Cited by 59Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorStress Responses and CortisolMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Developmental underpinnings of differences in rodent novelty‐seeking and emotional reactivity

Open access
Clinton, Sarah M., Stead, John D. H., Miller, Sue, Watson, Stanley J., Akil, Huda·2011·European Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Innate differences in human temperament strongly influence how individuals cope with stress and also predispose towards specific types of psychopathology. The present study examines the developing brain in an animal model of temperamental differences to examine how altered neurodevelopment may engender differences in emotional reactivity that are stable throughout the animal’s life. We utilize selectively‐bred High Responder (bHR) and Low Responder (bLR) rats that exhibit dramatic emotional behavior differences, with bHRs exhibiting exaggerated novelty‐exploration, aggression, impulsivity and drug self‐administration, and bLRs showing marked behavioral inhibition and exaggerated anxiety‐like and depressive‐like behavior. Using Affymetrix microarrays, we assessed bLR and bHR gene expression in the developing brain on postnatal days (P)7, 14 and 21, focusing on the hippocampus and nucleus accumbens, two regions related to emotionality and known to differ in adult bLR and bHR rats. We found dramatic gene expression differences between bLR and bHR in the P7 and P14 hippocampus, with minimal differences in the nucleus accumbens. Some of the most profound differences involved genes critical for neurodevelopment and synaptogenesis. Stereological studies evaluated hippocampal structure in developing bHR and bLR pups, revealing enhanced hippocampal volume and cell proliferation in bLR animals. Finally, behavioral studies showed that the characteristic bHR and bLR behavioral phenotypes emerge very early in life, with exploratory differences apparent at P16 and anxiety differences present by P25. Together these data point to specific brain regions and critical periods when the bHR and bLR phenotypes begin to diverge, which may eventually allow us to test possible therapeutic interventions to normalize extreme phenotypes (e.g. the anxiety‐prone nature of bLRs or drug addiction proclivity of bHRs).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07811.x

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These pathways were also enriched in genes identified through transcriptomic studies of animal models of aggression in mice, rats, zebrafish, and Drosophila.

    “These pathways were also enriched in genes identified through transcriptomic studies of animal models of aggression in mice [27, 28], rats [29], zebrafish [30], and Drosophila [31].”
  • The USA mice and the rat model were bred for varying phenotypes: increased reactivity toward stimulation, novelty exploration, impulsivity, and vulnerability to psychostimulant abuse.

    “The USA mice and the rat model were bred for varying phenotypes: increased reactivity toward stimulation [42], novelty exploration, impulsivity, and vulnerability to psychostimulant abuse [29, 44].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clinton, S. M., Stead, J. D. H., Miller, S., Watson, S. J., & Akil, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Carleton University (CA)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Clinton, Sarah M.
Venue
European Journal of Neuroscience
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-08-22
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
994-1005
ISSN
  • 0953-816X (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-9568
OpenAlex
W1930138558
Cited by
58
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K99MH085859, R00MH085859)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (P01DA021633)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
novelty seeking, emotional reactivity, temperament, selective breeding, brain development, gene expression, hippocampus, nucleus accumbens, synaptogenesis, hippocampal cell proliferation, anxiety-like behavior, self-administration, aggression, impulsivity, behavioral inhibition, postnatal development
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Brain, Emotions, Environment, Exploratory Behavior, Female, Hippocampus, Male, Motor Activity, Nucleus Accumbens, Reward, Synapses, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Dentate Gyrus, Microarray Analysis, Rats, Genome-Wide Association Study, Neurogenesis, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review