Cited by 50Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Meditation or Medication? Mindfulness training versus medication in the treatment of childhood ADHD: a randomized controlled trial.

Open access
Meppelink, Renée, de Bruin, Esther I., Bögels, Susan M.·2016·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Attention-Deficit-Hyperactivity-Disorder (ADHD) is, with a prevalence of 5 %, a highly common childhood disorder, and has severe impact on the lives of youngsters and their families. Medication is often the treatment of choice, as it currently is most effective. However, medication has only short-term effects, treatment adherence is often low and most importantly; medication has serious side effects. Therefore, there is a need for other interventions for youngsters with ADHD. Mindfulness training is emerging as a potentially effective training for children and adolescents with ADHD. The aim of this study is to compare the (cost) effectiveness of mindfulness training to the (cost) effectiveness of methylphenidate in children with ADHD on measures of attention and hyperactivity/impulsivity. METHODS/DESIGN: A multicenter randomized controlled trial with 2 follow-up measurements will be used to measure the effects of mindfulness training versus the effects of methylphenidate. Participants will be youngsters (aged 9 to 18) of both sexes diagnosed with ADHD, referred to urban and rural mental healthcare centers. We aim to include 120 families. The mindfulness training, using the MYmind protocol, will be conducted in small groups, and consists of 8 weekly 1.5-h sessions. Youngsters learn to focus and enhance their attention, awareness, and self-control by doing mindfulness exercises. Parents will follow a parallel mindful parenting training in which they learn to be fully present in the here and now with their child in a non-judgmental way, to take care of themselves, and to respond rather than react to difficult behavior of their child. Short-acting methylphenidate will be administered individually and monitored by a child psychiatrist. Assessments will take place at pre-test, post-test, and at follow-up 1 and 2 (respectively 4 and 10 months after the start of treatment). Informants are parents, children, teachers, and researchers. DISCUSSION: This study will inform mental health care professionals and health insurance companies about the clinical and cost effectiveness of mindfulness training for children and adolescents with ADHD and their parents compared to the effectiveness of methylphenidate. Limitations and several types of bias that are anticipated for this study are discussed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register: NTR4206 . Registered 11 October 2013.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-016-0978-3

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 103 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [21]National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK) Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: The NICE Guideline on diagnosis and management of ADHD in children, young people and adults 2009 Leicester The British Psychological Society & The Royal College of Psychiatrists 22420012
  2. [99]West AM Mindfulness and well-being in adolescence: An exploration of four mindfulness measures with an adolescent sample. Doctoral Dissertation 2008 Michigan Central Michigan University

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meppelink, R., de Bruin, E. I., & Bögels, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Amsterdam (NL)
Corresponding author
Meppelink, Renée
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2016-07-26
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
267-267
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2498089109
Cited by
50
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • World Health Organization
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (406-13-039)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, childhood ADHD, mindfulness training, methylphenidate, cost-effectiveness, mindful parenting, hyperactivity/impulsivity, attention, non-pharmacological treatment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Clinical Protocols, Female, Humans, Male, Methylphenidate, Parents, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review