Quantifying Molecular Bias in DNA Data Storage
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1038/s41467-020-16958-3 · Paper page
Abstract
DNA has recently emerged as an attractive medium for future digital data storage because of its extremely high information density and potential longevity. Recent work has shown promising results in developing proof-of-principle prototype systems. However, very uneven (biased) sequencing coverage distributions have been reported, which indicates inefficiencies in the storage process and points to optimization opportunities. These deviations from the average coverage in oligonucleotide copy distribution result in sequence drop-out and make error-free data retrieval from DNA more challenging. The uneven copy distribution was believed to stem from the underlying molecular processes, but the interplay between these molecular processes and the copy number distribution has been poorly understood until now. In this paper, we use millions of unique sequences from a DNA-based digital data archival system to study the oligonucleotide copy unevenness problem and show that two important sources of bias are the synthesis process and the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) process. By mapping the sequencing coverage of a large complex oligonucleotide pool back to its spatial distribution on the synthesis chip, we find that significant bias comes from array-based oligonucleotide synthesis. We also find that PCR stochasticity is another main driver of oligonucleotide copy variation. Based on these findings, we develop a statistical model for each molecular process as well as the overall process and compare the predicted bias with our experimental data. We further use our model to explore the trade-offs between synthesis bias, storage physical density and sequencing redundancy, providing insights for engineering efficient, robust DNA data storage systems.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Using UMI labeling, a ready-to-sequence 1,536,168-sequence pool, and dilution-PCR experiments, this study identifies DNA synthesis and PCR stochasticity as the two main sources of biased oligonucleotide copy distributions in DNA data storage. It builds a computational model of synthesis, PCR, and sequencing that predicts bias and explores trade-offs among synthesis bias, physical density, logical redundancy, and sequencing redundancy.
Key findings
- Synthesis is a prominent bias source: a UMI-labeled DNA file with over 400,000 sequences (sample size 457,772) showed biased UMI counts after synthesis, normalized to 7.7 mean coverage, while read counts were normalized to 83.0 mean coverage. Synthesis bias was related to spatial location on the synthesis chip; the first 1,536,168-sequence ready-to-sequence pool did not fit a normal distribution, but an improved synthesis process did.
- PCR stochasticity, not GC content, dominated PCR bias: the coefficient of variation before and after 31 cycles of PCR was 0.41 vs. 0.45 when subsampled to 20× coverage, and the standard deviation of population fraction change was 0.24 before PCR vs. 0.37 after PCR (p < 0.005, bootstrapping n = 1000). GC-content slopes were <0.01 for both the non-homopolymer pool (1,536,168 sequences, GC 40–60%) and homopolymer pool (1,358,998 sequences, GC 25–75%).
- In dilution-PCR experiments with 7,373 sequences, average copy numbers from 8 to 113, and 18 PCR cycles, lower copy number increased skew; the model predicted sequencing-coverage c.v. with R² = 0.71 and population-fraction-change standard deviation with R² = 0.84.
- Model trade-offs: storing as few as 10 copies per oligo could achieve <2% sequence dropout and a physical density of 9.3 EB/g; at 30 copies the required logical redundancy was 3%, whereas at 10 copies it grew to 8%, nearly tripling physical density. Biased synthesis (high c.v.) was the dominant factor in sequence dropout and could not be proportionally compensated by additional sequencing reads.
Methods
- UMI labeling was applied to an arbitrarily chosen DNA archival file with over 400,000 sequences; after ligation, PCR enrichment, sequencing, and BWA alignment, UMI filtering was used to decouple synthesis bias from PCR bias.
- A ready-to-sequence Twist Bioscience pool with 1,536,168 unique sequences was sequenced directly and after PCR (one 6-cycle plus five 5-cycle PCR processes, total 31 cycles); a separate homopolymer pool with 1,358,998 sequences was used to test GC-content effects on population fraction change.
- A serial dilution-PCR experiment used a 7,373-sequence pool diluted to average copy numbers of 8–113, amplified with 18 PCR cycles, and sequenced; the computational model used a normal distribution for synthesis copy numbers, a stochastic branching process for PCR with P = 0.95, and random sampling for sequencing and dilution.
Limitations
- Stated: experiments used Twist Bioscience synthesis and Illumina sequencing; applying the model to other technologies likely requires additional quantification and modeling, such as Ion Torrent or Oxford Nanopore homopolymer limitations and different array-based synthesis biases.
- Stated: PCR experiments amplified a single file without other non-targeted files in the pool; future work is needed for complex pools, where non-specific primer binding may increase copy-number variation.
- Stated/evident: the logical-redundancy example ignores insertions, deletions, and substitutions; the model treats high-copy-number PCR as effectively deterministic and models sequencing/dilution as random sampling, with synthesis modeled as normal for unbiased processes.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
18 of 26 cited sources checked · 12 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Synthesis bias is highly related to spatial location of oligos on a synthesis chip.
“We find that synthesis bias is highly related to spatial location of oligos on a synthesis chip.”
- Also stated in: another passage · hedged
“indicating that synthesis bias was related to the spatial location on the synthesis chip.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: another passage · hedged
- Findingown data
There is no practically important association between GC content and PCR bias in DNA storage.
“Even though these two encoding strategies lead to different GC distributions, we find no practically important association between GC content and PCR bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The old synthesis process is far more skewed than the improved process.
“indicating that the old synthesis process is far more skewed (there have since been process improvements, discussed in the next section).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The computational model's predicted bias is strongly associated with experimental data.
“We observe strong association between the bias predicted from this model and from our experimental data.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is significant bias from DNA synthesis.
“UMI labeling allow us to decouple synthesis bias from PCR bias, and we find significant bias from DNA synthesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
Regardless of the initial oligo copy number, the average amplification ratio remains constant.
“Figure 2e shows that regardless of the initial oligo copy number, the average amplification ratio remains constant.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
As average copy number decreased, oligo distribution skewed further away from its mean.
“Our experimental results show that as average copy number decreased, oligo distribution skewed further away from its mean (Fig. 5c).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The model prediction is in good agreement with the coefficient of variation of the experimental data (R2 = 0.71).
“Figure 5d shows that our model prediction is in good agreement with the c.v. of the experimental data (R2 = 0.71).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Physical storage density is a more important factor than sequencing reads in modulating sequence dropout.
“It shows that physical storage density is a more important factor than sequencing reads in modulating sequence dropout.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Lower oligo copy numbers were associated with greater PCR stochastic bias.
