The DOI matches its Crossref record; 261 of the 269 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 34 of the 163 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Digital Twin in the IoT Context: A Survey on Technical Features, Scenarios, and Architectural Models
Open accessAbstract
Digital twin (DT) is an emerging concept that is gaining attention in various industries. It refers to the ability to clone a physical object (PO) into a software counterpart. The softwarized object, termed logical object, reflects all the important properties and characteristics of the original object within a specific application context. To fully determine the expected properties of the DT, this article surveys the state-of-the-art starting from the original definition within the manufacturing industry. It takes into account related proposals emerging in other fields, namely augmented and virtual reality (e.g., avatars), multiagent systems, and virtualization. This survey thereby allows for the identification of an extensive set of DT features that point to the “softwarization” of POs. To properly consolidate a shared DT definition, a set of foundational properties is identified and proposed as a common ground outlining the essential characteristics (must-haves) of a DT. Once the DT definition has been consolidated, its technical and business value is discussed in terms of applicability and opportunities. Four application scenarios illustrate how the DT concept can be used and how some industries are applying it. The scenarios also lead to a generic DT architectural model. This analysis is then complemented by the identification of software architecture models and guidelines in order to present a general functional framework for the DT. This article, eventually, analyses a set of possible evolution paths for the DT considering its possible usage as a major enabler for the softwarization process.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This survey consolidates the Digital Twin concept for IoT by reviewing manufacturing, augmented/virtual reality, multi-agent systems, and virtualization, then proposing foundational properties and an architectural framework. It illustrates applicability through four scenarios and discusses technical, business, and evolution paths.
Key findings
- The paper identifies a set of characterizing DT properties, including identity, representativeness/contextualization, reflection, replication, entanglement, persistency, memorization, composability, accountability/manageability, augmentation, ownership, servitization, and predictability. It treats reflection/mirroring, virtualization, entanglement, and representativeness/contextualization as foundational for a basic DT.
- Entanglement is broken into connectivity, promptness, and association, with strong, simple, and weak forms. Replication can involve multiple logical objects per physical object, including a master replica that synchronizes others.
- Four application scenarios are used: virtual sensors, digital patient, digital city, and cultural heritage. The paper also outlines a value chain with physical object providers, virtualization platform providers, interface/view providers, and service/application providers.
- A layered DT architecture is proposed, spanning device/edge/cloud infrastructure, object lifecycle management, data collection and analysis, simulation/visualization, and open APIs. Industrial and IoT platform examples include Predix, Microsoft, IBM, SAP, FIWARE, and Eclipse Ditto.
Methods
- Design: a survey and conceptual consolidation of Digital Twin definitions, technologies, and architectural models, not an empirical study.
- Data/sample: literature and technical contributions from manufacturing, augmented/virtual reality, multi-agent systems, and virtualization, plus selected academic and industrial platform examples.
- Analysis: derives a common property set, proposes a consolidated DT definition, and uses four scenarios and a layered reference framework to illustrate implementation requirements and value.
Limitations
- The paper states that a fully fledged Digital Twin system does not yet exist, that current applications are dominated by prototypes or proprietary solutions, and that many are domain-specific and lack generality or openness.
- It lists unresolved technical and societal issues, including entanglement, scaling to millions of objects, aggregation, self-management/zero-touch operation, data contextualization, crawling and enrichment, simulation/prediction of large systems, security, privacy, and ethical concerns.
- Evident from the text: the proposed property set and architecture are not empirically validated or benchmarked, and the four scenarios are illustrative rather than tested deployments.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
34 of 163 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The Digital Twin thus introduces a more agile perspective to the improvement of product functionalities in manufacturing [18].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [18] 18. B. Schleich, N. Anwer, L. Mathieu, S. Wartzack. "Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering". CIRP Annals. 2017 Jan 1;66(1):141-4. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and §2.1 Background discuss virtual-machine allocation and cloud data centers, not Digital Twins or manufacturing. Searches for Digital Twin, agile product improvement, and manufacturing found no passage addressing the claim; absence of support is not a contradiction. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“From a software platform perspective, the novel manufacturing systems oriented towards the support of the Digital Twin concept are characterized by the need to integrate a) different flows of data originated by different manufacturing, control and management systems, and b) several enterprises processes and decision chains, [28].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [28] 28. Q. Qi and F. Tao, "Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison," in IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 3585-3593, Feb. 2018. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793265 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 1 (Introduction; page unavailable) says data models can help integrate and share sensed data. Section 3.1 (The Digital Twin concept; page unavailable) describes a common representation of factory entities, including processes, and information used for management decisions. The copy does not establish the more specific claim that a software platform must integrate several enterprise processes and decision chains. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Multi-agent systems can also support a relevant function that is at the very basis of the Digital Twin concept: the ability to simulate the behavior of a specific environment [92].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Influences of Multi-agent Systems
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [92] 92. A. Grignard, P. Taillandier, B. Gaudou, D. Vo, N. Huynh, and A. Drogoul, "GAMA 1.6: Advancing the art of complex agent- based modeling and simulation," in International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 117-131. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Abstract (p. 1) describes an agentless filesystem monitor for cloud virtual machines, and the Introduction (p. 2) discusses virtual machine introspection. Searches for multi-agent systems, environment simulation, and digital twins found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“For its interesting capabilities, it can be adopted for monitoring the entire life cycle of a distributed system and its objects [46][47].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [46] 46. C. Friedow, M. Völker, and M. Hewelt. "Integrating IoT devices into business processes." In International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering, pp. 265-277. Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2018. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4.6 (p. 1) mentions in-flight monitoring of engine systems as an example of an embedded service, but does not discuss monitoring the entire life cycle of a distributed system or its objects. Searches for the claim’s distinctive phrase, distributed-system objects, life-cycle monitoring, and monitoring found no passage addressing that capability. (LLM, conf=0.74)
- Could not verifycites [47] 47. A. Canedo, "Industrial IoT lifecycle via digital twins," 2016 International Conference on Hardware/Software Codesign and System Synthesis (CODES+ISSS), Pittsburgh, PA, 2016, pp. 1- 1. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 3.2 discusses connected industrial machines and the use of product data, but does not say they can monitor the entire life cycle of a distributed system and its objects. Searches for life-cycle monitoring and distributed systems found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Simulation theory [155] and agent-based simulation technologies [74] [156] for large systems also play a key role in representing the behavior of a large system composed of different Digital Twins.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > G. Composability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [155] 155. A. Tolk, "Interoperability, Composability, and Their Implications for Distributed Simulation: Towards Mathematical Foundations of Simulation Interoperability," 2013 IEEE/ACM 17th International Symposium on Distributed Simulation and Real Time Applications, Delft, 2013, pp. 3-9. DOI: 10.1109/DS- RT.2013.8. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [74] 74. K. Kravari, and N. Bassiliades. "A survey of agent platforms." In Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 18, no. 1 (2015): 11. source
- Partly supportedcites [156] 156. C.J. Macal. "Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation". Journal of Simulation, 2016, vol. 10(2), pp.144-156. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction links simulation of heterogeneous IoT systems to the Digital Twin, and §3.1 describes agents connecting separate component simulations to represent their interactions. The paper does not establish that the system is large or composed of different Digital Twins; its distinct simulations represent IoT components. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Definitions, implementations and use cases of IoT are creating a substrate for a general implementation of the DT concept beyond the so-called Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) [120].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > E. The intertwining of the concepts
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [120] 120. M. Weyrich and C. Ebert, "Reference Architectures for the Internet of Things," in IEEE Software, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 112- 116, Jan.-Feb. 2016. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2.3 discusses a future web in which people and things can communicate, but it does not address Digital Twins or IoT as a foundation for their implementation. Searches for Digital Twin, IoT, and IIoT found no passage in our copy supporting the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passes- Could not verify
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“There are ongoing technological trends for creating Digital Twins in several fields: Smart Cities [141] [202] or specific issues of the cities, like traffic [203], Aerospace [204], Aircraft fleet management [205], Innovative Factory [206] 228] are emerging.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > IV. THE VALUE OF THE DIGITAL TWINS CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [141] 141. N. Mohammadi and J. E. Taylor, "Smart city digital twins," 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), Honolulu, HI, 2017, pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.1109/SSCI.2017.8285439. source
The citation is attached to “Innovative Factory,” not to the other fields in the list. The Abstract describes digital-twin prototypes in the ESB Logistics Learning Factory, and the Introduction describes developing a digital twin for its real and digital factory. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [202] 202. M. Batty, "Digital Twins," Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, vol. 45, no. 5, 2018, pp. 817-820. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318796416 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [203] 203. S.A. Kumar, R. Madhumathi, P.R. Chelliah, L. Tao, S. Wang. "A novel digital twin-centric approach for driver intention prediction and traffic congestion avoidance". Journal of Reliable Intelligent Environments. 2018 Dec 1;4(4): pp 199-209. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40860-018-0069-y
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They assume primarily a 1-to-1 cardinality/relation between the assets and the logical object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > III. THE CHARACTERIZING PROPERTIES OF DIGITAL TWINS IN THE IOT CONTEXT AND THE REQUIRED TECHNOLOGIES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesA claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Another important feature of the DT to exploit in different phases is simulation [11] [12].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [11] 11. Y. Gao, H. Lv, Y. Hou, J. Liu and W. Xu, "Real-time Modeling and Simulation Method of Digital Twin Production Line," 2019 IEEE 8th Joint International Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence Conference (ITAIC), Chongqing, China, 2019, pp. 1639-1642. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [12] 12. U. Dahmen and J. Rossmann, "Experimentable Digital Twins for a Modeling and Simulation-based Engineering Approach," 2018 IEEE International Systems Engineering Symposium (ISSE), Rome, 2018, pp. 1-8. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“The concept of the DT [5] is originated in the manufacturing domain.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [5] 5. M. Grieves, "Digital Twin: Manufacturing excellence through virtual factory replication." University of Florida, White paper (2014): 1-7. Melbourne, Florida (USA) [ONLINE] available at https://research.fit.edu/media/site- specific/researchfitedu/camid/documents/1411.0_Digital_Twin _White_Paper_Dr_Grieves.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes- Not matched
- Probably not a substantial claim. 297
- It may state two separate claims as one. 82
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“If a robust and permanent link between the physical object, owned by a customer, and the logical one is possible, then the product could be tailored to a specific customer in terms of specialized features and/or additional functionalities [13].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [13] 13. Porter, Michael E., and James E. Heppelmann. "How smart, connected products are transforming companies." Harvard business review 93, no. 10 (2015): 96-114.Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Simulation and RPRV Facility Operational Experience sections discuss modifying flight-control software for a remotely piloted research vehicle. Searches for a permanent physical–logical link and customer-specific product features found no passage addressing the claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Management techniques for large virtualized infrastructure [163] could be usefully adopted in these cases.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > H. Accountability/Manageability
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [163] 163. R. P. Esteves, L. Z. Granville and R. Boutaba, "On the management of virtual networks," in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 80-88, July 2013. DOI: 10.1109/MCOM.2013.6553682. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Section 2 describe digital twins as virtual models and discuss how they can be used, but do not address management techniques for large virtualized infrastructure. Searches for virtualized infrastructure, cloud management, and adopting such techniques for digital twins found no passage on that point. The paper’s discussion of virtual models alone does not verify what the citation is attached to. (LLM, conf=0.73)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“A large composition of Digital Twins could become the definition of a large system of systems, and hence reliable approaches to complexity are needed [158].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > G. Composability
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [158] 158. E. Silva, T. Batista and F. Oquendo, "A mission-oriented approach for designing system-of-systems," 2015 10th System of Systems Engineering Conference (SoSE), San Antonio, TX, 2015, pp. 346-351. DOI: 10.1109/SYSOSE.2015.7151951. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2.1 (page not provided) says large, dynamic ensembles of distributed components require approaches for managing complexity and building dependable systems. The paper addresses pervasive multi-agent systems, however, not Digital Twins or a claim that their composition constitutes a system of systems. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“There is a long history of the computer augmentation of physical objects [177], [178].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > I. Augmentation
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [177] 177. J.W. Edwards, and D.A. Deets. "Development of a Remote Digital Augmentation System and Application to a Remotely Piloted Research Vehicle." 1975. NASA Technical report TN D-7941, [ONLINE] available at https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19750012 221.pdf sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The section “Digital Twins in Engineering Practices, and Their Relevance for Data- and Model-Driven Healthcare” describes traditional computer-aided design models of physical artifacts and contrasts them with newer digital twins (page unavailable). That supports the existence of earlier computer modeling of physical objects, but the paper does not establish the claimed long history. (LLM, conf=0.78)
- Partly supportedcites [178] 178. J. Glos Williamson. "Digital augmentation of keepsake objects: a place for interaction of memory, story, and self." MS Thesis, School of Architecture and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, September 1997. [ONLINE] available at https://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/61536/4123486 1-MIT.pdf?sequence=2 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Digital Twin section (page unavailable) dates the digital-twin concept to 2003 and describes it as linking physical objects with virtual objects and data. That supports a history of one form of computer augmentation, but does not establish the broader claim that computer augmentation of physical objects has a long history. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“More recently, this trend has been applied in new domains or it has profited of improved technologies, e.g., in Big Data and Smart Manufacturing [179], and Augmented and Virtual Reality [180]).”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > I. Augmentation
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [179] 179. Q. Qi and F. Tao, "Digital Twin and Big Data Towards Smart Manufacturing and Industry 4.0: 360 Degree Comparison," in IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 3585-3593, 2018. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2793265. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Materials and Methods section lists Big Data among technologies planned for integration into digital assistive technology, supporting that part of the claim. Our copy does not describe an application in Smart Manufacturing. Augmented and Virtual Reality belongs to a separate citation in the citing sentence, so it is not judged here. (LLM, conf=0.85)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [180] 180. D. Oliver, D, D. Adam, A.P. Hudson-Smith. "Living with a Digital Twin: Operational management and engagement using IoT and Mixed Realities at UCL's Here East Campus on the Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park". In: Proceedings of the 26th annual GIScience Research UK conference: GISRUK 2018. GIS Research UK (GISRUK): University of Leicester, UK. [ONLINE] available at http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/10056521/1/Hudson- Smith_Final_Oliver_Dawkins_Digital_Twin_GISRUK_2018 %20%281%29_segment.pdf source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Physical objects interact with very complex environments and are immersed in them.They reflect the dynamics of the physical context in which they are operating [141].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > F. Memorization
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [141] 141. N. Mohammadi and J. E. Taylor, "Smart city digital twins," 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI), Honolulu, HI, 2017, pp. 1-5. DOI: 10.1109/SSCI.2017.8285439. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2.3 describes autonomous vehicles operating amid dynamic logistics and production processes, and the Conclusion discusses interactions between people, machines, and products. But Section 3 says changes in the real world are reflected in the digital world; it does not say that physical objects themselves reflect the dynamics of a complex environment. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Orchestration is an essential function [154] in order to govern the aggregations.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > G. Composability
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [154] 154. R Buyya, MA Rodriguez, AN Toosi and J. Park. "Cost-efficient orchestration of containers in clouds: a vision, architectural elements, and future directions". in 2nd Mathematics, Informatics, Science and Education International Conference (MISEIC) July 2018, Surabaya, Indonesia (Journal of Physics: Conference Series; Vol. 1108). Bristol ENG: IOS Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012001. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 2 (GAMA Meta-Model; page unavailable) describes scheduling and nested agent populations, and §3.4 (Multi-Level modeling; page unavailable) gives an example of a building agent controlling its micro-agents. Neither passage says that orchestration is an essential function for governing aggregations. Searches for “orchestration” and governance of aggregations found no passage making that point. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The Digital Twin concept goes hand in hand with the ability to collect data and information by crawling and crowdsourcing social media [119].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > E. The intertwining of the concepts
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [119] 119. S. Bosse, and U. Engel, "Real-Time Human-In-The-Loop Simulation with Mobile Agents, Chat Bots, and Crowd Sensing for Smart Cities". Sensors, 19(20), p.4356. 2019 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Twitter service description (p. 4) supports the claim that data can be collected from social media: it describes retrieving tweets by user, content query, or stream. Our copy does not connect that capability to a Digital Twin or describe it as crowdsourcing. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“From the Definition of Composability in Software [146] and some implementations [147] up to the Software Component Model [148] [149] [150] efforts, software engineering shows a constant trend to create conditions and frameworks for supporting component integration and communication, e.g., also in specific fields like CPS [151].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > G. Composability
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [146] 146. R. Canetti, and M. Fischlin. "Universally composable commitments." In Annual International Cryptology Conference, pp. 19-40. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2001. source
