Cited by 371Treatment of Major DepressionAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Impact of pain on depression treatment response in primary care

Bair, Matthew J., Robinson, Rebecca L., Eckert, George J., Stang, Paul E., Croghan, Thomas W., Kroenke, Kurt·2004·Psychosomatic Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Pain commonly coexists with depression, but its impact on treatment outcomes has not been well studied. Therefore, we prospectively evaluated the impact of comorbid pain on depression treatment response and health-related quality of life. METHODS: We analyzed data from the ARTIST study, a randomized controlled trial with naturalistic follow-up conducted in 37 primary care clinics. Participants were 573 clinically depressed patients randomized to one of three selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressants: fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline. Depression as assessed by the Symptom Checklist-20 (SCL-20) was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included pain and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Pain was reported by more than two thirds of depressed patients at baseline, with the severity of pain mild in 25% of patients, moderate in 30%, and severe in 14%. After 3 months of antidepressant therapy, 24% of patients had a poor depression treatment response (ie, SCL-20 >1.3). Multivariate odds ratios for poor treatment response were 1.5 (95% confidence interval, 0.8-3.2) for mild pain, 2.0 (1.1-4.0) for moderate pain, and 4.1 (1.9-8.8) for severe pain compared with those without pain. Increasing pain severity also had an adverse impact on outcomes in multiple domains of health-related quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Pain is present in two thirds of depressed primary care patients begun on antidepressant therapy, and the severity of pain is a strong predictor of poor depression and health-related quality of life outcomes at 3 months. Better recognition, assessment, and treatment of comorbid pain may enhance outcomes of depression therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.psy.0000106883.94059.c5

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bair, M. J., Robinson, R. L., Eckert, G. J., Stang, P. E., Croghan, T. W., & Kroenke, K.
Affiliations
  • Regenstrief Institute (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Psychosomatic Medicine
Published
2004-01
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
17-22
ISSN
0033-3174 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080747491
Cited by
371
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 22
FWCI
10.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychosomatic Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
pain, depression, comorbidities, antidepressant response, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, health-related quality of life, pain intensity, primary care, artist study
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Depressive Disorder, Female, Fluoxetine, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Quality of Life, Treatment Failure, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Paroxetine, Sertraline

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review