Cited by 71Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringGene Regulatory Network Analysis

Transcriptome-wide analysis of differential expression in perturbation atlases

Open access
Nadig, Ajay, Replogle, Joseph M., Pogson, Angela N., Murthy, Mukundh, McCarroll, Steven A., Weissman, Jonathan S., Robinson, Elise B., O’Connor, Luke J.·2025·Nature Genetics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Single-cell CRISPR screens such as Perturb-seq enable transcriptomic profiling of genetic perturbations at scale. However, the data produced by these screens are noisy, and many effects may go undetected. Here we introduce transcriptome-wide analysis of differential expression (TRADE)—a statistical model for the distribution of true differential expression effects that accounts for estimation error appropriately. TRADE estimates the ‘transcriptome-wide impact’, which quantifies the total effect of a perturbation across the transcriptome. Analyzing several large Perturb-seq datasets, we show that many transcriptional effects remain undetected in standard analyses but emerge in aggregate using TRADE. A typical gene perturbation affects an estimated 45 genes, whereas a typical essential gene affects over 500. We find moderate consistency of perturbation effects across cell types, identify perturbations where transcriptional responses vary qualitatively across dosage levels and clarify the relationship between genetic and transcriptomic correlations across neuropsychiatric disorders. Transcriptome-wide analysis of differential expression (TRADE) is a broadly applicable tool for characterizing patterns of differential expression across the genome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-025-02169-3

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 34 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    In simulations, inferred distributions closely matched simulated true distributions, except slight overestimation of density at zero.

    “The inferred distributions closely matched the simulated true distributions, except that they slightly overestimated the density at zero.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    Many transcriptional effects remain undetected in standard analyses but emerge in aggregate using TRADE.

    “Analyzing multiple large Perturb-seq datasets, we show that many transcriptional effects remain undetected in standard analyses but emerge in aggregate using TRADE.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A typical essential gene perturbation affects over 500 genes.

    “whereas a typical essential gene affects over 500.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A typical gene perturbation affects an estimated 45 genes.

    “A typical gene perturbation affects an estimated 45 genes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In K562-Essential, GATA1 knockdown had 108 cells versus 7 for EIF4A3.

    “For example, in the K562-Essential dataset, 108 cells received GATA1 knockdown versus just 7 for EIF4A3.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 36
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 22
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    TI estimates were robust with slight downward bias.

    “Estimates of the transcriptome-wide impact (Fig. 1C) were robust, with slight downward bias.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Downward bias in TI results from inadequate power to detect very small effects at finite sample size; bias disappears at increased sample size.

    “The downward bias results from inadequate power to detect very small effects at finite sample size, even aggregating power across genes; at increased sample size, the bias disappears (Supplementary Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    TI correlations were weaker between K562 and HepG2 (0.64), Jurkat and HepG2 (0.69), and substantially weaker between K562 and RPE1 (0.40) and Jurkat and RPE1 (0.56).

    “There were weaker correlations between K562 and HepG2 (median: 0.64) and between Jurkat and HepG2 (median: 0.69), and substantially weaker correlations between K562 and RPE1 (0.40) and Jurkat and RPE1 (0.56).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fraction of TI explained by FDR-significant effects: K562-GenomeWide 36%, K562-Essential 18%, RPE1-Essential 35%, Jurkat-Essential 13%, HepG2-Essential 14%.

    “In the K562-GenomeWide experiment, 36% of transcriptome-wide impact was explained by FDR-significant effects (Fig. 2C); in K562-Essential, 18%; in RPE1-Essential, 35%; in Jurkat-Essential: 13%; and in HepG2-Essential, 14%.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In downsampling K562-GenomeWide to 50% gemgroups, signal in significant genes decreased substantially but TI estimate decreased only slightly.

    “We conducted a downsampling analysis, repeating our analysis of the K562-GenomeWide experiment using only 50% of the 10x Genomics gemgroups. Whereas the signal in significant genes decreased substantially, our estimate of the transcriptome-wide impact decreased only slightly (Fig. 2C), consistent with the slight downward biased observed in simulations (Supplementary Fig. 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    TRADE estimates GATA1 knockdown has large TI (0.4, p=9e-12) while EIF4A4 knockdown lacks evidence of broad TI (0.004, p=0.12).