The citation is attached to the example of a framework in a specific cyber-physical field, rather than to the claim of a constant trend across software engineering. The Abstract and Section III, T-RECS DESIGN (pages unavailable), describe an electric-grid testbed that runs software agents, simulates the physical grid, and emulates communication among agents. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Partly supportedcites [147] 147. D. Hofheinz and V. Shoup. "GNUC: A new universal composability framework." Journal of Cryptology 28, no. 3 (2015): pp 423-508. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper’s “Protocol hierarchy” section says its framework makes subprotocol composition easy to analyze and implement, so it supports an example of a composability framework. Its “Protocols” section defines composition for cryptographic protocols, not a general definition of software composability; it does not establish a constant trend across software engineering toward component integration and communication. No page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.81)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [148] 148. G. T. Heineman and W. T. Councill, Eds., Component-Based Software Engineering: Putting the Pieces Together. Reading, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley, 2001. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“This is a growing trend of AI that can also be applied to the Digital Twin concept [190].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > L. Predictability
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [190] 190. F. Tao, J. Cheng, Q. Qi, M. Zhang, H. Zhang, and F. Sui. (2017). ''Digital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data,'' Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., Mar. 2017, DOI: 10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Conclusion says the virtual-human systems use AI, and Selecting the Character Model describes 3-D digital twins made from a scanned human model (page numbers unavailable). This supports AI use with those digital characters, but the paper does not establish a growing AI trend or discuss applying AI to the broader Digital Twin concept. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The Digital Twin concept has been developed in the manufacturing industry with specific goals and its importance is likely to increase in the future [194] [195] [196] [197] [198].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > IV. THE VALUE OF THE DIGITAL TWINS CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [194] 194. R. Rosen, G. V. Wichert, G. Lo, and K. D. Bettenhausen, "About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing" IFAC-Papersonline, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 567-572, Aug. 2015. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction discusses IoT devices across several domains, and the Discussion & Future Work section evaluates IoT protocols, not Digital Twins. Searches for “Digital Twin” and its proposed manufacturing origins and future importance found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [195] 195. M. Castelluccio. "DIGITAL TWINS INVADE INDUSTRY." Strategic Finance, Mar. 2018, p. 63+. Academic OneFile. source
- Could not verifycites [196] 196. J. David, A. Lobov and M. Lanz, "Leveraging Digital Twins for Assisted Learning of Flexible Manufacturing Systems," 2018 IEEE 16th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Porto, 2018, pp. 529-535. DOI: 10.1109/INDIN.2018.8472083 sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Architecture Overview describe virtual representations of physical objects in IoT systems, but do not discuss the Digital Twin concept’s development in manufacturing. The Conclusion discusses future needs for the paper’s interoperability architecture, not the future importance of Digital Twins. Searches for “Digital Twin” and manufacturing-related terms found no passage addressing the attributed claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The concept has also attracted the interest of governments with possible funding and industrial fallout [122].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > IV. THE VALUE OF THE DIGITAL TWINS CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [122] 122. A. Bolton, L. Butler, I. Dabson, M. Enzer, M. Evans, T. Fenemore, F. Harradence et al. "Gemini Principles." University of Cambridge, UK 2018 [ONLINE] available at: https://www.repository.cam.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1810/2848 89/The%20Gemini%20Principles%202019.pdf?sequence=7] sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Digital Twin section (page unavailable) says the term appeared in a NASA technology roadmap, which indicates interest from one government agency, and notes adoption by several corporations. The Introduction (page unavailable) describes possible commercial use of results from the crane platform. The paper does not establish interest from governments more broadly or link that interest to possible funding and industrial outcomes. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Possibilities range from personalization and customization to the definition of a compelling set of software functionalities that will complement and augment the product and will be the major added value of a physical product [188].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > K. Servitization
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [188] 188. T.S. Baines, H.W. Lightfoot, O. Benedettini O, J.M. Kay. "The servitization of manufacturing: A review of literature and reflection on future challenges". Journal of manufacturing technology management. 2009 Jun 5;20(5):547-67. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4.3 (p. 1) describes tailored customer solutions and a continuum in which services can become the main source of value rather than the physical product. Section 4.6 (p. 1) also gives an example of services embedded in a product. The copy does not identify software functionalities as the means of augmenting a product or as its major added value. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“With the advent of the IoT and the possibility of fully monitoring clinical patients with a wealth of body and environmental sensors and low-cost devices [260], there is the possibility to implement many different solutions to improve patients' quality of life without requiring their hospitalization.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [260] 260. R. Kumar and M. P. Rajasekaran, "An IoT based patient monitoring system using raspberry Pi," 2016 International Conference on Computing Technologies and Intelligent Data Engineering (ICCTIDE'16), Kovilpatti, 2016, pp. 1-4. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 2 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: One of the major issues, with relevant costs, associated with health care is the monitoring and observation of patients.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“The Digital Patient could also be useful for the implementation of the Virtual Patient framework [261], a software framework that simulates real life pathologies in such a realistic way that practitioners and students can exercise and improve their skills at dealing with different diseases.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [261] 261. A.A. Kononowicz, N. Zary, S. Edelbring, J. Corral, I. Hege. "Virtual patients-what are we talking about? A framework to classify the meanings of the term in healthcare education". BMC medical education. 2015 Dec;15(1): pp. 11. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section 4, “Digital as a Service” (page unavailable), describes a virtual digital infrastructure for smart-city systems, not a Digital Patient or a Virtual Patient framework. Searches for “Digital Patient Virtual Patient framework” and for patient pathology simulation found no passage addressing the claimed use or the framework’s description. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“The Digital Twin concept is well aligned with the idea of Smart Cities as complex systems [263] that show real-time behavior as well as emerging ones in the long run.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [263] 263. M. Batty. "Cities and complexity: understanding cities with cellular automata, agent-based models, and fractals". The MIT press, Boston, USA, 2007 Sep 30. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The paper describes smart-city infrastructure as a combination of legacy platforms, sensor streams, open data, and historical time series (A. Legacy IoT platforms are not neglected, p. 1), supporting the description of cities as complex systems. It does not describe long-run emergent behavior. The sentence’s Digital Twin alignment is the citing authors’ framing, not a point established by this source. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“For instance, the IIOT Consortium is working on integrating in their standardization also the DT aspects [25].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Interoperability value
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [25] 25. S. Malakuti, and S. Grüner, "Architectural aspects of digital twins in IIoT systems". In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Proceedings (pp. 1-2), 2018. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction discusses digital twins and a lack of suitable IoT standards, but does not mention an IIOT Consortium or its standardization work. Searches for the consortium and digital-twin standardization found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.72)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Also, autonomics and self-management are well considered properties of the Digital Twins [194].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [194] 194. R. Rosen, G. V. Wichert, G. Lo, and K. D. Bettenhausen, "About the importance of autonomy and digital twins for the future of manufacturing" IFAC-Papersonline, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 567-572, Aug. 2015. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Introduction and Section III discuss managing IoT devices and a policy-based access-control framework, not properties of Digital Twins. Searches for “Digital Twins,” “autonomics,” and “self-management” found no passage in our copy addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“It is able to support DT applications [221] and providing some basic functionalities needed in a DT platform as identity management [266], cloud resources management [267], and semantic approaches for data analysis [268].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [221] 221. C.N. Verdouw, J.W. Kruize, J. Wolfert, and G. Chatzikostas,. "Digital Twins in Farm Management: Illustrated by cases from FIWARE Accelerators SmartAgriFood and Fractals". In 11th International European Forum (Igls-Forum) (161st EAAE Seminar) on System Dynamics and Innovation in Food Networks. 2017, February.
- Partly supportedcites [266] 266. Á. Alonso et al., "An Identity Framework for Providing Access to FIWARE OAuth 2.0-Based Services According to the eIDAS European Regulation," in IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 88435- 88449, 2019. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
Section II describes FIWARE’s context broker, context history, and IoT device-management tools, supporting its use as an application platform. The paper demonstrates AI/IoT applications, not digital-twin (DT) applications, so it does not establish the DT-specific part of the claim. The separately cited identity-management, cloud-resource, and semantic-analysis functions are not attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.76)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [267] 267. L. Moor, L. Bitter, M. D. Prado, N. Pazos and N. Ouerhani, "IoT meets distributed AI -Deployment scenarios of Bonseyes AI applications on FIWARE," 2019 IEEE 38th International Performance Computing and Communications Conference (IPCCC), London, United Kingdom, 2019, pp. 1-2. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“An interesting proposal, stressing out relevant properties of the Digital Twin like simulation and prediction, as well as collection of historical data in a context of advanced manufacturing comes from [206].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [206] 206. B. Brenner and V. Hummel, "Digital twin as enabler for an innovative digital shopfloor management system in the ESB logistics learning factory at Reutlingen-University," Procedia Manuf., vol. 9, pp. 198-205, Jan. 2017. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Middleware for Sensor Virtualization section describes PRESTO caching past sensor data and using predictive techniques; Testbeds and Experimental Resources discusses simulation for evaluating sensor-network middleware (pages not provided). These support the individual concepts, but our copy does not present them as a Digital Twin proposal in advanced manufacturing. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Partly supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“This trend is also strongly concerned with the usage of data in the context of industrial environments [274] and the integration of the platform and the Digital Twin solution within the IT infrastructure of the manufacturers [275].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [274] 274. General Electric. "PREDIX The Industrial IoT Application Platform". White Paper from General Electric , 2017 [ONLINE] available at https://www.ge.com/digital/sites/default/files/download_assets/ Predix-The-Industrial-Internet-Platform-Brief.pdf source
- Could not verifycites [275] 275. F. Luyckx. "Impact of the Digital Twin on the enterprise architecture". Blog entry of June 14 th 2018. [ONLINE] available at https://vnsg.nl/iMIS/VNSGWeb/Blogs/Impact_of_the_digital_ twin_on_the_enterprise_architecture.aspx sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The cited paper’s Section 6.1 discusses survey and sensor data used to create digital twins of people for smart-city simulations; Section 1.10 discusses data used in smart-city management. Neither addresses the industrial-environment data use attributed to this source. The separate claim about integration with manufacturers’ IT infrastructure is attached to citation [275], not this source. (LLM, conf=0.77)
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“The paradigms of Lambda computing [292] [293] and liquid software [294] are examples of the requested flexibility.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [292] 292. M. Kiran, P. Murphy, I. Monga, J. Dugan and S. S. Baveja, "Lambda architecture for cost-effective batch and speed big data processing," 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Santa Clara, CA, 2015, pp. 2785-2792. DOI: 10.1109/BigData.2015.7364082. source
The Introduction describes lambda architecture as combining batch and stream processing and providing flexible data provisioning based on user needs. The Lambda architecture section likewise says users can tailor analysis routines to their needs. This source is cited for the lambda paradigm, not for liquid software, which has a separate citation. (LLM, conf=0.91)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [293] 293. M. Gribaudo, M. Iacono, and M. Kiran, "A performance modeling framework for lambda architecture based applications". in: Future Generation Computer Systems, 86 (2018): pp. 1032-1041. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [294] 294. A. Gallidabino et al., "On the Architecture of Liquid Software: Technology Alternatives and Design Space," 2016 13th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture (WICSA), Venice, 2016, pp. 122-127. DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2016.14. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“All these platforms, especially the industrial ones, pay attention to the edge computing aspects and they support the possibility to execute and exploit the edge capabilities in order to better implement the Digital Twin concept, e.g., [287], [288] with examples of Smart City and Digital Twins.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [287] 287. J. Cheng, W. Chen, F. Tao, and C.-L. Lin, "Industrial IoT in 5G environment towards smart manufacturing," Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 10, pp. 10-19, 2018. sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Technical Approach (pp. 4–5) discusses edge computing devices and programmable edge gateways that can run dynamically deployed components. The FIWARE section (p. 3) gives a Smart City example. Our copy does not connect these capabilities to Digital Twins or establish that all the platforms, especially industrial ones, support edge execution for that purpose. (LLM, conf=0.88)
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [288] 288. B. Varghese et al., "Realizing Edge Marketplaces: Challenges and Opportunities," in IEEE Cloud Computing, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 9-20, Nov./Dec. 2018. DOI: 10.1109/MCC.2018.064181115. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The vast literature mentioned in this section is conceptually aligned on an idea of the DT, but there is not a shared set of properties that can help to create common background, language, and a unifying framework for representing and discussing the DT.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > E. The intertwining of the concepts
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The available definitions converge at a high level in representing the DT as made out of two entities, a physical one and a logical one.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > III. THE CHARACTERIZING PROPERTIES OF DIGITAL TWINS IN THE IOT CONTEXT AND THE REQUIRED TECHNOLOGIES
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These definitions are not operable ones, i.e., they don't define features that a DT must have.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > III. THE CHARACTERIZING PROPERTIES OF DIGITAL TWINS IN THE IOT CONTEXT AND THE REQUIRED TECHNOLOGIES
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The definitions end up to focus on specific aspects of the problem domains, e.g., a DT is a representation of a manufactured product, or the DT is a 3D representation within the multimedia realm, and they lose generality.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > III. THE CHARACTERIZING PROPERTIES OF DIGITAL TWINS IN THE IOT CONTEXT AND THE REQUIRED TECHNOLOGIES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The vast literature mentioned in this section is conceptually aligned on an idea of the DT, but there is not a shared set of properties that can help to create common background, language, and a unifying framework for representing and discussing the DT.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > E. The intertwining of the concepts
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Many papers reference it as a major requirement, a few try to define it, e.g., [51].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > III. THE CHARACTERIZING PROPERTIES OF DIGITAL TWINS IN THE IOT CONTEXT AND THE REQUIRED TECHNOLOGIES
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [51] 51. S. O. Erikstad, "Merging Physics, Big Data Analytics and Simulation for the Next-Generation Digital Twins." High- Performance Marine Vehicles (2017): 141-151. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Actually, academia and industry have already started several specification and prototyping activities in order to demonstrate, develop and introduce platforms supporting the Digital Twin concept.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many well-known companies are involved in positioning their solutions or future products as leaders of the sector.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“DT is finding interest and an increasing application in several fields.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DT finds its usage and utility in each of the different phases of the life cycle and the software counterpart helps in improving and optimize the 'product' at each step.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“• Since the Digital Twin is framed in a lifecycle composed of different steps, it can encompass data and information that describe the 'history' of the physical object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“• A Digital Twin strictly refers to a physical object;”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another characterizing feature of the Digital Twin concept is the 'linkage' between logical and physical objects.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The linkage is not necessarily real time, nor resilient or permanent.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This flow of information creates a linkage between the physical and the logical objects.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“It is important to note that Grieves' definition of Digital Twin [6] does not apply to systems that show an Evolutionary Emergence, i.e., systems that exhibit a deliberate capability to learn and modify their behavior in order to adapt to changing conditions.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [6] 6. M. Grieves, and J. Vickers. "Digital Twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems." in Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems, Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2017 pp. 85-113. [ONLINE] available :https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/digital-twin- mitigating-unpredictable-undesirable-emergent- behav/10588328 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From the Production phase onwards, the information about or from the physical object(s) must be collected and provided to the logical object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“• A Digital Twin contains all the information needed to fully characterize a physical object and its intended or predicted behavior; and”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In other words, a Digital Twin relates n products to a single software representation.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There is special correlation between the concepts of Digital Twin and of Avatar within the Virtual Reality domain.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Contributions of Augmented and Virtual Reality
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From a practical perspective, the linkage between the physical and the logical object is effective if the refresh time of the status of logical object is lower than the average access time of applications using the logical object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These transformations imply the generation of a continuous flow of data that represent the modifications and the current status of the physical object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Contributions of Augmented and Virtual Reality
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The intended goals of Multi-agent systems are very much aligned with those of the Digital Twin concept.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Influences of Multi-agent Systems
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“If a user cannot distinguish a virtual product from a physical one, under appropriate simulation conditions, then a virtual representation of the physical object could be considered a Digital Twin [6].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [6] 6. M. Grieves, and J. Vickers. "Digital Twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems." in Transdisciplinary perspectives on complex systems, Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2017 pp. 85-113. [ONLINE] available :https://www.springerprofessional.de/en/digital-twin- mitigating-unpredictable-undesirable-emergent- behav/10588328 source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For this, the Digital Twin concept has attracted a wide interest as a possible concept generally applicable in IoT and CPS (e.g., [39] 45]).”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [39] 45]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Changes in the real world occur according to physical laws and the logical objects must evolve to reflect them.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Contributions of Augmented and Virtual Reality
