The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maintenance of Foreign Language Vocabulary and the Spacing Effect
Abstract
In a 9-year longitudinal investigation, 4 subjects learned and relearned 300 English-foreign language word pairs. Either 13 or 26 relearning sessions were administered at intervals of 14, 28, or 56 days. Retention was tested for 1.2.3. or 5 years after training terminated. The longer intersession intervals slowed down acquisition slightly, but this disadvantage during training was offset by substantially higher retention. Thirteen retraining sessions spaced at 56 days yielded retention comparable to 26 sessions spaced at 14 days. The retention benefit due to additional sessions was independent of the benefit due to spacing, and both variables facilitated retention of words regardless of difficulty level and of the consistency of retrieval during training. The benefits of spaced retrieval practice to long-term maintenance of access to academic knowledge areas are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Bahrick et al. (1993) reported that subjects required twice as many trials in the second study session in order to achieve criterion, as gap increased from 14 to 56 days.”
From Optimizing distributed practice (2009) · cites this paper as Bahrick et al. (1993)
In the citing paper
“Every study examined here with a retention interval longer than one month (Bahrick, 1979; Bahrick, et al., 1993; Bahrick & Phelps, 1987; Cepeda et al., 2005) demonstrated a benefit from distribution of learning across weeks or months, as opposed to learning across a one-day interval;”
From Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. (2006) · cites this paper as Bahrick, et al., 1993
In the citing paper
“These studies confounded number of relearning trials with ISI; that is, there was more relearning at longer ISIs.”
From Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. (2006) · cites this paper as Bahrick et al., 1993
In the citing paper
“However, 56 days is actually a relatively short proportion of the extremely long retention intervals used in Bahrick et al.'s study, and it is this ratio that is probably most critical, as will emerge below.”
From Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention (2008) · cites this paper as Bahrick et al., 1993
In the citing paper
“The results showed that increasing the inter-study spacing out to 56 days improved performance (Figure 2).”
From Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention (2008) · cites this paper as Bahrick et al., 1993
In the citing paper
“Another issue in interpreting the Bahrick studies (Bahrick et al., 1993;Bahrick & Phelps, 1987) is the use of a fixed performance criterion.Given the forgetting that takes place during the gap between study sessions, this inevitably means that many more relearning trials will be necessary during most sessions at the longest gap (as compared to the shortest).”
From Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention (2008) · cites this paper as Bahrick et al., 1993
Citations
Cites
Memory: A Contribution to Experimental Psychology
Ebbinghaus, H. (2013) · Annals of Neurosciences · doi:10.5214/ans.0972.7531.200408 · Cited by 2,827
Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x · Cited by 1,582
Memory; a contribution to experimental psychology,
Ebbinghaus, H., Bussenius, C. E., & Ruger, H. A. (n.d.) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 1,281
Implications of short-term memory for a general theory of memory
Melton, A. W. (1963) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(63)80063-8 · Cited by 739
The situation with respect to the spacing of repetitions and memory
Melton, A. W. (1970) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(70)80107-4 · Cited by 527
Semantic memory content in permastore: Fifty years of memory for Spanish learned in school.
Bahrick, H. P. (1984) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.113.1.1 · Cited by 505
Self-citationComponent-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition
Glenberg, A. M. (1979) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197590 · Cited by 444
The spacing effect: A case study in the failure to apply the results of psychological research.
Dempster, F. N. (1988) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.43.8.627 · Cited by 439
Intraserial repetition and coding processes in free recall
Madigan, S. A. (1969) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(69)80050-2 · Cited by 239
Retention of Spanish vocabulary over 8 years.
Bahrick, H. P., & Phelphs, E. (1987) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.13.2.344 · Cited by 228
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612453266 · Cited by 3,138
Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 · Cited by 1,888
“The Bahrick studies (Bahrick, 1979; Bahrick et al., 1993; Bahrick & Phelps, 1987), which confounded amount of relearning and ISI, showed similar patterns to Cepeda et al. (2005), Experiments 2a and 2b, which are unconfounded.”
BackgroundResultEducational Data Mining and Learning Analytics
Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3305-7_4 · Cited by 1,423
Hulstijn, J. H. (2001) · Cognition and Second Language Instruction · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139524780.011 · Cited by 769
“Quite remarkable in this respect are the investigations of Bahrick and his associates and relatives (Bahrick, 1984; Bahrick & Phelps, 1987; H.P. Bahrick, L.E. Bahrick, A.S. Bahrick & P.E. Bahrick, 1993).”
