Cited by 80Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignRadio Frequency Integrated Circuit DesignLow-power high-performance VLSI design

An Orthogonal Current-Reuse Amplifier for Multi-Channel Sensing

Johnson, Ben, Molnar, Alyosha·2013·IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits

Abstract

We demonstrate a micropower low-noise CMOS amplifier array that reuses bias current to improve the fundamental noise-power tradeoffs of fully-differential amplifier designs. The presented circuit implements current-reuse by stacking the differential input pairs of four amplifiers. The output drain currents of each channel's differential pair are used as the tail currents for the differential pairs of the succeeding channel. Orthogonal current-reuse improves the noise and power tradeoff by sharing bias devices to conserve headroom. With four channels (n = 4), there are 16 unique output currents (2$^{n}$) from the stack, each of which is a linear combination of the four inputs. Amplified versions of the original input signals are reconstructed by appropriately combining the small-signal output currents in output stages that operate at much lower bias currents. With an input-referred noise of 3.7 µV$_{rms}$and a bandwidth of 19.9 kHz, a single channel achieves a noise efficiency factor (NEF) of 3.0. Amortizing the bias current across the amplifier's four channels yields an effective NEF of 1.64. The total power consumption is 15.6 µW, or 3.9 µW per path from a 1.5 V supply. Orthogonal biasing suppresses crosstalk between the channels, providing an isolation of 40 dB under 3-σ mismatch. The implemented circuit was fabricated in a standard 130 nm CMOS process and occupies an area of 0.125 mm$^{2}$. The proposed technique is useful for a variety of applications ranging from low-power neural recording arrays to multiphase radio baseband amplifiers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/jssc.2013.2257478

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent works reported that careful design of the OTA A1 makes low current consumption and low input-referred noise easily achievable.

    “Recent works have also reported that by carefully designing the OTA A1, low current consumption and low input-referred noise are easily achievable [63, 141, 142, 156].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johnson, B., & Molnar, A.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
Published
2013-06
Volume
48
Issue
6
Pages
1487-1496
ISSN
  • 0018-9200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-173X
OpenAlex
W2066186666
Cited by
80
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
Keywords
low noise amplifier, multi-channel sensing, noise efficiency factor, crosstalk reduction, fully differential amplifier, micropower circuits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review