    “However, TRADE accounts for the difference in sample size and estimates that whereas GATA1 knockdown has a large transcriptional effect (transcriptome-wide impact = 0.4, p = 9e-12), EIF4A4 knockdown lacks evidence of broad transcriptome-wide effects (transcriptome-wide impact = 0.004, p = 0.12) (Fig. 2A,B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Genes highly expressed in K562 are enriched for both perturbation impact (2.3x) and perturbation response (4.4x).

    “In contrast, genes that are highly expressed in K562 cells are strongly enriched for both perturbation impact (2.3x) and perturbation response (4.4x), supporting a correlation between absolute expression and functional importance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Weak-to-moderate perturbations of Sox9 and Polycomb caused relatively small TI, whereas strong perturbations caused disproportionately large TI.

    “Weak-to-moderate perturbations of these proteins caused relatively small transcriptome-wide effects, whereas strong perturbations caused disproportionately large transcriptome-wide effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Some identified cell-type-specific perturbations are known indispensable for that cell type (GATA1 for K562, HMGCR for Jurkat), but most had no previously documented explanation.

    “Some of these perturbations are known to be indispensable for their corresponding cell type, including GATA1 for erythroid cells such as K56221 and HMGCR for T-cells such as Jurkat22, but most had no previously documented explanation for their cell-type dependent effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [21] Weiss, M. J., Keller, G. & Orkin, S. H. Novel insights into erythroid development revealed through in vitro differentiation of GATA-1 embryonic stem cells. Genes Dev. 8, 1184–1197 (1994). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] Lacher, S. M. et al. HMG-CoA reductase promotes protein prenylation and therefore is indispensible for T-cell survival. Cell Death Dis. 8, e2824 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A few perturbations had low between-experiment TI correlations; most had very low TI, so their correlations are expected to be noisy.

    “A few perturbations did have low between-experiment transcriptome-wide impact correlations; most of these had very low transcriptome-wide impact, and thus, their correlations are expected to be noisy (Supplementary Fig. 18).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among 1660 perturbations with significant TI in all four cell types, TI correlation was highest between K562 and Jurkat (median 0.74) and between HepG2 and RPE1 (0.75).

    “The transcriptome-wide impact correlation was highest between K562 and Jurkat (median: 0.74) and between HepG2 and RPE1 (median: 0.75) (Fig. 4C; Supplementary Fig. 19).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Clustering perturbations with GMM found 44% in Cluster1 with selectively higher correlations between similar cell types (mean within similar 0.61; outside 0.35) and 56% in Cluster2 with high correlations across all cell types (mean within similar 0.75; outside 0.66).

    “Clustering these perturbations with a Gaussian mixture model (Methods), we found that 44% of perturbations belonged to a cluster with selectively higher correlations between more similar cell types (Cluster1, mean correlation within similar cell type pairs: 0.61; outside similar pairs: 0.35), whereas 56% of the perturbations belonged to a cluster with high correlations across all cell types (Clust”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Genes with more efficient CRISPRi knockdown were not enriched for perturbation impact, suggesting enrichments not driven by guide differences.

    “Genes with more efficient CRISPRi knockdown were not enriched for perturbation impact, suggesting that enrichments are not driven by differences between guides (Supplementary Fig. 15).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For dTag depletion of Sox9 and Polycomb, TI correlations decayed smoothly with dosage difference, and smallest and largest perturbations were only moderately correlated (r=0.60, 0.48).

    “For dTag depletion of Sox9 (Supplementary Table 12) and Polycomb (Supplementary Table 14), transcriptome-wide impact correlations decayed smoothly with the difference in dosage, and the smallest and largest perturbations were only moderately correlated (r=0.60, 0.48), implying that weak and strong perturbations have qualitatively different transcriptional consequences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Integrating all diagnosis pairs and technologies, TI correlations were substantially larger than sample Spearman correlations, with increase for 9/9 psychiatric trait pairs.

    “Integrating data from all diagnosis pairs and technologies, we found that transcriptome-wide impact correlations were substantially larger than sample Spearman correlations, with an increase for 9/9 psychiatric trait pairs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Inferred bivariate effect size distributions showed effects either null in both conditions or positively correlated; little evidence of negatively correlated component or large numbers of condition-specific genes.

    “Visualizing the inferred bivariate effect size distributions revealed that in general, effects are either null in both conditions or positively correlated; there was little evidence of a negatively correlated component or large numbers of condition-specific genes (Supplementary Fig. 24).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Dosage affects not only magnitude of transcriptome-wide effect but also which genes are affected.