BackgroundLearning Versus Performance: An Integrative Review
Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615569000 · Cited by 651
“Similarly, spacing study sessions, relative to massing them, can actually slow down the acquisition of foreign language vocabulary pairs but can still lead to superior retention—even over a span of several years (Bahrick, Bahrick, Bahrick, & Bahrick, 1993).”
BackgroundSpacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention
Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x · Cited by 631
Learning Concepts and Categories: Is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”?
Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02127.x · Cited by 602
Carpenter, S. K., Cepeda, N. J., Rohrer, D., Kang, S. H. K., & Pashler, H. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9205-z · Cited by 469
Applying the Science of Learning
Mayer, R. E. (2010) · Cited by 399
The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body
Kording, K. P., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Shadmehr, R. (2007) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1901 · Cited by 393
A Comparison of the Effects of Reading and Listening on Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition
Vidal, K. (2010) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00593.x · Cited by 414
Optimising learning using flashcards: Spacing is more effective than cramming
Kornell, N. (2009) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1537 · Cited by 350
The shuffling of mathematics problems improves learning
Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2007) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9015-8 · Cited by 357
“For this reason, many previous authors have advocated that learners space their study (Bahrick et al., 1993; Bjork, 1979, 1988, 1994; Bloom & Shuell, 1981; Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted, & Rohrer, 2006; Dempster, 1989; Pashler, Rohrer, Cepeda, & Carpenter, 2007; Reynolds & Glaser, 1964; Schmidt &…”
The Effect of Type of Written Exercise on L2 Vocabulary Retention
Folse, K. S. (2006) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/40264523 · Cited by 164
Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: How much is enough?
Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/a0023956 · Cited by 329
“practice schedules (Bahrick et al., 1993), four members of the”
Optimizing distributed practice
Cepeda, N. J., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., Mozer, M. C., & Pashler, H. (2009) · Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.236 · Cited by 296
The effects of interleaved practice
Taylor, K., & Rohrer, D. (2010) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1598 · Cited by 288
Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences
Pashler, H., Rohrer, D., Cepeda, N. J., & Carpenter, S. K. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194050 · Cited by 282
“While the validity of the principle is not in doubt, it seems not to have provided much non-obvious or concrete guidance for practitioners.”
BackgroundMaki, R. H., Maki, W. S., Patterson, M. M., & Whittaker, P. D. (2000) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03207788 · Cited by 279
Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies
Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2010) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x10374770 · Cited by 269
Increased Preclass Preparation Underlies Student Outcome Improvement in the Flipped Classroom
Gross, D., Pietri, E. S., Anderson, G., Camihort, K., & Graham, M. J. (2015) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.15-02-0040 · Cited by 297
“Long-standing cognitive psychology research highlights the benefits of spacing out learning activities over time in contrast to blocked learning, for example, short-term cramming in the lead-up to an exam (Bahrick et al., 1993; Son, 2004).”
Background(2010) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(10)53003-2 · Cited by 255
“, Bahrick et al., 1993), retrieval difficulty (e.g., McDaniel et al., 2007), feedback (e.g., Butler, Karpicke, & Roediger, 2007), and retention interval (e.g., Cepeda et al., 2008) can be optimized to produce superior memory. However, the typical focus of spacing and testing research is on memory, not on other kinds o…”
BackgroundThe effects of overlearning and distributed practise on the retention of mathematics knowledge
Rohrer, D., & Taylor, K. (2006) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1266 · Cited by 250
Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics
Baker, R. S., Martin, T., & Rossi, L. M. (2016) · John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781118956588.ch16 · Cited by 219
A Typology of Training Design and Work Environment Factors Affecting Workplace Learning and Transfer
Russ-Eft, D. F. (2002) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484302011003 · Cited by 208
Effects of Opportunities for Word Retrieval During Second Language Vocabulary Learning
Barcroft, J. (2007) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00398.x · Cited by 164
The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning
Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530 · Cited by 186
“…apart than when they are massed (Greene, 1989; Johnston & Uhl, 1976; Madigan, 1969; Melton, 1967; Whitten & Bjork, 1977 ; and see especially Bahrick, Bahrick, Bahrick, & Bahrick, 1993, who studied spacing in second language vocabulary learning , and Bjork & Allen, 1970, for theoretical discussion).”
