The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 100 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Human empathy through the lens of social neuroscience.
Open accessAbstract
Empathy is the ability to experience and understand what others feel without confusion between oneself and others. Knowing what someone else is feeling plays a fundamental role in interpersonal interactions. In this paper, we articulate evidence from social psychology and cognitive neuroscience, and argue that empathy involves both emotion sharing (bottom-up information processing) and executive control to regulate and modulate this experience (top-down information processing), underpinned by specific and interacting neural systems. Furthermore, awareness of a distinction between the experiences of the self and others constitutes a crucial aspect of empathy. We discuss data from recent behavioral and functional neuroimaging studies with an emphasis on the perception of pain in others, and highlight the role of different neural mechanisms that underpin the experience of empathy, including emotion sharing, perspective taking, and emotion regulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Intact ability to distinguish between the self and other then allows the observer to attribute the emotional state to the observed individual, thereby reducing personal distress, and giving rise to empathic concern (Bird and Viding, 2014; Coll, Viding, et al., 2017; Davis, 1980; Decety and Lamm, 2006; Moriguchi et al., 2007b).”
From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Decety and Lamm, 2006
In the citing paper
“A growing number of neuroimaging studies reliably documents that witnessing pain in others activates a similar network as the first-hand experience of pain [12], [34 for reviews].”
From What are you feeling? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the modulation of sensory and affective responses during empathy for pain (2007) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn755 · Cited by 12,881 · cited 1×
“In a number of studies (see [69], for review), it has been demonstrated that the right TPJ is specifically activated when subjects focusing their attention on a certain screen location are presented with a stimulus at a nonattended location, representing a violation of their expectancy and requiring them to redirect t…”
BackgroundThe emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
Gross, J. J. (1998) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.271 · Cited by 9,916 · cited 1×
“Various strategies have been identified to regulate emotions by means of top-down cognitive control[75].”
BackgroundLeDoux, J. E. (2000) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155 · Cited by 8,444
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144230 · Cited by 7,433 · cited 1×
“Electrophysiological recordings in monkeys as well as neuroimaging experiments in humans have shown that the observation of actions performed by others activates cortical motor representations in the self (see [17] for review).”
BackgroundHow do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiological condition of the body
Craig, A. D. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn894 · Cited by 6,006 · cited 1×
“This system includes the insula and medial cingulate cortices[81] and codes the affective and motivational dimensions of pain.”
BackgroundThe cognitive control of emotion
OCHSNER, K., & GROSS, J. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.03.010 · Cited by 4,495 · cited 1×
“Heuristically, these processes have been arranged on a continuum from attentional control to cognitive change[76].”
Background(2001) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511546396 · Cited by 4,482
(2000) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-109890-2.x5027-6 · Cited by 4,453
Empathy: its ultimate and proximate bases
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x02000018 · Cited by 4,126 · cited 2×
“Besides, empathy has evolved as an in-group phenomena[9].”
BackgroundEmpathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1093535 · Cited by 3,929
Flagged first, then by citations
4 of the 100 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Ickes, W. (1997) Empathic Accuracy. The Guilford Press, New York.
- Batson, C.D. (2006) Folly bridges. In Bridging Social Psychology. van Lange, P.A.M., Ed. Erlbaum, Mahwah. pp. 59-64.
- Russell, J. (1996) Agency and Its Role in Mental Development. Psychology Press, Hove.
- Ickes, W., Ed. The Guilford Press, New York. pp. 144-168.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lamm, C., Decety, J., & Singer, T. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.014 · Cited by 2,016
“However, many models of empathy assume an important role of mimicry and emotional contagion and regard these two phenomena as interacting (see Singer and Lamm, 2009, for clarification of terms, and Decety and Lamm, 2006; Preston and de Waal, 2002).”
Self-citationThe social neuroscience of empathy
Singer, T., & Lamm, C. (2009) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04418.x · Cited by 1,981
“Decety and Lamm (2006), for example, proposed a model in which bottom-up (i.e., direct matching between perception and action) and top-down (i.e., regulation, contextual appraisal, and control) information processes are fundamentally intertwined in the generation and modulation of empathy.”
BackgroundInfluentialEmpathy: A Review of the Concept
Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S., Taylor, L. M., & Howat, D. (2014) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073914558466 · Cited by 1,708
“In particular, this distinction is what separates empathy from emotional contagion (Decety & Lamm, 2006; de Vignemont & Singer, 2006; Gerdes et al., 2010; Scheler, cited in Ickes, 2003).”