“Both plots show that the lower oligo copy numbers were, the greater the PCR stochastic bias was.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The model predicted the trend of standard deviation of population fraction change Q: lower starting copy number in PCR showed higher standard deviation (R2 = 0.84).
“The model also predicted the trend of standard deviation of population fraction change Q: the lower starting copy number in the PCR showed higher standard deviation (R2 = 0.84; Supplementary Fig. 4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The coefficient of variation of oligo copy distribution changed little before and after PCR (0.41 and 0.45, respectively, when both are subsampled to 20× coverage).
“Sequencing data (Fig. 4a) shows qualitatively little change in the coefficient of variation (c.v.) of oligo copy distribution before and after PCR (0.41 and 0.45, respectively, when both are subsampled to 20× coverage).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The model estimates that it is possible to store as few as 10 copies per oligo sequence (physical density of 9.3 EB per g) while achieving less than 2% sequence dropout.
“Interestingly, our model estimates that it is possible to store as few as 10 copies per oligo sequence (physical density of 9.3 EB per g - EB: exabytes; 1018 bytes), while achieving less than 2% sequence dropout.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
PCR bias is related to oligo copy number, especially for sequences with low copy numbers in the initial pool.
“We have shown that PCR bias is related to oligo copy number in the UMI quantification experiment, especially for sequences with low copy numbers in the initial pool (from a previous PCR process or from a biased synthesis pool).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
UMI-filtered results are a proxy for the oligo distribution after DNA synthesis.
“The UMI-filtered results are a proxy for the oligo distribution after DNA synthesis, and the copy number is clearly variable, indicating that the old synthesis process is far more skewed (there have since been process improvements, discussed in the next section).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The standard deviation of the amplification ratio is inversely proportional to the square root of the initial number of strands.
“we would expect the standard deviation (s.d.) of the amplification ratio to be inversely proportional to the square root of the initial number of strands.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Direct PCR and sequencing in a DNA storage system cannot distinguish bias created by DNA synthesis from bias caused by PCR and sequencing.
“However, direct PCR and sequencing in a DNA storage system cannot distinguish bias created by DNA synthesis from bias caused by PCR and sequencing.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductreasoning
UMI labeling allows decoupling of synthesis bias from PCR bias.
“UMI labeling allow us to decouple synthesis bias from PCR bias, and we find significant bias from DNA synthesis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
Synthesis bias and PCR bias are typically coupled, complicating determination of the source of bias in DNA data storage and arbitrary DNA pools.
“Determining the source of bias in DNA data storage, and more generally in arbitrary DNA pools, is complicated because synthesis bias and PCR bias are typically coupled.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Sequencing observation adds a constant amount of deviation to the amplification ratio.
“Additionally, since observation takes a sequencing reaction (another binomial process) we would expect a constant amount of added deviation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The system model helps researchers rationally optimize the use of DNA physical density, logical redundancy, and sequencing redundancy for reliable data decoding without conducting hundreds of experimental trials.
“Importantly, such system model helps researchers rationally optimize the use of DNA physical density, logical redundancy, and sequencing redundancy for reliable data decoding without conducting hundreds of experimental trials.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Sequence dropout is caused by physical storage with a limited number of oligo copies coupled with PCR stochastic bias.
“Sequence dropout is caused by physical storage with a limited number of oligo copies coupled with PCR stochastic bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
PCR increased bias relative to a random sampling process.
“This indicates that PCR increased bias relative to a random sampling process.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The UMI experiment provided evidence that the oligo population distribution after synthesis is quite similar to the distribution resulting from a PCR process that starts from a large average copy count sample from that synthesized pool.
“Despite not being able to observe the oligo population directly after synthesis, our UMI experiment (Fig. 2) has provided evidence that its population distribution is quite similar to the distribution resulting from a PCR process that starts from a large average copy count sample coming from that synthesized pool.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
- May combine two claims. 18
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationGC content of individual sequences affects PCR amplification efficiency in biological DNA.
“GC content of individual sequences were previously found to affect PCR amplification efficiency in biological DNA15–17.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrevious studies observed PCR bias in genomic biological sample amplification.
“Although previous studies observed PCR bias in genomic biological sample amplification15–17, it remained unclear whether such bias is significant in DNA data storage.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationSequencing coverage of oligonucleotides in DNA data storage systems is very uneven, requiring modern error correction codes capable of handling sequence dropout.
“However, the sequencing coverage (number of read counts of a unique sequence) of an oligonucleotide (henceforth referred to simply as “oligo”) was found to be very uneven, requiring modern error correction codes capable of handling sequence dropout7–12.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim5 of 6 sources checked- cites [7] Organick, L. et al. Random access in large-scale DNA data storage. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, (2018). source
- cites [8] source
- cites [9] source
Methods > Address Design and Encoding (page unavailable) says GC content affects sequencing coverage, and the Abstract (page unavailable) discusses coding against sequencing noise and assembly errors. The paper does not report very uneven read counts across oligonucleotides or say that sequence dropout requires dropout-tolerant error-correction codes. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [10] 2016, A DNA-Based Archival Storage System, ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev source
- cites [11] 2017, Portable and Error-Free DNA-Based Data Storage, Sci. Rep source
- cites [12] source
In System Implementation (Table 2; page unavailable), read counts vary substantially across the DNA blocks, supporting uneven coverage in this experiment. The Encoding Step and Post-processing Step describe codes for sequencing deletion and homopolymer errors, not codes capable of handling complete sequence dropout. The paper therefore does not support the claimed need for dropout correction. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationPCR is an exponential process, so small random variations early on in amplification can have a large impact on distribution.
“PCR is an exponential process, so small random variations early on in amplification can have a large impact on distribution18–24.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 7 sources checked- cites [18] Hassibi, A. , Kakavand, H. & Lee, T. H. A stochastic model and simulation algorithm for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems. Proc. GENSIPS (2004). source
- cites [19] 2005, Confidence intervals for nonhomogeneous branching processes and polymerase chain reactions, Ann. Probab source
- cites [20] source
- cites [21] source
The Model of the PCR (p. 3) describes random branching during PCR’s exponential phase, and the introduction (p. 2) reports significant finite-population effects and persistent variance. These passages support sensitivity to randomness, but they do not specifically establish that small variations early in amplification have a large impact on the final distribution. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [22] Kebschull, J. M. & Zador, A. M. Sources of PCR-induced distortions in high-throughput sequencing data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, (2015). source
- cites [23] source
- cites [24] source
The Materials and Methods sections on plasmids and chromatin immunoprecipitation describe using PCR to generate fragments and analyze samples. Neither those passages nor searches for exponential amplification and early-cycle stochastic variation address whether small random variations can substantially change the resulting distribution. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataHigh-throughput sequencing and sample dilution are modeled using random sampling because GC content in the files did not show practically significant bias in the PCR GC bias test.