BackgroundThe science of effective learning with spacing and retrieval practice
Carpenter, S. K., Pan, S. C., & Butler, A. C. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00089-1 · Cited by 184
Bahrick, H. P., & Hall, L. K. (2005) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2005.01.012 · Cited by 178
Self-citationNakata, T. (2011) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2010.520675 · Cited by 167
“According to this effect, the larger the intervals between study opportunities for a given item, the better the retention will be (e.g. Baddeley, 1997, pp. 108–114; H. P. Bahrick et al., 1993; H. P. Bahrick & Phelps, 1987; Kornell, 2009).”
The spacing effect in children’s memory and category induction
Vlach, H. A., Sandhofer, C. M., & Kornell, N. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.013 · Cited by 165
The Power of Successive Relearning: Improving Performance on Course Exams and Long-Term Retention
Rawson, K. A., Dunlosky, J., & Sciartelli, S. M. (2013) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9240-4 · Cited by 148
“Given the implications of successive relearning for promoting student learning and the voluminous literatures on testing and spacing more generally, it is surprising that only five other studies have examined successive relearning since Bahrick’s seminal work in 1979 (Bahrick et al. 1993; Bahrick and Hall 2005; Pyc an…”
Ullman, M. T., & Lovelett, J. T. (2016) · Second language Research · doi:10.1177/0267658316675195 · Cited by 169
“A somewhat larger literature has examined spaced repetition in L2 learning, in particular for vocabulary (Bahrick, 1979; Bahrick et al., 1993; Bahrick and Phelps, 1987; Bloom and Shuell, 1981; Kupper-Tetzel et al., 2014).”
BackgroundTHE PSYCHOLOGY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGE VOCABULARY ACQUISITION: IMPLICATIONS FOR CALL
Ellis, N. C. (1995) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/0958822940080202 · Cited by 156
Time windows in cognitive development.
Rovee‐Collier, C. (1995) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.31.2.147 · Cited by 149
Spacing One's Study: Evidence for a Metacognitive Control Strategy.
Son, L. K. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.30.3.601 · Cited by 147
“Although typically people have been forced into a massed versus spacing paradigm, acquisition is slower for the spaced items than it is for the massed items (although at final test, the spacing effect still transpires; Bahrick et al., 1993; Simon & Bjork, 2001; Zechmeister & Shaughnessy, 1980).”
BackgroundVlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2012) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01781.x · Cited by 162
An integrated theory for improved skill acquisition and retention in the three stages of learning
Kim, J. W., Ritter, F. E., & Koubek, R. J. (2011) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1464536x.2011.573008 · Cited by 139
“Bahrick et al. (1993) investigated acquisition and retention of English-foreign language word pairs in a 9-year longitudinal study.”
Is Temporal Spacing of Tests Helpful Even When It Inflates Error Rates?
Pashler, H., Zarow, G. J., & Triplett, B. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1051 · Cited by 132
“A number of more recent studies have shown that the advantage of spaced presentations is greater for longer retention intervals (Bahrick, Bahrick, Bahrick, & Bahrick, 1993; Glenberg, 1976; Glenberg & Lehman, 1980).”
BackgroundList learning of second language vocabulary
Griffin, G., & Harley, T. A. (1996) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716400008195 · Cited by 129
Divjak, D. (2019) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95504-1.01134-0 · Cited by 135
Towards a Theory of Learning for Naming Rehabilitation: Retrieval Practice and Spacing Effects
Middleton, E. L., Schwartz, M. F., Rawson, K. A., Traut, H., & Verkuilen, J. (2016) · Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2016_jslhr-l-15-0303 · Cited by 125
“For example, on tests administered after retention intervals spanning 1 to 5 years, Bahrick et al. (1993) found 13 sessions of training administered every 56 days produced the same level of performance as 26 sessions of training administered every 14 days.”
MethodA Revised Methodology for Research on Metamemory: Pre-judgment Recall And Monitoring (PRAM).
