Cited by 850Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentMental Health Treatment and Access

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening for Adolescent Depression: A Comparison of Depression Scales

Open access
ROBERTS, ROBERT E., LEWINSOHN, PETER M., SEELEY, JOHN R.·1991·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

The ability of two depression scales, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), to identify cases of DSM-III-R major depression and dysthymia was investigated in a large, community sample of high school students. Receiver operating characteristics analyses indicated that different caseness criteria should be used for boys and girls for both the CES-D and the BDI. Internal consistency-reliability and sensitivity and specificity for detecting current episodes of current depression and dysthymia were adequate and comparable to those found with adult samples, but both the CES-D and the BDI generated many false positives. Multiple screening using the "serial" strategy increased positive predictive power substantially for both the CES-D and the BDI, whereas using the "parallel" strategy had very little effect on the efficacy of the two screeners. The results indicate that neither the BDI nor the CES-D should be used by themselves as methods for case ascertainment in either epidemiological or experimental studies, although the BDI does function somewhat better than the CES-D as a screener.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00004583-199101000-00009

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 1987, Special Section: structured diagnostic interviews for children and adolescents, J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 26, 611

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
ROBERTS, R. E., LEWINSOHN, P. M., & SEELEY, J. R.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
  • Oregon Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
ROBERTS, ROBERT E.
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-01
Volume
30
Issue
1
Pages
58-66
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053115639
Cited by
850
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 40
FWCI
18.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH040501, MH40501)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
adolescent depression, depression screening, CES-D, Beck Depression Inventory, major depressive disorder, dysthymia, high school students, false positives, positive predictive value, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Tests, Psychometrics, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review