Cited by 164Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

Prejudice expectations moderate preconscious attention to cues that are threatening to social identity

Kaiser, Cheryl R., Vick, S. Brooke, Major, Brenda·2006·Psychological Science

Abstract

Two studies examined whether chronic and situational expectations about being stigmatized predict attention toward cues that are threatening to social identity. In Study 1, women's chronic expectations about experiencing sexism were positively associated with their attention toward subliminal cues threatening to their social identity. In Study 2, women were vigilant toward subliminal cues threatening to their social identity when the experimental situation conveyed that their gender was devalued, but not when the experimental situation promoted value and respect for their gender. Women were vigilant toward consciously presented cues threatening to their social identity regardless of the attitudes the experimental context conveyed toward their group. These studies have important theoretical and practical implications for understanding the psychological experience of possessing a devalued social identity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01707.x

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exposure to chronically threatening environments can lead to enhanced vigilance to cues that signal threat.

    “Exposure to chronically threatening environments can lead to an enhanced vigilance to cues that signal threat (Kaiser, Vick, & Major, 2006;Purdie-Vaughns, et al., 2008).”

    From Managing to clear the air: Stereotype threat, women, and leadership (2016) · cites this paper as Kaiser, Vick, & Major, 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kaiser, C. R., Vick, S. B., & Major, B.
Affiliations
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Venue
Psychological Science
Published
2006-04
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
332-338
ISSN
  • 0956-7976 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9280
OpenAlex
W2156388933
Cited by
164
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 11
FWCI
18.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r03mh071276-01, 5f32mh064308-02)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1R03MH071276, 1F32MH64308)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
social identity threat, subliminal cues, stigma, sexism, gender identity, sustained attention, situational context
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attention, Attitude, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Prejudice, Reaction Time, Social Identification, Unconscious, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review