Nelson, T. O., Narens, L., & Dunlosky, J. T. (2004) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.9.1.53 · Cited by 122
Verb Learning in Children With SLI
Riches, N. G., Tomasello, M., & Conti‐Ramsden, G. (2005) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2005/097 · Cited by 118
Effects of distributed practice on the acquisition of second language English syntax
BIRD, S. (2010) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716410000172 · Cited by 117
“Conversely, foreign language vocabulary learning has been shown to be beneficially affected by distributed practice (Bahrick et al., 1993; Bloom & Shuell, 1981), and this may reflect the relatively uncomplicated nature of vocabulary learning (e.g., word lists with native language translations;…”
BackgroundThe Effects of Spaced Practice on Second Language Learning: A Meta‐Analysis
Kim, S. K., & Webb, S. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12479 · Cited by 119
Frequency in Language: Memory, Attention and Learning
Divjak, D. (2019) · doi:10.1017/9781316084410 · Cited by 115
Toppino, T. C., & Gerbier, É. (2013) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800090-8.00004-4 · Cited by 122
Improving Students' Evaluation of Informal Arguments
Larson, A. A., Britt, M. A., & Kurby, C. A. (2009) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.3200/jexe.77.4.339-366 · Cited by 118
Distributed Learning: Data, Metacognition, and Educational Implications
Son, L. K., & Simon, D. A. (2012) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-012-9206-y · Cited by 127
“While the bulk of the laboratory data have examined learning over extremely short time periods, Bahrick et al. (1993) were the first to have participants commit to a 9-year-long investigation of spacing.”
InfluentialThe effect of distributed practice: Neuroscience, cognition, and education
Gerbier, É., & Toppino, T. C. (2015) · Trends in Neuroscience and Education · doi:10.1016/j.tine.2015.01.001 · Cited by 122
Appleton-Knapp, S. L., Bjork, R. A., & Wickens, T. D. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/432236 · Cited by 101
Oberg, A., & Daniels, P. (2012) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2011.649484 · Cited by 104
Kapler, I. V., Weston, T., & Wiseheart, M. (2015) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.11.001 · Cited by 101
The Testing Effect in the Psychology Classroom: A Meta-Analytic Perspective
Schwieren, J., Barenberg, J., & Dutke, S. (2017) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725717695149 · Cited by 100
Event segmentation improves event memory up to one month later.
Flores, S. E., Bailey, H. R., Eisenberg, M. L., & Zacks, J. M. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000367 · Cited by 114
“For example, research on the spacing effect shows that increasing the time between restudy sessions can improve memory, and this benefit can persist for up to eight years (Bahrick, Bahrick, Bahrick, & Bahrick, 1993; Bahrick & Phelphs, 1987; Glenberg & Lehmann, 1980; Pavlik & Anderson, 2005).”
BackgroundThe effect of overlearning on long‐term retention
Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., Pashler, H., Wixted, J. T., & Cepeda, N. J. (2004) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1083 · Cited by 100
Cull, W. L., Shaughnessy, J. J., & Zechmeister, E. B. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.2.4.365 · Cited by 99
Multimedia comprehension skill predicts differential outcomes of web-based and lecture courses.
Maki, W. S., & Maki, R. H. (2002) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037//1076-898x.8.2.85 · Cited by 101
Lexical Input Processing and Vocabulary Learning
Barcroft, J. (2015) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.43 · Cited by 95
Nakata, T. (2016) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263116000280 · Cited by 111
“Other L2 vocabulary studies (e.g., Bahrick & Phelps, 1987; Bahrick et al., 1993; Bloom & Shuell, 1981) also found long-term benefits of distributing practice over a longer period of time.”
BackgroundStress and Cognition: A Cognitive Psychological Perspective
Bourne, L. E., & Yaroush, R. A. (2003) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 97
Sichletidis, L. T., Spyratos, D. G., Papaioannou, M., Chloros, D. A., Tsiotsios, A. I., Tsagaraki, V., & Haidich, A. (2011) · Primary Care Respiratory Journal · doi:10.4104/pcrj.2011.00038 · Cited by 89
Hanson, A. E. S., & Brown, C. M. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2018.1552975 · Cited by 99
“The effectiveness of spaced-repetition testing for long-term retention of L2 vocabulary has been established through experimental research (Bahrick, Bahrick, Bahrick & Bahrick, 1993; Bloom & Shuell, 1981; Ellis, 1995), yet these powerful experimental demonstrations have not resulted in classroom…”
BackgroundSuccessful Lecturing: Presenting Information in Ways That Engage Effective Processing
deWinstanley, P. A., & Bjork, R. A. (2002) · New Directions for Teaching and Learning · doi:10.1002/tl.44 · Cited by 85
LearningQ: A Large-Scale Dataset for Educational Question Generation
Chen, G., Yang, J., Hauff, C., & Houben, G.-J. (2018) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v12i1.14987 · Cited by 83
“Previous research has shown that the number of questions learners receive about a knowledge concept is positively correlated with the effectiveness of knowledge retention (Bahrick et al. 1993).”