BackgroundThe Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspective-taking and Cognitive Appraisal
Lamm, C., Batson, C. D., & Decety, J. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.42 · Cited by 1,464
“It was thus important to demonstrate both the similarities in the neural networks underlying the sharing of pain with others and the specific mechanisms that permit distinguishing the self from others, which is critical for the experience of empathy (Decety & Hodges, 2006; Decety & Lamm, 2006; Decety, 2005).”
BackgroundA common role of insula in feelings, empathy and uncertainty
Singer, T., Critchley, H. D., & Preuschoff, K. (2009) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.05.001 · Cited by 1,270
Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2007) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858407304654 · Cited by 1,044
“Both empathy and theory of mind involve an ability to simultaneously distinguish between different possible perspectives on the same situation (Decety and Jackson 2004; Decety and Lamm 2006).”
BackgroundIs there a core neural network in empathy? an fMRI based quantitative meta-analysis
Fan, Y., Duncan, N. W., de Greck, M., & Northoff, G. (2011) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.009 · Cited by 902
Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C. D., & Singer, T. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.09.003 · Cited by 821
Empathic brain responses in insula are modulated by levels of alexithymia but not autism
Bird, G., Silani, G., Brindley, R., White, S., Frith, U., & Singer, T. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq060 · Cited by 655
“2009), at least two different routes to the understanding of other minds can be distinguished: our ability to understand the abstract beliefs and intentions of others, which is referred to as Theory of Mind, cognitive perspective taking or mentalizing (Premack and Woodruff, 1978; Frith and Frith, 2003) and our ability…”
BackgroundInfluentialI feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and its modulation
Hein, G., & Singer, T. (2008) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2008.07.012 · Cited by 607
“Accumulating evidence has put forward the view that there are at least two different routes to put us in the shoes (the mind) of the other person [1–6].”
From emotion resonance to empathic understanding: A social developmental neuroscience account
Decety, J., & Meyer, M. (2008) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579408000503 · Cited by 597
“Recent data from cognitive neuroscience also offer new insights regarding the neural mechanisms and brain areas that underpin empathy (Decety & Jackson, 2004, 2006; Decety & Lamm, 2006; Leiberg & Anders, 2006).”
BackgroundThe role of anterior insular cortex in social emotions
Lamm, C., & Singer, T. (2010) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0251-3 · Cited by 566
Self-citationPhysicians down-regulate their pain empathy response: An event-related brain potential study
Jean Decety, A., Yang, C.-Y., & Cheng, Y. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.025 · Cited by 532
“The dynamics of this evoked response are consistent with the two-stage model of empathy for pain, as evidenced by clear demarcations in the time course, scalp distribution, and functional in aspects of time course, scalp distribution, and functional significance (Decety, 2007; Decety and Lamm, 2006; Decety and Meyer,…”
BackgroundResultWilkinson, H., Whittington, R., Perry, L., & Eames, C. (2017) · Burnout Research · doi:10.1016/j.burn.2017.06.003 · Cited by 509
“Theoretically and conceptually, empathy has seen much attention in the philosophical, psychological, and more recently, cognitive neuroscience literature, with varying definitions and conceptualizations (Decety & Lamm, 2006).”
BackgroundDecety, J., & Moriguchi, Y. (2007) · BioPsychoSocial Medicine · doi:10.1186/1751-0759-1-22 · Cited by 497
“However, subcortical systems do not lose their basic function, they may give up some of their autonomy in terms of the degree to which higher cortical systems can modulate their functions or regulate the emotional experience (adapted from [168–170]).”
BackgroundSocial Functionality of Human Emotion
Niedenthal, P. M., & Bräuer, M. (2011) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131605 · Cited by 531
“How we might do so requires consideration of the cognitive components of empathy, which may be said to be unique to humans and other primates (Decety & Lamm 2006, de Waal 2008).”
BackgroundExpertise modulates the perception of pain in others
Cheng, Y., Lin, C.-P., Liu, H.-L., Hsu, Y.-Y., Lim, K.-E., Hung, D., & Decety, J. (2007) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2007.09.020 · Cited by 477
“We further predicted an enhanced self-other distinction in the expert group, represented neurally as additional activation of the right temporoparietal junction, an area known to play a crucial role in self-other distinction processes and theory of mind [2, 4].”
