Cited by 10Muscle metabolism and nutritionSports Performance and TrainingCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Delaying post‐exercise carbohydrate intake impairs next‐day exercise capacity but not muscle glycogen or molecular responses

Open access
Díaz‐Lara, Javier, Reisman, Elizabeth, Botella, Javier, Probert, Bianka, Burke, Louise M., Bishop, David J., Lee, Matthew J.·2024·Acta Physiologica

Abstract

Aim: To investigate how delayed post‐exercise carbohydrate intake affects muscle glycogen, metabolic‐ and mitochondrial‐related molecular responses, and subsequent high‐intensity interval exercise (HIIE) capacity. Methods: In a double‐blind cross‐over design, nine recreationally active men performed HIIE (10 × 2‐min cycling, ~94% W˙peak) in the fed state, on two occasions. During 0–3 h post‐HIIE, participants drank either carbohydrates (“Immediate Carbohydrate” [IC], providing 2.4 g/kg) or water (“Delayed Carbohydrate” [DC]); total carbohydrate intake over 24 h post‐HIIE was matched (~7 g/kg/d). Skeletal muscle (sampled pre‐HIIE, post‐HIIE, +3 h, +8 h, +24 h) was analyzed for whole‐muscle glycogen and mRNA content, plus signaling proteins in cytoplasmic‐ and nuclear‐enriched fractions. After 24 h, participants repeated the HIIE protocol until failure, to test subsequent HIIE capacity; blood lactate, heart rate, and ratings of perceived effort (RPE) were measured throughout. Results: Muscle glycogen concentrations, and relative changes, were similar between conditions throughout (p > 0.05). Muscle glycogen was reduced from baseline (mean ± SD mmol/kg dm; IC: 409 ± 166; DC: 352 ± 76) at post‐HIIE (IC: 253 ± 96; DC: 214 ± 82), +3 h (IC: 276 ± 62; DC: 269 ± 116) and + 8 h (IC: 321 ± 56; DC: 269 ± 116), returning to near‐baseline by +24 h. Several genes (PGC‐1ɑ, p53) and proteins (p‐ACC Ser79, p‐P38 MAPK Thr180/Tyr182) elicited typical exercise‐induced changes irrespective of condition. Delaying carbohydrate intake reduced next‐day HIIE capacity (5 ± 3 intervals) and increased RPE (~2 ratings), despite similar physiological responses between conditions. Conclusion: Molecular responses to HIIE (performed in the fed state) were not enhanced by delayed post‐exercise carbohydrate intake. Our findings support immediate post‐exercise refueling if the goal is to maximize next‐day HIIE capacity and recovery time is ≤24 h.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apha.14215

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delaying post-exercise carbohydrate ingestion by 2 h may impair exercise performance the following day.

    “and may impair exercise performance the following day [14]”

    From Nutritional Strategies to Improve Post-exercise Recovery and Subsequent Exercise Performance: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [14]

    The Discussion reports reduced next-day high-intensity exercise capacity after delaying post-exercise carbohydrate intake. It specifies a 3-hour delay, not the 2-hour delay in the attributed claim; no page number is available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. McKay AKA, Stellingwerff T, Smith ES, et al. Defining train- ing and performance caliber: a participant classification frame- work. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2022;17(2):317-331.
  2. Thomas DT, Erdman KA, Burke LM. American College of Sports Medicine joint position Statement. Nutrition and ath- letic performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(3):543-568.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Díaz‐Lara, J., Reisman, E., Botella, J., Probert, B., Burke, L. M., Bishop, D. J., & Lee, M. J.
Affiliations
  • Victoria University (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Defence Science and Technology Group (AU)
  • Australian Catholic University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lee, Matthew J.
Venue
Acta Physiologica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2024-09-12
Volume
240
Issue
10
Pages
e14215-e14215
ISSN
  • 1748-1708 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-1716
OpenAlex
W4402484614
Cited by
10
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1
FWCI
2.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Physiologica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • RUIdeRA - Institutional University Repository (University of Castilla-La Mancha) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Defence Science and Technology Group
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
muscle glycogen, high-intensity interval exercise, exercise capacity, PGC-1α, p53, p38 MAPK, post-exercise recovery, rating of perceived exertion, blood lactate, heart rate, exercise-induced gene expression
MeSH terms
High-Intensity Interval Training, Adult, Dietary Carbohydrates, Double-Blind Method, Glycogen, Humans, Male, Exercise, Exercise Tolerance, Muscle, Skeletal, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review