BackgroundResearch Commentary: The Effects of Spacing and Mixing Practice Problems
Rohrer, D. (2009) · Journal for Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.5951/jresematheduc.40.1.0004 · Cited by 88
Augmented Self-Modeling as a Treatment for Children with Selective Mutism
Kehle, T. J., Madaus, M. M. R., Baratta, V. S., & Bray, M. A. (1998) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-4405(98)00013-2 · Cited by 82
Spaced cognitive training promotes training transfer.
Wang, Z., Zhou, R., & Shah, P. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00217 · Cited by 81
“Likewise, tasks that are adaptive and cognitively challenging may also limit the extent to which task-specific strategies that can be developed.”
BackgroundMeasuring study time distributions: Implications for designing computer-based courses
Taraban, R., Maki, W. S., & Rynearson, K. (1999) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03207718 · Cited by 79
EFFECTS OF MASSING AND SPACING ON THE LEARNING OF SEMANTICALLY RELATED AND UNRELATED WORDS
Nakata, T., & Suzuki, Y. (2019) · Studies in Second Language Acquisition · doi:10.1017/s0272263118000219 · Cited by 78
“This adds to existing literature suggesting that spacing facilitates L2 vocabulary learning (e.g., Bahrick et al., 1993; Nakata, 2015; Nakata & Webb, 2016).”
BackgroundResultLearning and Long-Term Retention of Large-Scale Artificial Languages
Frank, M. C., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Gibson, E. A. F. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0052500 · Cited by 83
“Second, the scale of learning is consistent with previous work on long-term lexical memory [44].”
ResultSpacing Repetitions Over Long Timescales: A Review and a Reconsolidation Explanation
Smith, C., & Scarf, D. (2017) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00962 · Cited by 89
“…seem unusual, a close reading of the studies referenced reveals that this finding is very consistent (Keppel, 1964, 1967; Bahrick, 1979; Glenberg and Lehmann, 1980; Bloom and Shuell, 1981; Bahrick et al., 1993; Moss, 1995; Cepeda et al., 2006, 2009; Simone et al., 2013; Suzuki and DeKeyser, 2015).”
ResultA comparative analysis of massed vs. distributed practice on basic math fact fluency growth rates
Schutte, G. M., Duhon, G. J., Solomon, B. G., Poncy, B. C., Moore, K., & Story, B. (2015) · Journal of School Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2014.12.003 · Cited by 70
Interleaved practice in multi-dimensional learning tasks: Which dimension should we interleave?
Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.07.003 · Cited by 67
Spaced vs. massed distribution instruction for L2 grammar learning
Miles, S. W. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.01.014 · Cited by 66
Metacognitive control and the spacing effect.
Son, L. K. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0017892 · Cited by 64
“Studies have, in fact, shown that during spaced study (more than during massed study), not only is acquisition slower but also confidence is lower (Bahrick et al., 1993; Zechmeister & Shaughnessy, 1980).”
BackgroundRodriguez, F., Rivas, M. J., Matsumura, L. H., Warschauer, M., & Sato, B. K. (2018) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0200767 · Cited by 64
“This has been shown to be effective for long-term learning in a variety of different scenarios, from acquiring and maintaining vocabulary from a foreign language [18] or remembering words on a list [19], among others [20].”
