Cited by 6Philosophy and Theoretical ScienceEmbodied and Extended CognitionPhilosophy and History of Science

The value of consciousness: experiences worth having

Open access
Moncoucy, Léa, Dołęga, Krzysztof, Tallon-Baudry, Catherine, Cleeremans, Axel·2025·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

DC. Dennett (2020,personal communication) asked: ‘How do we go from doing things for reasons to having reasons for doing things?’. This question targets a fundamental shift in nature: while all organisms act in the way they do for reasons that are shaped by extrinsic evolutionary cost functions, some also act for reasons of their own, even engaging in behaviour that may be detrimental to their own existence. For such organisms, we argue, phenomenal experience—what it feels like—has intrinsic value. Here, we elaborate on the perspective developed by Axel Cleeremans and Catherine Tallon-Baudry (Cleeremans, Tallon-Baudry 2022 Neurosci. Conscious , 2022 , niac007. (doi: 10.1093/nc/niac007 )) and defend the claim that phenomenal experience broadens an organism’s ability to act in a manner that is not merely responsive to the objective value of an extrinsic evolutionary cost function but is also shaped by the preference-driven subjective value associated with items, situations, events or other agents. Importantly, we argue that the intrinsic value of subjective experience cannot always be reduced to other forms of extrinsic values, because subjective value can act not only as a driver of behaviour, but also as a target for behaviour. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolutionary functions of consciousness’.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2024.0303

Cites

54 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Respondents may view consciousness positively, thus preferentially attributing it to entities, including AI, when uncertain to provide what they perceive as a socially agreeable, expected answer.

    “Respondents may also view consciousness positively (Moncoucy et al., 2025), thus preferentially attributing it to entities, including AI, when uncertain to provide what they perceive as a socially agreeable, expected answer (Steenkamp et al., 2010).”

    From Are Attributions of Consciousness to AI Chatbots Epistemically Innocent? (2026) · cites this paper as Moncoucy et al., 2025

    The Introduction (page unavailable) describes phenomenal experience as intrinsically valuable to the conscious subject, which supports a positive valuation of conscious experience. It does not examine whether respondents view consciousness itself positively. The claims about attributing consciousness to AI and giving a socially agreeable answer are attached to a different citation in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. [2]Armstrong D. 1968 A materialist theory of the mind. London, UK: Routledge.
  2. [3]Lycan W. 1996 Consciousness and experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  3. [5]Rosenthal DM. 2012 Awareness and identification of self. In Consciousness and the self: new essays (eds L JeeLoo, J Perry), pp. 22– 50. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  4. [23]Mitchell KJ. 2023 Free agents. how evolution gave us free will. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  5. [26]Chalmers D. 1996 The conscious mind: in search of a fundamental theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  6. [30]Staddon JER. 1983 Adaptive behavior and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  7. [47]Dickinson A, Balleine B. 2010 Hedonics: the cognitive–motivational interface. In Pleasures of the brain (eds ML Kringelbach, AC Berridge), pp. 74– 84. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  8. [51]Millikan R. 1984 Language, thought and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  9. [61]Metzinger T. 2008 Empirical perspectives from the self-model theory of subjectivity: a brief summary with examples. In Progress in brain research, vol. 168 (eds B Rahul, KC Bikas), pp. 215– 246. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. 18166398
  10. [64]Moncoucy L, Dolega K. Unknown pleasures: do we have evidence for unconscious, positively valenced hedonic states? SSRN 19– 23. (10.2139/ssrn.5296974) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moncoucy, L., Dołęga, K., Tallon-Baudry, C., & Cleeremans, A.
Affiliations
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • INSERM-ENS, Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory
Corresponding author
Cleeremans, Axel
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2025-11-13
Volume
380
Issue
1939
Pages
20240303-20240303
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W4416188548
Cited by
6
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3
FWCI
6.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
H2020 European Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
phenomenal consciousness, subjective value, extrinsic value, reasons for action
MeSH terms
Consciousness, Biological Evolution, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review