“Illumina sequencing was previously observed to have bias on GC-extreme sequences15,27,28, but GC content in our files did not show practically significant bias in the PCR GC bias test. Therefore, high-throughput sequencing and sample dilution are modeled using random sampling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe estimated physical density is over 10-fold higher than prior work by Erlich and Zielinski and is aligned with what has been observed in practice.
“This estimated physical density is over 10-fold higher than prior work by Erlich and Zielinski10 and is aligned with what we have recently observed in practice29.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [10] 2016, A DNA-Based Archival Storage System, ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev source
- cites [29] source
The Results section on U1 levels reports cancer-cell migration and invasion, while the Methods section on LECDS calculations concerns RNA-seq analysis; neither addresses physical density. Searches for the tenfold comparison, Erlich and Zielinski, and physical density in practice found no relevant passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPrior work found that PCR copy data from a deeply diluted oligo pool resulted in dramatic bias, which is less suitable for data recovery.
“Indeed, prior work also found that PCR copy data from a deeply diluted oligo pool resulted in dramatic bias, which is less suitable for data recovery10.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] 2016, A DNA-Based Archival Storage System, ACM SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev source
The Text reports that nine serial PCR amplifications produced a deep copy with substantially more skewed oligo representation than the master pool. But the decoder fully recovered the file from that copy, so the claim overstates its effect on recovery. The paper separately reports high dropout rates for libraries made from very small DNA inputs; those dilution results should not be conflated with the deep-copy result. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPCR stochasticity widens oligo copy distributions of the test DNA archival file and seems to be a dominant factor in PCR bias.
“Instead, we find that PCR stochasticity widens oligo copy distributions of our test DNA archival file and, based on our observations, seems to be a dominant factor in PCR bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe amplification ratio has high variation when oligos have very low copy numbers, indicating that the amplification ratio is affected by stochastic effects at these low copy numbers.
“On the other hand, the amplification ratio was observed to have high variation when oligos had very low copy numbers, indicating that the amplification ratio was affected by stochastic effects at these low copy numbers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe distribution after synthesis is very similar in shape to the distribution after PCR, indicating that PCR does not significantly increase bias overall.
“This distribution is also very similar in shape to the distribution after PCR, indicating that PCR does not significantly increase bias overall.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe oligo distribution before synthesis process improvement did not follow a normal distribution, but the oligo distribution using the improved synthesis process is well fitted to a normal distribution.
“Interestingly, the oligo distribution before the synthesis process improvement did not follow a normal distribution, but the oligo distribution using the improved synthesis process is now well fitted to a normal distribution (Fig. 3b, d).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt 30 copies, the required logical redundancy for data recovery is 3%, whereas at 10 copies the logical redundancy grows to only 8%, nearly tripling physical density.
“For example, at 30 copies, the required logical redundancy for data recovery is 3% whereas at 10 copies the logical redundancy grows to only 8%, nearly tripling physical density.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the ready-to-sequence pool with GC content between 40 and 60%, the association between population fraction changes and GC content was statistically significant (P < 0.05) but very small and practically unimportant (slope < 0.01).
“Although the association between population fraction changes and GC content of this pool (between 40 and 60%) was found to be statistically significant (P value < 0.05), the association between the two was very small and practically unimportant (the slope of the linear fit was <0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA biased synthesis pool (high c.v.) is the dominant factor in sequence dropout and cannot be proportionally compensated by additional sequencing reads.
“It shows that a biased synthesis pool (i.e., high c.v.) is the dominant factor in sequence dropout and cannot be proportionally compensated by additional sequencing reads.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn 9 homopolymer DNA archival files with 1,358,998 unique sequences and GC content from 25 to 75%, the association between GC content and population fraction changes was very small and not practically important (slope < 0.01).
“These homopolymer files had a wider range of GC content from 25 to 75%, but the association between GC content and the population fraction changes was still very small and not practically important (the slope of the linear fit was <0.01).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe standard deviations of population fraction changes were 0.24 before PCR and 0.37 after PCR, and these two numbers were statistically different (p < 0.005, bootstrapping n = 1000).
“The standard deviations of population fraction changes were 0.24 and 0.37 before PCR and after PCR, respectively, and these two numbers were statistically different (p < 0.005, computed by bootstrapping n = 1000).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductreasoningA ready-to-sequence pool with 1,536,168 unique sequences can be sequenced directly without intermediate PCR or DNA ligation steps required for sequencing library preparation.
“This ready-to-sequence pool can be sequenced using an Illumina sequencer directly, with no need for intermediate PCR or DNA ligation steps required for sequencing library preparation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
PremisereasoningTwist Bioscience increased the dosage tolerance window and introduced engineering changes, resulting in dramatically decreased error rates and more robust molecules in subsequent processes.
“The combination of these changes has resulted in dramatically decreased error rates and more robust molecules in subsequent processes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone givenInitial data used in this paper were produced with a process that allowed process excursions outside of the dosage tolerance window.
“Initial data used in this paper were produced with a process that allowed process excursions outside of the dosage tolerance window.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenEven an unbiased PCR process will have nonzero population fraction change for finite sample sizes, and this should asymptotically decrease with the total number of reads.
“It is worth noting that even an unbiased process will have for finite sample sizes. Furthermore, should asymptotically decrease with the total number of reads.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenUMI labeling ensures with high probability that each molecule will include a tag different from any other.
“Synthetic DNA pools include multiple copies of each sequence, and UMI labeling ensures with high probability that each molecule will include a tag different from any other.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOligos from unbiased synthesis and sequencing processes can be well modeled as a normal distribution and random sampling, respectively.
“In this study, we found that oligos from unbiased synthesis and sequencing processes can be well modeled as a normal distribution and random sampling, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisereasoningPCR is not perfect; replication of an individual molecule has a probability of less than one, so even small random divergence in early phases of amplification can create significant bias known as PCR stochastic bias.
“Because PCR is not perfect (i.e., replication of an individual molecule has a probability of less than one), even small random divergence in early phases of amplification can create significant bias, which is known as PCR stochastic bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe experiment was designed to avoid complexity from other files for proper quantification of the impact of PCR stochastic bias.
“This experiment was designed to avoid complexity from other files for proper quantification of the impact of PCR stochastic bias.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenThe system model was experimentally tested by PCR-amplifying a single file without any other non-targeted files in a pool.
