Cited by 330Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlTactile and Sensory InteractionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Accuracy of heartbeat perception is reflected in the amplitude of the heartbeat‐evoked brain potential

Pollatos, Olga, Schandry, Rainer·2004·Psychophysiology

Abstract

Neurotransmission from the heart to the brain results in a heartbeat‐evoked potential (HEP). In this study, the influence of the ability to detect one's heartbeats based on the HEP was examined. According to their results in a heartbeat perception task, subjects were classified as good ( n =18) or poor ( n =26) heartbeat perceivers. EEG, EOG, and ECG were recorded while participants attended to their heartbeats. The R‐wave of the ECG served as a trigger for EEG averaging. In the latency range of 250–350 ms after the ECG R‐wave, the HEP amplitude at the right central location was significantly higher in good heartbeat perceivers. A significantly positive correlation was observed between the heartbeat perception score and the mean HEP amplitude. Our results confirm that the accuracy of heartbeat perception is reflected in the amplitude of the HEP. Thus, the HEP may be a suitable research tool for the study of brain processes related to visceral perception.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1469-8986.2004.00170.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • HEP results are consistent with previous investigations concerning the neural response to heartbeats, in that effects were typically found between 200 ms and 500 ms after ECG R peaks.

    “Our HEP results are consistent with previous investigations concerning the neural response to heartbeats, in that the effects were typically found to exist between 200 ms and 500 ms after ECG R peaks (Montoya et al. 1993;Pollatos and Schandry 2004).”

    From Brain–Heart Interactions Underlying Traditional Tibetan Buddhist Meditation (2019) · cites this paper as Pollatos and Schandry 2004

  • Turning attention inwards and explicitly attending to one's own heartbeats consistently modulates HERs.

    “Turning attention inwards and explicitly attending to one's own heartbeats consistently modulates HERs 92-98 .”

    From Interoceptive rhythms in the brain (2023) · cites this paper as [94]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pollatos, O., & Schandry, R.
Affiliations
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Corresponding author
Schandry, Rainer
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-05
Volume
41
Issue
3
Pages
476-482
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2111277581
Cited by
330
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
heartbeat perception, heartbeat-evoked potentials, heart-brain interaction, visceral sensation, EEG amplitude
MeSH terms
Adult, Brain, Electrocardiography, Electroencephalography, Evoked Potentials, Female, Heart, Humans, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review