Cited by 419Health disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology ResearchDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Aging and Loneliness: Downhill Quickly?

Hawkley, Louise C., Cacioppo, John T.·2007·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Levels of loneliness are relatively stable across most of adult life, but correlates of loneliness show age differences. We review evidence of age differences in associations between loneliness and individual differences in health behaviors, stress exposure, physiological stress responses, appraisal and coping, and restorative processes. The effects of each of these pathways endow loneliness with the capacity to accelerate the rate of physiological decline with age. Additional research across the lifespan is required to understand the nature of accrued loneliness effects on health behavior and physiology in the short and long term.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00501.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of loneliness accrue over time to accelerate physiological aging.

    “The effects of loneliness seem to accrue over time to accelerate physiological aging [20].”
  • Elevated SBP is a well-known risk factor for chronic cardiovascular disease, and these data suggest that the effects of loneliness accrue to accelerate movement along a trajectory toward serious health consequences.

    “Elevated SBP is a well-known risk factor for chronic cardiovascular disease, and these data suggest that the effects of loneliness accrue to accelerate movement along a trajectory toward serious health consequences [20].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1111/1467-8721.01232 · DOI
  2. 10.1073/pnas.0605053103 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1016/S0167-8760(99)00049-5 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2002.00469.x · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1001/archpedi.160.8.805 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Demakakos P., 2006, Retirement, health and relationships of the older population in England: The 2004 English Longitudinal Study of Ageing
  7. 10.1080/13548500500266607 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1177/000312240607100301 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195145410.003.0006 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/0271-5384(81)90061-2 · DOI
  11. 10.1353/cja.2004.0028 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Hawkley, Louise C.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2007-08
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
187-191
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2113961844
Cited by
419
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 18
FWCI
10.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
loneliness, aging, age differences, health behavior, stress exposure, physiological stress response, stress appraisal, coping, reparative processes, physiological decline, lifespan development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review