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, this cardinality may also be 1-to-N in case different replicas exists with respect to the asset.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > III. THE CHARACTERIZING PROPERTIES OF DIGITAL TWINS IN THE IOT CONTEXT AND THE REQUIRED TECHNOLOGIES
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Initially, industries relay on proprietary interfaces and methods specific for their products, approaches and needs.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These features are indeed very relevant for the Digital Twin evolution.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Contributions of Augmented and Virtual Reality
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These specific developments tend to segment the applicability of the solutions.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another emerging aspect of the DT is its software programmability.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Multi-agent systems offer several interesting properties that a consolidated Digital Twin concept may embody:”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Influences of Multi-agent Systems
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The Digital Twin solution must be integrated with existing systems for Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) and Production Unit control and their related information flows by means of an Enterprise Service Bus [32].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [32] 32. D. Schel C. Henkel D. Stock O. Meyer G. Rauhöft P. Einberger M. Stöhr M. A. Daxer J. Seidelmann "Manufacturing Service Bus: an Implementation" 11th CIRP Conference on Intelligent Computation in Manufacturing Engineering Jul. 2017: pp 179- 184. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A timerelated representation is also needed in order to understand the past behavior of an object and to use the data to predict future modifications and actions.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Contributions of Augmented and Virtual Reality
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Virtualization has also been extensively applied to the IoT: a sensor can be virtualized in a cloud system and behave as the real one by running software functionalities that represent a specific 'smart object' [109].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Influences of Multi-agent Systems
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [109] 109. I. Khan, F. Belqasmi, R. Glitho, N. Crespi, M. Morrow and P. Polakos, "Wireless sensor network virtualization: A survey," in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 553-576, Firstquarter 2016. DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2412971. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“• Knowledge of the Physical World: it is a daunting task to determine and to describe the models, laws and effects of the real world in a logical object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“IIoT and Industry 4.0 are beneficiaries of many of the possibilities offered by the Digital Twin and they are also well intertwined with IoT, and CPS technologies [37] [38].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [37] 37. E. Negri, L. Fumagalli, and M. Macchi. "A review of the roles of digital twin in cps-based production systems." Procedia Manufacturing 11 (2017): 939-948. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [38] 38. B. Ashtari Talkhestani, T. Jung, B. Lindemann, N. Sahlab, N. Jazdi, W. Schloegl, and M. Weyrich,. "An architecture of an Intelligent Digital Twin in a Cyber-Physical Production System". Automatisierungstechnik 2019, 67(9), 762-782. https://doi.org/10.1515/auto-2019-0039 source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, physical objects can change over time in terms of status, behavior and response to events.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Contributions of Augmented and Virtual Reality
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Objects with limited processing and storage power can also be virtualized and represented in the 'cloud', and subsequently replicated several times, freeing the original object to support the processing required to serve all the possible applications.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Influences of Multi-agent Systems
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Virtual Reality can also be used to visualize the Digital Twins in order to better understanding its features [35] or for more complex tasks [36].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [35] 35. G. Schroeder, C. Steinmetz, C. E. Pereira, I. Muller, N. Garcia, D. Espindola, and R. Rodrigues. "Visualising the Digital Twin using web services and augmented reality." In Proc. IEEE 14th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Poitiers, France, pp. 522-527. IEEE, 2016 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [36] 36. M. Kritzler, M. Funk, F. Michahelles, and W. Rohde.. The virtual twin: controlling smart factories using a spatially-correct augmented reality representation. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on the Internet of Things (IoT '17), 2017, ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 38, 2 pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3131542.3140274 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In order to fully exploit the DT it is important to have DT's Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) [23], and models for programming the objects [24].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] 23. J. Scheibmeir and Y. Malaiya, "An API Development Model for Digital Twins," 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS- C), Sofia, Bulgaria, 2019, pp. 518-519. doi: 10.1109/QRS- C.2019.00103 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [24] 24. A. Burghardt, D. Szybicki, P. Gierlak, K. Kurc, P. Pietruś, and R. Cygan, "Programming of Industrial Robots Using Virtual Reality and Digital Twins". Applied Sciences, 10(2), p.486, 2020 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, physical objects need to be exactly located in space and tracked in order to accurately embody them.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Contributions of Augmented and Virtual Reality
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“For example, the Industrial Internet of Thing Consortium is addressing the manufacturing community with its architecture and APIs [25][26].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [25] 25. S. Malakuti, and S. Grüner, "Architectural aspects of digital twins in IIoT systems". In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Proceedings (pp. 1-2), 2018. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [26] 26. V. Souza, R. Cruz, W. Silva, S. Lins and V. Lucena, "A Digital Twin Architecture Based on the Industrial Internet of Things Technologies," 2019 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2019, pp. 1-2. doi: 10.1109/ICCE.2019.8662081 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This reduces the need to always build expensive prototypes and mockups, thereby offering significant cost savings during product development and testing [19].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [19] 19. E. M. Kraft, "The air force digital thread/digital twin-life cycle integration and use of computational and experimental knowledge." In 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, San Diego, California, USA, January 2016, p. 0897. source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the concept of the Digital Twin, as it is currently evolving, also inherits some features from other research and technological efforts.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This linkage between the physical and the logical object is also a key element for introducing new capabilities and thus new business opportunities for the industry.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These data must promptly be mirrored by the logical object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Contributions of Augmented and Virtual Reality
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“• Siloing/Programming: if proprietary and closed interfaces are used, it will be extremely difficult to create ecosystems of Digital Twins capable of working together and being interoperable.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“In addition, the simulation capabilities related to the Digital Twin concept are very useful for planning and projecting products [33][34].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Contributions from Manufacturing Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] 33. M. Schluse and J. Rossmann, "From simulation to experimentable digital twins: Simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems," 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), Edinburgh, 2016, pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/SysEng.2016.7753162 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] 34. B. Schleich, N. Anwer, L. Mathieu, S. Wartzack, "Shaping the digital twin for design and production engineering", CIRP Annals, Volume 66, Issue 1, 2017, pp 141-144, ISSN 0007- 8506, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.04.040. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Replicas can also cooperate to share data and information about the physical object quickly and efficiently.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 8 -Examples of replication patterns for virtualization of logical objects
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Other domains, e.g., e-health or cultural heritage, not necessarily fit in the product and its life cycle perspective.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > E. The intertwining of the concepts
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, different replicas, each devoted to a single application or domain of applications, can be instantiated and fed by a master logical object or by the physical object itself.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 8 -Examples of replication patterns for virtualization of logical objects
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each replica can be tailored to the needs of the requesting application.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 8 -Examples of replication patterns for virtualization of logical objects
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The physical object could provide relevant status information, and the logical object could provide relevant updates and adjustments to the physical one to improve its functioning.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Entanglement
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A physical object can be virtualized and replicated several times in a virtualization space.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Replication
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, a logical object may also mediate and represent the change status requested by applications.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 8 -Examples of replication patterns for virtualization of logical objects
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The notion of self-organizing (self-X) systems is also influencing the definition of the DT [175][176].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > H. Accountability/Manageability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [175] 175. K. Ding, F.T. Chan, X. Zhang, G. Zhou, F. Zhang. "Defining a digital twin-based cyber-physical production system for autonomous manufacturing in smart shop floors". International Journal of Production Research. 2019 Oct 18;57(20):6315-34. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [176] 176. C. Liu, P. Jiang, W. Jiang. "Web-based digital twin modeling and remote control of cyber-physical production systems". Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing. 2020 Aug 1;64:101956. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Multi tenancy is in fact demonstrated in the vIoT testbed [174].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > H. Accountability/Manageability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [174] 174. M. Ahmad, J. S. Alowibdi and M. U. Ilyas, "vIoT: A first step towards a shared, multi-tenant IoT Infrastructure architecture," 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), Paris, 2017, pp. 308-313. source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“By means of APIs, a set of physical objects, through their logical object counterparts, can be made interoperable within a complex environment in order to cooperate and achieve specific business results [181].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > I. Augmentation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [181] 181. K. Borodulin, G. Radchenko, A. Shestakov, L. Sokolinsky, A. Tchernykh, and R. Prodan, "Towards Digital Twins Cloud Platform," in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Utility and Cloud Computing -UCC '17, pp. 209-210, 2017. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Recent techniques for rapid recovery and restoration of virtual machines [167] [168] [169] can be adopted to provide these required capabilities.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > H. Accountability/Manageability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [167] 167. B. Egger, E. Gustafsson, C. Jo, and J. Son, "Efficiently restoring virtual machines," Int. J. Parallel Programm., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 421-439, 2015. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [168] 168. L. Cui, Z. Hao, Y. Peng and X. Yun, "Piccolo: A Fast and Efficient Rollback System for Virtual Machine Clusters," in IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 2328-2341, 1 Aug. 2017. DOI: 10.1109/TPDS.2017.2668403. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [169] 169. Y. Yamato, Y. Nishizawa, S. Nagao and K. Sato, "Fast and Reliable Restoration Method of Virtual Resources on OpenStack," in IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 572-583, 1 April-June 2018. DOI: 10.1109/TCC.2015.2481392. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The issue of entanglement and the fast data acquisition is an important one for the DT as well as for IoT systems.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Entanglement
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The quantity of historical information, for certain objects, increases over time and there are also new findings and new contextualization of them.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > F. Memorization
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For some physical objects, real-time processing, communication and storage capabilities could be required in order to properly keep track of the events and changes in status, while for other objects daily updates or even longer periods may be acceptable.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Entanglement
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While all of these mechanisms ensure the high persistency of objects and memory in large distributed systems, they do introduce the issues of managing different copies and their consistency.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > E. Persistency
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Typically, the intended direction of communication is from physical to logical.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Entanglement
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“The efforts related to virtualization also offer mechanisms and technologies for supporting the composability property of the Digital Twin: microservices [152] and containers [153] are possible candidates for supporting the integration and composition of several logical objects.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > G. Composability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [152] 152. K. Bakshi, "Microservices-based software architecture and approaches," 2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, 2017, pp. 1-8. DOI: 10.1109/AERO.2017.7943959. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [153] 153. B. Burns and D. Oppenheimer, "Design Patterns for Container- Based Distributed Systems," Proc. 8 th USENIX Workshop Hot Topics in Cloud Computing (HotCloud 16), 2016; [ONLINE] available at https://www.usenix.org/system/files/conference/hotcloud16/hot cloud16_burns.pdf.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For some objects, a very short interval for synchronization may be a stringent requirement for the use of the Digital Twin approach, e.g., medical applications, robotics, Industrial Internet applications and the like.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Entanglement
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, for physical objects that are instrumented, there could be a great value in supporting bidirectional communication.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Entanglement
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“'Objects with memory' [145] is a technology that tackles the issue to save the history of the 'old things' in the context of IoT.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > F. Memorization
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [145] 145. R. Barthel, K.L. Mackley, A. Hudson-Smith, A. Karpovich, M. De Jode, C. Speed. "An internet of old things as an augmented memory system". Personal and ubiquitous computing. 2013 Feb 1;17(2):321-33. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This should not come as a surprise; in fact, smart manufacturing is moving from the design of logical objects to the actual implementation of several physical objects that can be coupled with one or more corresponding logical object(s).”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 8 -Examples of replication patterns for virtualization of logical objects
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Replicability is assured by the ability of software environments to virtualize components.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 8 -Examples of replication patterns for virtualization of logical objects
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For instance, a smart city application has been prototyped exploiting these concepts [166].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > H. Accountability/Manageability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [166] 166. B. Rusti, H. Stefanescu, M. Iordache, J. Ghenta, C. Brezeanu and C. Patachia, "Deploying Smart City components for 5G network slicing," 2019 European Conference on Networks and Communications (EuCNC), Valencia, Spain, 2019, pp. 149-154. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedSingle caseTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Different studies and experiments have addressed the need for composition/aggregation of objects within the IoT context, for instance the EU project iCore has provided and experimented the possibility to virtualize and aggregate different objects [161].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > G. Composability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [161] 161. R. Giaffreda. "iCore: A cognitive management framework for the Internet of Things". The Future Internet Assembly 2013 May 7 (pp. 350-352). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DT is able to support the transformation of physical objects (atoms) into software entities (bits).”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > E. The intertwining of the concepts
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The logical object within the DT is the main enabling factor for this property, it has to be persistent and resilient in order to be always available.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > E. Persistency
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, communication can occur by means of other objects that are capable of directly observing and determining the status of a physical object and then feed that information to the logical object of the observed physical entity.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Entanglement
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Some physical objects may lack the ability to process, store, or communicate data.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, the status of an object can be monitored by means of a camera and/or sensor, with any relevant information extracted from the multimedia flow and passed to the logical object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Entanglement
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Some physical objects may lack the ability to process, store, or communicate data.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A single virtualized instance (i.e., a logical object) can have enough processing power in the cloud to reply to multiple and real-time requests.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 8 -Examples of replication patterns for virtualization of logical objects
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As seen, the logical object can be used to represent the physical object in time and space.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Identity of the DT.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The logical replica makes this information available to the applications and services.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Entanglement
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the DT concept will be implemented in several application domains then these properties can result a valid means to reason about the DT and its features.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 9 -Representation of some DT Properties
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The most tangible value of a large Digital Twin implementation may reside in the possibility to observe, analyze and understand real-world interactions and impacts on different objects at a very granular level.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A temperature value could refer to a specific object, and/or to an entire environment.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Wherever the unpredictability of behavior and complexity in interactions and in the change of states are relevant, Digital Twin modeling could be a viable option for attacking some control problems.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
In the paper
“Servitization is a term and a set of technical definitions and methods that are very interesting to a broad industry and business community [187].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > K. Servitization
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [187] 187. C. Kowalkowski, H. Gebauer B. Kamp, G. Parry. "Servitization and deservitization: Overview, concepts, and definitions". Industrial Marketing Management. 2017 Jan 1;60: pp 4-10. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some of the properties discussed herein are foundational for a Digital Twin, i.e., without them there is no a real DT implementation; while others extend and increase the intrinsic value of the Digital Twin relation.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > M. A short recap of Digital Twin Properties
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first group includes the following properties: Reflection or Mirroring, Virtualization, and Entanglement, along with Representativeness and Contextualization in space and time.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > M. A short recap of Digital Twin Properties
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Memorization guarantees that a Digital Twin can be represented and controlled along a large part or the entire life cycle, while Augmentation ensures that it can become a programmable object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 9 -Representation of some DT Properties
