Cited by 129Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignNeural dynamics and brain function

Ceramic-Based Multisite Electrode Arrays for Chronic Single-Neuron Recording

Moxon, K.A., Leiser, S., Gerhardt, G.A., Barbee, K.A., Chapin, J.K.·2004·IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

A method is described for the manufacture of a microelectrode array for chronic, multichannel, single neuron recording. The ceramic-based, multisite electrode array has four recording sites patterned onto a ceramic shaft the size of a single typical microwire electrode. The sites and connecting wires are applied to the ceramic substrate using a reverse photolithographic procedure. Recording sites (22 x 80 microm) are separated by 200 microm along the shaft. A layer of alumina insulation is applied over the whole array (exclusive of recording sites) by ion-beam assisted deposition. These arrays were capable of recording single neuron activity from each of their recording sites for at least three weeks during chronic implantation in the somatosensory cortex of rats, and several sites had recordings that lasted for more than 8 weeks. The vertical arrangement of the recording sites on these electrodes is ideal for simultaneously recording across the different layers of brain areas such as the cerebral cortex and hippocampus in chronic preparations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tbme.2003.821037

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moxon, K. A., Leiser, S., Gerhardt, G. A., Barbee, K. A., & Chapin, J. K.
Affiliations
  • Drexel University (US)
  • Hahnemann University Hospital (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • State University of New York (US)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
Published
2004-04
Volume
51
Issue
4
Pages
647-656
ISSN
0018-9294 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2121376289
Cited by
129
References
47
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7r01ns026722-13, 5r21da014944-02)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA14944)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (1-R01-NS26722)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
single-unit recording, chronic implantation, ion beam assisted deposition, somatosensory cortex, multichannel recording, neural recording electrodes
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Ceramics, Electrodes, Implanted, Equipment Design, Male, Microelectrodes, Nerve Net, Neurons, Sensitivity and Specificity, Somatosensory Cortex, Reproducibility of Results, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Equipment Failure Analysis, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review