European SRI Study 2018
- 2020, Philanthropy Report
- 2018, Philanthropy Report
- 2018, Sustainable investing is moving mainstream
- 2017, From ‘why’ to ‘why not’: Sustainable investing as the new normal
- Simons,, 2019, Eerlijk Pensioenlabel. Beoordeling van het duurzaamheidsbeleid van tien Nederlandse pensioenfondsen – pilotstudie
- 2018, Report on sustainable, responsible and impact investing trends
- 2020, Global Pension Assets Study 2020
- 2016, World Values Survey Wave 6 2010–2014
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Barber, B. M., Morse, A., & Yasuda, A. (2021) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.07.008 · Cited by 728
Presidential Address: Sustainable Finance and ESG Issues— Value versus Values
STARKS, L. T. (2023) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.13255 · Cited by 474
Do Investors Care about Impact?
Heeb, F., Kölbel, J. F., Paetzold, F., & Zeisberger, S. (2023) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhac066 · Cited by 332
Broccardo, E., Hart, O., & Zingales, L. (2020) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/720516 · Cited by 327
The role of artificial intelligence in sustainable finance
Al-Sartawi, A. M. A. M., Hussainey, K., & Razzaque, A. (2022) · Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment · doi:10.1080/20430795.2022.2057405 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Bauer, R., Ruof, T., & Smeets, P.
- Affiliations
- Maastricht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Smeets, Paul
- Venue
- The Review of Financial Studies
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2021-04-19
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3976-4043
- ISSN
- 0893-9454 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-7368
- OpenAlex
- W3155804760
- Cited by
- 552
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 90 · 2025: 118 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 35
- FWCI
- 64.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Review of Financial Studies (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Network for Studies on Pensions, Aging and Retirement
- Strong
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (016.Veni.175.019, 016.Veni, 451-16-005)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Finance › Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
- Keywords
- sustainable investment, pension funds, Sustainable Development Goals, shareholder engagement, social preferences, individual preferences, ESG investing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