BackgroundInfluentialEmpathy and Judging Other's Pain: An fMRI Study of Alexithymia
Moriguchi, Y., Decety, J., Ohnishi, T., Maeda, M., Mori, T., Nemoto, K., Matsuda, H., & Komaki, G. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhl130 · Cited by 488
“aspects of empathy (Decety and Lamm 2006).”
BackgroundConnecting minds and sharing emotions through mimicry: A neurocognitive model of emotional contagion
Prochazkova, E., & Kret, M. E. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.05.013 · Cited by 433
“, 2016) and share emotions is automatic mimicry (Decety and Lamm, 2006; Schuler et al., 2016; Singer and Lamm, 2009).”
Fan, Y., & Han, S. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.07.023 · Cited by 422
“…emotional and sensory experience of other individuals. n addition, appropriate social communications and behaviours eed vicarious experiencing of emotions congruent with those of thers while being aware of the distinction between the self and thers (Decety & Jackson, 2004; Decety & Lamm, 2006).”
InfluentialAutism, oxytocin and interoception
Quattrocki, E., & Friston, K. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.012 · Cited by 393
Lamm, C., Nusbaum, H. C., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2007) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001292 · Cited by 411
“, [12,13,45]) emphasize the contribution of both automatic and controlled processes to the conscious experience of empathy.”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
van Berkhout, E. T., & Malouff, J. M. (2015) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/cou0000093 · Cited by 399
“Nevertheless, this result is consistent with developmental and neurological research findings that have suggested individuals must reach a certain level of neurological maturity before they can adequately understand and display empathy (Choudhury et al., 2006; Decety & Lamm, 2006).”
ResultBird, G., & Viding, E. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.021 · Cited by 472
“It has previously been argued that forming such a cognitive representation is likely to serve to reduce empathic personal distress (Decety and Lamm, 2006), and therefore one might predict that not only would self-reported personal distress scores be higher than in typical controls, but also that…”
BackgroundEmpathy, Teacher Dispositions, and Preparation for Culturally Responsive Pedagogy
Warren, C. A. (2017) · Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1177/0022487117712487 · Cited by 372
“…as a process of knowing is influenced by prior experiential knowledge of factors shaping the observation condition, previous interaction(s) with the target, and/ or exposure to texts, worlds, or spaces that in some way shape how the target is experiencing a circumstance (Decety & Lamm, 2006).”
BackgroundO'Brien, E., Konrath, S., Grühn, D., & Hagen, A. (2013) · The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · doi:10.1093/geronb/gbs055 · Cited by 352
The Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form.
Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D’Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche‐Richard, C. (2013) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/a0032297 · Cited by 358
“Emotional disconnection is considered to be a top-down process that has a regulatory function, in particular in terms of the inhibitory control exercised by the prefrontal and the cingulate cortex (Decety & Lamm, 2006; Singer & Lamm, 2009).”
BackgroundEmpathy in adults with clinical or subclinical depressive symptoms
Schreiter, S., Pijnenborg, G. H. M., & Rot, M. A. H. (2013) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2013.03.009 · Cited by 350
“With respect to cognitive empathy, various functional neuroimaging studies have shown involvement of frontal brain areas in perspective taking, ToM, and empathic accuracy (Decety and Lamm, 2006; Frith and Frith, 2006; Gallese et al., 2004; Singer, 2006; Zaki et al., 2009).”
BackgroundGilet, A.-L., Mella, N., Studer, J., Grühn, D., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement · doi:10.1037/a0030425 · Cited by 308
“As a two-component model distinguishing cognitive and affective aspects of empathy is proposed in the literature (e.g., Decety & Lamm, 2006), we ran a two-factor model in which fantasy items and perspective-taking items were assumed to measure the cognitive empathy factor, and personal distress…”
BackgroundMethodSterzer, P., Stadler, C., Poustka, F., & Kleinschmidt, A. K. (2007) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.043 · Cited by 308
“, 2003) support the notion of a central involvement of anterior insular cortex in empathy (for overviews, see de Vignemont and Singer, 2006; Decety and Lamm, 2006; Gallese et al., 2004).”
BackgroundDifferences in Empathic Concern and Perspective Taking Across 63 Countries
Chopik, W. J., O’Brien, E., & Konrath, S. (2016) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022116673910 · Cited by 301
“empathy, cultural differences, prosocial behavior, collectivism, personality, emotion Empathy is defined as the tendency to be psychologically in tune with others’ feelings and perspectives (Decety & Lamm, 2006).”