    “In dose-response experiments, we found that dosage affects not only the magnitude of the transcriptome-wide effect, but also the genes that are affected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Response to GATA1 knockdown was highly correlated among all but the weakest perturbation, which was only moderately correlated with the strongest.

    “The response to GATA1 knockdown was highly correlated among all but the weakest perturbation, which was only moderately correlated with the strongest perturbation (Fig. 5B).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    For autism, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia, TI correlation between microarray and RNA-seq cohorts was 0.96, 0.91, and 0.78 respectively.

    “The transcriptome-wide impact correlation was 0.96, 0.91, and 0.78 for autism, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia respectively (Supplementary Fig. 25).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The bivariate Gaussian mixture model identified two components: one with mean within-similar-cell-type correlation 0.75 and outside 0.66, and another with mean within 0.61 and outside 0.35.

    “including one component with relatively high correlations within and outside of similar cell types (mean correlation within = 0.75, mean correlation outside = 0.66) and one component with lower correlations outside of similar cell types (mean correlation within = 0.61, mean correlation outside = 0.35).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    In simulations, TRADE-generated posterior-mean effect size estimates had lower mean squared error than DESeq2 effect size estimates.

    “We briefly explored TRADE-generated posterior-mean effect size estimates in simulations, finding that these posterior-mean estimates had lower mean squared error than DESeq2 effect size estimates (Supplementary Figure 5)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Existing methods for capturing aspects of the DE effect distribution have conceptual limitations, including lack of clear estimand, ambiguous units, or finite-sample bias.

    “However, while these approaches are useful, they have conceptual limitations. Some lack a clear estimand (such as the running-sum GSEA statistic); some have ambiguous units (such as the energy distance); some are biased at finite sample size (such as the proportion of DE genes π in iDEA, see O’Connor et al11).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [6] Replogle, J. M. et al. Mapping information-rich genotype-phenotype landscapes with genome-scale Perturb-seq. Cell 185, 2559–2575.e28 (2022). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] Peidli, S. et al. scPerturb: harmonized single-cell perturbation data. Nat. Methods 21, 531–540 (2024). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [9] Plaisier, S. B., Taschereau, R., Wong, J. A. & Graeber, T. G. Rank–rank hypergeometric overlap: identification of statistically significant overlap between gene-expression signatures. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, e169 (2010). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] Ma, Y. et al. Integrative differential expression and gene set enrichment analysis using summary statistics for scRNA-seq studies. Nat. Commun. 11, 1585 (2020). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [11] O’Connor, L. J. The distribution of common-variant effect sizes. Nat. Genet. 53, 1243–1249 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    Perturb-seq data are noisy and many true effects may go undetected because the number of cells per perturbation is limited.

    “However, the data produced by these screens are noisy, and many effects may go undetected.”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · hedged
      “Perturb-seq allows thousands of genetic perturbations to be tested in a single pool of cells, but the number of cells per perturbation (the sample size) is limited, such that many true effects may not be detected.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    GWAS power is limited, but statistical methods can estimate SNP-heritability and characterize genetic architecture even when few associations are significant.

    “Even when genome-wide significant associations are few, statistical methods can be used to estimate “SNP-heritability,” a measure of the total genetic effect5, and to characterize nearly every aspect of genetic architecture.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Yang, J. et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat. Genet. 42, 565–569 (2010). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data

    TRADE-derived estimators of transcriptome-wide impact, effective number of DE genes, gene-set enrichments, and correlation are unbiased at finite sample size.

    “TRADE also estimates gene-set enrichments, correlations between different experiments, and the effective number of differentially expressed genes, all of which are unbiased at finite sample size (Methods; Supplementary Fig. 1,12,14,16).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Perturb-Seq combines single-cell RNA sequencing with high-throughput CRISPR screens.

    “A particularly scalable approach to differential expression is Perturb-Seq, which combines single-cell RNA sequencing with a high-throughput CRISPR screen1-4.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [1] Dixit, A. et al. Perturb-seq: dissecting molecular circuits with scalable single-cell RNA profiling of pooled genetic screens. Cell 167, 1853–1866.e17 (2016). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] Adamson, B. et al. A multiplexed single-cell CRISPR screening platform enables systematic dissection of the unfolded protein response. Cell 167, 1867–1882.e21 (2016). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [3] Jaitin, D. A. et al. Dissecting immune circuits by linking CRISPR-pooled screens with single-cell RNA-seq. Cell 167, 1883–1896.e15 (2016). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Datlinger, P. et al. Pooled CRISPR screening with single-cell transcriptome readout. Nat. Methods 14, 297–301 (2017). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Because dataset targeted common essential genes, many more cell-type-specific effects are expected in a larger atlas.

