Cited by 117Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Mothers know best: redirecting adolescent reward sensitivity toward safe behavior during risk taking

Open access
Telzer, Eva H., Ichien, Nicholas T., Qu, Yang·2015·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Abstract

Despite being one of the healthiest developmental periods, morbidity and mortality rates increase dramatically during adolescence, largely due to preventable, risky behaviors. Heightened reward sensitivity, coupled with ineffective cognitive control, has been proposed to underlie adolescents' risk taking. In this study, we test whether reward sensitivity can be redirected to promote safe behavior. Adolescents completed a risk-taking task in the presence of their mother and alone during fMRI. Adolescents demonstrated reduced risk-taking behavior when their mothers were present compared with alone, which was associated with greater recruitment of the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) when making safe decisions, decreased activation in the ventral striatum following risky decisions and greater functional coupling between the ventral striatum and VLPFC when making safe decisions. Importantly, the very same neural circuitry (i.e. ventral striatum) that has been linked to greater risk-taking can also be redirected toward thoughtful, more deliberative and safe decisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsv026

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In adolescents, the presence of a caregiver during a risky decision task decreased risky choices and increased activation in control regions including vlPFC and mPFC, and decreased ventral striatum and amygdala activation.

    “Similarly, in the reward domain, the presence of a caregiver during a risky decision task decreased risky choices and increased activation in control regions including vlPFC and mPFC, and decreased ventral striatum and amygdala activation in adolescents [50].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Telzer, E. H., Ichien, N. T., & Qu, Y.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Department of Psychology and
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2015-03-09
Volume
10
Issue
10
Pages
1383-1391
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2004445171
Cited by
117
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 4
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (1459719)
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA039923)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
adolescent risk-taking, reward sensitivity, maternal presence, ventral striatum, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, cognitive control, risk-taking, parental influence
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Mothers, Reward, Risk-Taking, Prefrontal Cortex, Ventral Striatum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review