Cited by 196Impact of Technology on AdolescentsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Peer Influence via Instagram: Effects on Brain and Behavior in Adolescence and Young Adulthood

Open access
Sherman, Lauren E, Greenfield, Patricia M, Hernandez, Leanna M, Dapretto, Mirella·2018·Child Development

Abstract

Mobile social media often feature the ability to "Like" content posted by others. This study examined the effect of Likes on youths' neural and behavioral responses to photographs. High school and college students (N = 61, ages 13-21) viewed theirs and others' Instagram photographs while undergoing functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). Participants more often Liked photographs that appeared to have received many (vs. few) Likes. Popular photographs elicited greater activity in multiple brain regions, including the nucleus accumbens (NAcc), a hub of the brain's reward circuitry. NAcc responsivity increased with age for high school but not college students. When viewing images depicting risk-taking (vs. nonrisky photographs), high school students, but not college students, showed decreased activation of neural regions implicated in cognitive control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.12838

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Instagram users' own pictures presented with many Likes elicit stronger activity in the ventral striatum than pictures with few Likes.

    “The power of such feedback has also been proven neuroscientifically, when Instagram users are confronted with their own posted pictures from their account which were manipulated by being presented either with many or few ‘Likes’ (in this case hearts [74]). Pictures being presented with many Likes elicit stronger activity in the ventral striatum, an area involved of the processing of a rewards [74,”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hu Y Manikonda L Kambhampati S 2014 6 What We Instagram: A First Analysis of Instagram Photo Content and User Types Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sherman, L. E., Greenfield, P. M., Hernandez, L. M., & Dapretto, M.
Affiliations
  • Temple University (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Sherman, Lauren E
Venue
Child Development
Published
2018-01-01
Volume
89
Issue
1
Pages
37-47
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2625713807
Cited by
196
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
45.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (F31 DA038578-01A1, F31 DA038578‐01A1)
  • National Center for Research Resources (C06RR012169, C06RR015431, S10OD011939)
  • Brain Mapping Medical Research Organization, Brain Mapping Support Foundation
  • Pierson- Lovelace Foundation
  • The Ahmanson Foundation, Capital Group Companies Charitable Foundation
  • William M. and Linda R. Dietel Philanthropic Fund
  • Northstar Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
Instagram, peer influence, adolescents, young adults, nucleus accumbens, reward processing, risk-taking, cognitive control, age differences
MeSH terms
Facial Recognition, Peer Influence, Adolescent, Adult, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Photography, Risk-Taking, Social Behavior, Social Perception, Young Adult, Executive Function, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review