BackgroundLamothe, M., Boujut, É., Zenasni, F., & Sultan, S. (2014) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/1471-2296-15-15 · Cited by 291
“Sharing the patient’s emotions (sympathy) can lead to empathic overarousal or personal distress (an aversive self-focused emotional reaction to the apprehension of another person’s emotional state) [22].”
BackgroundInfluentialHow do we empathize with someone who is not like us? A functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
Lamm, C., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21186 · Cited by 278
“…model of empathy that involves a complex interaction between bottom–up (i.e., direct matching between perception and action) and top–down (i.e., regulation and control) information processes (Lamm, Porges, Cacioppo, & Decety, 2008; Decety & Lamm, 2006; Goubert et al., 2005; Decety & Jackson, 2004).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEmpathy versus Personal Distress: Recent Evidence from Social Neuroscience
Jean Decety, A., & Lamm, C. (2009) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262012973.003.0016 · Cited by 275
“Here, we consider empathy as a construct accounting for a sense of similarity in feelings experienced by the self and the other, without confusion between the two individuals (Decety & Jackson, 2004; Decety & Lamm, 2006).”
BackgroundCheng, Y., Yang, C., Lin, C., Lee, P., & Jean Decety, A. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.01.064 · Cited by 270
“Empathy, the ability to experience and understand what other people feel without confusion between self and others, plays a fundamental role in social interaction and moral development (Decety and Jackson, 2004; Decety and Lamm, 2006; Decety and Moriguchi, 2007; Hodges and Wegner, 1997).”
The role of social cognition in decision making
Frith, C. D., & Singer, T. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0156 · Cited by 361
“…links in our brains enable us to understand other peoples motor action has been expanded to include the ability to share not only motor actions but also feelings and sensations with others (Preston & de Waal 2002; Gallese 2003; Decety & Jackson 2004; Decety & Lamm 2006; de Vignemont & Singer 2006).”
BackgroundSinger, T., Snozzi, R., Bird, G., Petrovic, P., Silani, G., Heinrichs, M., & Dolan, R. J. (2008) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0014195 · Cited by 248
“Theoretical conceptualizations of empathy (Decety & Jackson, 2004; Decety & Lamm, 2006; de Vignemont & Singer, 2006; Gallese, 2003; Preston & de Waal, 2002) suggest that we understand other people’s affective states via activation of neural networks usually involved in processing our own affective states.”
BackgroundThe role of shared neural activations, mirror neurons, and morality in empathy – A critical comment
Lamm, C., & Majdandžić, J. (2015) · Neuroscience Research · doi:10.1016/j.neures.2014.10.008 · Cited by 252
“…neuroscientists have argued for a definition that requires at least a partial, isomorphic sharing of the feeling(s) of another person to be classified as empathy (e.g. Bernhardt and Singer, 2012; Decety and Lamm, 2006; Decety et al., 2012; Gonzalez-Liencres et al., 2013; Singer and Lamm, 2009).”
Self-citationNeurobiology of empathy and callousness: Implications for the development of antisocial behavior
Shirtcliff, E. A., Vitacco, M. J., Graf, A., Gostisha, A. J., Merz, J., & Zahn‐Waxler, C. (2009) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.862 · Cited by 259
“The brain can distinguish at the cortical level whether the self or another individual is experiencing an emotion or pain or peripheral arousal; yet, at some core level, it is difficult to distinguish personal from socially relevant cues (Decety & Lamm, 2006).”
InfluentialBehrends, A., Müller, S., & Dziobek, I. (2012) · The Arts in Psychotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.aip.2012.02.003 · Cited by 263
Toward a consensus on the nature of empathy: A review of reviews
Eklund, J. H., & Meranius, M. S. (2020) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.022 · Cited by 253
Gender difference in empathy for pain: An electrophysiological investigation
Han, S., Fan, Y., & Mao, L. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.12.062 · Cited by 231
“Based on a model of empathy for pain consisting of early emotional sharing and late cognitive evaluation (Decety and Lamm, 2006; De Vignemont and Singer, 2006; Fan and Han, in press; Preston and de Waal, 2002), the ERP results reported in this paper indicate that the early neural activity…”
ResultMitigating Psychological Reactance: The Role of Message-Induced Empathy in Persuasion
Shen, L. (2010) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01381.x · Cited by 235
Importance of Empathy for Social Work Practice: Integrating New Science
Gerdes, K. E., & Segal, E. (2011) · Social Work · doi:10.1093/sw/56.2.141 · Cited by 239
“Without self-regulation, information processing would lose flexibility and would become primarily bound to external stimulations” (Decety & Lamm, 2006, p. 1160).”