    “As this dataset targeted primarily common essential genes which are expected to be important for growth across most cell types, there are expected to be many more examples of cell-type-specific effects in a larger cellular perturbation atlas.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    When a gene has a cell type specific function, perturbing it in the relevant cell type causes both larger magnitude and different pattern of effects across genes.

    “This indicates that when a gene has a cell type specific function, perturbing that gene in the relevant cell type causes not only a larger magnitude of effect, but also a different pattern of effects across genes (Supplementary Fig. 21).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    πDEG estimation procedure was validated in simulations and downsampling.

    “We validated our estimation procedure for πDEG in simulations (Supplementary Fig. 12) and in a downsampling analysis (Supplementary Fig. 13).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    One explanation for higher correlations among neuropsychiatric conditions is that transcriptomic effects are often downstream of condition liability and shared.

    “One explanation for this difference is that transcriptomic effects are often downstream of condition liability, and these downstream effects are often shared between neuropsychiatric conditions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    TI may be a suitable distance metric for cell-type variation because it is unbiased at finite sample size and computable from summary statistics.

    “Transcriptome-wide impact may be a suitable distance metric for such analyses, as it is unbiased at finite sample size (unlike the commonly used Euclidean distance, Supplementary Note 6) and can be computed from differential expression summary statistics.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Across cell types or replicate experiments, concordance between estimated effect sizes is attenuated due to sampling variation, but true effect sizes are often highly concordant.

    “Across cell types or even replicate experiments, the concordance between estimated effect sizes is attenuated due to sampling variation, but in many cases, the true effect sizes are highly concordant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Gandal et al found DE effects correlated between conditions, paralleling genetic correlations.

    “They found that differential expression effects were correlated between conditions, and that these correlations paralleled those between the genetic effects on those conditions (the genetic correlation).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [29] Gandal, M. J. et al. Shared molecular neuropathology across major psychiatric disorders parallels polygenic overlap. Science 359, 693–697 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Sox9 and Polycomb are haploinsufficient (pLI=117), indicating 50% depletion is deleterious.

    “These genes are haploinsufficient (pLI = 117) indicating that 50% depletion is deleterious; our results suggest that stronger depletions nonetheless produce progressively larger cellular effects.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Genetic correlation was estimated with REML accounting for sampling variation, whereas transcriptomic effect correlation was estimated as sample Spearman correlation between DE point estimates, which is downwardly biased in a sample size dependent manner.

    “A notable difference between the transcriptomic and genetic analyses in this study is that the genetic correlation was estimated with a REML approach that accounts for sampling variation30, whereas the transcriptomic effect correlation was estimated as the sample Spearman correlation between differential expression point estimates, which is downwardly biased in a sample size dependent manner (”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [30] Lee, S. H., Yang, J., Goddard, M. E., Visscher, P. M. & Wray, N. R. Estimation of pleiotropy between complex diseases using single-nucleotide polymorphism-derived genomic relationships and restricted maximum likelihood. Bioinformatics 28, 2540–2542 (2012). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Naqvi et al found a subset of Sox9 targets sensitive at partial dosage depletions, whereas a larger set affected only at full dosage depletions.

    “Indeed, Naqvi et al26 found that a subset of Sox9 targets are sensitive at partial dosage depletions, whereas a much larger set of targets are affected only at full dosage depletions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [26] Naqvi, S. et al. Precise modulation of transcription factor levels identifies features underlying dosage sensitivity. Nat. Genet. 55, 841–851 (2023). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    TRADE relies on predefined labels and cannot cluster cells into cell types.

    “However, a limitation of TRADE is that it relies upon predefined labels and cannot be used to cluster cells into cell types.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Some biological processes are better assayed using alternative modalities (splicing, chromatin, protein, imaging).

