Cited by 209Eating Disorders and BehaviorsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

Food addiction: true or false?

Corsica, Joyce A, Pelchat, Marcia L·2010·Current Opinion in Gastroenterology

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Food addiction has been implicated as a putative causal factor in chronic overeating, binge eating, and obesity. The concept of food addiction has been controversial historically due to definitional and conceptual difficulties and to a lack of rigorous scientific data. RECENT FINDINGS: Support for the food addiction hypothesis comes from alterations in neurochemistry (dopamine, endogenous opioids), neuroanatomy (limbic system), and self-medication behaviors. Foods identified as having potential addictive properties include sweets, carbohydrates, fats, sweet/fat combinations, and possibly processed and/or high salt foods. Eating topography has been identified as a necessary factor in neural pathway changes that promote addiction-like properties in response to some foods. A recently developed food addiction scale shows promise in identifying food addiction. SUMMARY: Recent findings have strengthened the case for food addiction. These findings may serve to validate the perception of food addiction in patients and inform psychoeducational, cognitive-behavioral, and/or pharmacological treatment for chronic food cravings, compulsive overeating, and binge eating that may represent a phenotype of obesity. Screening for food addiction has the potential to identify people with eating difficulties that seriously compromise weight management efforts. Future research should include a focus on human food addiction research; evaluating the impact of treatment on underlying neurochemistry; and prevention or reversal of food addiction in humans.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/mog.0b013e328336528d

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The human response to food is complex and influenced by palatability, availability, eating topography, visual appeal, economics, incentives, social routines, alternative reinforcement, and advertisements.

    “the response to foods in humans, is far more complex, and is influenced not just by its palatability but also by its availability (the patterns of restriction plus overeating, referred to as the eating topography (16)), its visual appeal, economics and incentives (i.e., ‘super sizing’ offers, soda combos), social routines for eating, alternative reinforcement and advertisements (17).”

    From Obesity and addiction: Neurobiological overlaps (2013) · cites this paper as [16]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Corsica, J. A., & Pelchat, M. L.
Affiliations
Rush University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Corsica, Joyce A
Venue
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology
Published
2010-03
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
165-169
ISSN
0267-1379 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063756488
Cited by
209
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 24
FWCI
19.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Gastroenterology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
food addiction, binge eating, compulsive eating, obesity, dopamine, endogenous opioids, limbic system, self-medication, food cravings, weight management, neurochemistry
MeSH terms
Feeding and Eating Disorders, Bulimia, Feeding Behavior, Female, Food, Humans, Male, Obesity, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Behavior, Addictive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review