Cited by 27Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Available alternative incentives modulate anticipatory nucleus accumbens activation

Open access
Cooper, Jeffrey C., Hollon, Nick G., Wimmer, G. Elliott, Knutson, Brian·2009·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

A reward or punishment can seem better or worse depending on what else might have happened. Little is known, however, about how neural representations of an anticipated incentive might be influenced by the available alternatives. We used event-related FMRI to investigate the activation in the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), while we varied the available alternative incentives in a monetary incentive delay task. Some task blocks included only uncertain gains and losses; others included the same uncertain gains and losses intermixed with certain gains and losses. The availability of certain gains and losses increased NAcc activation for uncertain losses and decreased the difference between uncertain gains and losses. We suggest that this pattern of activation can result from reference point changes across blocks, and that the worst available loss may serve as an important anchor for NAcc activation. These findings imply that NAcc activation represents anticipated incentive value relative to the current context of available alternative gains and losses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsp031

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The neuroimaging literature is profoundly inconsistent on the role of the striatum in aversive learning, with some studies reporting increased VS activity in aversive contexts and others reporting decreased activity.

    “the neuroimaging literature is profoundly inconsistent on this point, with some studies reporting increased VS activity in aversive contexts (Figure 2c) [62–64] and others reporting decreasing activity in this area during the prediction, learning, and receipt of aversive outcomes [65,66].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brett, M., Anton, J.-L., Valabregue, R., Poline, J.-B. (2002). Region of interest analysis using an SPM toolbox (abstract). Presented at 8th International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain. Sendai, Japan.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, J. C., Hollon, N. G., Wimmer, G. E., & Knutson, B.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2009-10-20
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
409-416
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2144886479
Cited by
27
References
37
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0748915)
  • National Institutes of Health (5t32mh020006-19)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH020006), 5T32 MH020006, 5T32MH020006-10)
  • Division of Graduate Education
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
nucleus accumbens, monetary incentive delay task, reward and punishment, uncertainty, loss, incentive salience
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Brain Mapping, Cues, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Nucleus Accumbens, Oxygen, Reaction Time, Reinforcement Schedule, Reward, Time Factors, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review