“Our system model was experimentally tested by PCR-amplifying a single file without any other non-targeted files in a pool.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningThe example ignores all other errors such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions, which should be taken into account when determining proper logical redundancy.
“It is worth pointing out the example here ignores all other errors such as insertions, deletions, and substitutions. These errors depend on synthesis and sequencing technologies, and they should be taken into account when determining the proper logical redundancy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone givenThe proposed system model can in principle be applied to other synthesis and sequencing technologies.
“While the experiments were tested using Twist Bioscience and Illumina sequencing, the proposed system model can in principle be applied to other synthesis and sequencing technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe negligible bias impact from GC content in the experimental data was likely because the oligos were relatively short (150-nt) and the use of KAPA HIFI polymerase reduced the impact of GC bias.
“The negligible bias impact from GC content in our experimental data was likely because these oligos were relatively short (150-nt), and the use of KAPA HIFI polymerase also reduced the impact of GC bias26.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Benjamini, Y. & Speed, T. P. Summarizing and correcting the GC content bias in high-throughput sequencing. 40, 1–14 (2012). source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone givenDifferent array-based synthesis technologies could have their own unique dependent bias caused by processes specific to them, such as uneven fluidic operation, surface treatment, and other factors.
“Different array-based synthesis technologies could also have their own unique dependent bias caused by processes specific to them, such as uneven fluidic operation, surface treatment, and other factors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
InterpretationreasoningWhen applying the model to other technologies, additional quantification and modeling is likely needed.
“It is worth noting that when applying our model to other technologies, additional quantification and modeling is likely needed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningPCR carried out at high copy number of templates should obey the law of mass action and therefore be effectively deterministic.
“PCR carried out at high copy number of templates should obey the law of mass action and therefore be effectively deterministic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Current methods typically require either trial-and-error of experimental protocols or brute-force use of hundreds to thousands of sequencing reads per sequence to capture underrepresented sequences.
“Current methods typically require either trial-and-error of experimental protocols or brute-force use of hundreds to thousands of sequencing reads per sequence to capture underrepresented sequences.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The inefficiency in DNA data storage stems from lack of understanding about bias in oligo copy distribution and how it changes as oligos are manipulated in DNA data storage systems.
“This inefficiency stems from lack of understanding about bias in oligo copy distribution, as well as how it changes as the oligos are manipulated in DNA data storage systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ion Torrent and Oxford Nanopore sequencing show limited ability to accurately sequence long homopolymers, which is less significant in Illumina sequencing.
“For example, Ion Torrent and Oxford Nanopore sequencing show limited ability to accurately sequence long homopolymers, which is less significant in Illumina sequencing.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effect of homopolymers in the payload has recently been found to be minimal in practice.
“While the effect of homopolymers in the payload has recently found to be minimal in practice19, it is encouraging to note that the care taken to randomize payloads yields no systematic sequence loss.”
From Probing the physical limits of reliable DNA data retrieval. (2020) · cites this paper as [19]
PCR-based random access irreversibly removes oligos from the pool, which necessitates potentially lossy reamplification of the entire pool after repeated data retrieval.
“Second, PCR-based random access irreversibly removes oligos from the pool, which necessitates potentially lossy reamplification of the entire pool after repeated data retrieval.75,76”
From Emerging Approaches to DNA Data Storage: Challenges and Prospects (2022) · cites this paper as [76]
Each PCR amplification may introduce stochastic variation in copy number of the file sequences, leading to up to 2% data loss per amplification if using ten-fold physical redundancy.
“In this case, each PCR amplification may introduce stochastic variation in copy number of the file sequences, leading to up to 2% data loss per amplification19 if using ten-fold physical redundancy, as recently suggested18.”
From Random access DNA memory using Boolean search in an archival file storage system (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
The file system overcomes several challenges associated with pre-existing PCR-based file systems, including obviating the need for numerous heating and cooling cycles and enzymatic synthesis, and eliminating non-specific crosstalk between file sequences and barcodes, while enabling arbitrary Boolean logical search queries.
“Our file system overcomes several challenges associated with pre-existing PCR-based file systems, including obviating the need for numerous heating and cooling cycles and enzymatic synthesis, and eliminating non-specific crosstalk between file sequences and barcodes17,19,21, while enabling arbitrary Boolean logical search queries.”
From Random access DNA memory using Boolean search in an archival file storage system (2021) · cites this paper as [19]
Random access of data using PCR can cause data loss owing to biased amplification.
“Random access of data using PCR can also cause data loss owing to biased amplification (28, 29).”
From Electrochemical DNA synthesis and sequencing on a single electrode with scalability for integrated data storage (2021) · cites this paper as [28]
The slightly higher sequence loss in the 500 μg particle sample could be explained by the effect of subsampling to equalize the concentration of both samples before sequencing preparation.
