Cited by 274Fire effects on ecosystemsPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsForest Management and Policy

Climate change, human land use and future fires in the Amazon

COCHRANE, MARK A., BARBER, CHRISTOPHER P.·2009·Global Change Biology

Abstract

There is increasing consensus that the global climate will continue to warm over the next century. The biodiversity‐rich Amazon forest is a region of growing concern because many global climate model (GCM) scenarios of climate change forecast reduced precipitation and, in some cases, coupled vegetation models predict dieback of the forest. To date, fires have generally been spatially co‐located with road networks and associated human land use because almost all fires in this region are anthropogenic in origin. Climate change, if severe enough, could alter this situation, potentially changing the fire regime to one of increased fire frequency and severity for vast portions of the Amazon forest. High moisture contents and dense canopies have historically made Amazonian forests extremely resistant to fire spread. Climate will affect the fire situation in the Amazon directly, through changes in temperature and precipitation, and indirectly, through climate‐forced changes in vegetation composition and structure. The frequency of drought will be a prime determinant of both how often forest fires occur and how extensive they become. Fire risk management needs to take into account landscape configuration, land cover types and forest disturbance history as well as climate and weather. Maintaining large blocks of unsettled forest is critical for managing landscape level fire in the Amazon. The Amazon has resisted previous climate changes and should adapt to future climates as well if landscapes can be managed to maintain natural fire regimes in the majority of forest remnants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01786.x

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longer fire seasons prolong conducive burning conditions, potentially expanding areas susceptible to escaped deforestation fires and strengthening feedbacks in regional climate-fire dynamics.

    “Longer fire seasons prolong conducive burning conditions, potentially expanding areas susceptible to escaped deforestation fires59 and subsequently strengthening feedbacks in regional climate-fire dynamics60.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
COCHRANE, M. A., & BARBER, C. P.
Affiliations
South Dakota State University (US)
Corresponding author
COCHRANE, MARK A.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-02-06
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
601-612
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2128759273
Cited by
274
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
11.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Change Biology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
Amazon forest fires, climate change, anthropogenic land use, fire regimes, drought, forest decline, anthropogenic fire, fire risk management, landscape configuration, forest disturbance history, floristic composition, fire adaptation, road network

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review