Cited by 233EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesGaze Tracking and Assistive TechnologyMuscle activation and electromyography studies

Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Sensorimotor Rhythms

Open access
He, Bin, Baxter, Bryan, Edelman, Bradley J., Cline, Christopher C., Ye, Wenjing W.·2015·Proceedings of the IEEE

Abstract

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been explored in the field of neuroengineering to investigate how the brain can use these systems to control external devices. We review the principles and approaches we have taken to develop a sensorimotor rhythm EEG based brain-computer interface (BCI). The methods include developing BCI systems incorporating the control of physical devices to increase user engagement, improving BCI systems by inversely mapping scalp-recorded EEG signals to the cortical source domain, integrating BCI with noninvasive neuromodulation strategies to improve learning, and incorporating mind-body awareness training to enhance BCI learning and performance. The challenges and merits of these strategies are discussed, together with recent findings. Our work indicates that the sensorimotor-rhythm-based noninvasive BCI has the potential to provide communication and control capabilities as an alternative to physiological motor pathways.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jproc.2015.2407272

Cites

172 of 172 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 177 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [3]Vallabhaneni A, Wang T, and He B, “ Brain-Computer Interface,” In Neural Engineering, ed. He B, Kruwer Academic Publishers, 2005, pp. 85– 121.
  2. [7]He B, Gao S, Yuan H, and Wolpaw JR, “ Brain-Computer Interface,” In Neural Engineering, 2nd Ed., ed. He B, Boston, MA: Springer US, 2013, pp. 87– 151.
  3. [88]He B and Ding L, “ Electrophysiological Neuroimaging,” In Neural Engineering, 2nd Ed., ed. He B, Boston, MA: Springer US, 2013, pp. 499– 543.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
He, B., Baxter, B., Edelman, B. J., Cline, C. C., & Ye, W. W.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
He, Bin
Venue
Proceedings of the IEEE
Published
2015-06
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
907-925
ISSN
  • 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-2256
OpenAlex
W2147854680
Cited by
233
References
177
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4
FWCI
15.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the IEEE (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (CBET-1264782, DGE-1069104)
  • National Institute of Health (EB006433, EY023101)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords
non-invasive brain-computer interface, sensorimotor rhythm, EEG, cortical source localization, non-invasive neuromodulation, motor control, communication aids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review