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Servitization is a property that ensures the usability and the effectiveness of a DT with respect to its usage by final or intermediate customers.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 9 -Representation of some DT Properties
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the implementation of the Digital Twin concept suffers from the lack of an established set of platforms, modelling and development tools that can scale up to very complex representations.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Also NASA is using the DT for its own developments [192].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > L. Predictability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [192] 192. E. Glaessgen, D. Stargel. "The digital twin paradigm for future NASA and US Air Force vehicles". 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC structures, structural dynamics and materials conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS adaptive structures conference 14th AIAA 2012 Apr 16 (p. 1818). source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“This is an important signal of the need to create large, continuously running complex systems devoted to the prediction of Digital Twins' behavior in particular situations or environments [33][191].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > L. Predictability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] 33. M. Schluse and J. Rossmann, "From simulation to experimentable digital twins: Simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems," 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), Edinburgh, 2016, pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/SysEng.2016.7753162 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [191] 191. T. Gabor, L. Belzner, M. Kiermeier, M. T. Beck and A. Neitz, "A Simulation-Based Architecture for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems," 2016 IEEE International Conference on Autonomic Computing (ICAC), Wurzburg, 2016, pp. 374-379. DOI: 10.1109/ICAC.2016.29. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In [189], an analysis of some current industrial initiative is provided as well as a general overview of the 'Servitization of the Digital Twin'.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > K. Servitization
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [189] 189. Q. Qi, F. Tao, Y. Zuo, D. Zhao. "Digital twin service towards smart manufacturing". Procedia Cirp. 2018 Jan 1;72:237-42. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another important issue is related to when applying the DT approach.In fact, many problems can be solved without introducing the Digital Twin concept.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For instance, in [33] Digital Twins are embedded in Virtual Testbeds in order to execute several experiments.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > L. Predictability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] 33. M. Schluse and J. Rossmann, "From simulation to experimentable digital twins: Simulation-based development and operation of complex technical systems," 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Systems Engineering (ISSE), Edinburgh, 2016, pp. 1-6. DOI: 10.1109/SysEng.2016.7753162 source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are a few typical scenarios for the usage of the Digital Twin that can be inferred from the state of the art:”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > IV. THE VALUE OF THE DIGITAL TWINS CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In [193], a survey on current efforts within the IoT field to use simulation techniques and in particular the DT is given.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > L. Predictability
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [193] 193. T. Jung, N. Jazdi and M. Weyrich, "A survey on dynamic simulation of automation systems and components in the Internet of Things," 2017 22nd IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA), Limassol, 2017, pp. 1-4. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Others are considered useful and they have been mentioned or introduced in some experiments or implementations.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 9 -Representation of some DT Properties
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Predictability is an important property that ensures that the behavior of the Digital Twin within its operational contexts can be studied and predicted.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 9 -Representation of some DT Properties
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Having more detailed information by means of a set of DTs could enable the provision of better models, applications, and solutions to the people involved.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In this area, the EU project iCore has provided some practical implementations and a seminal architecture [161].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > I. Augmentation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [161] 161. R. Giaffreda. "iCore: A cognitive management framework for the Internet of Things". The Future Internet Assembly 2013 May 7 (pp. 350-352). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“• Prediction and simulation of the behavior of an aggregated set of Digital Twins in order to understand, control, govern, and orchestrate the behavior of a complex system.This is supported by the collection of historical data that show the past behavior of the physical object;”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > IV. THE VALUE OF THE DIGITAL TWINS CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such a system could also offer the possibility to predict and actually simulate objects' behavior under different conditions.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A permanent linkage between the customer and the producer is then established by means of the ownership of the servitized product.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > K. Servitization
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ownership may pass from one object to the other.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > J. Ownership
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Composability and Accountability/Manageability introduce the ability to interact between different logical objects, softwarized objects, and to compose them into larger aggregations.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 9 -Representation of some DT Properties
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The complexity of the models increases in relation to the number of involved objects, and so very large systems' modeling could require a huge effort.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, the reference [183] proposes a data management model for the data produced by DTs in the maritime industry.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > J. Ownership
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [183] 183. Ø.J. Rødseth, A.J. Berre. 'From digital twin to maritime data space: Transparent ownership and use of ship information. 13th Int. Symp. Integr. Ship's Inf. Syst. Mar. Traffic Eng. Conf.(ISIS-MTE), Berlin, Germany 2018 Sep.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The concept is also appealing for other application domains, and, along with the extensions, 'interpretations', and consolidation discussed in Section II, it has been studied and partially applied by several research efforts and in different industrial contexts.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > IV. THE VALUE OF THE DIGITAL TWINS CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“• Servitization of a physical product and its augmentation in terms of new functions and interaction with the customers.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > IV. THE VALUE OF THE DIGITAL TWINS CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In this case, the Digital Twin is a means for offering high level of Servitization [186] of a physical object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > K. Servitization
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [186] 186. S. Vandermerwe J. Rada. "Servitization of business: adding value by adding services". European management journal. 1988 Dec 1;6(4): pp 314-24. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ownership could also be useful to understand the story beyond a physical object, a used car, and to fully represent the status of the artifact.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > J. Ownership
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clearly, large IoT systems, such as manufacturing or smart cities, could especially benefit from the unique properties of the DT concept.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > IV. THE VALUE OF THE DIGITAL TWINS CONCEPT
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DT has been implemented in different applications in several fields (see Table 1 for a recap of some of the application areas addressed by this survey) and, most likely, it will receive attention from other sectors.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > IV. THE VALUE OF THE DIGITAL TWINS CONCEPT
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Their replication can create a set of logical objects that refer to the physical one, but they not necessarily share the same ownership.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > J. Ownership
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DT, as many IoT systems, produce a large quantity of data.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > J. Ownership
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Having a large-scale platform would reduce the time required for implementing solutions, so that programmers could focus more on representing the Digital Twins than on developing a solution for supporting that representation.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many 'simple' IoT implementation could use these data to offer very effective services for traffic detection and prevention.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the long term, Servitization could lead to a new kind of economy no longer based on the ownership of things, but based on a pay per usage philosophy.The Digital Twin concept is a major enabler for this kind of change.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > K. Servitization
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ownership introduces the ability to correctly manage Intellectual Properties Rights issues and associated responsibilities of the logical objects.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 9 -Representation of some DT Properties
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, some logical objects can offer different capabilities of interaction or better ways to exploit the features of the physical object and, consequently, they can have different constraints in ownership.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > J. Ownership
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the other side, a poor description can be detrimental for the entire system and it can generate inadequate data and results.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Actually, a sensor can represent an object, or some properties of an object in its environment, or direct properties of the environment in which the object is embedded.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The augmentation property also aims at increasing the number of functions that a logical object can provide [186].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > K. Servitization
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [186] 186. S. Vandermerwe J. Rada. "Servitization of business: adding value by adding services". European management journal. 1988 Dec 1;6(4): pp 314-24. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Obviously, there is a great interest in the manufacturing community for the concrete implementation of strategies and processes related to the Servitization of products and their DT.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > K. Servitization
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The industry is particularly interested in changes of ownership and its management for business reasons [184][185].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > J. Ownership
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [184] 184. J.G. Berti, L.S. Deluca, "Digital agreement management on digital twin ownership change inventors"; United States patent application US 16/392,426. 2019 Aug 15. [online] https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/6c/8a/26/9e9ed9f 1d6a043/US20190251575A1.pdf latest accessed: Feb, 22 nd 2020
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [185] 185. C. Altun, B. Tavli and H. Yanikomeroglu, "Liberalization of Digital Twins of IoT-Enabled Home Appliances via Blockchains and Absolute Ownership Rights," in IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 57, no. 12, pp. 65-71, December 2019. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The possibility of defining platform mechanisms to support the creation of services is also discussed in [182].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > I. Augmentation
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [182] 182. T. Niemirepo, M. Sihvonen, V. Jordan and J. Heinilä, "Service Platform for Automated IoT Service Provisioning," 2015 9th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing, Blumenau, 2015, pp. 325- 329. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With these properties, a Digital Twin system offers the ability to represent the current status of the physical object, and can be considered as a basic implementation of the concept.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > M. A short recap of Digital Twin Properties
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Some properties are generally considered valid, e.g., Identity, Representation in [51], Identity, Communication and others in [56], Entanglement is substantially addressed by the definition of Tactile Internet [15], and extensively used in the practice of the implementation of the DT.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 9 -Representation of some DT Properties
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [51] 51. S. O. Erikstad, "Merging Physics, Big Data Analytics and Simulation for the Next-Generation Digital Twins." High- Performance Marine Vehicles (2017): 141-151. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [56] 56. A. El Saddik,. "Digital Twins: the convergence of multimedia technologies." IEEE MultiMedia, v. 25, n. 2, Apr.-Jun. 2018, pg. 87-92. DOI: https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/MMUL.2018.023 121167 source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [15] 15. M. Simsek, A. Aijaz, M. Dohler, J. Sachs and G. Fettweis, "5G- Enabled Tactile Internet," in IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 460-473, March 2016. doi: 10.1109/JSAC.2016.2525398
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These capabilities are instrumental to the ability to create a large number of new services and functionalities on the entire Digital Twin.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > K. Servitization
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Industries and especially manufacturing are extremely interested in Servitization.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > K. Servitization
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“• Design and consolidation of products, i.e., where the Digital Twin is used to help in the design and the production phases of complex products and then used as a means to collect and check the operation of the product in order to identify variations or unexpected behavior;”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > IV. THE VALUE OF THE DIGITAL TWINS CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thanks to strong entanglement, these functions can be used to control and to operate on the physical side of the Digital Twin.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > K. Servitization
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Some industries are interested in the concept and looking for potential applications [199], or checking the costs and applicability of the concept [200], or considering how to cope with data collection and usage [201].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > IV. THE VALUE OF THE DIGITAL TWINS CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [199] 199. M. Zborowski. "Finding Meaning, Application for the Much- Discussed "Digital Twin"". Journal of Petroleum Technology. 2018 Jun 1;70(06):26-32. doi:10.2118/0618-0026-JPT source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [200] 200. T.D. West, M. Blackburn. "Is Digital Thread/Digital Twin Affordable? A Systemic Assessment of the Cost of DoD's Latest Manhattan Project". Procedia computer science. 2017 Jan 1;114: pp 47-56. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [201] 201. T. H.-J. Uhlemann, C. Schock, C. Lehmann, S. Freiberger, and R. Steinhilper, ''The digital twin: Demonstrating the potential of real time data acquisition in production systems,'' Procedia Manuf., vol. 9, pp. 113-120, Jan. 2017, ISSN 2351-9789, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.04.043. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They ensure that the logical object fully represents and behaves like the physical object within one or more specific operational contexts.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > M. A short recap of Digital Twin Properties
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The replication of a set of objects' behaviors in a well-formed software environment can help to determine its faults and/or possible improvements.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the Digital Twin representation could be used in order to provide more granular information.For instance, which cars are involved in a traffic jam, where each of them is heading, how much a single vehicle is polluting the environment, etc.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In certain cases, it may be very difficult to associate some data, e.g., those collected by a sensor, to a specific physical object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. System value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“DT will benefit from this interoperability effort.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Interoperability value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, the Digital Twin acts as an agent that actively seeks information about its physical counterpart.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The properties of the DT seem to fit in the need to control small contexts and environments and to be able to scale up to understanding and controlling the macro-behavior of the entire city.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The different DTs will also behave in such a way to create relationships between them in order to identify common properties, e.g., the same subject, or the same owner, or the same usage of colors or other techniques.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“For instance, CoAP [241] and MQTT [242] are largely used depending on applications needs.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Interoperability value
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [241] 241. K. Lee and S. Seol, "Applying CoAP for real-time device control over public networks," 2018 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication (ICEIC), Honolulu, HI, 2018, pp. 1-2. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [242] 242. P. Bellavista, L. Foschini, N. Ghiselli and A. Reale, "MQTT- based Middleware for Container Support in Fog Computing Environments," 2019 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC), Barcelona, Spain, 2019, pp. 1-7.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This means that current IoT solutions could be integrated to provide a view on a large system as a Digital Twin.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Business Value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, a wealth of information could even be inferred by the continuous access and crawling of information available on the internet like general wikis, specialized data bases, or even information extracted from Social Media and Networks.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Self-organization is a fundamental function to be guaranteed in these kinds of systems.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 16 -Digital Twin Brokerage
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Smart City platforms and applications require the ability to deal with a multitude of different objects and their instantiations and replications.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In each moment of a product's life cycle, producers and customers could have a clear idea of its functioning.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Business Value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First of all, it implies a higher control level and an improved ability to manage the characteristics of a product (on a large scale) in its daily operation.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Business Value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This ensures a high level of composability and the programmability.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This search for relationships will create a network that could be evaluated by historians and experts in order to figure out new associations between different artifacts.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Moreover, the different LOs should be strongly synchronized with the physical object maintaining its consistency, e.g., no conflicting commands or changing of status.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Scenario 1: Virtual Sensors
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An enterprise can enter the service market in order to augment the capabilities of its product(s), the customer appeal and user experience.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Business Value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Digital Patient is also posing very stringent requirements in terms of security and privacy.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Cultural Objects are not only determined by their 'physicality' but mainly by the context and the perspective of people over time.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Cultural objects are mainly determined by context and perspective of people over time, not only physicality.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some relationships between the sensors can be determined over time by the virtualization platform, for example by means of ML techniques, and exploited to improve the functioning of the sensors.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Scenario 1: Virtual Sensors
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, data collected from several specific patients could be organized, analyzed and compared in order to determine a general pattern in the evolution of some diseases as well as variants of the diseases.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In particular, the AIOTI definition of a Virtual Entity strongly associated to an IoT Service [234] is extremely relevant to build a relationship with the DT.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Interoperability value
