Cited by 132Inflammatory Bowel DiseasePain Management and Placebo EffectMindfulness and Compassion Interventions

Gut-directed hypnotherapy significantly augments clinical remission in quiescent ulcerative colitis

Open access
Keefer, L., Taft, T. H., Kiebles, J. L., Martinovich, Z., Barrett, T. A., Palsson, O. S.·2013·Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Psychotherapy is not routinely recommended for in ulcerative colitis (UC). Gut-directed hypnotherapy (HYP) has been linked to improved function in the gastrointestinal tract and may operate through immune-mediated pathways in chronic diseases. AIMS: To determine the feasibility and acceptability of HYP and estimate the impact of HYP on clinical remission status over a 1-year period in patients with an historical flare rate of 1.3 times per year. METHODS: A total of 54 patients were randomised at a single site to seven sessions of gut-directed HYP (n = 26) or attention control (CON; n = 29) and followed for 1 year. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants in each condition that had remained clinically asymptomatic (clinical remission) through 52 weeks post treatment. RESULTS: One-way analysis of variance comparing HYP and CON subjects on number of days to clinical relapse favoured the HYP condition [F = 4.8 (1, 48), P = 0.03] by 78 days. Chi-squared analysis comparing the groups on proportion maintaining remission at 1 year was also significant [χ²(1) = 3.9, P = 0.04], with 68% of HYP and 40% of CON patients maintaining remission for 1 year. There were no significant differences between groups over time in quality of life, medication adherence, perceived stress or psychological factors. CONCLUSION: This is the first prospective study that has demonstrated a significant effect of a psychological intervention on prolonging clinical remission in patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis (Clinical Trial # NCT00798642).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/apt.12449

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only three intervention studies confirmed that intervention and comparator groups had similar baseline characteristics.

    “Only three studies 34 , 41 , 58 confirmed that intervention and comparator groups had similar baseline characteristics”

    From Systematic review: the role of psychological stress in inflammatory bowel disease (2022) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Statistical Analysis section says the study compared baseline demographic and disease variables between the hypnotherapy and control groups. The Discussion reports no detected difference in baseline treatment expectancy, but the passages do not confirm that the groups had similar baseline characteristics generally. This paper also cannot establish the citing document’s count of only three studies. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Hypnotherapy did not affect perceived stress.

    “Hypnotherapy did not affect perceived stress. 41”
  • Emerging data suggest that psychological therapies may have positive effects on IBD outcomes, prolonging remission for adults with ulcerative colitis.

    “Emerging data suggest that psychological therapies may have positive effects on IBD outcomes, prolonging remission for adults with ulcerative colitis (68,69)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]Palsson OS Hypnosis treatment for Gut Problems European Gastroenterology and Hepatology Review 2010 6 42 6

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Keefer, L., Taft, T. H., Kiebles, J. L., Martinovich, Z., Barrett, T. A., & Palsson, O. S.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Keefer, L.
Venue
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-19
Volume
38
Issue
7
Pages
761-771
ISSN
0269-2813 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991923515
Cited by
132
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
FWCI
6.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (R21AT003204, R21AT0032004)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Keywords
gut-directed hypnotherapy, ulcerative colitis, clinical remission, psychotherapy, clinical relapse, feasibility and acceptability, psychological intervention, quality of life, perceived stress
MeSH terms
Adult, Colitis, Ulcerative, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Hypnosis, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Treatment Outcome, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review