“The slightly higher sequence loss in the 500 µg particle sample could be explained by the effect of subsampling to equalize the concentration of both samples (100 and 500 µg) before sequencing preparation.[31]”
From Integrating DNA Encapsulates and Digital Microfluidics for Automated Data Storage in DNA (2022) · cites this paper as [31]
Cites
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607 · see citing works
Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · Cited by 12,063 · see citing works
U1 snRNP regulates cancer cell migration and invasion in vitro
Oh, J.-M., Venters, C. C., Di, C., Pinto, A. M., Wan, L., Younis, I., Cai, Z., Arai, C., So, B. R., Duan, J., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-13993-7 · Cited by 7,157 · see citing works
Next-Generation Digital Information Storage in DNA
Church, G. M., Gao, Y., & Kosuri, S. (2012) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1226355 · Cited by 1,441 · see citing works
Towards Practical, High-Capacity, Low-Maintenance Information Storage in Synthesized DNA
Goldman, N., Bertone, P., Chen, S., Dessimoz, C., LeProust, E. M., Sipos, B., & Birney, E. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11875 · Cited by 1,220 · see citing works
Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries
Aird, D., Ross, M. G., Chen, W.-S., Danielsson, M., Fennell, T., Russ, C., Jaffe, D. B., Nusbaum, C., & Gnirke, A. (2011) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2011-12-2-r18 · Cited by 1,174 · see citing works
Counting absolute numbers of molecules using unique molecular identifiers
Kivioja, T., Vähärautio, A., Karlsson, K., Bonke, M., Enge, M., Linnarsson, S., & Taipale, J. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1778 · Cited by 1,010 · see citing works
Summarizing and correcting the GC content bias in high-throughput sequencing
Benjamini, Y., & Speed, T. P. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks001 · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Characterizing and measuring bias in sequence data
Ross, M. G., Russ, C., Costello, M., Hollinger, A., Lennon, N. J., Hegarty, R., Nusbaum, C., & Jaffe, D. B. (2013) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2013-14-5-r51 · Cited by 909 · see citing works
DNA Fountain enables a robust and efficient storage architecture
Erlich, Y., & Zielinski, D. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaj2038 · Cited by 898 · see citing works
Large-scale de novo DNA synthesis: technologies and applications
Kosuri, S., & Church, G. M. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2918 · Cited by 869 · see citing works
Random access in large-scale DNA data storage
Organick, L., Ang, S. D., Chen, Y.-J., Lopez, R., Yekhanin, S., Makarychev, K., Racz, M. Z., Kamath, G., Gopalan, P., Nguyen, B., et al. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4079 · Cited by 775 · see citing works
Self-citationRobust Chemical Preservation of Digital Information on DNA in Silica with Error-Correcting Codes
Grass, R. N., Heckel, R., Puddu, M., Paunescu, D., & Stark, W. J. (2015) · Angewandte Chemie International Edition · doi:10.1002/anie.201411378 · Cited by 754 · see citing works
Molecular Digital Data Storage Using DNA
Ceze, L., Nivala, J., & Strauss, K. (2019) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41576-019-0125-3 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Self-citationA Rewritable, Random-Access DNA-Based Storage System
Tabatabaei Yazdi, S. M. H., Yuan, Y., Ma, J., Zhao, H., & Milenkovic, O. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14138 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Portable and Error-Free DNA-Based Data Storage
Yazdi, S. M. H. T., Gabrys, R., & Milenkovic, O. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-05188-1 · Cited by 361 · see citing works
A DNA-Based Archival Storage System
Bornholt, J., Lopez, R. M., Carmean, D. M., Ceze, L., Seelig, G., & Strauß, K. (2016) · International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS) · doi:10.1145/2872362.2872397 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Self-citationDabney, J., & Meyer, M. (2012) · BioTechniques · doi:10.2144/000113809 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Zhirnov, V., Zadegan, R. M., Sandhu, G. S., Church, G. M., & Hughes, W. L. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4594 · Cited by 307 · see citing works
Sources of PCR-induced distortions in high-throughput sequencing data sets
Kebschull, J. M., & Zador, A. M. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv717 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Effects of GC Bias in Next-Generation-Sequencing Data on De Novo Genome Assembly
Chen, Y.-C., Liu, T., Yu, C.-H., Chiang, T.-Y., & Hwang, C.-C. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062856 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Self-citationOptimal enzymes for amplifying sequencing libraries
Quail, M. A., Otto, T. D., Gu, Y., Harris, S. R., Skelly, T. F., McQuillan, J. A., Swerdlow, H. P., & Oyola, S. O. (2012) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1814 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Theoretical uncertainty of measurements using quantitative polymerase chain reaction
Peccoud, J., & Jacob, C. (1996) · Biophysical Journal · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(96)79205-6 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Cox, J. P. (2001) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/s0167-7799(01)01671-7 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Probing the physical limits of reliable DNA data retrieval.
Organick, L., Chen, Y.-J., Dumas Ang, S., Lopez, R., Liu, X., Strauss, K., & Ceze, L. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14319-8 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationEfficiency of DNA replication in the polymerase chain reaction
Stolovitzky, G., & Cecchi, G. (1996) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.93.23.12947 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
A DNA-Based Archival Storage System
Bornholt, J., Lopez, R., Carmean, D. M., Ceze, L., Seelig, G., & Strauss, K. (2016) · ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review · doi:10.1145/2954680.2872397 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Self-citationKoster, M. J. E., & Timmers, H. T. M. (2015) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gku1263 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
Random variation and concentration effects in PCR
Jagers, P., & Klebaner, F. (2003) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00166-8 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Lalam, N., Jacob, C., & Jagers, P. (2004) · Advances in Applied Probability · doi:10.1239/aap/1086957587 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Sixma, T. K. (2012) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/nchembio.1143 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Efficiency of DNA replication in the Polymerase Chain ReactioPreprint
Cecchi, G., & Stolovitzky, G. A. (2001) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.cond-mat/0105099 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Confidence intervals for nonhomogeneous branching processes and polymerase chain reactions
Piau, D. (2005) · The Annals of Probability · doi:10.1214/009117904000000775 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Author Correction: Probing the physical limits of reliable DNA data retrieval
Organick, L., Chen, Y.-J., Ang, S. D., Lopez, R. M., Liu, X., Strauß, K., & Ceze, L. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14904-x · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Self-citationA Characterization of the DNA Data Storage Channel
Heckel, R., Mikutis, G., & Grass, R. N. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-45832-6 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Hassibi, A. , Kakavand, H. & Lee, T. H. A stochastic model and simulation algorithm for polymerase chain reaction (PCR) systems. Proc. GENSIPS (2004).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Advances in multiplexed techniques for the detection and quantification of microRNAs
Jet, T., Gines, G., Rondelez, Y., & Taly, V. (2021) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d0cs00609b · Cited by 459 · see citing works
Emerging Approaches to DNA Data Storage: Challenges and Prospects
Doricchi, A., Platnich, C. M., Gimpel, A., Horn, F., Earle, M., Lanzavecchia, G., Cortajarena, A. L., Liz-Marzán, L. M., Liu, N., Heckel, R., et al. (2022) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c06748 · Cited by 235 · see citing works
Towards practical and robust DNA-based data archiving using the yin–yang codec system
Ping, Z., Chen, S., Zhou, G., Huang, X., Zhu, S. J., Zhang, H., Lee, H. H., Lan, Z., Cui, J., Chen, T., et al. (2022) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-022-00231-2 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Random access DNA memory using Boolean search in an archival file storage system
Banal, J. L., Shepherd, T. R., Berleant, J., Huang, H., Reyes, M., Ackerman, C. M., Blainey, P. C., & Bathe, M. (2021) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-021-01021-3 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Probing the physical limits of reliable DNA data retrieval.
