Cited by 103Primate Behavior and EcologyEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Prosocial behaviour emerges independent of reciprocity in cottontop tamarins

Open access
Cronin, Katherine A., Schroeder, Kori K. E., Snowdon, Charles T.·2010·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

Abstract

The cooperative breeding hypothesis posits that cooperatively breeding species are motivated to act prosocially, that is, to behave in ways that provide benefits to others, and that cooperative breeding has played a central role in the evolution of human prosociality. However, investigations of prosocial behaviour in cooperative breeders have produced varying results and the mechanisms contributing to this variation are unknown. We investigated whether reciprocity would facilitate prosocial behaviour among cottontop tamarins, a cooperatively breeding primate species likely to engage in reciprocal altruism, by comparing the number of food rewards transferred to partners who had either immediately previously provided or denied rewards to the subject. Subjects were also tested in a non-social control condition. Overall, results indicated that reciprocity increased food transfers. However, temporal analyses revealed that when the tamarins' behaviour was evaluated in relation to the non-social control, results were best explained by (i) an initial depression in the transfer of rewards to partners who recently denied rewards, and (ii) a prosocial effect that emerged late in sessions independent of reciprocity. These results support the cooperative breeding hypothesis, but suggest a minimal role for positive reciprocity, and emphasize the importance of investigating proximate temporal mechanisms underlying prosocial behaviour.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rspb.2010.0879

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Untreated marmosets, tamarins, and capuchins have each demonstrated some form of spontaneous other-regarding preferences toward familiar partners.

    “Untreated marmosets (Burkart et al., 2007), tamarins (Cronin et al., 2010), and capuchins (Lakshminarayanan and Santos, 2008) have each demonstrated some form of spontaneous other-regarding preferences toward familiar partners”

    From Neuropeptide diversity and the regulation of social behavior in New World primates (2016) · cites this paper as Cronin et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cronin, K. A., Schroeder, K. K. E., & Snowdon, C. T.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2010-07-14
Volume
277
Issue
1701
Pages
3845-3851
ISSN
  • 0080-4649 (ISSN-L)
  • 0962-8452
  • 1471-2954
OpenAlex
W2101300059
Cited by
103
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 21
FWCI
15.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
prosocial behavior, reciprocity, reciprocal altruism, food sharing, primate social behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Female, Male, Random Allocation, Saguinus, Social Behavior, Video Recording, Linear Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review