Cited by 57Treatment of Major DepressionMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationHealth and Well-being Studies

Depression and pain impair daily functioning and quality of life in patients with major depressive disorder

Lin, Ching-Hua, Yen, Yung-Chieh, Chen, Ming-Chao, Chen, Cheng-Chung·2014·Journal of Affective Disorders

Abstract

Background Depression and pain frequently occur together. The objective of this study was to investigate the effects of depression and pain on the impairment of daily functioning and quality of life (QOL) of depressed patients.Methods We enrolled 131 acutely ill inpatients with major depressive disorder. Depression, pain, and daily functioning were assessed using the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Body Pain Index, and the Work and Social Adjustment Scale. Health-related QOL was assessed using three primary domains of the SF-36: social functioning, vitality, and general health perceptions. Pearson׳s correlation and structural equation modeling were used to examine relationships among the study variables. Five models were proposed.Results In all, 129 patients completed all the measures. Model 5, both depression and pain impaired daily functioning and QOL, was the most fitted structural equation model (χ(2)=9.2, df=8, p=0.33, GFI=0.98, AGFI=0.94, TLI=0.99, CFI=0.99, RMSEA=0.03). The correlation between pain and depression was weak (r=-0.27, z=-2.95, p=0.003).Limitation This was a cross-sectional study with a small sample size.Conclusion Depression and pain exert a direct influence on the impairment of daily functioning and QOL of depressed patients; this impairment could be expected regardless of increased pain, depression, or both pain and depression. Pain had a somewhat separate entity from depression.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.039

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, C.-H., Yen, Y.-C., Chen, M.-C., & Chen, C.-C.
Affiliations
  • Kaohsiung Medical University (TW)
  • E-Da Hospital (TW)
Corresponding author
Chen, Cheng-Chung
Venue
Journal of Affective Disorders
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-09
Volume
166
Pages
173-178
ISSN
0165-0327 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2008456432
Cited by
57
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Affective Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
major depressive disorder, pain, daily functioning, quality of life, comorbidities, work and social adjustment, social functioning, vitality, hospitalized patients
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Health Status, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Quality of Life, Social Adjustment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review