Organick, L., Chen, Y.-J., Dumas Ang, S., Lopez, R., Liu, X., Strauss, K., & Ceze, L. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14319-8 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationDNA as a universal chemical substrate for computing and data storage
Yang, S., Bögels, B. W. A., Wang, F., Xu, C., Dou, H., Mann, S., Fan, C., & de Greef, T. F. A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-024-00576-4 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Bi, D., Almpanis, A., Noel, A., Deng, Y., & Schober, R. (2021) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2021.3066117 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Robust data storage in DNA by de Bruijn graph-based de novo strand assembly
Song, L., Geng, F., Gong, Z.-Y., Chen, X., Tang, J., Gong, C., Zhou, L., Xia, R., Han, M., Xu, J.-Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33046-w · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Parallel molecular data storage by printing epigenetic bits on DNA
Zhang, C., Wu, R., Sun, F., Lin, Y., Liang, Y., Liang, Y., Chen, Y., Teng, J., Song, Z., Liu, N., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08040-5 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationXu, C., Ma, B., Gao, Z., Dong, X., Zhao, C., & Liu, H. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abk0100 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Wang, S., Mao, X., Wang, F., Zuo, X., & Fan, C. (2023) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202307499 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Improved read/write cost tradeoff in DNA-based data storage using LDPC codes
Chandak, S., Tatwawadi, K., Lau, B., Mardia, J., Kubit, M., Neu, J., Griffin, P., Wootters, M., Weissman, T., & Ji, H. (2019) · 2019 57th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton) · doi:10.1109/allerton.2019.8919890 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Uncertainties in synthetic DNA-based data storage
Xu, C., Zhao, C., Ma, B., & Liu, H. (2021) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkab230 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
DNA storage in thermoresponsive microcapsules for repeated random multiplexed data access
Bögels, B. W. A., Nguyen, B. H., Ward, D., Gascoigne, L., Schrijver, D. P., Pistikou, A. M., Joesaar, A., Yang, S., Voets, I. K., Mulder, W. J. M., et al. (2023) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-023-01377-4 · Cited by 67 · see citing works
Self-citationIntegrating DNA Encapsulates and Digital Microfluidics for Automated Data Storage in DNA
Antkowiak, P. L., Koch, J., Nguyen, B. H., Stark, W. J., Strauss, K., Ceze, L., & Grass, R. N. (2022) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.202107381 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationA Novel Image Encryption Scheme for DNA Storage Systems Based on DNA Hybridization and Gene Mutation
Yao, X., Xie, R., Zan, X., Su, Y., Xu, P., & Liu, W. (2023) · Interdisciplinary Sciences Computational Life Sciences · doi:10.1007/s12539-023-00565-z · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Information-Theoretic Foundations of DNA Data Storage
Shomorony, I., & Heckel, R. (2022) · Foundations and Trends® in Communications and Information Theory · doi:10.1561/0100000117 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
DNA synthesis for true random number generation
Meiser, L. C., Koch, J., Antkowiak, P. L., Stark, W. J., Heckel, R., & Grass, R. N. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19757-y · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Sun, J., Philpott, M., Loi, D. S. C., Li, S., Monteagudo-Mesas, P., Hoffman, G., Robson, J., Mehta, N., Gamble, V., Brown, T., et al. (2024) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/s41592-024-02168-y · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Novel Modalities in DNA Data Storage
Lim, C. K., Nirantar, S., Yew, W. S., & Poh, C. L. (2021) · Trends in biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.12.008 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
A Mixed Culture of Bacterial Cells Enables an Economic DNA Storage on a Large Scale
Hao, M., Qiao, H., Gao, Y., Wang, Z., Qiao, X., Chen, X., & Qi, H. (2020) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-020-01141-7 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Low-Bias Manipulation of DNA Oligo Pool for Robust Data Storage
Gao, Y., Chen, X., 郝建业, Zhang, C., Qi, H., Ke, Y., & Qi, H. (2020) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.0c00419 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
A digital twin for DNA data storage based on comprehensive quantification of errors and biases
Gimpel, A. L., Stark, W. J., Heckel, R., & Grass, R. N. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-41729-1 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
Mobile and Self‐Sustained Data Storage in an Extremophile Genomic DNA
Sun, F., Dong, Y., Ni, M., Ping, Z., Sun, Y., Ouyang, Q., & Qian, L. (2023) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202206201 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Digital data storage on DNA tape using CRISPR base editors
Sadremomtaz, A., Glass, R. F., Guerrero, J. E., LaJeunesse, D., Josephs, E. A., & Zadegan, R. M. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-42223-4 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
A primordial DNA store and compute engine
Lin, K. N., Volkel, K., Cao, C., Hook, P. W., Polak, R. E., Clark, A. S., San‐Miguel, A., Timp, W., Tuck, J. M., Velev, O. D., et al. (2024) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-024-01771-6 · Cited by 38 · see citing works
GCNSA: DNA storage encoding with a graph convolutional network and self-attention
Cao, B., Wang, B., & Zhang, Q. (2023) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.106231 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Xie, R., Zan, X., Chu, L., Su, Y., Xu, P., & Liu, W. (2023) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-023-05237-9 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Improving error-correcting capability in DNA digital storage via soft-decision decoding
Ding, L., Wu, S., Hou, Z., Li, A., Xu, Y., Feng, H., Pan, W., & Ruan, J. (2023) · National Science Review · doi:10.1093/nsr/nwad229 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Survey of Information Encoding Techniques for DNA
Heinis, T., Sokolovskii, R., & Alnasir, J. J. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3626233 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Decoding DNA data storage for investment
Stanley, P. M., Strittmatter, L. M., Vickers, A., & Lee, K. C. K. (2020) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107639 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
DeSP: a systematic DNA storage error simulation pipeline
Yuan, L., Xie, Z., Wang, Y., & Wang, X. (2022) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-022-04723-w · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Targeted Genome Sequencing (TG-Seq) Approaches to Detect Plant Viruses
Maina, S., Zheng, L., & Rodoni, B. (2021) · Viruses · doi:10.3390/v13040583 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Advances and Challenges in Random Access Techniques for In Vitro DNA Data Storage
Zhou, Y., Bi, K., Ge, Q., & Lu, Z. (2024) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.4c07235 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
The zettabyte era is in our DNA
Bar-Lev, D., Sabary, O., & Yaakobi, E. (2024) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00717-1 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Hidden Addressing Encoding for DNA Storage
Wang, P., Mu, Z., Sun, L., Si, S., & Wang, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.916615 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
CLGBO: An Algorithm for Constructing Highly Robust Coding Sets for DNA Storage