BackgroundInfluentialInter-individual differences in empathy are reflected in human brain structure
Banissy, M. J., Kanai, R., Walsh, V., & Rees, G. E. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.081 · Cited by 230
“appraisal, and mechanisms of control (Decety and Sommerville, 2003; Decety and Jackson, 2004; Decety and Lamm, 2006).”
BackgroundStrategic regulation of empathy
Weisz, E., & Cikara, M. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2020.12.002 · Cited by 217
Smith, A. (2009) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395675 · Cited by 230
On a Scale of State Empathy During Message Processing
Shen, L. (2010) · Western Journal of Communication · doi:10.1080/10570314.2010.512278 · Cited by 214
“…since there is strong empirical evidence that individuals tend to be empathic toward others’ pain, suffering, and distress (Decety & Jackson, 2006; Decety & Lamm, 2006; Preston & de Waal, 2002); (2) the perceived verisimilitude of the message, since it is a precedent of state empathy (Campbell…”
BackgroundInfluentialSocial context and perceived agency affects empathy for pain: An event-related fMRI investigation
Akitsuki, Y., & Decety, J. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.091 · Cited by 219
“A growing body of empirical neuroscientific evidence suggests that perception and/or empathy for pain is not an all-or-none phenomenon but it is strongly influenced by interpersonal, intrapersonal and situational factors (Decety and Jackson, 2004; Decety and Lamm, 2006).”
BackgroundAssociation between interoception and empathy: Evidence from heartbeat-evoked brain potential
Fukushima, H., Terasawa, Y., & Umeda, S. (2011) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.015 · Cited by 209
“The evaluation of another person's emotion can be achieved in more than one way, i.e. via autonomic perception ( " emotional empathy " ), and/or intellectual reasoning of the other's mental state ( " cognitive empathy " ; Decety & Lamm, 2006; Preston & de Waal, 2002; Davis, 1983).”
BackgroundTEACHING EMPATHY: A FRAMEWORK ROOTED IN SOCIAL COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE AND SOCIAL JUSTICE
Gerdes, K. E., Segal, E. A., Jackson, K. F., & Mullins, J. L. (2011) · Journal of Social Work Education · doi:10.5175/jswe.2011.200900085 · Cited by 221
“On the contrary, they are sophisticated cognitive skills and as such can be learned, increased, perhaps even “mastered” (Decety & Lamm, 2006).”
BackgroundGender differences in the mu rhythm during empathy for pain: An electroencephalographic study
Yang, C., Jean Decety, A., Lee, S., Chen, C., & Cheng, Y. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.11.062 · Cited by 191
Cheng, Y., Chou, K., Decety, J., Chen, I.-Y., Hung, D. L., Tzeng, O. J. L., & Lin, C. (2008) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2008.10.026 · Cited by 204
Experience modulates vicarious freezing in rats: a model for empathy
Atsak, P., Orre, M., Bakker, P., Cerliani, L., Roozendaal, B., Gazzola, V., Moita, M., & Keysers, C. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021855 · Cited by 193
“While this conclusion may seem trivial, it actually brakes new grounds in the context of empathy research: most current models of empathy for pain or distress in human neuroscience used prerecorded stimuli [2,4,9,10,11,72,73,74] or used live interactions but prevented participants from viewing the reactions of their p…”
InfluentialLoggia, M. L., Mogil, J. S., & Bushnell, C. M. (2007) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2007.07.017 · Cited by 193
“, the affective link between the empath and the person in pain) processes shape the cognitive, affective and behavioral responses accompanying this phenomenon (Goubert et al., 2005; Decety and Lamm, 2006).”
BackgroundPositive Empathy and Prosocial Behavior: A Neglected Link
Telle, N.-T., & Pfister, H. (2015) · Emotion Review · doi:10.1177/1754073915586817 · Cited by 216
“The observing person catches and shares the pleasant affect, while still knowing that the original source of the affect lies in the other person and not within the self (Decety & Jackson, 2004; Decety & Lamm, 2006), that is, positive empathy is triggered (Sallquist et al., 2009).”
BackgroundInfluentialAutomatic imitation: A meta-analysis.