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [234] 234. Alliance for IoT (AIOTI). "High level Architecture, Release 4.0" 2018. [ONLINE} available at https://aioti.eu/wp- content/uploads/2018/06/AIOTI-HLA-R4.0.7.1-Final.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These protocols can also be reused in DT supporting systems.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Interoperability value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the composability, contextualization and the memorization properties are very important.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, a single product, by means of the Digital Twin approach, could be tailored to the lifestyle and to the current preferences of individual customers.This will very likely result in improved customer satisfaction.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Business Value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These four examples cover a large spectrum of application domains and highlight the flexibility of the concept.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > V. SOME APPLICATION SCENARIOS OF DIGITAL TWINS IN
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this sense, a bottom up approach, from small objects and sensors up to large aggregations of objects, and/or a top down approach, from large systems to their decomposition into smaller ones, each one representing an important city object, could be possible and implementable.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Depending on the specific application area and the industry, two points are most likely to embody the greatest value in terms of revenues: physical objects and the virtualization platform.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Towards an initial value chain for Digital Twins
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The possibility to optimize all the processes related to a product, from design to construction, delivery and operation.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Business Value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This requires that the platform is capable of providing functionalities for selfmanagement.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 16 -Digital Twin Brokerage
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
- Rests on an assumption: Smart City platforms and applications require the ability to deal with a multitude of different objects and their instantiations and replications.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In case of the digital city, it is also important to note that the Digital Twins, by means of augmentation and servitization capabilities are the basic for open solutions that do not create siloed and closed vertical application domains.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“All these activities are demonstrating the possibility to program in the large IoT systems, e.g., in the context of smart cities [245][246] or in other situation critical environments.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Interoperability value
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [245][246]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Digital Twin concept could also be applied to the representation of Cultural Artifacts.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In cases where more than one sensor is virtualized, the aggregated set of sensors can be used by one or more applications.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Scenario 1: Virtual Sensors
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, the memorization property plays a fundamental role in terms of collecting the data and helping in determining emerging patterns in the city behavior.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It should be emphasized that the Digital Twin could represent a very large and complex system without necessarily using the composition's property, e.g., a smart city could be a represented as a Digital Twin without necessarily requiring that each individual component, e.g., buildings, of a city can be represented as a Digital Twin.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Business Value
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A lot of effort has been put on the standardization of IoT protocols [238][239].It has led to a more consolidated choice of a few alternatives [240].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Interoperability value
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [238][239]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [240] 240. C. Sharma and N. K. Gondhi, "Communication Protocol Stack for Constrained IoT Systems," 2018 3rd International Conference On Internet of Things: Smart Innovation and Usages (IoT-SIU), Bhimtal, 2018, pp. 1-6. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A painting, a statue, a watch, a work of art can be represented as a Digital Twin.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each object can be replicated at will and it could be specialized for the particular goal of the application.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increasing the number of related logical objects, i.e., objects it will have to interact with directly, may require levels of processing, communication and storage power that could easily and quickly exceed the physical object's capabilities.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Scenario 1: Virtual Sensors
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The physical object will often have scarce processing, storage and communication capabilities.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each single and simple object can be accessed by APIs and it can be composed into several aggregations of other more complex objects.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The concept of Digital Twin has been frequently associated to the Smart City studies [141] [180], [202], [262].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [141] [180], [202], [262]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The ability to continuously monitor and control the functioning of their products from design to operation, up to end of life.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Business Value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Augmentation is also extremely important because it offers the possibility to doctors or other personnel to check on demand some body values or to accommodate the environment to a particular need that could emerge.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The creation of a continuous link between an enterprise and its customers.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Business Value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, from an historical perspective, a story of the changes of the ownership of an artifact is important to determine the cultural context in which the artifact has been produced and also the perception of its value along the time.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Ownership is important to determine the historical relevance of a cultural artifact.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It will not be possible to manage and orchestrate a multitude of objects by human intervention and configuration.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 16 -Digital Twin Brokerage
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Smart City platforms and applications require the ability to deal with a multitude of different objects and their instantiations and replications.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another aspect that has to be considered is that a Smart City could be related to Digital Twins representing other large environments.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The first set should be continuously monitored and hence a long lasting and secure association between the Patient and its DT is important: the strong entanglement property of the Digital Twin could be very effective for these types of monitoring.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“More practically, the approach is to apply the Digital Twin to small parts of it and to scale up over time.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, access and analysis, if available, of genomic data of a specific patient could bring to very useful information about how a specific disease can develop or can be prevented, or how a disease can impact on other peculiar physiological aspects of a specific patient.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Still it will be entangled and synchronized with the original and possibly with other instances of the object.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This creates silos of interoperability, i.e., specialized systems that offer some level of internal programmability.They are efficient and effective for the immediate goal and tasks, but they pose issues in interoperating with other systems.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Interoperability value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: The DT approach is sometimes based on a 'closed-loop' approach.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this case, the basic properties of the Digital Twin concept are: reflection, virtualization, and entanglement.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is evident that modelling a city in all its aspects by means of Digital Twins is a daunting endeavor.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The second set of patients can be associated to a weaker entanglement and hence data may be collected and sometimes crawled from several sources without restricting the patient to a specific physical space fully under control.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If this approach is applied to a vast population and it is contextualized in specific areas and/or associated to specific lifestyles, this could lead to unprecedent information about how to treat a large part of the population or how to intervene for specific polluted areas.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These Twin Cities could be related and studied in order to better determine the effects of events occurring in one city over the other one.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Cultural Heritage scenario is useful for exploiting the definition of the Ownership Property.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Ownership is important to determine the historical relevance of a cultural artifact.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In fact, the Digital Twin can represent the 'Digital Patients' in their own context, e.g., at home, during daily activities, etc., offering very effective ways to monitor and interact with the real patient.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The properties of the DT, augmentation and memorization, actually offer the possibility to standardize the APIs of DT, as proposed in [23], and to promote its programmability [243][244].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Interoperability value
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [23] 23. J. Scheibmeir and Y. Malaiya, "An API Development Model for Digital Twins," 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS- C), Sofia, Bulgaria, 2019, pp. 518-519. doi: 10.1109/QRS- C.2019.00103 source
- Not matchedcites [243][244]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, customers can benefit from additional functionalities and services offered by the Digital Twin.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Business Value
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For instance, DT can help in determining when the specific patient has to undergo surgery or must have specific treatments.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If detailed measurements of its characteristics are recorded and analyzed, e.g., the impacts of the introduction of a new 'one way' road, new traffic lights, new buildings, and so on could be simulated and studied before to decide their implementation.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > C. Scenario 3: The Digital City.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DT can also emit warnings or alarms in critical or important situations, or even to predict the possibility that a critical situation can occur.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Scenario 2: The Digital Patient.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The case of a single sensor offers two different implementation options: a) A single instance of the logical object associated to the physical one to form the Digital Twin; or b) Several logical objects associated to the physical one in order to provide a specialized logical entity to the different requesting applications.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > A. Scenario 1: Virtual Sensors
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Digital Twin infrastructure could potentially become another case of large interoperable platforms that deliver value to multiple stakeholders and actors.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Towards an initial value chain for Digital Twins
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“There are several efforts for standardizing IoT systems [232][233].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > B. Interoperability value
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [232][233]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A DT can graphically represent an artifact by means of Augmented or Virtual Reality technologies, but it offers much more.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another important aspect that emerges in the middleware development effort is the usage of functional layers as a means for organizing the platform capabilities.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the raw data should not be lost, because they are the major source for determining patterns and pre-or partial elaboration could impact the pattern emergence.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“They also introduce a programmable layer called Digital Twins Services that comprises services, applications and tools that can be used and exploited by customers.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [278] 278. Microsoft. "The promise of a Digital Twin strategy. Best practices for designers and manufacturers of products and industrial equipment". White paper from Microsoft Services. 2017. [ONLINE] available at https://info.microsoft.com/rs/157- GQE- 382/images/Microsoft%27s%20Digital%20Twin%20%27How -To%27%20Whitepaper.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [279] 279. B. Van Hoof. "Announcing Azure Digital Twins: Create digital replicas of spaces and infrastructure using cloud, AI and IoT". Microsoft Blog entry September 24 th 2018, [ONLINE] available at https://blogs.microsoft.com/iot/2018/09/24/announcing- azure-digital-twins-create-digital-replicas-of-spaces-and- infrastructure-using-cloud-ai-and-iot/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are some that are actively working with a sound background in manufacturing and, as a consequence, Industry 4.0 or the so-called Industrial Internet are their target.These groups base their developments on the requirements and goals of large manufacturing companies that want to implement the Digital Twins concept in manufacturing.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“It is worth to point out to a specific API defined by Eclipse that is expressly addressing the Digital Twin: the Eclipse Ditto API [285].It is used in conjunction with other Twin characteristics with a specific focus on Digital Twin interoperability for industrial systems”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [285] 285. Eclipse. "DITTO API definition and documentation" API specification from Eclipse for the Digital Twin. [ONLINE] available at https://www.eclipse.org/ditto/intro-overview.html
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Entanglement may not be possible for specific objects, or usages and applications.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“its capability of collecting and representing large set of values and attributes describing the physical object;”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Digital Twin platform and the associated devices will operate and use heterogeneous operating systems and languages.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Not all the system will require a large historical data set, or alternatively, these data can be stored as simple files, e.g., in CVS format.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DT could be an additional tool for seeking relevant historical information.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“For instance, an architecture as FIWARE [265] is a good platform moving from the research into a consolidation phase for wide commercialization.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [265] 265. F. Cirillo, G. Solmaz, E. L. Berz, M. Bauer, B. Cheng and E. Kovacs, "A Standard-Based Open Source IoT Platform: FIWARE," in IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 12-18, September 2019. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“its ability to support servitization.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Virtualization techniques are widely used, actually in both paths, and the recent technologies in this field can be useful for segmenting the different functionalities needed to support the Digital Twin.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The need for creating mathematical models for the description of objects is, instead, described in [277].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [277] 277. H. Zhang, Q. Liu, X. Chen, D. Zhang and J. Leng, "A Digital Twin-Based Approach for Designing and Multi-Objective Optimization of Hollow Glass Production Line," in IEEE Access, vol. 5, pp. 26901-26911, 2017. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2766453. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A first loose differentiator factor in the design of the platform may refer to the background of originating companies and research group.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On the other side, the groups working more on IoT are taking their platforms as a reference for supporting the Digital Twin concept.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“There are also relevant attempts to move this concept into practice in the Industry 4.0 [273] or to standardize supporting interoperability solutions for the Industrial Internet 2 .”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [273] 273. U. Pontes (ed.). "Visit [Industrial Internet of Things -Digital Twins], Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics, System - Technologies and Image Exploitation IOSB Karlsruhe, Germany 2018 [ONLINE] available at https://www.iosb.fraunhofer.de/servlet/is/14330/visIT_1-26- 03-2018_web.pdf source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They are the needed functionalities that allow to cope with the cultural aspects and the extraction of new interpretation and 'understanding' of the artifact.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Augmentation by means of programmability and APIs definition is an aspect taken care by all the middleware proposals.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“its ability to represent physical objects, in fact logical objects are models of the physical objects;”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Layering helps with different interfaces and functions to better serve and support the applications' needs as discussed in [290] and [291].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [290] 290. M. Lammers. "Digital Twin offers huge opportunities for real estate life cycle". PropTechNL blog entry 2018 [ONLINE] available at https://www.proptech.nl/blog/digital-twin-life- cycle/ source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [291] 291. C. Sarkar, S. N. A. U. Nambi, R. V. Prasad and A. Rahim, "A scalable distributed architecture towards unifying IoT applications," 2014 IEEE World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), Seoul, 2014, pp. 508-513. DOI: 10.1109/WF- IoT.2014.6803220. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One of these layers is commonly associate to 'cognition' or the capability to 'reason' about the data and the states of objects and their behaviors.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In addition, SAP points to the objects modelling, Thing Modeler, in order to fully describe the physical objects' characteristics.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [282] 282. D. Ammermann. "Digital Twin Implementation". SAP blog entry September 9 th , 2017 [ONLINE] available at https://blogs.sap.com/2017/09/09/digital-twin-implementation/ source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“its ability to place in time and space the physical object;”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This is offering interesting functionalities and points to be considered by different architectures: Twin-to-device integration (e.g., mirroring and entanglement), Twin-to-twin integration (composability and augmentation) and Twin-to-system-ofrecord integration and Twin-to-system-of-intelligence integration (i.e., memorization and data analysis).”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [282] 282. D. Ammermann. "Digital Twin Implementation". SAP blog entry September 9 th , 2017 [ONLINE] available at https://blogs.sap.com/2017/09/09/digital-twin-implementation/ source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Simple applications do not require servitization capabilities and complex level of management of ownership.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Under this perspective, large and cross-domain applications could benefit from the capabilities of the DT for accurately representing large aggregation of objects and to transform them in services.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The aggregation of DTs into a larger aggregation may be difficult and it may require a lot of processing.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This architectural model can be used as an outline or a high-level design for a Digital Twin platform.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A DT is actually a softwarization example of artifacts.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“One interesting paper, introducing schemas for modelling objects is [281].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [281] 281. S. De, T. Elsaleh, P. Barnaghi, and S. Meissner, "An Internet of Things platform for real-world and digital objects," Scalable Comput., Pract. Exper., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 45-57, 2012. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, objects could require mobility and fast replication deployment within a flexible execution environment.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They can fully complement the idea of the entanglement with the physical object and the passing of status information.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“On the industrial level, SAP is trying to leverage its Leonardo platform in order to implement a Digital Twin solution [282].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [282] 282. D. Ammermann. "Digital Twin Implementation". SAP blog entry September 9 th , 2017 [ONLINE] available at https://blogs.sap.com/2017/09/09/digital-twin-implementation/ source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Also IBM is operating in this context and its proposition is to leverage the Watson IoT platform together with cognitive capabilities in order to model the Digital Twins and providing valuable functionalities to customers [280].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [280] 280. D. Edwards. "IBM Digital Twin: Designing for a connected, software driven world". IBM presentation at Digital Twin at the Genius of Things Summit in Boston October 4th, 2017 [ONLINE] available at: https://www.slideshare.net/IBMIoT/ibm-digital-twin- designing-for-a-connected-software-driven-world source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The DT is a step further respect to the digitalization of Cultural Heritage.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A claim is checked only against the cited paper’s full text, never its abstract, and none is available for its sources.