Zheng, Y., Wu, J., & Wang, B. (2021) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.644945 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Oligo Design with Single Primer Binding Site for High Capacity DNA-Based Data Storage
Wang, Y., Noor‐A‐Rahim, M., Zhang, J., Gunawan, E., Guan, Y. L., & Poh, C. L. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2019.2940177 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Multiplexed Random Access Approach to DNA Microspheres for High‐Capacity Data Storage
Zhong, W., Wang, S., Geng, C., Zheng, Y., Bai, S., Cao, X., Liu, K., Yang, Y., Lü, C., & Jiang, X. (2024) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.202408852 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Liu, Q., Liu, Q., Zhang, J., Zhang, C., Qian, L., Qi, H., Li, Y., & Song, D. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adw2613 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Multidimensional data organization and random access in large-scale DNA storage systems
Song, X., Shah, S., & Reif, J. H. (2021) · Theoretical Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2021.09.021 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Lee, H., Lee, B., Kim, D. G., Cho, Y. A., Kim, J.-S., & Suh, Y. (2021) · Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.4143/crt.2021.107 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Luo, H., Huang, W. L., He, Z., Fang, Y., Tian, Y., & Xiong, Z. (2025) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202415358 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Information decay and enzymatic information recovery for DNA data storage
Meiser, L. C., Gimpel, A. L., Deshpande, T., Libort, G., Chen, W. D., Heckel, R., Nguyen, B. H., Strauß, K., Stark, W. J., & Grass, R. N. (2022) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-022-04062-9 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citationOligo replication advantage driven by GC content and Gibbs free energy
Qiao, H., Gao, Y., Liu, Q., Wei, Y., Li, J., Wang, Z., & Qi, H. (2022) · Biotechnology Letters · doi:10.1007/s10529-022-03295-2 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
DNA Logic Gates for Small Molecule Activation Circuits in Cells
Emanuelson, C., Bardhan, A., & Deiters, A. (2024) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.3c00474 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Encoding of non-biological information for its long-term storage in DNA
Гарафутдинов, Р. Р., Chemeris, D. A., Sakhabutdinova, A. R., Kiryanova, O. Y., Mikhaylenko, C. I., & Chemeris, A. V. (2022) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2022.104664 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Data Readout Techniques for DNA‐Based Information Storage
Liu, B., Wang, F., Fan, C., & Li, Q. (2025) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202412926 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Modelling, Characterization of Data-Dependent and Process-Dependent Errors in DNA Data Storage
Wang, Y., Noor‐A‐Rahim, M., Gunawan, E., Guan, Y. L., & Poh, C. L. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2022.3233914 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
An image cryptography method by highly error-prone DNA storage channel
Zan, X., Chu, L., Xie, R., Su, Y., Yao, X., Xu, P., & Liu, W. (2023) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1173763 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Improved read/write cost tradeoff in DNA-based data storage using LDPC codesPreprint
Chandak, S., Tatwawadi, K., Lau, B. T., et al. (2019) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/770032 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Zhou, Y., Bi, K., Xu, Q., Liu, Q., Zhao, X., Ge, Q., & Lu, Z. (2025) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c17817 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Advancing Archival Data Storage: The Promises and Challenges of DNA Storage System
Sensintaffar, A., Wei, Y., Ou, L., Du, D. H. C., & Li, B. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Storage · doi:10.1145/3723166 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Cao, B., Li, X., Wang, B., He, T., Zheng, Y., Zhang, X., & Zhang, Q. (2025) · Patterns · doi:10.1016/j.patter.2025.101288 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Xu, Y., Ding, L., Wu, S., & Ruan, J. (2024) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202402951 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
RBS: A Rotational Coding Based on Blocking Strategy for DNA Storage
Mu, Z., Cao, B., Wang, P., Wang, B., & Zhang, Q. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience · doi:10.1109/tnb.2023.3254514 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Bi, D., Almpanis, A., Noel, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2009.00090 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Electro-switchable addressing system for achieving repetitive random data access
Yu, H., Han, Y., Lin, W., Gao, H., Li, W., Lv, M., Cheng, M., Huang, Y., Bi, K., Lu, Z., et al. (2025) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkaf733 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Adaptation of lentiviral vectors for viral gene therapy and their impact on host cell biology
Kaiser, C. W., Rouchka, E. C., & Smith, M. L. (2026) · Journal of Translational Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12967-025-07626-5 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Robust DNA Image Storage Decoding with Residual CNN
Ruan, C., Yang, L. H., Han, R., Gao, S., Wu, H., & Ling, N. (2024) · IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems proceedings · doi:10.1109/iscas58744.2024.10558127 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
DNA Bloom Filter enables anti-contamination and file version control for DNA-based data storage
Li, Y., Zhang, H., Chen, Y., Shen, Y., & Ping, Z. (2024) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbae125 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationAdvanced DNA Amplification for Efficient Data Storage
Zhang, J., Chen, M., Lin, G., Liu, S., Yang, C. J., & Song, Y. (2024) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.4c12102 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
In-vitro validated methods for encoding digital data in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)
Mortuza, G. M., Guerrero, J. E., Llewellyn, S., Tobiason, M. D., Dickinson, G. D., Hughes, W. L., Zadegan, R. M., & Andersen, T. (2023) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-023-05264-6 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Hybrid RNA sequencing of broad bean wilt virus 2 from faba beans
Maina, S., Norton, S., & Rodoni, B. (2023) · Microbiology Spectrum · doi:10.1128/spectrum.02663-23 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Highly Accurate Sequence- and Position-Independent Error Profiling of DNA Synthesis and Sequencing
Yeom, H., Kim, N., Lee, A. C., Kim, J., Kim, H., Choi, H., Song, S. W., Kwon, S., & Choi, Y. (2023) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.3c00308 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Low-cost and automated magnetic bead-based DNA data writing via digital microfluidics
Bao, M., Herdendorf, B., Mendonsa, G., Chari, S., & Reddy, A. (2025) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/d5lc00106d · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Using Artificial Neural Networks to Model Errors in Biochemical Manipulation of DNA Molecules
Guo, A. J. X., & Qi, H. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2021.3088525 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
GC-balanced polar codes correcting insertions, deletions and substitutions for DNA storage