Cracco, E., Bardi, L., Desmet, C., Genschow, O., Rigoni, D., De Coster, L., Radkova, I., Deschrijver, E., & Brass, M. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000143 · Cited by 228
“For instance, empathy does not only require individuals to share others’ emotional state but also to control these emotions to provide a complementary empathic response (Bird & Viding, 2014; Decety & Lamm, 2006).”
BackgroundTheory of Mind and Empathic Explanations of Machiavellianism
Bagozzi, R. P., Verbeke, W. J. M. I., Dietvorst, R. C., Belschak, F. D., van den Berg, W. E., & Rietdijk, W. J. R. (2013) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312471393 · Cited by 200
“Such processes are characteristic of nonconscious mimicry of facial expressions, posture, gestures, and mannerisms observed in self and others when we interact with them.”
BackgroundInfluentialEres, R., Decety, J., Louis, W. R., & Molenberghs, P. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.038 · Cited by 207
“For example, the anterior insula appears to activate more so with vicarious experiences of pain (Jackson et al., 2006), while for first-hand experiences of pain the posterior insula is implemented (Decety & Lamm, 2006).”
BackgroundMethodA Social Work Model of Empathy
Gerdes, K. E., & Segal, E. A. (2009) · Advances in Social Work · doi:10.18060/235 · Cited by 190
“Decety and colleagues (Decety & Jackson, 2004; Decety & Lamm, 2006; Decety & Moriguchi, 2007) combined cumulative, qualitative descriptions of empathy from the social sciences with the new findings in social cognitive neuroscience, which led to a conceptualization of empathy as the dynamic…”
BackgroundShapiro, J. F. (2011) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3182088833 · Cited by 185
Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review
Brewer, R., Murphy, J., & Bird, G. (2021) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.036 · Cited by 180
Contagious crying beyond the first days of life
Geangu, E., Benga, O., Stahl, D., & Striano, T. (2010) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2010.03.004 · Cited by 176
“…in its “functional architecture” which encompasses several major components – affect sharing, self-other awareness, regulatory processes, and mental flexibility to adopt the subjective perspective of another, with constant interplay between these mechanisms (Decety & Lamm, 2006; Decety, 2007).”
BackgroundNarcissistic personality disorder: a current review.
Ronningstam, E. (2010) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-009-0084-z · Cited by 177
Rey, R. D., Lazuras, L., Casas, J. A., Barkoukis, V., Ruiz, R. O., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.021 · Cited by 179
“…states; second, cognitive empathy requires more conscious deliberation, enables understanding of people's emotions and putting these into perspective, and may support strategic social interactions and communication (Decety & Jackson, 2004; Decety & Lamm, 2006; Hakansson & Montgomery, 2003).”
BackgroundWaller, R. E., Wagner, N. J., Barstead, M. G., Subar, A. R., Petersen, J. L., Hyde, J. S., & Hyde, L. W. (2019) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101809 · Cited by 175
Control of shared representations relies on key processes involved in mental state attribution
Spengler, S., von Cramon, D. Y., & Brass, M. (2009) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20800 · Cited by 170
“…suggest that the flow of information from the shared representational system is not unidimensional, but rather that the aFMC may control shared representations, by enhancing or inhibiting the automatically evoked activations of this system [see also Decety and Lamm, 2006; Olsson and Ochsner, 2008].”
BackgroundThe roots of empathy: Through the lens of rodent models
Meyza, K. Z., Bartal, I. B.-A., Monfils, M., Panksepp, J. B., & Knapska, E. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.10.028 · Cited by 172
“According to their definition, affective representations in the brain are automatically activated by perceptual input, whereas cognitive control is mediated by cortical structures, mainly the prefrontal cortex (Decety and Lamm, 2006).”
BackgroundMeasuring empathy for human and robot hand pain using electroencephalography
Suzuki, Y., Galli, L., Ikeda, A., Itakura, S., & Kitazaki, M. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep15924 · Cited by 181
“These findings support the two-level (early bottom-up and late top-down processing) theory of Decety and Lamm (2006)3.”
BackgroundResultEmpathic concern and the effect of stories in human-robot interaction
Darling, K., Nandy, P., & Breazeal, C. (2015) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/roman.2015.7333675 · Cited by 166
“Empathy is generally considered to be the ability to experience and understand what others feel [10].”
