Cited by 339Gut microbiota and healthInfant Nutrition and HealthProbiotics and Fermented Foods

Prenatal Stress Alters Bacterial Colonization of the Gut in Infant Monkeys

Open access
Bailey, Michael T., Lubach, Gabriele R., Coe, Christopher L.·2004·Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition

Abstract

Objective The hypothesis that prenatal stress lowers the levels of protective microflora and increases the risk for postpartum Gram-negative pathogens was tested in infant monkeys. Methods Female monkeys were left undisturbed or were stressed during pregnancy using an acoustical startle paradigm for 6 weeks either early or late in their 24-week gestation. Several types of intestinal microflora were repeatedly enumerated by fecal culture while infants were reared normally by their mothers. Results Significant changes in microflora concentrations occurred during the first 6 months of life. The profile of total aerobes and facultative anaerobes was biphasic, with peak concentrations occurring between 2 and 16 weeks of age. The numbers of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli were low at 2 days after birth but rapidly increased to a peak between 8 and 16 weeks of age. Although similar temporal patterns were evident in all infants, prenatal stress reduced the overall numbers of bifidobacteria and lactobacilli. Conclusions Moderate disturbance during pregnancy was sufficient to alter the intestinal microflora in the newborn infant. These alterations could result in enhanced susceptibility to infection and suggest a mechanism for some effects of maternal pregnancy conditions on infant health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005176-200404000-00009

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Both prenatal and postnatal stress were associated with transient reductions in the levels of the enteric microbiota in rhesus monkeys.

    “Both pre natal17 and postnatal stress16 were associated with transient reductions in the levels of the enteric microbiota in rhesus monkeys.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bailey, M. T., Lubach, G. R., & Coe, C. L.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Bailey, Michael T.
Venue
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-04
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
414-421
ISSN
0277-2116 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2057396462
Cited by
339
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 12
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5f31mh012458-03, AI46521)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 12458)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01AI046521, AI46521)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
prenatal stress, gut microbiota, intestinal colonization, infant monkeys, Bifidobacterium, lactobacilli, Gram-negative pathogens, maternal stress, fecal microbiota
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Newborn, Bacteria, Aerobic, Bacteria, Anaerobic, Bacterial Adhesion, Bifidobacterium, Feces, Female, Hydrocortisone, Lactobacillus, Macaca mulatta, Male, Pregnancy, Stem Cells, Stress, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review