In the paper
“Examples of this approach with a specific reference to microservices are found in [30] and [289].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] 30. M. Ciavotta, M. M. Alge, S. Menato, D. Rovere, and P. Pedrazzoli. "A microservice-based middleware for the digital factory." Procedia Manufacturing 11 (2017): 931-938. source
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [289] 289. V. Damjanovic-Behrendt. "A Digital Twin Architecture for Security, Privacy and Safety." ERCIM NEWS 115 (2018): pp. 25-26. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“its ability to relate with other DTs to investigate and figure out relationships and communalities between objects;”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“They are an integral part of the architecture and they well conjugate with all the other functionalities.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Amazon is exploiting its cloud and IoT infrastructure and is also putting forward the possibility to integrate the Digital Twin concept with some forms of Virtual Reality [283] for a better visualization.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [283] 283. AWS. "Meet Preston, and Explore Your Digital Twin in Virtual Reality" (GPSTEC321) -AWS presentation at re:Invent 2018 [ONLINE] available at https://www.slideshare.net/AmazonWebServices/meet-preston- and-explore-your-digital-twin-in-virtual-reality-gpstec321- aws-reinvent-2018
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From a software architecture perspective, the cognitive aspects are extremely relevant as well as the continuous information crawling, formatting, and assessment.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From a software platform perspective, the broad implementation and span of the Digital Twin concept will require an extreme flexibility in deploying, executing and managing the software.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“its ability to serve the life cycle from creation to the dismissal of physical objects;”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, the DT also introduces a level of complexity in terms of modelling of physical objects and environments.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Cultural Heritage scenario pinpoints to an extremely complex problem: the capture of historical and contextual information that span from physical to cultural realms and its organization into semantic and reasoning systems for information capture, extraction, and manipulation.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Digital Twin can use its capabilities and properties in order to create a continuous entanglement and search for information related to itself and its context.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is difficult to evaluate the real implementation status and the availability of these solutions and their readiness for entering into the market.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Modelling of object is clearly a need that emerges in several implementation and platforms.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the case of Cultural Heritage, the data management part and the cognitive and AI mechanisms constitute two fundamental features to support the concept in this relevant application domain.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > D. Scenario 4: The Cultural Heritage Scenario.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Reference [284] follows a similar path but with a specific focus on Web Services architectures.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [284] 284. G. Schroeder et al., "Visualising the digital twin using web services and augmented reality," 2016 IEEE 14th International Conference on Industrial Informatics (INDIN), Poitiers, 2016, pp. 522-527. source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim could be matched to a paper in Crossref, so there is nothing to check it against.
In the paper
“Microsoft aims at being a provider of IoT solutions for the Industrial Internet and the Digital Twin is a concept to be supported in their software infrastructure.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [278] 278. Microsoft. "The promise of a Digital Twin strategy. Best practices for designers and manufacturers of products and industrial equipment". White paper from Microsoft Services. 2017. [ONLINE] available at https://info.microsoft.com/rs/157- GQE- 382/images/Microsoft%27s%20Digital%20Twin%20%27How -To%27%20Whitepaper.pdf
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Not matchedcites [279] 279. B. Van Hoof. "Announcing Azure Digital Twins: Create digital replicas of spaces and infrastructure using cloud, AI and IoT". Microsoft Blog entry September 24 th 2018, [ONLINE] available at https://blogs.microsoft.com/iot/2018/09/24/announcing- azure-digital-twins-create-digital-replicas-of-spaces-and- infrastructure-using-cloud-ai-and-iot/
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Clearly there is still need for academic and industrial research in this sector, but one issue is of paramount importance: security.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Each replica is instantiated to offer information and functionalities to a limited set of applications.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Data Layer deals with collecting and contextualizing the data as well as to execute data analysis and information inferring.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From a technical perspective, there are still some major issues to resolve and to prove, e.g., the entanglement capabilities, the scaling up of the Digital Twin platform to millions of objects, the aggregation capability, the possibility of self-management and the 0-Touch approach, the collection and analysis of captured data, the ability to contextualize Digital Twins, the crawling and the Enrich”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is very attractive, but it still needs to demonstrate its merits beyond clear and obvious scenarios, e.g., the Digital Twin of an aircraft engine is surely a valuable scenario for a manufacturer or a pilot in training, but is it practical or useful for controlling all the airplanes that are operating every day?”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Semantic and ontologies could be added in here for specific problem domains.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Increasing the number of related logical objects, i.e., objects it will have to interact with directly, may require levels of processing, communication and storage power that could easily and quickly exceed the physical object's capabilities.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: Physical objects in IoT often have scarce processing, storage, and communication capabilities.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The upper layers deal with the major properties of the Digital Twin, the Object Layer is devoted to the life cycle of logical objects and their existence.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The hacker would become the 'real' owner of the physical object and it could control it at will unless the entanglement is broken or unidirectional.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It can fully satisfy the specific applications requirements in terms of collection of data or management policies.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The layering is essentially derived from the current developments in virtualization of network resources as defined, for example, by ETSI [295].”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [295] 295. G. A. Carella, M. Pauls, T. Magedanz, M. Cilloni, P. Bellavista and L. Foschini, "Prototyping nfv-based multi-access edge computing in 5G ready networks with open baton," 2017 IEEE Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft), Bologna, 2017, pp. 1-4. DOI: 10.1109/NETSOFT.2017.8004237. source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All this infrastructure is based on open APIs in such a way to be programmable at different level and with different abstraction capabilities.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It will be used to understand the behavioral patterns of people, and possibly to influence, control, govern or manipulate their behavior.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The bottom layers are those that interact with the devices, the edge and the cloud resources, and take into consideration how to use them, how to virtualize and how to exploit their characteristics.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“It is difficult to predict the future of the Digital Twin concept; however, it is a concept that is already having a significant impact in the manufacturing industry and in IoT, and it has the possibility to have a very large impact on the lives of many people in the future.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Actually, it is also important to create a representation of the context[142] in which the object and other entities operate and have operated in order to be able to recreate and study the past situation of the entire system.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [142] 142. A. Held, S. Buchholz, and A. Schill, "Modeling of Context Information for Pervasive Computing Applications," Proc. Sixth World Multiconf. Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics, p. 6, 2002.
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“From a business perspective, the Digital Twin approach appears to be a very useful enabler for the digital transformation / softwarization of several industries.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Specific people's behavior will be revealed to applications and to owners of those applications in a deeper way than what is already possible.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The need for synchronization may lead to a situation where the status of the different replicas is constantly updated even if each LO substantially represents the same state.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Servitization capability certainly is appealing, useful, and clear enough to be a successful mechanism for supporting new businesses.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, there are crawling functions in order to collect external information not directly provided by the physical objects.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The variety of relevant scenarios shows that the Digital Twin concept is already well accepted by both the academic and industrial environments.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, due to the stringent needs of some LOs, the communication has to be optimized, especially for efficiently supporting the entanglement.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In certain situations, like self-driving cars, the communication capabilities and, consequently, , the entanglement, are an essential part of the physical object, and they could not work or be otherwise usable if the entanglement is not established and operational.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Applications will be able to interact with all the needed platform functions by means of well-formed APIs and structured data.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This comprises functions for modelling of objects, instantiation, self-management, orchestration, entanglement and other.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some functions are needed to allocate the right resources and to virtualize functions/objects in the infrastructure.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is also useful in order to avoid a kind of siloing effect due to the technologies used.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > CONCEPT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Layering is consistent with the general trends in large middleware development and it is consistent with the broadness in scope of a Digital Twins platform and its needs in terms of separation of concerns.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The Simulation Layer supports the visualization of the DTs, their simulation as well as tools for the design and the definition of them.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > Figure 22 -A general framework for the Digital Twin
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, if the Digital Twin paradigm is largely applied to several different application domains, a sort of 'Virtual User', i.e., a counterpart of the physical user, could be created, represented, updated and exploited.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“If the PO is programmable, the LOs can execute commands on the physical device, in this case, an actuator, for a specific application case.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As for other pervasive technologies, there is a 'huge' privacy issue for the Digital Twin: the Servitization of generally used goods and products will inevitably lead to knowledge about people's usage patterns.”
§ Digital Twin in the IoT context: a survey on technical features, scenarios and architectural models > VII. THE PATH AHEAD
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper relies on this without support.
The Digital Twin concept has been attracting increasing attention for its ability to create a software counterpart of a physical object.
“The Digital Twin (DT) concept has been attracting increasing attention for its the ability to create a software counterpart of a physical object.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Digital Twin model has attracted significant interests, both in academia and industry.
“Since then, the Digital Twin model has attracted significant interests, both in academia and industry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Usage of DT first grew in the manufacturing environment and later in the community of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber Physical Systems (CPS).
“Usage of DT first grew in the manufacturing environment and later in the community of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Cyber Physical Systems (CPS).”
The paper relies on this without support.
The definition has moved from an industrial artifact or product to a more generic notion applicable to almost any physical object and, in principle, to intangible objects.
“One important point is that the definition has moved from an industrial artifact or product to a more generic notion applicable to almost any physical object and, in principle, to intangible objects.”
The paper relies on this without support.
An extensive literature has been produced about DT, but sometimes different words or different facets of the DT have been considered, defined, and stressed.
“An extensive literature has been produced about DT, but, sometimes, different words or different facets of the DT have been considered, defined, and stressed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
There is an increasing need to develop products or to control processes in an adaptive manner.
“There is an increasing need to develop products or to control processes in an adaptive manner.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The possibility that the physical and the logical objects are connected by means of the internet or other specific networks can often be assumed.
“Thanks to the increasing capabilities of communications, the possibility that the physical and the logical objects are connected by means of the internet or other specific networks can often be assumed.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The different paths have different views and definitions of the Digital Twin, but they are conceptually aligned at the level of replicating physical objects by software.
“The different paths have different views and definitions of the Digital Twin.They refer to the general idea of replicating, by software, physical objects or products.This is the level at which the DT definitions are 'conceptually' aligned, but they differ in terms of properties and emphasis on specific characteristics.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The originating object of a Digital Twin is material in nature.
“For the sake of simplicity, in this paper the originating object is material in nature.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A physical object can be fully described and characterized by a set of variables and their values in a specific multi-dimensional space.
“Let us assume that a physical object is fully described and characterized by a set of variables and their values 𝑋 = {𝑥 1 , 𝑥 2 , … , 𝑥 𝑛 } in a specific multi-dimensional space 𝑆 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 ∀ 𝑥 𝑖 ∈ 𝑆.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some physical objects may lack the ability to process, store, or communicate data.
“Depending on the type of (physical) objects, they may or may not be able to process, store and communicate data.”
“Not all of the physical objects are capable of communication or processing.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A fully-fledged Digital Twin system does not exist yet.
“Actually, a fullyfledged Digital Twin system does not exist yet, and it is not sure that one will be implemented soon.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The DT approach is sometimes based on a 'closed-loop' approach.
“The DT approach is sometimes based on a 'closed-loop' approach.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The physical object will often have scarce processing, storage and communication capabilities.
“The most common one is that the physical object will often have scarce processing, storage and communication capabilities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
One of the major issues, with relevant costs, associated with health care is the monitoring and observation of patients.
“One of the major issues, with relevant costs, associated with health care is the monitoring and observation of patients.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The virtualization space, and the supporting platform, is capable of managing the functioning of the logical objects.
“It is assumed that the virtualization space, and the supporting platform, is capable of managing the functioning of the logical objects.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The relationship between the physical object and the customer and the producer is very important for enabling new business models, and for Servitization in particular.
“The relationship between the physical object and the customer and the producer is very important for enabling new business models, and for Servitization in particular.”
The paper relies on this without support.
IoT and Smart City applications suffer from application silos, i.e., strong separation of architectures, tools, interfaces, and data between different application domains.
“Typically, the IoT and the Smart Cities applications suffer from the issue of applications silos, i.e., the strong separation of architectures, tools, interfaces and data between different applications domains, transportation, traffic, cultural heritage, and more.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Smart City platforms and applications require the ability to deal with a multitude of different objects and their instantiations and replications.
“One strong requirement of a Smart City platform and its applications is the ability to deal with a multitude of different objects and even more with plenty of their instantiations and replications.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cultural artifacts have physical characteristics and features but also a relevant content or idea associated with them.
“These kinds of physical objects are not simply objects, they have physical characteristics and features, but they also have a relevant content, an idea, associated to them.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Ownership is important to determine the historical relevance of a cultural artifact.
“In addition, the ownership is important to determine the historical relevance of the artifact.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cultural objects are mainly determined by context and perspective of people over time, not only physicality.
“Cultural Objects are not only determined by their 'physicality' but mainly by the context and the perspective of people over time.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The current offering of IoT applications may cover a large part of the needs and requirements of use cases.
“The current offering of IoT applications may cover a large part of the needs and requirement of use cases.”
The paper relies on this without support.
AI applications, if data sets are available, could be competitors of Digital Twin implementations.
“Also AI applications, if data sets are available, could be competitors of DT implementations.”
The paper relies on this without support.
To date, the Digital Twin application domain is dominated by prototypes and/or proprietary solutions, sometimes not fully implemented.
“It is important to understand that, to date, the application domain is dominated by prototypes and/or by proprietary solutions, sometimes not fully implemented.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Some existing Digital Twin solutions only address specific application domains and lack the needed generality and openness to be widely used.
“In addition, some of them only address specific application domains and lack the needed generality and openness to be widely used.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Physical objects in IoT often have scarce processing, storage, and communication capabilities.
“The most common one is that the physical object will often have scarce processing, storage and communication capabilities.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Different communication links can be difficult and costly to maintain.
“In addition, different communication links can be difficult and costly to maintain.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In the standard IIoT framework, DT is commonly positioned in the service layer as a logical entity, capable of virtualization and replication [10].”
From Digital Twins in the IIoT: Current Practices and Future Directions Toward Industry 5.0 (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Reflection equation maps every value to the first mirrored value
MinorThe first expression equates every xi to x1′, whereas the subsequent expression maps xi to its corresponding xi′. For a set containing distinct values, these cannot both describe the stated reflection mapping.