BackgroundImproving Learning Efficiency of Factual Knowledge in Medical Education
Yeh, D. D., & Park, Y. S. (2015) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.03.012 · Cited by 66
Chen, O., Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2021) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09613-w · Cited by 62
The lag effect in secondary school classrooms: Enhancing students’ memory for vocabulary
Kuepper-Tetzel, C. E., Erdfelder, E., & Dickhäuser, O. (2013) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9285-2 · Cited by 65
Thai, K.-P., Bang, H. J., & Li, L. (2021) · Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness · doi:10.1080/19345747.2021.1969710 · Cited by 78
Dynamic internal states shape memory retrievalPreprint
Tarder-Stoll, H., Jayakumar, M., Dimsdale-Zucker, H. R., Günseli, E., & Aly, M. (2019) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107328 · Cited by 67
Spacing Simultaneously Promotes Multiple Forms of Learning in Children's Science Curriculum
Gluckman, M., Vlach, H. A., & Sandhofer, C. M. (2014) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2997 · Cited by 57
Does testing with feedback help grade-school children learn key concepts in science?
Lipko, A. R., Dunlosky, J. T., & Rawson, K. A. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.04.002 · Cited by 63
Metacognitive Control: Children's Short-Term Versus Long-Term Study Strategies
Son, L. K. (2005) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.3200/genp.132.4.347-364 · Cited by 59
“More specifically, people choose to mass items that are judged as difficult and space items that are judged as easy, which supports the assumption that people choose to study an item until it is fully encoded, and only until fully encoded (Bahrick et al., 1993; Simon & Bjork, 2001).”
BackgroundNovikoff, T. P., Kleinberg, J. M., & Strogatz, S. H. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1109863109 · Cited by 57
Callan, D. E., & Schweighofer, N. (2010) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20894 · Cited by 55
“Indeed, forgetting is known to be faster after massed practice [Bahrick et al., 1993; Pavlik and Anderson, 2005].”
BackgroundCannon‐Bowers, J. A., Bowers, C. A., & Procci, K. (2010) · Surgical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.suc.2010.02.006 · Cited by 57
Effect of Massed Versus Interleaved Teaching Method on Performance of Students in Radiology
Rozenshtein, A., Pearson, G. D. N., Yan, S. X., Liu, A. Z., & Toy, D. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2016.03.031 · Cited by 53
Maddox, G. B. (2016) · Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/20445911.2016.1181637 · Cited by 54
The time window hypothesis: Spacing effects
Rovee‐Collier, C., Evancio, S., & Earley, L. A. (1995) · Infant Behavior and Development · doi:10.1016/0163-6383(95)90008-x · Cited by 48
Rau, M. A., Aleven, V. A. W. M. M., Rummel, N., & Pardos, Z. A. (2013) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-013-0011-7 · Cited by 56
Koval, N. G. (2019) · Applied Psycholinguistics · doi:10.1017/s0142716419000158 · Cited by 52
Confidence judgments in real classroom settings: Monitoring performance in different types of tests
Filho, M. K. D. C. (2008) · International Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1080/00207590701436744 · Cited by 48
Déjà Vu All Over Again: Effects of Reenactment on Toddlers' Event Memory
Hudson, J. A., & Sheffield, E. G. (1998) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.1998.tb06132.x · Cited by 48
Walsh, M. M., Gluck, K. A., Glenn Gunzelmann, A., Jastrzembski, T. S., & Krusmark, M. (2018) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12602 · Cited by 46
Ellis, L. A. (2005) · ACEReSearch Repository (Australian Council for Educational Research) · Cited by 45
Spacing Effects on Learning and Memory ☆
Carpenter, S. K. (2017) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-809324-5.21054-7 · Cited by 52
Developing an intelligent tool for computer-assisted formulaic language learning from YouTube videos
Lin, P. (2021) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344021000252 · Cited by 53
“Informed by Bahrick et al.’s (1993) experimental findings, the system has been set to provide 13 repetitions at 14-day intervals.”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, L. E., Bahrick, A. S., & Bahrick, P. E.
- Affiliations
- Ohio Wesleyan University (US)
- Florida International University (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Ohio Wesieyan University
- Corresponding author
- Bahrick, Harry P.
- ORCID
- Bahrick, Lorraine E.
- Venue
- Psychological Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1993-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 316-321
- ISSN
- 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9280
- OpenAlex
- W2132404624
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 1.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
- Florida International University Digital Commons (Florida International University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Keywords
- foreign language vocabulary, spacing effect, retention, relearning, spaced retrieval practice, long-term maintenance, word learning, retrieval consistency, vocabulary difficulty
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review