BackgroundGender Differences in the Mu Rhythm of the Human Mirror-Neuron System
Cheng, Y., Lee, P., Yang, C.-Y., Lin, C., Hung, D. L., & Decety, J. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002113 · Cited by 168
“This sharing stems from the perception–action coupling (supported by the MNS), which automatically induces the observer to resonate with the emotional state of another individual, with the observer emulating the motor representations and associated automatic and somatic responses that stem from the observed target [22…”
BackgroundTimmers, I., Park, A. L., Fischer, M. D., Kronman, C. A., Heathcote, L. C., Hernandez, J. M., & Simons, L. E. (2018) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00289 · Cited by 154
“In any case, it is clear that observing—or even merely anticipating—someone else in pain elicits an empathic response (Decety and Lamm, 2006; Bernhardt and Singer, 2012; Lamm et al., 2017).”
Corradi‐Dell’Acqua, C., Hofstetter, C., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2686-11.2011 · Cited by 170
“These results were consistent across three independent analyses aimed at testing the same hypothesis and shed new light on the existence and nature of shared neural representations of affective states (Decety and Lamm, 2006; Singer and Lamm, 2009).”
ResultA Framework for Understanding Moral Distress among Palliative Care Clinicians
Rushton, C. H., Kaszniak, A. W., & Halifax, J. S. (2013) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2012.0490 · Cited by 157
Perspective taking is associated with specific facial responses during empathy for pain
Lamm, C., Porges, E. C., Cacioppo, J. T., & Jean Decety, A. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.066 · Cited by 159
“The present study supports theoretical concepts defining empathy as a complex interplay of bottom-up and top-down processes (e.g., Decety and Lamm, 2006; Goubert et al., 2005).”
Social modulation of learning in ratsPreprint
Knapska, E., Mikosz, M., Werka, T., & Maren, S. (2009) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.1670910 · Cited by 162
“Obviously, this is a complex social phenomenon that, until recently, has received much attention from philosophers and psychologists rather than neuroscientists (Decety and Lamm 2006).”
BackgroundFace processing in autism spectrum disorders: From brain regions to brain networks
Nomi, J. S., & Uddin, L. Q. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.029 · Cited by 168
“…one contrasts internally represented imitated states with the perceived emotional state of another while keeping a separation of the self from the other person; this allows for an overall assessment of imitated and perceived emotional states (Decety and Lamm, 2006; Preston and de Waal, 2002).”
BackgroundSmith, A. (2009) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395663 · Cited by 158
“Decety and Lamm (2006) pointed out that distractive strategies may be important for humans if the cost of empathizing is excessive.”
BackgroundInfluentialEmpathy in patient care: from ‘Clinical Empathy’ to ‘Empathic Concern’
Guidi, C., & Traversa, C. (2021) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-021-10033-4 · Cited by 161
AI and the Future of Skills, Volume 1
OECD (2021) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/5ee71f34-en · Cited by 233
“Feeling” the pain of those who are different from us: Modulation of EEG in the mu/alpha range
Perry, A., Bentin, S., Bartal, I. B.-A., Lamm, C., & Decety, J. (2010) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.10.4.493 · Cited by 154
“For example, Decety and Lamm (2006) proposed that empathy involves both emotion sharing (bottom-up information processing) and executive control, which modulates the shared affective experience (top-down information processing).”
BackgroundEmpathy and emotion regulation: An integrative account
Thompson, N. M., Uusberg, A., Gross, J. J., & Chakrabarti, B. (2019) · Progress in brain research · doi:10.1016/bs.pbr.2019.03.024 · Cited by 169
Empathy and contextual social cognition
Melloni, M., López, V., & Ibáñez, A. M. (2013) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-013-0205-3 · Cited by 147
Empathy≠sharing: Perspectives from phenomenology and developmental psychology
Zahavi, D., & Rochat, P. (2015) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2015.05.008 · Cited by 161
Social Value Orientation: Related to Empathy and the Ability to Read the Mind in the Eyes
Declerck, C. H., & Bogaert, S. (2008) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.3200/socp.148.6.711-726 · Cited by 147
Jauniaux, J., Khatibi, A., Rainville, P., & Jackson, P. L. (2019) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsz055 · Cited by 154
Self-regulation: Brain, cognition, and development.
Berger, A. (2011) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/12327-000 · Cited by 150
Enzi, B., de Greck, M., Prösch, U., Tempelmann, C., & Northoff, G. (2009) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008429 · Cited by 146
“Most recently, the insula has also been associated with different aspects of the self [5,6,16], reward [14,15] and empathy [66].”
