Cited by 217Emotions and Moral BehaviorEmpathy and Medical EducationAction Observation and Synchronization

Strategic regulation of empathy

Weisz, Erika, Cikara, Mina·2021·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

Empathy is an integral part of socioemotional well-being, but recent research has highlighted some of its downsides. Here we examine literature that establishes when, how much, and what aspects of empathy promote specific outcomes. After reviewing a theoretical framework that characterizes empathy as a suite of separable components, we examine evidence showing how dissociations of these components affect important socioemotional outcomes and describe emerging evidence suggesting that these components can be independently and deliberately regulated. Finally, we advocate for an approach to a multicomponent view of empathy that accounts for the interrelations among components. This perspective advances scientific conceptualization of empathy and offers suggestions for tailoring empathy to help people realize their social, emotional, and occupational goals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2020.12.002

Cites

139 of 139 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Weisz, E., & Cikara, M.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Weisz, Erika
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-03
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
213-227
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3113892495
Cited by
217
References
139
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 49 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
empathy, social and emotional wellbeing
MeSH terms
Emotions, Empathy, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review