Cited by 104Global Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyObesity, Physical Activity, DietConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

Drinking to our health: can beverage companies cut calories while maintaining profits?

Open access
Kleiman, S., Ng, S. W., Popkin, B.·2012·Obesity Reviews

Abstract

Carbonated soft drinks and other beverages make up an increasing percentage of energy intake, and there are rising public health concerns about the links between consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain, obesity, and other cardiometabolic problems. In response, the food and beverage industry claims to be reformulating products, reducing package or portion sizes and introducing healthier options. Comparative analysis on various changes and their potential effects on public health are needed. We conduct a case study using the two largest and most influential producers of sweetened beverages, The Coca-Cola Company and PepsiCo Inc., who together control 34% of the global soft drink market, examining their product portfolios globally and in three critical markets (the United States, Brazil and China) from 2000 to 2010. On a global basis, total revenues and energy per capita sold increased, yet the average energy density (kJ 100 mL(-1) ) sold declined slightly, suggesting a shift to lower-calorie products. In the United States, both total energy per capita and average energy density of beverages sold decreased, while the opposite was true in the developing markets of Brazil and China, with total per capita energy increasing greatly in China and, to a lesser extent, in Brazil.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00949.x

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the 1985 to 2005 period extensive added sugar intake occurred across HIC, but more recently large increases have occurred in LMIC, particularly in consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed foods.

    “In the 1985 to 2005 period extensive added sugar intake occurred across HIC (55) but more recently large increases have occurred in LMIC, particularly in consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages and processed foods (56–59).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [26]Federal Trade Commission and DHHS Perspective on marketing, self-regulation, & childhood obesity: a report on a joint workshop of the Federal Trade Commission and DHHS 2006
  2. [38]Ma J Press Release on Major Figures of the 2010 National Population Census National Bureau of Statistics of China 2011
  3. [40]The Coca-Cola Company 2010 Annual Review 2010

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kleiman, S., Ng, S. W., & Popkin, B.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Popkin, B.
Venue
Obesity Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-11-10
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
258-274
ISSN
  • 1467-7881 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-789X
OpenAlex
W1853249141
Cited by
104
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Obesity Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (2r24hd050924-06)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL104580)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24 HD-050924)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
sugar-sweetened beverages, soft drinks, energy density, Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, corporate profits, obesity, cardiometabolic risk, emerging markets, portion size reduction
MeSH terms
Beverages, Energy Intake, Carbonated Beverages, Drinking, Drinking Behavior, Food Preferences, Food Supply, Humans, Nutritive Value, Obesity, Public Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review