Cited by 18Chronic Disease Management StrategiesMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and Education

An Adaptive, Contextual, Technology‐Aided Support (ACTS) System for Chronic Illness Self‐Management

Open access
GLASGOW, RUSSELL E., HUEBSCHMANN, AMY G., KRIST, ALEX H., DEGRUY, FRANK V.·2019·The Milbank Quarterly

Abstract

Policy Points: Fundamental changes are needed in how complex chronic illness conditions are conceptualized and managed. Health management plans for chronic illness need to be integrated, adaptive, contextual, technology aided, patient driven, and designed to address the multilevel social environment of patients’ lives. Such primary care–based health management plans are feasible today but will be even more effective and sustainable if supported by systems thinking, technological advances, and policies that create and reinforce home, work, and health care collaborations. Context: The current health care system is failing patients with chronic illness, especially those with complex comorbid conditions and social determinants of health challenges. The current system combined with unsustainable health care costs, lack of support for primary care in the United States, and aging demographics create a frightening probable future. Methods: Recent developments, including integrated behavioral health, community resources to address social determinants, population health infrastructure, patient‐centered digital‐health self‐management support, and complexity science have the potential to help address these alarming trends. This article describes, first, the opportunity to integrate these trends and, second, a proposal for an integrated, patient‐directed, adaptive, contextual, and technology‐aided support (ACTS) system, based on a patient's life context and home/primary care/work‐setting “support triangle.” Findings: None of these encouraging trends is a panacea, and although most have been described previously, they have not been integrated. Here we discuss an example of integration using these components and how our proposed model (termed My Own Health Report) can be applied, along with its strengths, limitations, implications, and opportunities for practice, policy, and research. Conclusions: This ACTS system builds on and extends the current chronic illness management approaches. It is feasible today and can produce even more dramatic improvements in the future.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1468-0009.12412

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
GLASGOW, R. E., HUEBSCHMANN, A. G., KRIST, A. H., & DEGRUY, F. V.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
GLASGOW, RUSSELL E.
Venue
The Milbank Quarterly
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-08-19
Volume
97
Issue
3
Pages
669-691
ISSN
  • 0887-378X (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-0009
OpenAlex
W2969587833
Cited by
18
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Milbank Quarterly (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Cancer Institute
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (ULTR00058)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
Keywords
chronic disease self-management, behavioral health integration, social determinants of health, primary care, complexity science, comorbidities, health care costs, health policy
MeSH terms
Psychosocial Support Systems, Self-Management, Chronic Disease, Humans, Primary Health Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review