    “In addition, some biological processes are better assayed using alternative modalities, including mRNA splicing, chromatin state, protein level, and imaging, all of which are now being studied at scale with single cell CRISPR screens39-44.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 6 sources checked
    • cites [39] Rubin, A. J. et al. Coupled single-cell CRISPR screening and epigenomic profiling reveals causal gene regulatory networks. Cell 176, 361–376.e17 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [40] Feldman, D. et al. Optical pooled screens in human cells. Cell 179, 787–799.e17 (2019). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [41] Gu, J. et al. CRISPRmap: sequencing-free optical pooled screens mapping multi-omic phenotypes in cells and tissue. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.26.572587 (2023). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [42] Binan, L. et al. Simultaneous CRISPR screening and spatial transcriptomics reveals intracellular, intercellular, and functional transcriptional circuits. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.30.569494 (2023). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [43] Xu, Z., Sziraki, A., Lee, J., Zhou, W. & Cao, J. Dissecting key regulators of transcriptome kinetics through scalable single-cell RNA profiling of pooled CRISPR screens. Nat. Biotechnol. 42, 1218–1223 (2024). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [44] Kudo, T. et al. Multiplexed, image-based pooled screens in primary cells and tissues with PerturbView. Nat. Biotechnol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02391-0 (2024). source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    For genetic perturbations, parameters such as TI are likely driven by the pattern of causal regulatory connections (GRN).

    “For genetic perturbations, parameters such as transcriptome-wide impact are likely driven by the pattern of causal regulatory connections between genes, i.e. the gene regulatory network (GRN).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    On day 7 after transduction, cells were measured to be more than 90% GFP positive.

    “On day 7 post-transduction, cells were measured to be >90% GFP positive”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Cells were filtered for quality by removing cells with low UMI content (Jurkat: >1750 UMIs, HepG2: >3000 UMIs) and high mitochondrial RNA content (Jurkat: <14%, HepG2: <18%).

    “Cells were filtered for quality to remove cells with low UMI content (Jurkat: > 1750 UMIs, HepG2: > 3000 UMIs) and high mitochondrial RNA content (Jurkat: < 14%, HepG2: <18%).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Estimates of the fraction of signal in FDR-significant genes are expected to be upwardly biased by winner's curse.

    “we note that such estimates are expected to be upwardly biased by winner’s curse.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    GFP-positive singlets were isolated by FACS in order to decrease cell doublets in the single-cell RNA-sequencing.

    “In order to decrease cell doublets in the single-cell RNA-sequencing, GFP positive singlets were isolated by FACS”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Choosing Sg as a diagonal matrix with diagonal entries equal to the variance of the individual estimated effects is appropriate when each estimate is derived from a different experiment, as is the case in these analyses.

    “We choose Sg to be a diagonal matrix with diagonal entries equal to the variance of the individual estimated effects. This choice is appropriate when each estimate is derived from a different experiment, which is the case in our analyses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The quality filters removed 7408 cells from the Jurkat-Essential experiment (262,956 retained) and 15,952 cells from the HepG2-Essential experiment (145,473 retained).

    “These filters removed 7408 cells from the Jurkat-Essential experiment (262956 cells retained), and 15952 cells from the HepG2-Essential experiment (145473 cells retained).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Removing the null-biased prior prevents bias in the distribution estimate.

    “We removed the null-biased prior in order to prevent bias in our distribution estimate.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Using a null-biased prior is crucial for accurately computing the local false sign rate, but is less important for estimating the effect size distribution itself.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    On day 3 after transduction, the infection rate was measured as 7% using GFP as a transduction marker.

    “On day 3 post-transduction, an infection rate of 7% was measured based on GFP as a marker of transduction”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Stephens found that the half-uniform mixture model is sufficiently flexible to model realistic effect size distributions.

    “Stephens 13 found that these this model is sufficiently flexible to model realistic effect size distributions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [13] Stephens, M. False discovery rates: a new deal. Biostatistics 18, 275–294 (2016).

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The transcriptome-wide impact estimates have a slight downward bias, which may lead to slight over-shrinkage for underpowered perturbations.

    “Our estimates could be used in this way, although we caution that slight downward bias in our transcriptome-wide impact estimates (Supplementary Figure 1) may lead to slight over-shrinkage for underpowered perturbations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The targeted low infection rate of about 10% was chosen to reduce the chance that a single cell would be infected by multiple viruses.

    “This low rate was chosen to reduce the chances of a single cell being infected by multiple viruses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Cells were maintained at a coverage of more than 1000 cells per library element throughout the screen.

    “Cells were maintained at a coverage of >1000 cells per library element for the duration of the screen.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    In our analyses, the influence of pseudoreplication bias is expected to be minimal because the pseudobulk observation units are different sequencing batches from the same cell line, with no variability from supra-cellular sampling units.