Zhang, R., & Wu, H. (2025) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbaf278 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Scaling the High-Yield Potential of Large-Scale DNA Data Storage with Cap-Free DNA Synthesis
Lin, W., Yu, H., Li, W., Han, Y., Lv, M., Gao, H., Cheng, M., Huang, Y., Bi, K., Lu, Z., et al. (2025) · ACS Synthetic Biology · doi:10.1021/acssynbio.5c00175 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Reddy, R., Carpenter, E. J., Halpin, A., et al. (2025) · Glycobiology · doi:10.1093/glycob/cwaf042 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Kilinc, V., Hayakawa, R., Yamauchi, Y., Wakayama, Y., & Hill, J. P. (2024) · Advanced Sensor Research · doi:10.1002/adsr.202300176 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
High-Risk Sequence Prediction Model in DNA Storage: The LQSF Method
Ma, Y., Chen, S., Qi, X., Lu, Z., & Bi, K. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience · doi:10.1109/tnb.2024.3424576 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Emanuelson, C., Bardhan, A., Ankenbruck, N., Boette, J., & Deiters, A. (2025) · ACS Chemical Biology · doi:10.1021/acschembio.5c00333 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
On the Reliability of Information Retrieval from MDS Coded Data in DNA Storage
Hanna, S. K. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT) · doi:10.1109/isit63088.2025.11195362 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
From deep archival to real-time applications: Challenges and opportunities in DNA data storage
Liu, Q., Liu, Q.-J., Kang, S., Li, J., Xia, H., & Qi, H. (2026) · Biotechnology Advances · doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2026.108833 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Toward Portable DNA Data Storage: A Paper-Based System for Rewritable and Random Access
Liu, Q., Zhang, J., Cui, J., Song, D., & Qi, H. (2026) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.5c25216 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Leveraging nature to advance data storage: DNA as a storage medium
Abram, K. Z., & Udaondo, Z. (2023) · Microbial Biotechnology · doi:10.1111/1751-7915.14291 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Low-Bias Amplification for Robust DNA Data ReadoutPreprint
Gao, Y., Chen, X., Hao, J., Zhang, C., Qiao, H., Ke, Y., & Qi, H. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.02.09.940411 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Image Storage in DNA by an Extensible Quaternary Codec System
Pang, R., Dong, Y., & Zhao, X. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15094760 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
DNA Data Storage Security: How to Detect a DNA Pool has been Copied
Gasnier, H., Coatrieux, G., Genot, A. J., Berton, C., & Bellafqira, R. (2025) · International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Computing (IC_ETC) · doi:10.1109/ic_etc65981.2025.11141190 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Zhang, Y., Qin, R., Ge, Q., Guo, Q., & Chen, W. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aec1469 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Comparative Analysis of Clustering Methodologies in DNA Storage
Sankar, S., Wang, Y., Jiayu, Z., Sabrina, N. N., Gunawan, E., Guan, Y. L., Noor‐A‐Rahim, M., & Poh, C. L. (2022) · International Computer Science and Engineering Conference · doi:10.1109/icsec56337.2022.10049327 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
High‐Fidelity DNA Polymerase for DNA‐Based Digital Information Storage
Liu, X., Wen, K., Yu, E., Zhao, Q., Fu, H., Zhu, J., Han, H., & Li, Q. (2025) · Small Methods · doi:10.1002/smtd.202500817 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
An Overview of DNA ‐Based Digital Data Storage
Song, X., Shah, S., & Reif, J. H. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9783527825424.ch18 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Robust retrieval of data stored in DNA by de Bruijn graph-based de novo strand assemblyPreprint
Song, L., Geng, F., Gong, Z.-Y., Chen, X.-M., Tang, J., Gong, C., Zhou, L., Xia, R., Han, M., Xu, J., et al. (2020) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2020.12.20.423642 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Yao, X., Xie, R., Zan, X., Su, Y., Xu, P., & Liu, W. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2000112/v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
The adaptive landscapes of three global Escherichia coli transcriptional regulatorsPreprint
Westmann, C. A., Goldbach, L., & Wagner, A. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.103774 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
АНАЛІЗ МОЖЛИВОСТЕЙ ДОВГОСТРОКОВОГО ЗБЕРІГАННЯ ДАНИХ НА ДНК
Крючин, А. А., Беляк, Є. В., Крючина, Є. А., & Shikhovets, О. V. (2021) · Medical Informatics and Engineering · doi:10.11603/mie.1996-1960.2020.3.12390
DNA based service data security in cloud computing environment
Patel, A. M., Ge, Z., Seher, I., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1109/citisia53721.2021.9719943
Wang, Y. (2021) · doi:10.32657/10356/155241
Oligo replication advantage driven by GC content and Gibbs free energyPreprint
Qi, H., Qiao, H., Gao, Y., Wei, Y., Li, J., Liu, Q., & Wang, Z. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1502541/v1
Application of CRISPR Cas systems in DNA recorders and writers
Sen, D., & Mukhopadhyay, P. (2023) · Biosystems · doi:10.1016/j.biosystems.2023.104870
D2Sim: A Computational Simulator for Nanopore Sequencing Based DNA Data Storage
Sankar, S., Yixin, W., Noor‐A‐Rahim, M., Gunawan, E., Guan, Y. L., & Poh, C. L. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbbio.2026.3716589
The adaptive landscapes of three global Escherichia coli transcriptional regulatorsPreprint
Westmann, C. A., Goldbach, L., & Wagner, A. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.103774.1
Research Progress on Nucleic Acid Information Material
Song, L., Li, M., & Zuo, X. (2025) · 中国科学基金 · doi:10.3724/bnsfc-2025.02.19.0002
Randomized DNA Base Sequence Design by Using Degenerate Bases for DNA Data Storage
Seo, S., Tandon, A., Nguyen, T. B. N., Vu, T. H. N., Lee, K. W., & Park, S. H. (2025) · ACS Applied Bio Materials · doi:10.1021/acsabm.5c01680
Namba, R., Asari, M., Takahashi, Y., et al. (2025) · Legal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2025.102759
A Hybridization-Based Novel DNA Storage Technology with Rapid Read PerformancePreprint
Zhang, Y., Jia, L., XiaoXia, W. A. N. G., Shi, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, D., Cheng, P., Zhao, Y., Xu, M., Zhang, X., et al. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2025.12.24.696143
Majority‐Voting Overlapping Method for Error Correction in DNA Data Storage
Nguyen, T. B. N., Seo, S., Tandon, A., Uyen, N. K., Vu, T. H. N., & Park, S. H. (2026) · Advanced Intelligent Discovery · doi:10.1002/aidi.202500209
- Authors
- Chen, Y.-J., Takahashi, C. N., Organick, L., Stewart, K., Ang, S. D., Weiss, P., Peck, B., Seelig, G., Ceze, L., & Strauss, K.
- Affiliations
- Microsoft (United States) (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Twist Bioscience (United States) (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Yuan-Jyue
- Strauss, Karin
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2019-03-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3264-3264
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7324401
- OpenAlex
- W3037026856
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 3.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- Microsoft
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA and Biological Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Advanced Data Storage Technologies
- Keywords
- DNA data storage, PCR bias, storage density, data archiving
- MeSH terms
- Models, Theoretical, Bias, Information Storage and Retrieval, Sequence Analysis, DNA
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review