“∀ 𝑖 𝑥 𝑖 ≡ 𝑥 1 ′”
“∀ 𝑖 ∈ 𝑆, ∃! 𝑥 𝑖 ′ 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓 𝑖 (𝑥 𝑖 ) ≡ 𝑥 𝑖 ′”
The 1:N relationship is defined in opposite directions
MinorThe manufacturing section uses 1:N for multiple physical products sharing one logical object. The identity section uses 1-to-N for multiple logical replicas of one physical asset, reversing what the ratio counts.
“an 1:N refers to the fact that n physical implementations of product refer to one logical object.”
“However, this cardinality may also be 1-to-N in case different replicas exists with respect to the asset.”
Citations
Cites
Software-Defined Networking: A Comprehensive Survey
Kreutz, D., Ramos, F. M. V., Esteves Verissimo, P., Esteve Rothenberg, C., Azodolmolky, S., & Uhlig, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2371999 · Cited by 5,050
Digital Twin in Industry: State-of-the-Art
Tao, F., Zhang, H., Liu, A., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics · doi:10.1109/tii.2018.2873186 · Cited by 4,391
Tangible bits: towards seamless interfaces between people, bits and atoms
Ishii, H., & Ullmer, B. (1997) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems · doi:10.1145/258549.258715 · Cited by 3,853 · cited 1×
“They point to a large “atoms to bits” transformation [114].”
BackgroundDigital Twin: Mitigating Unpredictable, Undesirable Emergent Behavior in Complex Systems
Grieves, M., & Vickers, J. (2017) · Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-38756-7_4 · Cited by 3,727 · cited 9×
“A simplified view of the PLM takes into consideration the creation/design phase in which the product is conceived and designed; the production phase during which the product is actually manufactured and realized; the operations phase during which the product is operated and actually used; and the disposal phase when t…”
BackgroundInfluentialDigital Twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification
Kritzinger, W., Karner, M., Traar, G., Henjes, J., & Sihn, W. (2018) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.08.474 · Cited by 3,612 · cited 1×
“This effort covers different stages in the production and also different applications cases [27].”
BackgroundDigital twin-driven product design, manufacturing and service with big data
Tao, F., Cheng, J., Qi, Q., Zhang, M., Zhang, H., & Sui, F. (2018) · The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology · doi:10.1007/s00170-017-0233-1 · Cited by 2,920
Servitization of business: Adding value by adding services
Vandermerwe, S., & Rada, J. (1988) · European Management Journal · doi:10.1016/0263-2373(88)90033-3 · Cited by 2,641
The Digital Twin Paradigm for Future NASA and U.S. Air Force Vehicles
Glaessgen, E., & Stargel, D. (2012) · 53rd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 20th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 14th AIAA · doi:10.2514/6.2012-1818 · Cited by 2,404 · cited 2×
“There are ongoing technological trends for creating DTs in several fields: smart cities [138], [196] or specific issues of the cities, like traffic [197], aerospace [187], aircraft fleet management [198], innovative factory [2], [199]–[201], environmental management [202], logistics [203], [204], the future of work or…”
BackgroundMethodDescribing objects by their attributes
Farhadi, A., Endres, I., Hoiem, D., & Forsyth, D. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2009.5206772 · Cited by 1,917
DIGITAL TWIN: MANUFACTURING EXCELLENCE THROUGH VIRTUAL FACTORY REPLICATION
RajratnaKharat, V. B. P. (2018) · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.1493930 · Cited by 1,784
Flagged first, then by citations
8 of the 269 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- 0, DITTO API Definition and Documentation
- 2018, Meet Preston and Explore Your Digital Twin in Virtual Reality
- edwards, 2017, IBM digital twin: Designing for a connected, software driven world, Digital Twin at the Genius of Things Summit in Boston
- van hoof, 2018, Announcing Azure Digital Twins Create Digital Replicas of Spaces and Infrastructure Using Cloud AI and IoT
- rødseth, 2018, From digital twin to maritime data space: Transparent ownership and use of ship information, Proc 13th Int Symp Integr Ship’s Inf Syst Mar Traffic Eng Conf (ISIS-MTE), 1
- hippold, 2019, How Digital Twins Simplify the IoT
- 2017, PREDIX the industrial IoT application platform
- 2017, The Promise of a Digital Twin Strategy Best Practices for Designers and Manufacturers of Products and Industrial Equipment
- asenjo, 2018, Digital twin—Modeling interrelated devices, Innovations Journal
- lammers, 2018, Digital Twin Offers Huge Opportunities for real Estate Life Cycle
- erikstad, 2017, Merging physics, big data analytics and simulation for the next-generation digital twins, Proc 10th Symp High-Perform Mar Vehicles (HIPER), 140
- wasik, 2013, Programmable World All Our Objects Will Act As One
- bottani, 2017, From the cyber-physical system to the digital twin: The process development for behaviour modelling of cyber guided vehicle in M2M logic, Proc 12th Summer School Francesco Turco Ind Syst Eng, 1
- pettey, 2017, Prepare for the Impact of Digital Twins
- van zütphen, 2018, Digital twins when decency meets temptation
- biru, 2015, Towards a definition of the Internet of Things (IoT), Proc IEEE Internet Things Initiative, 1
- litvinova, 2018, Collaborating in Virtual Reality by using Digital Twins, Proc ISPIM Innov Symp, 1
- castelluccio, 2018, Digital twins invade industry, Strategic Finance, 63
- tao, 2017, Digital twin workshop: A new paradigm for future workshop, Comput Integr Manuf Syst, 23, 1
- liu, 2018, The role of data fusion in predictive maintenance using Digital Twin, AIP Conf Proc, 1949
- hamilton, 2018, Detecting opportunities and challenges for australian rural industries Final report
- constantinescu, 2018, Methodology of realizing the digital twin of exoskeleton-centred workspaces, Acta Technica Napocensis Series Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 29, 3
- belkin, 2010, Object-oriented world modelling for autonomous systems, Joint Workshop of Fraunhofer IOSB and Institute for Anthropomatics, 231
- 10.1109/SAS.2019.8706111 · DOI
- 2018, High Level Architecture Release 4 0
- 2016, SmartM2M IoT Standards Landscape
- 2009, Overview of Ubiquitous Networking and of Its Support in NGN[S]
- kenney, 2016, The rise of the platform economy, Issues Sci Technol, 32, 61
- holenstein, 2007, Breaking the Availability Barrier II Achieving Century Uptimes With Active/Active Systems
- 2013, Network Function Virtualization Architectural Framework
- 2016, GE digital twin—Analytic engine for the digital power plant
- rotem-gal-oz, 2006, Fallacies of Distributed Computing Explained
- escorsa, 2018, Digital Twin A Glimpse at the Main Patented Developments
- bolton, 2018, Gemini principles
- pontes, 2018, Visit [Industrial Internet of Things—Digital Twins] Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics
- 2017, PREDIX the industrial IoT application platform
- luyckx, 2018, Impact of the Digital Twin on the Enterprise Architecture
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 804
Towards the Integration of Digital Twins and Service-Oriented Architectures
Kruger, K., Human, C., & Basson, A. H. (2022) · Studies in computational intelligence · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-99108-1_10 · Cited by 15
TMETA: Trust Management for the Cold Start of IoT Services With Digital-Twin-Aided Blockchain
Wang, C., Cai, Z., Seo, D., & Li, Y. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3285108 · Cited by 12
Mariani, S., Picone, M., & Ricci, A. (2023) · Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10472-023-09884-9 · Cited by 13
Alhalaybeh, A., Alkhatib, A. A. A., Albustanji, R. N., Elmanaseer, S., Kanan, T., & Alsakarnah, R. (2023) · 2023 International Conference on Information Technology (ICIT) · doi:10.1109/icit58056.2023.10226029 · Cited by 8
Zhidchenko, V., Startcev, E., & Handroos, H. (2022) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2022.3176645 · Cited by 13
(Draft) Considerations for Digital Twins StandardsPreprint
Voas, J. M. (2021) · doi:10.6028/nist.ir.8356-draft · Cited by 12
Lan, H.-Y., Cheng, S., Lu, H., Chang, C.-C., Li, S.-Y., & Huang, C. (2024) · Preprints.org · doi:10.20944/preprints202401.0927.v1 · Cited by 12
Shehata, A. O., Farsangi, E. N., Morrison, G. M., Rashidi, M., Yang, T. Y., & Mirdan, M. M. (2025) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2025.115880 · Cited by 11
Digital twins for machine tools: a systematic mapping study
Chen, S., Ellwein, C., Klingel, L., Neumann, R., Zhang, J., Riedel, O., Verl, A. W., & Wortmann, A. (2025) · Digital Twin · doi:10.1080/27525783.2025.2538727 · Cited by 11
Kim, Y., Oh, S., & Kim, G. (2025) · Signals · doi:10.3390/signals6040051 · Cited by 12
Redefining Interaction in a Digital Twin Laboratory with Mixed Reality
Barra, P., Giammetti, M., Tortora, A., & Greca, A. D. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-60611-3_21 · Cited by 12
A Data-Driven Framework for Digital Twin Creation in Industrial Environments
Dietz, M., Reichvilser, T., & Pernul, G. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3423372 · Cited by 11
The application of cybersecurity in smart city innovations: an AI aspect
Nath, N. C., & Faruq, O. (2025) · Современные инновации системы и технологии - Modern Innovations Systems and Technologies · doi:10.47813/2782-2818-2025-5-2-3025-3039 · Cited by 11
Wang, M., Zhang, Q., Tai, C., et al. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0267440 · Cited by 11
Digital Twin for IoT Environments: A Testing and Simulation Tool
Nguyen, L., Segovia, M., Mallouli, W., de, E. M., & Cavalli, A. R. (2022) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-14179-9_14 · Cited by 12
6G-Enabled DTaaS (Digital Twin as a Service) for Decarbonized Cities
Duran, K., Ak, E., Yurdakul, G., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Communications workshops · doi:10.1109/iccworkshops57953.2023.10283586 · Cited by 11
Poltronieri, F., Stefanelli, C., Tortonesi, M., & Zaccarini, M. (2023) · Future Internet · doi:10.3390/fi15110359 · Cited by 18
A Fully Open-Source Approach to Intelligent Edge Computing: AGILE’s Lesson
Vecchio, M., Azzoni, P., Menychtas, A., Maglogiannis, I. G., & Felfernig, A. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21041309 · Cited by 11
Evaluating a Digital Twin of an IoT Resource Slice: An Emulation Study Using the ELIoT Platform
Granelli, F., Capraro, R., Lorandi, M., et al. (2021) · IEEE Networking Letters · doi:10.1109/lnet.2021.3097556 · Cited by 11
A Collaborative Industrial Augmented Reality Digital Twin: Developing the Future of Shipyard 4.0
Vidal-Balea, A., Blanco-Novoa, Ó., Fraga‐Lamas, P., Montesinos, M., & Fernández‐Caramés, T. M. (2022) · Lecture notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-06371-8_8 · Cited by 12
The development of a digital twin concept system
Duan, H., Gao, S., Yang, X., & Li, Y. (2025) · Digital Twin · doi:10.12688/digitaltwin.17599.3 · Cited by 10
Blockchain in the Digital Twin Context: A Comprehensive Survey
Li, D., Han, D., Crespi, N., Minerva, R., Raza, S. M., Farahbakhsh, R., Liang, W., & Zheng, Z. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3772366 · Cited by 11
Self-citationA digital twin framework for urban parking management and mobility forecasting
Piccialli, F., Amitrano, S., Cerciello, D., Borrelli, A., Prezioso, E., & Canzaniello, M. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-65306-w · Cited by 11
Digital Twin Prospects in IoT-Based Human Movement Monitoring Model
Parween, G., Al‐Anbuky, A., Mawston, G. A., & Lowe, A. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25216674 · Cited by 15
Digital Twin‐Based Modeling of Complex Systems for Smart Aging
Deng, Y. (2022) · Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society · doi:10.1155/2022/7365223 · Cited by 10
Threat intelligence using Digital Twin honeypots in Cybersecurity
Nintsiou, M., Grigoriou, E., Karypidis, P. A., Saoulidis, T., Fountoukidis, E., & Sarigiannidis, P. G. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR) · doi:10.1109/csr57506.2023.10224997 · Cited by 11
UAV Digital Twin Based Wireless Channel Modeling for 6G Green IoT
Qi, F., Xie, W., Liu, L., et al. (2023) · Drones · doi:10.3390/drones7090562 · Cited by 10
Zhang, Y. Z., Wang, W., Yang, Q., Tang, X., Ruan, W., Li, Y., Daoerji, S., Zhang, X., Ye, Y., Huang, J., et al. (2024) · Digital twins and applications. · doi:10.1049/dgt2.12010 · Cited by 10
An Entanglement-Aware Middleware for Digital Twins
Bellavista, P., Bicocchi, N., Fogli, M., et al. (2024) · ACM Transactions on Internet of Things · doi:10.1145/3699520 · Cited by 10
Tang, L., Wang, L., Fang, D., & Chen, Q. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2024.3524595 · Cited by 10
Digital Twins and Artificial Collective Intelligence: Synergies for the Future
Pretel, E., Navarro, E., Pujol, V. C., & Dustdar, S. (2025) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2024.3521607 · Cited by 10
Bibliometric Analysis of Digital Twin: Scientometrics and Future Research Trends
Bhatia, M., & Kumar, V. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3555282 · Cited by 11
AI-enabled consumer digital twins as a platform for research aimed at enhancing customer experience
Hornik, J., & Rachamim, M. (2025) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-025-00527-3 · Cited by 14
Alves, S. F. D. R., Uribe-Quevedo, Á., Chen, D., Morris, J., & Radmard, S. (2022) · IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW) · doi:10.1109/vrw55335.2022.00036 · Cited by 11
Towards an Edge Intelligence-Based Traffic Monitoring System
Barbuto, V., Savaglio, C., Minerva, R., Crespi, N., & Fortino, G. (2023) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc53992.2023.10393907 · Cited by 14
Self-citationArtificial intelligence and internet of things in manufacturing decision processes
Wijaya, S., Rudy, L. H., Debora, F., et al. (2024) · IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.11591/ijai.v13.i2.pp2185-2200 · Cited by 9
Anyene, G., Schultz, C. M., Nepomuceno, A., & Kim, I. (2024) · SIMULATION · doi:10.1177/00375497241283047 · Cited by 12
Challenges and Opportunities of DevOps for IoT Systems:DevOps-For-IoT
Khalaifat, W., & Abdulaziz, F. (2024) · International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT) · doi:10.1109/3ict64318.2024.10824302 · Cited by 9
Liu, J., Zainudin, E. S., As’arry, A., Ismai, M. I. S. B., & Zhang, C. (2025) · Soft Computing · doi:10.1007/s00500-025-10461-x · Cited by 10
An AI-Driven, Scalable, and Modular Digital Twin Framework for Traffic Management