    “Because there is no variability due to supra-cellular sampling unit (i.e. animal, donor, etc.), the influence of pseudoreplication bias is expected to be minimal.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The adaptive grid procedure produces a set of covariance matrices that attempt to tile all possible bivariate relationships between the two perturbations.

    “This procedure produces a set of covariance matrices that attempt to tile all possible bivariate relationships between the two perturbations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: mash was designed primarily for multivariate experiments with several conditions, where specifying all possible covariance patterns is not feasible.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The perturbation response enrichment approach is expected to be approximately unbiased for most gene sets.

    “This approach is expected to be approximately unbiased for most gene sets.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Failure to account for biological variability across supra-cellular sampling units can lead to overestimation of effects, a phenomenon called pseudoreplication bias.

    “In single cell differential expression analyses, a failure to account for biological variability across supra-cellular sampling units (i.e. animal, donor, etc.) can lead to overestimation of effects; this phenomenon is referred to as “pseudoreplication bias” 36,37.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [36] Squair, J. W. et al. Confronting false discoveries in single-cell differential expression. Nat. Commun. 12, 5692 (2021). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [37] Soneson, C. & Robinson, M. D. Bias, robustness and scalability in single-cell differential expression analysis. Nat. Methods 15, 255–261 (2018). source

      Not checked in the free run.

55 of 55
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The Gaussian model used by ash is appropriate for the distribution of differential expression effects.

    “whether the Gaussian model assumed by ash is appropriate.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Genetic effects on neuropsychiatric conditions are usually causal.

    “Because genetic effects are usually causal, this parallel was interpreted as evidence that transcriptomic overlap reflects upstream, disease-causing processes rather than confounding or downstream effects.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Pseudobulk mean RNA expression level adequately captures the transcriptional state relevant to differential expression.

    “A key limitation of TRADE is that it currently uses only a simple readout from single cell RNA-seq experiments, the pseudo-bulk mean RNA expression level.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The distribution of true differential expression effects can be represented by a mixture model with null and normally distributed non-null effects.

    “In a simplified model where effects are either null or normally distributed with some variance σ2, πDEG equals the number of non-null effects, σ2 is the ratio between the scaled transcriptome-wide impact and πDEG, and σ can be interpreted as the average non-null log2FoldChange (Supplementary Note 3).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    DESeq2 scales poorly with the number of covariates.

    “DESeq2 scales poorly with the number of covariates.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    mash was designed primarily for multivariate experiments with several conditions, where specifying all possible covariance patterns is not feasible.

    “while mash was designed primarily for multivariate experiments with several conditions, where specifying all possible covariance patterns is not feasible”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Using a null-biased prior is crucial for accurately computing the local false sign rate, but is less important for estimating the effect size distribution itself.

    “using a null-biased prior is crucial for accurately computing the local false sign rate, but is less important for estimating the effect size distribution itself.”
7 of 7

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TRADE addresses the challenges of noise and undetected effects that are common in single-cell CRISPR screens, such as Perturb-seq, by providing a robust estimation of the true DE effects.

    “TRADE addresses the challenges of noise and undetected effects that are common in single-cell CRISPR screens, such as Perturb-seq, by providing a robust estimation of the true DE effects.”
  • TRADE quantifies the total effect of a perturbation across the entire transcriptome.

    “we used the TRADE (TRADEtools version 0.99.0) (63) method, which quantifies the total effect of a perturbation across the entire transcriptome.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • The low-sample-size perturbation changes identity

    Minor

    The comparison identifies EIF4A3 as the gene with seven cells, but attributes the resulting low-impact estimate to EIF4A4. The text does not establish that these are the same perturbation.

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lee, S. H. et al. Estimation of pleiotropy between complex diseases using single-nucleotide polymorphism-derived genomic relationships and restricted maximum likelihood. Bioinformatics 28, 2540–2542 (2012). · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nadig, A., Replogle, J. M., Pogson, A. N., Murthy, M., McCarroll, S. A., Weissman, J. S., Robinson, E. B., & O’Connor, L. J.
Affiliations
  • Broad Institute (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Nadig, Ajay
  • Replogle, Joseph M.
  • O’Connor, Luke J.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2025-04-21
Volume
57
Issue
5
Pages
1228-1237
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W4409622123
Cited by
70
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 3
FWCI
20.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007753, T32GM007618)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (F31NS115380)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
Perturb-seq, single-cell CRISPR screens, differential expression detection, estimation error, essential genes, dosage effect, neuropsychiatric disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-05.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-05.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review