The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Range size predicts the risk of local extinction from habitat loss
Open accessAbstract
Aim: The geographical range size of species is a strong predictor of vulnerability to global extinction. However, it remains unclear whether range size is also a good predictor of extinction risk at much smaller scales. Here, we reconstruct biodiversity time series to ask whether species with small ranges have declined preferentially with habitat loss at the local scale. Location: Global. Time period: 1500–2015. Major taxa studied: Vascular plants. Method: We collated 70 million occurrence records of 180,000 species of vascular plants from three biodiversity data‐sharing networks. We combined these with data on changes in global land use to find locations (0.25° grid cells) with biodiversity data before and after loss of natural habitat. First, we examined the change in community median range size before and after habitat loss. Second, we quantified the probabilities of local persistence of small‐ and large‐ranged species at different levels of habitat loss. Results: Community median range size was higher after habitat loss, on average. Species with small ranges had lower probabilities of persistence than species with large ranges at already moderate habitat loss (≤50%). Main conclusions: The loss of natural habitat has a differential effect on the local extinction risk of species with different range sizes. Given that species with small ranges decline preferentially, habitat loss can create a linkage between temporal and spatial species turnover, in that changes within communities decrease compositional differences between communities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1244693 · Cited by 11,704
Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100
Sala, O. E., Stuart Chapin, F., III, Armesto, J. J., Berlow, E., Bloomfield, J., Dirzo, R., Huber-Sanwald, E., Huenneke, L. F., Jackson, R. B., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5459.1770 · Cited by 9,280
The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection
Pimm, S. L., Jenkins, C. N., Abell, R., Brooks, T. M., Gittleman, J. L., Joppa, L. N., Raven, P. H., Roberts, C. M., & Sexton, J. O. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1246752 · Cited by 3,542
Biodiversity: The ravages of guns, nets and bulldozers
Maxwell, S. L., Fuller, R. A., Brooks, T. M., & Watson, J. E. M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/536143a · Cited by 1,979
Assemblage Time Series Reveal Biodiversity Change but Not Systematic Loss
Dornelas, M., Gotelli, N. J., McGill, B., Shimadzu, H., Moyes, F., Sievers, C., & Magurran, A. E. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1248484 · Cited by 1,412
Klein Goldewijk, K., Beusen, A., van Drecht, G., & de Vos, M. (2011) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00587.x · Cited by 1,270
Ellis, E. C., Kaplan, J. O., Fuller, D. Q., Vavrus, S., Klein Goldewijk, K., & Verburg, P. H. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1217241110 · Cited by 812
Global meta-analysis reveals no net change in local-scale plant biodiversity over time
Vellend, M., Baeten, L., Myers-Smith, I. H., Elmendorf, S. C., Beauséjour, R., Brown, C. D., De Frenne, P., Verheyen, K., & Wipf, S. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1312779110 · Cited by 628
Estimating local biodiversity change: a critique of papers claiming no net loss of local diversity
Gonzalez, A., Cardinale, B. J., Allington, G. R. H., Byrnes, J., Arthur Endsley, K., Brown, D. G., Hooper, D. U., Isbell, F., O'Connor, M. I., & Loreau, M. (2016) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/15-1759.1 · Cited by 354
Newbold, T., Hudson, L. N., Contu, S., Hill, S. L. L., Beck, J., Liu, Y., Meyer, C., Phillips, H. R. P., Scharlemann, J. P. W., & Purvis, A. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2006841 · Cited by 287
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.2307/3545823 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature23285 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/284267 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.021 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.12688/f1000research.2-191.v1 · DOI · Paper page
- Christiansen F. B., 2012, Theories of populations in biological communities
- 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0843 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.288.5470.1414 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00363850 · doi:10.1007/bf00363850
- 10.1890/1051-0761(2001)011[0001:CBUOHD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- FAO, 2008, Food and agriculture organisation of the united nations
- 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02602.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0169-5347(96)10027-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/5669 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01596.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00485.x · DOI · Paper page
- GBIF.org(6th December2017).GBIF occurrence download. Retrieved fromhttps://doi.org/10.15468/dl.chiubr · doi:10.15468/dl.chiubr
- 10.1086/284695 · doi:10.1086/284695
- 10.1890/06-1060.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1991.tb00549.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ece3.1303 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10584-011-0153-2 · DOI · Paper page
- IPBES. (2019).Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. InS.Díaz J.Settele E. S.Brondizio H. T.Ngo M.Guèze J.Agard …C. N.Zayas(eds.).Bonn Germany:IPBES secretariat. Retrieved fromhttps://www.ipbes.net/global-assessment-report-biodiversity-ecosystem-services
- 10.1111/bij.12532 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1525/bio.2011.61.2.10 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01815.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00608.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/ncomms9405 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/2041-210X.12861 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/20436 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/S1367943001001056 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/nature13139 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/ele.12624 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/378212 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/02-5405 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1196624 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0806080105 · DOI · Paper page
- Rabinowitz D., 1986, Conservation biology: the science of scarcity and diversity
- 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0238:RCIDNA]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1038/330474a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/1365-2664.13067 · DOI
- 10.3732/ajb.1000215 · DOI
Cited by
Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration
Strassburg, B. B. N., Iribarrem, A., Beyer, H. L., Cordeiro, C. L., Crouzeilles, R., Jakovac, C. C., Braga Junqueira, A., Lacerda, E., Latawiec, A. E., Balmford, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2784-9 · Cited by 1,175
Extinction risk and threats to plants and fungi
Nic Lughadha, E., Bachman, S. P., Leão, T. C. C., Forest, F., Halley, J. M., Moat, J., Acedo, C., Bacon, K. L., Brewer, R. F. A., Gâteblé, G., et al. (2020) · PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET · doi:10.1002/ppp3.10146 · Cited by 451
Endemism increases species' climate change risk in areas of global biodiversity importance
Manes, S., Costello, M. J., Beckett, H., Debnath, A., Devenish-Nelson, E., Grey, K.-A., Jenkins, R., Khan, T. M., Kiessling, W., Krause, C., et al. (2021) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2021.109070 · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- Staude, I. R., Navarro, L. M., & Pereira, H. M.
- Venue
- Global Ecology and Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-09-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 16-25
- ISSN
- 1466-822X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-8238
- OpenAlex
- W2972453122
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 11.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG FZT 118)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Range size predicts the risk of local extinction from habitat loss. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/geb.13003
- The paper
- Staude, I. R., Navarro, L. M., & Pereira, H. M. (2020). Range size predicts the risk of local extinction from habitat loss. Global Ecology and Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