Herath, M., Dutta, H., Minerva, R., Crespi, N., Alvi, M., & Raza, S. M. (2025) · IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference · doi:10.1109/wcnc61545.2025.10978260 · Cited by 9
Self-citationDigital Twin Road: value and implications involving data and application
Haverkamp, P., Anantheswar, A., May, M., Wadlig, G., Hildebrandt, J., Thiessat, K. A., Wollny, I., Traverso, M., Müller-Mall, S., Kaliske, M., et al. (2025) · Discover Applied Sciences · doi:10.1007/s42452-025-07018-w · Cited by 10
Digital Twins for Smart Home Gadget Threat Prediction using Deep Convolution Neural Network
Padmapriya, V., & Srivenkatesh, M. (2023) · International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications · doi:10.14569/ijacsa.2023.0140270 · Cited by 9
Wang, C., Chen, C.-I., & Zheng, M.-C. (2023) · Buildings · doi:10.3390/buildings13061366 · Cited by 11
Digital Twin Simulation Development and Execution on HPC Infrastructures
Kasztelnik, M., Nowakowski, P., Meizner, J., et al. (2023) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-36021-3_2 · Cited by 9
An Ecosystem of Digital Twins for Operating Room Management
Burattini, S., Montagna, S., Croatti, A., Gentili, N., Ricci, A., Leonardi, L., Pandolfini, S., & Tosi, S. (2023) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · doi:10.1109/cbms58004.2023.00317 · Cited by 9
Xu, Y., Suo, L., Zhou, W. H., et al. (2023) · IEEE Sensors Letters · doi:10.1109/lsens.2023.3322274 · Cited by 9
Multivibration Sensors Data Fusion Codec for Mechanical Digital Twin
Fu, H., Deng, L., Tang, B., et al. (2023) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2023.3330152 · Cited by 9
Kowal, D., Radzik, M., & Domaracká, L. (2024) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su16135718 · Cited by 12
Implementation of DT-based monitoring system of induction motors
Tshoombe, B. K., dos Santos, J. F., Araújo, R. C. F., et al. (2021) · IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/induscon51756.2021.9529868 · Cited by 9
Enabling Smart Agriculture in Nigeria: Application of Digital-Twin Technology
Elijah, O., Rahim, S. K. A., Emmanuel, A. A., Salihu, Y. O., Usman, Z. G., & Jimoh, A. M. (2021) · International Conference on Multidisciplinary Engineering and Applied Science (ICMEAS) · doi:10.1109/icmeas52683.2021.9692351 · Cited by 12
5G mobile networks and Digital Twins concept: Research challenges in network DT emulation
Pantović, V., Milovanovic, D. A., Starčević, D., & Bojkovic, Z. S. (2022) · International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Electronic and Communications Engineering (ELECOM) · doi:10.1109/elecom54934.2022.9965265 · Cited by 9
Digital Twins and Blockchain for IoT Management
Samaniego, M., & Deters, R. (2023) · ACM International Symposium on Blockchain and Secure Critical Infrastructure (BSCI) · doi:10.1145/3594556.3594611 · Cited by 12
Measuring Digital Twin Entanglement in Industrial Internet of Things
Bellavista, P., Bicocchi, N., Fogli, M., Giannelli, C., Mamei, M., & Picone, M. (2023) · International Conference on Communications · doi:10.1109/icc45041.2023.10278787 · Cited by 8
Awasthi, K., Padwekar, K., & Misra, S. C. (2024) · Advances in information quality and management · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-7366-5.ch074 · Cited by 7
Digital Twin for Smart Grid: A Survey
Xu, J., Li, Y., Zhang, X., Guan, P., Zhang, S., & Li, T. (2024) · International Conference on Cyber-Energy Systems and Intelligent Energy (ICCSIE) · doi:10.1109/iccsie61360.2024.10698570 · Cited by 9
Zhang, Q., Wang, Y., & Li, Z. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3486125 · Cited by 10
Leveraging Digital Twins and Generative AI for Effective Urban Mobility Management
Canzaniello, M., Amitrano, S., Prezioso, E., et al. (2024) · doi:10.1109/cyberscitech64112.2024.00032 · Cited by 8
MAS4DT: A novel proposal for developing Digital Twins following a Multi-Agent system approach
Pretel, E., Zhinín-Vera, L., Navarro, E., López‐Jaquero, V., & González, P. (2025) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2025.112344 · Cited by 9
Digital twin assisted multi‐task offloading for vehicular edge computing under SAGIN with blockchain
Chen, Q., Li, C., Chen, M., Wu, M., & Zhang, G. (2025) · IET Communications · doi:10.1049/cmu2.70002 · Cited by 8
Distributing intelligent functionalities in the Internet of Things with agents and Digital Twins
Burattini, S., Mariani, S., Montagna, S., Picone, M., & Ricci, A. (2025) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2025.101560 · Cited by 9
Bhatia, M., & Kumar, V. (2025) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2025.3575476 · Cited by 15
Overview of Digital Twin Development in Power Electronics
Bhoi, S. K., Chakraborty, S., Hosseinabadi, F., Frikha, M. A., Martin, G. E., Sorniotti, A., & Hegazy, O. (2025) · IEEE Open Journal of Power Electronics · doi:10.1109/ojpel.2025.3615238 · Cited by 13
HT-TPP: A Hybrid Twin Architecture for Thermal Power Plant Collaborative Condition Monitoring
Ghita, M., Benhadou, S., Medromi, H., & Mounaam, A. (2022) · Energies · doi:10.3390/en15155383 · Cited by 10
TwinSync: A Digital Twin Synchronization Protocol for Bandwidth-Limited IoT Applications
Kalasapura, D., Li, J.-Y., Liu, S.-Z., Chen, Y., Wang, R., Abdelzaher, T., Caesar, M., Bhattacharyya, J., Kim, J. H., Wang, G., et al. (2023) · International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks · doi:10.1109/icccn58024.2023.10230154 · Cited by 15
Understanding Stakeholder Requirements for Digital Twins In Manufacturing Maintenance
Chen, S., Sánchez, J. P. G., Bekar, E. T., Bokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., & Lopes, P. V. (2023) · Online World Conference on Soft Computing in Industrial Applications · doi:10.1109/wsc60868.2023.10408657 · Cited by 9
On the Integration of Digital Twin Networks into City Digital Twins: Benefits and Challenges
Turcanu, I., Castignani, G., & Faye, S. (2024) · IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference · doi:10.1109/ccnc51664.2024.10454704 · Cited by 9
Internet of Things and Shop-Floor Digital Twin: an Aerospace case study
Corallo, A., Buccoliero, F. O., Crespino, A. M., Vecchio, V. D., Spennato, A., Visone, D., & Napolitano, D. R. (2022) · International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech) · doi:10.23919/splitech55088.2022.9854314 · Cited by 9
Digital Twin Data Management: Framework and Performance Metrics of Cloud-Based ETL System
Dapkute, A., Šiožinys, V., Jonaitis, M., Kaminickas, M., & Siozinys, M. (2024) · Machines · doi:10.3390/machines12020130 · Cited by 10
Real-Time Task Scheduling With Fairness in Digital Twin Systems
Kim, C., Saad, W., Han, J., Yu, T., Sakaguchi, K., & Jung, M. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3519666 · Cited by 8
Hierarchical Digital Twin Ecosystem for Industrial Manufacturing Scenarios
Martinelli, M., Zhang, J., Splettstößer, A.-K., Picone, M., Lippi, M., & Wortmann, A. (2024) · Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA) · doi:10.1109/seaa64295.2024.00018 · Cited by 7
Digital twin: a driver of sustainable smart cities? Evidence from a bibliometric analysis
Mongo, M., & Daidj, N. (2025) · Environmental Economics and Policy Studies · doi:10.1007/s10018-025-00437-4 · Cited by 10
Ethical, Privacy, and Security Implications of Digital Twins
Evangeline, S. I. (2025) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-0538-7.ch012 · Cited by 7
Digital twins as decision infrastructure: evolution, architecture, and research roadmap
Yang, C. P., Malarvizhi, A. S., Masri, Y., Smith, J. S., Li, Z., Huang, Q., Liu, L., & Kim, J. (2026) · Big Earth Data · doi:10.1080/20964471.2026.2678046 · Cited by 10
Digital Twin Concept, Method and Technical Framework for Smart Meters
Irfan, M., Niaz, A., Habib, M. Q., et al. (2023) · European Journal of Theoretical and Applied Sciences · doi:10.59324/ejtas.2023.1(3).10 · Cited by 7
Digital Twins & Fluid Computing in the Edge-to-Cloud Compute Continuum
Picone, M., Bedogni, L., Pietri, M., et al. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops and other Affiliated Events (PerCom Workshops) · doi:10.1109/percomworkshops59983.2024.10503446 · Cited by 7
Channel Access Methods for RF-Powered IoT Networks: A Survey
Yu, H., Zhang, L., Li, Y., et al. (2024) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2024.3428511 · Cited by 7
Calibration of the Double Digital Twin for the Hand Rehabilitation by the Virtual Glove
Matteo, A. D., Lozzi, D., Mattei, E., Mignosi, F., Montagna, S., Polsinelli, M., & Placidi, G. (2024) · Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems · doi:10.1109/cbms61543.2024.00092 · Cited by 7
Mapping Wireless Networks into Digital Reality through Joint Vertical and Horizontal Learning
Zhang, Z., Chen, M., Yang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2024) · IFIP Networking Conference (IFIP Networking) · doi:10.23919/ifipnetworking62109.2024.10619056 · Cited by 8
Maree, J.-M., Kruger, K., & Basson, A. H. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems (MODELS) · doi:10.1145/3652620.3688258 · Cited by 8
System Development Life-Cycle Assisted Digital Twin Development Model for Smart Micro-grids
Özkan, E., Kök, İ., & Özdemi̇r, S. (2025) · Internet of Things · doi:10.1016/j.iot.2025.101580 · Cited by 8
The development of a digital twin concept system
Duan, H., Gao, S., Yang, X., & Li, Y. (2022) · Digital Twin · doi:10.12688/digitaltwin.17599.1 · Cited by 20
WoTwins: Automatic Digital Twin Generator for the Web of Things
Sciullo, L., Trotta, A., Montori, F., Bononi, L., & Felice, M. D. (2022) · IEEE International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM) · doi:10.1109/wowmom54355.2022.00095 · Cited by 9
A Digital-Twin Based Architecture for Software Longevity in Smart Homes
Zdankin, P., Picone, M., Mamei, M., et al. (2022) · IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS) · doi:10.1109/icdcs54860.2022.00070 · Cited by 7
Economics of Semantic Communication in Metaverse: An Auction Approach
Liew, Z. Q., Du, H., Lim, W. Y. B., Xiong, Z., Niyato, D. T., & Yu, H. (2023) · IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference · doi:10.1109/ccnc51644.2023.10060647 · Cited by 7
Towards Developing a Digital Twin for a Manufacturing Pilot Line: An Industrial Case Study
Kakavandi, F., Gomes, C. Â. G., de Reus, R., Badstue, J., Jensen, J. L., Larsen, P. G., & Iosifidis, A. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-0252-1_2 · Cited by 7
A Virtual Community Healthcare Framework in Metaverse Enabled by Digital Twins
Qu, Q., Sun, H. X., & Chen, Y. (2023) · Communications in computer and information science · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-3581-9_2 · Cited by 7
Definition Of Digital Twin Network Data Model in The Context of Edge-Cloud Continuum
Raza, S. M., Minerva, R., Crespi, N., et al. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Network Softwarization (NetSoft) · doi:10.1109/netsoft57336.2023.10175444 · Cited by 7
Self-citationDigital Twin & Blockchain: Technology Enablers for Metaverse Computing
Picone, M., Mariani, S., Virdis, A., & Castagnetti, P. (2023) · IEEE International Conference on Metaverse Computing, Networking and Applications (MetaCom) · doi:10.1109/metacom57706.2023.00017 · Cited by 7
Wang, T., Huang, N., Dai, M., Wu, Y., Qian, L., & Lin, B. (2022) · IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference · doi:10.1109/vtc2022-spring54318.2022.9860888 · Cited by 7
A Comprehensive Survey on Digital Twin for Future Networks and Emerging Iot IndustryPreprint
Hakiri, A., Gokhale, A. S., Yahia, S. B., & Mellouli, N. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4535810 · Cited by 7
A Web of Things approach for learning on the Edge–Cloud Continuum
Bedogni, L., & Chiariotti, F. (2025) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2025.107736 · Cited by 7
Review: application of green manufacturing processes in precision machining of automotive components
Yang, Q., & Ming, W. (2025) · Green Manufacturing Open · doi:10.20517/gmo.2024.120501 · Cited by 10
A Survey on Machine Learning Approaches for Personalized Coaching with Human Digital Twins
Rietdijk, H. H., Conde-Céspedes, P., Dijkhuis, T. B., Oldenhuis, H. K. E., & Trocan, M. (2025) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app15137528 · Cited by 6
Galera‐Zarco, C., & Moretti, N. (2025) · Journal of Enterprise Information Management · doi:10.1108/jeim-05-2024-0217 · Cited by 8
Maté‐González, M. Á., Blázquez, C. S., Vargas, S. A. C., et al. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25195941 · Cited by 6
Artificial Intelligence in Urban Planning: A Bibliometric Analysis and Hotspot Prediction
Si, S., Yao, Y., & Wu, J. (2025) · Land · doi:10.3390/land14112100 · Cited by 11
Learning-powered migration of social digital twins at the network edge
Chukhno, O., Chukhno, N., Araniti, G., Campolo, C., Iera, A., & Molinaro, A. (2024) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2024.07.019 · Cited by 6
A Study on Service-Oriented Digital Twin Modeling Methods for Weaving Workshops
Yu, B., Fang, L., Luo, L., Hu, X., & Shen, C. (2024) · Machines · doi:10.3390/machines12080542 · Cited by 6
Mindful Human Digital Twins: Integrating Theory of Mind with multi-agent reinforcement learning
Zhinín-Vera, L., Pretel, E., López‐Jaquero, V., Navarro, E., & González, P. (2025) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2025.112939 · Cited by 8
Enabling Distributed and Hybrid Digital Twins in the Industry5.0 Cloud Continuum
Bellavista, P. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-12429-7_10 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Minerva, R., Lee, G. M., & Crespi, N.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
- Venue
- Proceedings of the IEEE
- Published
- 2020-10
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1785-1824
- ISSN
- 0018-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-2256
- OpenAlex
- W3036600965
- Cited by
- 812
- References
- 269
- Citations by year
- 2026: 119 · 2025: 185 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 13
- FWCI
- 52.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- Proceedings of the IEEE (publishedVersion)
- Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Digital Transformation in Industry
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Applied Advanced Technologies
- Keywords
- digital twin, Internet of Things, network softwarization, digital twin definition, digital twin architecture, software architecture models, virtual reality, multi-agent systems, virtualization, manufacturing industry
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-11, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-11 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review