Cited by 338Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A 0.013 ${\hbox {mm}}^{2}$, 5 $\mu\hbox{W}$, DC-Coupled Neural Signal Acquisition IC With 0.5 V Supply

Muller, Rikky, Gambini, Simone, Rabaey, Jan M.·2012·IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits

Abstract

We present an area-efficient neural signal-acquisition system that uses a digitally intensive architecture to reduce system area and enable operation from a 0.5 V supply. The architecture replaces ac coupling capacitors and analog filters with a dual mixed-signal servo loop, which allows simultaneous digitization of the action and local field potentials. A noise-efficient DAC topology and an compact, boxcar sampling ADC are used to cancel input offset and prevent noise folding while enabling “per-pixel” digitization, alleviating system-level complexity. Implemented in a 65 nm CMOS process, the prototype occupies 0.013 mm2while consuming 5 μW and achieving 4.9 μVrms of input-referred noise in a 10 kHz bandwidth.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jssc.2011.2163552

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 27 references

1 of the 27 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. xiao, 2010, A 20 <ref_formula><tex Notation="TeX">$\mu{W}$</tex> </ref_formula> neural recording tag with supply-current-modulated AFE in 0.13 <ref_formula> <tex Notation="TeX">$\mu{\hbox {m}}$</tex></ref_formula> CMOS, IEEE Solid-State Circuits Conf Dig Tech Papers, 122
  2. muller, 2011, A 0.013 <ref_formula><tex Notation="TeX">${\hbox {mm}}^{2}$</tex></ref_formula>, 5 <ref_formula><tex Notation="TeX">$\mu{W}$</tex> </ref_formula>, DC-coupled neural signal acquisition IC with 0.5 V supply, IEEE Solid-State Circuits Conf Dig Tech Papers, 302

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 338

Metadata

Authors
Muller, R., Gambini, S., & Rabaey, J. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
Published
2012-01
Volume
47
Issue
1
Pages
232-243
ISSN
  • 0018-9200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-173X
OpenAlex
W2003444784
Cited by
338
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 7
FWCI
10.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
neural signal acquisition, low-power integrated circuits, local field potentials, digital-to-analog converter, noise folding, low-voltage operation, 65 nm CMOS, area-efficient circuit design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review