Cited by 30Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Salience network dynamics underlying successful resistance of temptation

Open access
Steimke, Rosa, Nomi, Jason S, Calhoun, Vince D, Stelzel, Christine, Paschke, Lena M, Gaschler, Robert, Goschke, Thomas, Walter, Henrik +1 more·2017·Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Self-control and the ability to resist temptation are critical for successful completion of long-term goals. Contemporary models in cognitive neuroscience emphasize the primary role of prefrontal cognitive control networks in aligning behavior with such goals. Here, we use gaze pattern analysis and dynamic functional connectivity fMRI data to explore how individual differences in the ability to resist temptation are related to intrinsic brain dynamics of the cognitive control and salience networks. Behaviorally, individuals exhibit greater gaze distance from target location (e.g. higher distractibility) during presentation of tempting erotic images compared with neutral images. Individuals whose intrinsic dynamic functional connectivity patterns gravitate toward configurations in which salience detection systems are less strongly coupled with visual systems resist tempting distractors more effectively. The ability to resist tempting distractors was not significantly related to intrinsic dynamics of the cognitive control network. These results suggest that susceptibility to temptation is governed in part by individual differences in salience network dynamics and provide novel evidence for involvement of brain systems outside canonical cognitive control networks in contributing to individual differences in self-control.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/scan/nsx123

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Intrinsic dynamics of the M-CIN, but not the L-FPN, relate to individual differences in distractibility in neurotypical adults.

    “For example, intrinsic dynamics of the M-CIN (but not the L-FPN) have been shown to relate to individual differences in distractibility in neurotypical adults84.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Calhoun V., Adali T., Pearlson G., Pekar J. (2001). A method for making group inferences using independent component analysis of functional mri data: exploring the visual system. Neuroimage, 13(6), S88 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(01)91431-4 PMC6871952 11559959 · DOI
  2. Schönbrodt F.D., Perugini M. (2013). At what sample size do correlations stabilize?. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(5), 609– 12.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Steimke, R., Nomi, J. S., Calhoun, V. D., Stelzel, C., Paschke, L. M., Gaschler, R., Goschke, T., Walter, H., & Uddin, L. Q.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • Mind Research Network (US)
  • Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE)
  • FernUniversität in Hagen (DE)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Corresponding author
Steimke, Rosa
Venue
Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
Published
2017-10-18
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
1928-1939
ISSN
  • 1749-5016 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-5024
OpenAlex
W2952732530
Cited by
30
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • NIH (2R01EB005846, P20GM103472, and R01EB020407)
  • NSF (#1539067)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
resistance to temptation, self-control, salience network, dynamic functional connectivity, cognitive control network, individual differences, distractibility, gaze patterns, erotic images, long-term goal pursuit
MeSH terms
Adult, Attention, Brain Mapping, Cognition, Cues, Ego, Female, Humans, Impulsive Behavior, Individuality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Nerve Net, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Substantia Nigra, Prefrontal Cortex, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review