Cited by 567Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesUltrasound and Hyperthermia ApplicationsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

Transcranial direct current stimulation: A computer-based human model study

Wagner, Tim, Fregni, Felipe, Fecteau, Shirley, Grodzinsky, Alan, Zahn, Markus, Pascual-Leone, Alvaro·2007·NeuroImage

Abstract

Objectives Interest in transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in clinical practice has been growing, however, the knowledge about its efficacy and mechanisms of action remains limited. This paper presents a realistic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived finite element model of currents applied to the human brain during tDCS.Experimental design Current density distributions were analyzed in a healthy human head model with varied electrode montages. For each configuration, we calculated the cortical current density distributions. Analogous studies were completed for three pathological models of cortical infarcts.Principal observations The current density magnitude maxima injected in the cortex by 1 mA tDCS ranged from 0.77 to 2.00 mA/cm(2). The pathological models revealed that cortical strokes, relative to the non-pathological solutions, can elevate current density maxima and alter their location.Conclusions These results may guide optimized tDCS for application in normal subjects and patients with focal brain lesions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.027

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wagner, T., Fregni, F., Fecteau, S., Grodzinsky, A., Zahn, M., & Pascual-Leone, A.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Wagner, Tim
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-04
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
1113-1124
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171800174
Cited by
567
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 38
FWCI
12.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
transcranial direct current stimulation, finite element model, current density distribution, electrode montage, cortical infarction, stroke, non-invasive brain stimulation, focal brain lesions
MeSH terms
Brain, Computer Simulation, Electromagnetic Fields, Head, Humans, Models, Neurological, Radiation Dosage, Radiometry, Scattering, Radiation, Finite Element Analysis, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review