Cited by 489Reading and Literacy DevelopmentVisual perception and processing mechanismsNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex

Open access
Tarkiainen, A., Helenius, P., Hansen, P. C., Cornelissen, P. L., Salmelin, R.·1999·Brain

Abstract

The inferior occipitotemporal brain areas, especially in the left hemisphere, have been shown to be involved in the processing of written words and letter strings. This processing probably occurs within 200 ms after presentation of the letter string. It has also been suggested that this activation may differ between fluent and dyslexic readers. Using whole-head magnetoencephalography, we studied the spatiotemporal dynamics of brain processes evoked by visually presented letter strings in 12 healthy adult subjects. Our achromatic stimuli consisted of rectangular patches in which single letters, two-letter syllables, four-letter words, or symbol strings of equal length were embedded and to which variable noise was added. This manipulation dissociated three different response patterns. The first of these patterns took place approximately 100 ms after stimulus onset, originated in areas surrounding the V1 cortex and was distributed along the ventral visual stream, extending laterally as far as V4v. This response was systematically modulated by noise but was insensitive to the stimulus content, suggesting involvement in early visual analysis. The second pattern took place approximately 150 ms after stimulus onset and was concentrated in the inferior occipitotemporal region with left-hemisphere dominance. This activation showed a preference for letter strings, and its strength and timing correlated with the speed at which the subjects were able to read words aloud. The third pattern also occurred in the time window approximately 150 ms after stimulus onset, but originated mainly in the right occipital area. Like the second pattern, it was modulated by string length, but showed no preference for letters compared with symbols. The present data strongly support the special role of the left inferior occipitotemporal cortex in visual word processing within 200 ms after stimulus onset.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/122.11.2119

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The study supplies the developmental trajectory for the visual word form sensitivity enhancement previously reported in adult good readers.

    “Our findings fill in the developmental trajectory for the enhanced sensitivity to visual word forms previously described in adult good readers (Ben-Shachar et al., 2007b; Tarkiainen, Helenius, Hansen, Cornelissen, & Salmelin, 1999).”

    From The Development of Cortical Sensitivity to Visual Word Forms (2011) · cites this paper as Tarkiainen et al., 1999

  • Similar results have been obtained using single-subject MEG and intracranial recordings.

    “Similar results have been obtained using singlesubjects MEG (Tarkiainen et al., 1999) and intracranial recordings (Allison et al., 1999).”

    From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Tarkiainen et al., 1999

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Pugh KR, Shaywitz BA, Shaywitz SE, Constable RT, Skudlarski P, Trans Biomed Eng 1989; 36: 165-71.
  2. Howard D, Patterson K, Wise R, Brown WD, Friston K, Weiller C, et al. The cortical localization of the lexicons. Brain 1992; 115: 1769-82.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tarkiainen, A., Helenius, P., Hansen, P. C., Cornelissen, P. L., & Salmelin, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Tarkiainen, A.
Venue
Brain
Published
1999-11
Volume
122
Issue
11
Pages
2119-2132
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W1976191493
Cited by
489
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 29
FWCI
18.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Academy of Finland
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
visual word processing, left hemisphere dominance, spatiotemporal dynamics, ventral stream, dyslexia, noise modulation, string length, magnetoencephalography
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Male, Occipital Lobe, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Reading, Temporal Lobe, Visual Perception, Magnetoencephalography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review