Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 592

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence for General and Domain-Specific Elements of Teacher–Child Interactions: Associations With Preschool Children's Development

Hamre, Bridget, Hatfield, Bridget, Pianta, Robert, Jamil, Faiza·2014·Child Development

Abstract

This study evaluates a model for considering domain-general and domain-specific associations between teacher–child interactions and children's development, using a bifactor analytic strategy. Among a sample of 325 early childhood classrooms there was evidence for both general elements of teacher–child interaction (responsive teaching) and domain-specific elements related to positive management and routines and cognitive facilitation. Among a diverse population of 4-year-old children (n = 1,407) responsive teaching was modestly associated with development across social and cognitive domains, whereas positive management and routines was modestly associated with increases in inhibitory control and cognitive facilitation was associated with gains in early language and literacy skills. The conceptual and methodological contributions and challenges of this approach are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cdev.12184

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Beach, 2013, Interacting with the CLASS tool: How to help teachers understand and engage in high level instructional supports. Paper presented at the annual conference of National Head Start Association
  2. Bowlby, 1973, Attachment and loss
  3. Bronfenbrenner, 1998, Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 1. Theoretical models of human development, 993
  4. Connell, 1991, The Minnesota symposium on child development: Self-processes and development, 43
  5. Dunn, 1997, Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test III
  6. Hamre, 2007, School readiness and the transition to school, 49
  7. Kane, 2012, Gathering feedback for teachers: Combining high-quality observations with student surveys and achievement gains
  8. Lonigan, 2004, Handbook on family literacy: Research and services
  9. Lonigan, 2007, Test of Preschool Early Literacy (TOPEL)
  10. Muthén, 1998, Mplus user's guide
  11. Pianta, 2001, Student-Teacher Relationship Scale: Professional manual
  12. Sarama, 2009, Manual for Classroom Observation of Early Mathematics Environment and Teaching
  13. Zaslow, 2011, Quality and measurement in early childhood education

Cited by

See all 592

Metadata

Authors
Hamre, B., Hatfield, B., Pianta, R., & Jamil, F.
Venue
Child Development
Published
2014-05-01
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
1257-1274
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2022384642
Cited by
592
References
51
FWCI
140.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.