Cited by 167Gastrointestinal motility and disordersInflammatory Bowel DiseasePsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Psychological Interventions for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Open access
Ballou, Sarah, Keefer, Laurie·2017·Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology

Abstract

Psychological interventions have been designed and implemented effectively in a wide range of medical conditions, including Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD). The psychological treatments for IBS and IBD with the strongest evidence base include: cognitive behavioral therapy, hypnosis, and mindfulness-based therapies. The evidence for each of these therapies is reviewed here for both IBS and IBD. In general, there is a stronger and larger evidence base to support the use of psychological interventions in IBS compared with IBD. This is likely due to the high level of psychiatric comorbidity associated with IBS and the involvement of the stress-response in symptom presentation of IBS. Further research in psychosocial interventions for IBD is necessary. Finally, the importance of conceptualizing both IBS and IBD in a biopsychosocial model is discussed and several resources for accessing Clinical Health Psychology materials and referrals are provided.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/ctg.2016.69

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT is demonstrated to be somewhat effective in improving HRQoL and depressive symptoms for those with IBD, but there remain mixed reviews on its long-term efficacy and its effectiveness, if any, in treating anxiety symptoms.

    “CBT is demonstrated to be somewhat effective in improving HRQoL and depressive symptoms for those with IBD; however, there remain mixed reviews on its long-term efficacy and its effectiveness, if any, in treating anxiety symptoms (Ballou & Keefer, 2017; Bennebroek Evertsz et al., 2017; Gracie et al., 2017; Hanlon et al., 2018; Mikocka-Walus et al., 2017; Stapersma et al., 2020).”

    From Moving Towards Acceptance and Values: A Qualitative Study of ACTforIBD Compared to IBD Psychoeducation (2024) · cites this paper as Ballou & Keefer, 2017

    The CBT > IBD section (page not provided) says CBT may improve quality of life in adults and reports small positive effects on quality of life and depression in adolescents. It describes the overall IBD evidence as mixed, but does not specifically assess long-term CBT efficacy; it also reports a small positive effect on anxiety in adolescents, rather than uniformly uncertain effectiveness for anxiety. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Current evidence around the efficacy of different types of psychotherapy for IBD is mixed, and questions remain about what types of support might be most effective.

    “Current evidence around the efficacy of different types of psychotherapy is mixed and there remain questions around what types of support might be most effective in improving patient outcomes for those with IBD (Ballou & Keefer, 2017; Gracie et al., 2017; Knowles et al., 2013).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 88 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barney P Master Your IBS: An 8-week Plan To Control The Symptoms Of Irritable Bowel Syndrome. AGA Press: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2010, pp 229..

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ballou, S., & Keefer, L.
Affiliations
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Ballou, Sarah
Venue
Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology
Published
2017-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
e214
ISSN
2155-384X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2572736963
Cited by
167
References
88
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 7
FWCI
19.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32DK007760)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, psychological intervention, cognitive behavioral therapy, hypnosis, mindfulness-based interventions, psychiatric comorbidity, stress response, biopsychosocial model, psychosocial interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review