BackgroundEmpathy, Connectedness and Organisation
Pavlovich, K., & Krahnke, K. (2011) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0961-3 · Cited by 159
“Decety and Lamm (2006) claim that altruistic empathy is a striking quality that runs contrary to the Darwinian tradition of natural selection, and is evident in life beyond humanity.”
BackgroundGery, I., Miljkovitch, R., Berthoz, S., & Soussignan, R. (2009) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2007.11.006 · Cited by 142
“…recognition (perception) and affective empathy (feeling and action) is also supported by both psychophysiological and cognitive neuroscience research, which has suggested that the link stems from an automatic perception–action mechanism leading to emotional contagion (Decety and Lamm, 2006).”
Hierarchical prediction errors in midbrain and septum during social learning
Diaconescu, A. O., Mathys, C. D., Weber, L. A. E., Kasper, L., Mauer, J., & Stephan, K. E. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsw171 · Cited by 138
“Although several of the advice PE (e2) activations reported in this paper have previously been associated with ‘theory of mind’ processes (Decety and Lamm, 2006; Lamm et al., 2009; Carrington and Bailey, 2009; Chang et al., 2011; Frith and Frith, 2012), these activations may not be specific to social learning tasks.”
BackgroundThoma, P., Friedmann, C., & Suchan, B. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.024 · Cited by 134
Emotional processing and social cognition in alcohol use disorder.
Berre, A. L. (2019) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037/neu0000572 · Cited by 152
“…M anuscript A uthor M anuscript Empathy, the ability to understand and experience what others feel without confusion between oneself and others (Decety & Lamm, 2006), is a multidimensional construct encompassing (1) a cognitive component, the ability to understand another’s perspective and…”
BackgroundShared pain: From empathy to synaesthesia
Fitzgibbon, B. M., Giummarra, M. J., Georgiou‐Karistianis, N., Enticott, P. G., & Bradshaw, J. L. (2009) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.007 · Cited by 133
“Without self–other distinction and the regulation of emotions, an affective response to another person’s emotional state could be aversive causing distress or excessive emotional stimulation in the observer: this is particularly important in the context of modern life where we may experience the emotional states of ot…”
Gerdes, K. E., Lietz, C. A., & Segal, E. A. (2011) · Social Work Research · doi:10.1093/swr/35.2.83 · Cited by 133
Skin Conductance Response to the Pain of Others Predicts Later Costly Helping
Hein, G., Lamm, C., Brodbeck, C. J., & Singer, T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022759 · Cited by 133
Soto, J. A., & LEVENSON, R. W. (2009) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/a0017399 · Cited by 149
Thomas, J. T. (2013) · Journal of Social Service Research · doi:10.1080/01488376.2013.771596 · Cited by 131
“This is likely related to the mirror neuron system (Gallese, 2004; Rizzolatti, 2005, Singer & Lamm) and occurs in a bottom-up, automatic way (Decety & Lamm, 2006; Singer & Lamm).”
BackgroundGender differences in neural mechanisms underlying moral sensitivity
Harenski, C. L., Antonenko, O., Shane, M. S., & Kiehl, K. A. (2008) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsn026 · Cited by 132
“…suggest dissociable roles of dorsal anterior cingulate and anterior insula in empathic processing, though this has not yet been demonstrated (only anterior–posterior distinctions within each region representing observed and experienced pain, respectively; see Decety and Lamm, 2006, for a review).”
BackgroundPerceiving one's body shapes empathy
Grynberg, D., & Pollatos, O. (2014) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.026 · Cited by 140
Metadata
- Authors
- Decety, J., & Lamm, C.
- Affiliations
- Department of Psychology Center for Cognitive and Social Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
- University of Chicago (US)
- ORCID
- Lamm, Claus
- Venue
- The Scientific World JOURNAL
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 6
- Pages
- 1146-1163
- ISSN
- 1537-744X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5917291
- OpenAlex
- W2144872492
- Cited by
- 1,051
- References
- 100
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 62 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 48 · 2015: 60 · 2014: 53 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 44
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Scientific World JOURNAL (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
- Keywords
- empathy, social neuroscience, emotional sharing, executive function, top-down processing, bottom-up processing, self-other distinction, perspective taking, emotion regulation, neural mechanisms of empathy
- MeSH terms
- Awareness, Brain Mapping, Empathy, Biological Evolution, Humans, Models, Psychological, Nerve Net, Neurosciences, Psychology, Social, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review